Quadrula fragosa

(Conrad, 1835)

Winged Mapleleaf

G1Critically Imperiled Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G1Critically ImperiledGlobal Rank
Critically endangeredIUCN
Very high - highThreat Impact
Winged Mapleleaf (Quadrula fragosa). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.111959
Element CodeIMBIV39050
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNCritically endangered
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumMollusca
ClassBivalvia
OrderUnionoida
FamilyUnionidae
GenusQuadrula
Other Common Names
Rough Maple Leaf Pearlymussel (EN)
Concept Reference
Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
This species was recognized as valid, although apparently often confused with Quadrula quadrula, until Neel (1941) synonymized it and several other species under Quadrula quadrula. Neel's (1941) "Q. quadrula" is a composite species representing a complex of closely related species rather than one highly polymorphic entity.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2018-11-30
Change Date1998-05-26
Edition Date2018-11-30
Edition AuthorsSmith-Patten, B.D. (2018, in part); Cordeiro, J. (2006); Gordon, M. 1992; Whittaker J. C. 1994
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences1 - 5
Rank Reasons
The species was once extremely widespread (15 states historically; 5 now) and now is limited to 4-5 isolated populations (depending upon connectivity of the two Arkansas populations). It is imminently threatened with extinction, thus its status as a Federally listed, 2C Recovery Priority Species. Due to the mistaken synonomy of it under Quadrula quadrula by Neel (1941) and its relative rarity compared to the latter species, the declines in its populations were not recognized until relatively recently. It is currently known from the Little River in Oklahoma, the Saline and Ouachita Rivers in Arkansas, the Bourbeuse River in Missouri, and the St. Croix River bordering Minnesota and Wisconsin. One to perhaps three of these populations are probably viable, but have yet to be clearly defined as such. Re-introductions at historical locations have been attempted in recent years.
Range Extent Comments
The species was once extremely widespread (15 states historically). Currently, it is limited to 4-5 isolated populations (depending upon connectivity of the two Arkansas populations): the Little River in Oklahoma, the Saline and Ouachita Rivers in Arkansas, the Bourbeuse River in Missouri, and the St. Croix River bordering Minnesota and Wisconsin. GeoCat calculated the historical range of the species at 1,097,273 km2 and its present range at 242,839 km2 (not counting locations where re-introduction attempts are taking place). Because of misidentifications (confusion with Quadrula quadrula), published records cannot be relied upon to accurately reflect the distribution of this species.
Occurrences Comments
Currently, this species is only known from four or five isolated populations (count depends upon whether one considers the Arkansas locations as one connected population or not): the Little River in Oklahoma, the Saline and Ouachita Rivers in Arkansas, the Bourbeuse River in Missouri, and the St. Croix River bordering Minnesota and Wisconsin.
Threat Impact Comments
Chemical and organic pollution, alteration and inundation of river channels and siltation have, and continue to have, a severe negative impact on this species. Commercial harvest of shells may also be a threat. A single catastrophic event could possibly cause the extinction of this species. Six of 12 municipal and industrial facilities with wastewater discharge permits into the Croix River are within the reach containing Quadrula fragosa. Stream flow in the relevant stretch of the St. Croix River is influenced, in part, by a hydroelectric dam at St. Croix Falls, Wisconsin. The availability of suitable habitat is a major concern for the continued existence of this species. The species is vulnerable to stochastic events and, as a result of its small, fragmented distribution, has difficulty with recruitment. Changes in land use practices in the watershed are anticipated because the watershed is close to a major and growing metropolitan area. Recreational use in the area is heavy and potentially damaging (USFWS, 1997). Water diversion, anthropogenic water temperature changes, possible issues with the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha), and drought and subsequent flooding are also threats.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Shell subcircular to pentagonal, solid, inflated; anterior end broadly rounded from dorsum to terminus of medial ridge; ventral margin between termini of medial and posterior ridges concave; posterio-ventral junction bluntly biangulate; posterior margin truncated, may be a slight concavity above the posterio-ventral biangulation; dorsal margin generally straight, concave lunule before beak; beak subcentral, elevated, relatively narrow, inclined anteriorly, sculpted by fine irregularly arched ridges and pustules; anterior third of shell surface generally lacks pustules, termini of annual growth increments elevated; maximum shell inflation along a medial ridge, sculpted by a narrow row of medium-sized pustules; medial and posterior ridges separated by a narrow sulcus; posterior ridge relatively low, bluntly angular, sculpted by a single row of prominent, widely spaced pustules; posterior slope concave, broad, expanded into moderately-developed wing, transversed by relatively heavy costations curved posterio-dorsally, a faint radial ridge and sulcus posterior to posterior ridge; periostracum with a cloth-like texture, greenish to brown, occasionly with wide, indistinct green rays. Pseudocardinal teeth heavy, serrated, triangular, double in left valve, single in right but with lamellar denticle adjacent to contiguous sulci; interdentum short, moderately wide; lateral teeth rather lamellar, roughened with striations, double in left valve, single in right but accessary lamella may develop ventrally; anterior muscle scars distinct, rather small, impressed, smooth; pallial line impressed, lighter posteriorly; posterior muscle scars lightly impressed, confluent; beak cavaties deep, compressed; nacre white, somewhat iridescent posteriorly.

Diagnostic Characteristics

This species is quite similar to and has often been confused with Quadrula quadrula. In outline, Q. fragosa more resembles the shape of Q. nodulata. With respect to Q. quadrula, Q. fragosa is more rounded and pentagonal in outline, the medial sulcus is narrower and more centrally positioned, the beak is narrower and appears more elevated, beak sculpture is finer and less developed, and the posterior slope is broader and more alate. The costations across the posterior slope are relatively thick, fairly smooth, and well-separated. In Q. quadrula, costations are more closely packed and tend to be composed of small pustules. Additionally, Q. quadrula is more quadrate in appearance, tends to be posteriorly elongated, has a yellowish and shiny periostracum, and may be highly rayed. Height: 84mm.

