Faxonius obscurus

(Hagen, 1870)

Allegheny Crayfish

G5Secure Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
MediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.112938
Element CodeICMAL11130
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumArthropoda
ClassMalacostraca
OrderDecapoda
FamilyCambaridae
GenusFaxonius
Synonyms
Orconectes obscurus(Hagen, 1870)
Other Common Names
Écrevisse obscure (FR) Obscure Crayfish (EN)
Concept Reference
Hobbs, H. H., Jr. 1989. An Illustrated Checklist of the American Crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidae, Cambaridae, and Parastacidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 480:1-236.
Taxonomic Comments
Based on Crandall and De Grave (2017), the representatives of Orconectes form at least two distinct groups. The nominal group (the "cave Orconectes") form a monophyletic group that is more closely related to members of Cambarus, while the remaining "Orconectes" are more closely related to Barbicambarus, Creaserinus, and other species of Cambarus (Crandall and Fitzpatrick 1996, Fetzner 1996). As the type species of Orconectes, Orconectes inermis Cope, 1872, belongs to the cave-dwelling group, the genus is herein restricted to just those taxa. The surface-dwelling taxa now excluded from Orconectes sensu stricto are herein placed in the resurrected genus Faxonius Ortmann, 1905a, the oldest available name previously considered to be a synonym of Orconectes Cope, 1872.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2015-05-26
Change Date1996-02-19
Edition Date2009-07-01
Edition AuthorsCordeiro, J.
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
This species is relatively widespread and abundant, but has been eliminated from parts of its range due to the competitive impact of the invasive species O. rusticus, and has shown declines due to acid mine runnoff from strip mining. Whilst these impacts are insufficient to trigger a threatened category listing, these local declines and extirpations should be monitored.
Range Extent Comments
This species ranges from southeastern Ontario and New York to Pennsylvania and eastern Ohio, south to West Virginia, northern Virginia, and western Maryland (Hobbs, 1989). Fitzpatrick (1967) included the Ohio River drainage east of the 81st meridian; Susquehanna, Potomac, and upper Rappahannock River drinages; miscellaneous Lake Erie and Lake Ontario drainages in extreme western New York, northern Pennsylvania, and extreme northeastern Ohio.
Occurrences Comments
This species has been introduced to Massachusetts in the North Branch of the Housic River and some of its tributaries; and in Goose Pond in Lee, Greenwater Pond in Becket, Konkapot Brook in Stockbridge (all Housatonic River system); and in the Housatonic River in Stockbridge (Smith, 2000). Smith (1979) noted that although it occurs in limited areas of the upper Mohawk River system, Fitzpatrick's (1967) deptiction of its presence also in the lower Hudson River and upper Delaware River systems of New York is erroneous. In Maryland, it is distributed from the Piedmont to the Appalachian Plateau but is also in impounements in the Appalachian Plateau and Ridge and Valley Provinces (Kilian et al., 2010) and is known only historically from the Coastal Plain (Meredith and Schwartz, 1960). Jezerinac et al. (1995) considered it native to the Potomic River drainage but Ortmann (1906) suggested it was introduced east of the continental divide in Wills Creek (Potomac tributary near Cumberland, Maryland); thus its native status is unclear in Maryland, however the population in Octoraro Creek (Susquehanna tributary) is most likely an introduction by anglers (Bouchard et al., 2007). In West Virginia, its distribution is primarily allied with the Potomac and ancient Pittsburgh River systems and it occurs throughout the Potomac River drainage, Monongahela River drainage, higher elevations in the Greenbrier River drainage, and central and northern portions of the Ohio River direct drains (Loughman and Welsh, 2010). In Ohio, it is found in tributaries of the Ohio River from Sunfish Creek (Monroe Co.) to Little Beaver Creek (Columbiana Co.) with very little range expansion since the retreat of the Wisconsin Glacier (Thoma and Jezerinac, 2000). Jezerinac (1986) lists Belmont, Columbiana, Jefferson, Mahoning, Monroe, Portage, Stark, and Trumbull Cos., Ohio.
Threat Impact Comments
Orconectes obscurus has been displaced by Orconectes rusticus in areas where this invasive crayfish has encroached, as O. rusticus is less vulnerable to predation than O. obscurus (Kuhlmann et al., 2008). O. obscurus has been replaced entirely by O. rusticus in the Sunfish Creek watershed, Ohio (Jezerinac, 1986; R. Thoma, pers. comm., 2009.). This is known to have occurred within a 30 year period. It is also impacted across large areas of its range by acid mine runoff from strip mining which are causing localized population decline. There are still large portions of the range which have not been invaded, and O. obscurus has strong holds in small, forested headwater streams (Thoma and Jezerinac, 2000; Kulmann et al., 2008).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Inhabits clear streams with gravel bottoms (Hogger, 1988).
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
MarylandS3Yes
MassachusettsSNANo
OhioS3Yes
VirginiaS3Yes
New JerseySNRYes
VermontSNANo
New YorkSNANo
PennsylvaniaS4Yes
MaineSNANo
West VirginiaS4Yes
CanadaNNA
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioSNANo
QuebecSNANo
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge - smallModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesLarge - smallModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionLarge - smallUnknownHigh (continuing)
9.2 - Industrial & military effluentsLarge - smallUnknownHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (1)
West Virginia (1)
AreaForestAcres
Little MountainMonongahela National Forest8,172
References (20)
  1. Bouchard, R.W., D.A. Lieb, R.f. Carline, T.R. Nuttall, C.B. Wengert,and J.R. Wallace. 2007. 101 years of change (1906-2007). The distribution of the crayfishes of Pennsylvania. Part I: Eastern Pennsylvania. Academy of Natural Sciences of Pheladelphia, Report number 07-11. 83 pp.
  2. Crandall, K. A., and S. De Grave. 2017. An updated classification of the freshwater crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidea) of the world, with a complete species list. Journal of Crustacean Biology 37(5):615-653.
  3. Dube, J. et J.-F. Desroches. 2007. Les ecrevisses du Quebec. Ministere des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune, Direction de l'amenagement de la faune de l'Estrie, de Montreal et de la Monteregie, Longueuil. v + 51 pp.
  4. Dube, J. J-F. Desroches, F.W. Schueler, R. Pariseau, D. St.-Hilaire, and I. Picard. 2002. Premiere mention de l'ecrevisse <i>Orconectes obsucrus</i> (Hagen) au Quebec. The Canadian Naturalist 126(2): 48-50.
  5. Fielder, D.D. 1972. Some aspects of the life histories of three closely related crayfish species, <i>Orconectes obscurus</i>, <i>O. sanborni</i>, and <i>O. propinquus</i>. The Ohio Journal of Science 72(3):129-145.
  6. Fitzpatrick, J.F. Jr. 1967. The <i>propinquus </i>group of the crawfish genus <i>Orconectes </i>(Decapoda: Astacidae). The Ohio Journal of Science, 67(3): 129-172.
  7. Hobbs, H. H., Jr. 1989. An Illustrated Checklist of the American Crayfishes (Decapoda: Astacidae, Cambaridae, and Parastacidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 480:1-236.
  8. Jezerinac, R.F. 1986. Endangered and threatened crayfishes ( Decapoda: Cambaridae) of Ohio. Ohio Journal of Science 86: 177-180.
  9. Jezerinac, R. F., G. W. Stocker, and D. C. Tarter. 1995. The Crayfishes (Decapoda: Cambaridae) of West Virginia. Bulletin of the Ohio Biological Survey, Vol. 10, No. 1. Ohio Biological Survey, College of Biological Sciences, The Ohio State University, and Nongame Wildlife and Natural Heritage Programs, West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, Columbus, Ohio. 193 pp.
  10. Kilian, J.V., A.J. Becker, S.A. Stranko, M. Ashton, R.J. Klauda, J. Gerber, and M. Hurd. 2010. The status and distribution of Maryland crayfishes. Southeastern Naturalist 9 (special issue 3):11-32.
  11. Kuhlmann, M.L. 2008. Do invading rusty crayfish interfere with reproduction in a native congener? Journal of Crustacean Biology, 28(3): 461-465.
  12. Kuhlmann, M.L., S.L. Badylak, and E.L. Carvin. 2008. Testing the different predation hypothesis for the invasion of rusty crayfish in a stream community: Laboratory and field experiments. Freshwater Biology 53:113-128.
  13. Loughman, Z.J. and S.A. Welsh. 2010. Distribution and conservation standing of West Virginia crayfishes. Southeastern Naturalist 9 (special issue 3):63-78.
  14. McLaughlin, P. A., D. K. Camp, M. V. Angel, E. L. Bousfield, P. Brunel, R. C. Brusca, D. Cadien, A. C. Cohen, K. Conlan, L. G. Eldredge, D. L. Felder, J. W. Goy, T. Haney, B. Hann, R. W. Heard, E. A. Hendrycks, H. H. Hobbs III, J. R. Holsinger, B. Kensley, D. R. Laubitz, S. E. LeCroy, R. Lemaitre, R. F. Maddocks, J. W. Martin, P. Mikkelsen, E. Nelson, W. A. Newman, R. M. Overstreet, W. J. Poly, W. W. Price, J. W. Reid, A. Robertson, D. C. Rogers, A. Ross, M. Schotte, F. Schram, C. Shih, L. Watling, G. D. F. Wilson, and D. D. Turgeon. 2005. Common and Scientific Names of Aquatic Invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Crustaceans. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 31. 545 pp.
  15. Meredith, W.G. and F.J. Schwartz. 1960. Maryland crayfishes. Maryland Department of Research and Education, Educational Series 46:1-32.
  16. Schwartz, F.J. and W.G. Meredith. 1962. Crayfishes of the Cheat River watershed in West Virginia and Pennsylvania. Part II. Observations upon ecological factors relating to distribution. The Ohio Journal of Sciences, 62(5): 260-273.
  17. Smith, D.G. 1979. New locality records of crayfishes from the middle Hudson River system. Ohio Journal of Science, 79(3): 133-135.
  18. Smith, D.G. 2000a. Keys to the Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Southern New England. Douglas G. Smith: Sunderland, Massachusetts. 243 pp.
  19. Taylor, C. A., G. A. Schuster, J. E. Cooper, R. J. DiStefano, A. G. Eversole, P. Hamr, H. H. Hobbs III, H. W. Robison, C. E. Skelton, and R. F. Thoma. 2007. A reassessment of the conservation status of crayfishes of the United States and Canada after 10+ years of increased awareness. Fisheries 32(8):371-389.
  20. Thoma, R.F. and R.E. Jezerinac. 2000. Ohio crayfish and shrimp atlas. Ohio Biological Survey Miscellaneous Contribution 7:1-28.