Habitat

This species appears to have inhabited medium-sized and large rivers. Baker (1928) lists its habitat as "mud bottom in water 2m or more in depth". Locality records indicate that it also inhabited riffle areas with substantially shallower water depths and substrates ranging from sand and gravel to mixture including some cobble and boulder sized particles. The remnant population in the St. Croix River is found in riffles with clean gravel, sand, or rubble substrates and in clear water of high water quality but this may not reflect ideal habitat (USFWS, 1997). Information on substrate, flow, current, sediment, temperature, oxygen, alkalinity, nitrogen, phosphorus, conductivity, and toxics in the St. Croix River can be found in USFWS (1997).

Ecology

Other than what was listed by Baker (1928) and the above speculation on habitat, nothing is known of this species.

Reproduction

Heath et al. (2000) observed winged mapleleaf in the St. Croix River for 3 years before they described it as a late season, short-term (~5 weeks) brooder that typically released its glochidia as water temperature decreased to ~15 C in early autumn. Most other Quadrula species are reported to brood and release glochidia over longer periods during spring and summer (Oesch, 1995; Heath et al., 2000). Steingraeber et al. (2007) provided evidence for a thermal cue (17-20 C) that presumably is needed to trigger peak juvenile excystment with glochidial metamorphosis time ranging from 28 to 37 d at constant 19C, 70 d in varied 12-19C, and 260-262 d in simulated natural thermal 0-21C. Therefore, the winged mapleleaf may be a host overwintering mussel (Watters and O'Dee, 2000) throughout much of its range. The channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, may be a suitable glochidial host (Hove et. al., 2000; 2001). Recently, channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, has been confirmed as the host fish for this species (Schwebach et al., 2003). Steingraeber et al. (2004; 2007) have confirmed blue catfish (Ictalurus furcatus) and channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) as suitable fish hosts, but blue catfish are a more prolific host. Oetker et al. (2005) also successfully reared this species on channel catfish.
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
MissouriS1Yes
OhioSXYes
IllinoisSXYes
ArkansasS1Yes
KansasSXYes
OklahomaS1Yes
KentuckySXYes
South DakotaSXYes
TennesseeS1Yes
IowaSXYes
MinnesotaS1Yes
WisconsinS1Yes
IndianaSXYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh - moderate
1.1 - Housing & urban areasRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh - moderate
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh - moderate
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh - moderate
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh - moderate
5 - Biological resource use
5.4 - Fishing & harvesting aquatic resources
6 - Human intrusions & disturbance
6.1 - Recreational activities
7 - Natural system modificationsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseases
9 - PollutionLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
9.1 - Domestic & urban waste water
9.2 - Industrial & military effluentsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weather
11.2 - Droughts
11.4 - Storms & flooding

Roadless Areas (1)
Oklahoma (1)
AreaForestAcres
Beech CreekOuachita National Forest8,303
References (62)
  1. Baker, F.C. 1928b. The freshwater Mollusca of Wisconsin: Part II. Pelecypoda. Bulletin of the Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, University of Wisconsin, 70(2): 1-495.
  2. Baker, Richard J. (Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, MN Department of Natural Resources). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. November 1997.
  3. Bleam, D.E., C.H. Cope, K.J. Couch, D.A. Distler. 1998. The winged mapleleaf <i>Quadrula fragosa</i> (Conrad 1835) in Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 101(1-2): 35-38.
  4. Bogan, Art (Curator of Aquatic Invertebrates, North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences). 1997. Review and annotation of mussel watershed distribution maps for TN. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  5. Cicerello, Ronald R. (Kentucky State Nature Preserves). 1997b. Review and annotation of mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  6. Couch, K.J. 1997. An Illustrated Guide to the Unionid Mussels of Kansas. Karen J. Couch. [Printed in Olathe, Kansas]. 124 pp.
  7. Cummings, K.S. and C.A. Mayer. 1992. Field Guide to Freshwater Mussels of the Midwest. Illinois Natural History Survey Manual 5, Illinois. 194 pp.
  8. Cummings, K.S. and C.A. Mayer. 1997. Distributional checklist and status of Illinois freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Unionacea). Pages 129-145 in: K.S. Cummings, A.C. Buchanan, C.A. Mayer, and T.J. Naimo (eds.) Conservation and management of freshwater mussels II: initiatives for the future. Proceedings of a UMRCC Symposium, October 1995, St. Louis, Missouri. Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, Rock Island, Illinois.
  9. Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society (FMCS). 2023. The 2023 checklist of freshwater bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Considered and approved by the Bivalve Names Subcommittee October 2023. Online: https://molluskconservation.org/MServices_Names-Bivalves.html
  10. Galbraith, H.S., D.E. Spooner, and C.C. Vaughn. 2008. Status of rare and endangered freshwater mussels in southeastern Oklahoma. The Southwestern Naturalist, 53(1): 45-50.
  11. Gordon, M.E. and J.B. Layzer. 1989. Mussels (Bivalvia: Unionoidea) of the Cumberland River review of life histories and ecological relationships. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report, 89(15): 1-99.
  12. Graf, D.L. and K.S. Cummings. 2021. A 'big data' approach to global freshwater mussel diversity (Bivalvia: Unionoida), with an updated checklist of genera and species. Journal of Molluscan Studies 87(1):1-36.
  13. Harris, J.L., P.J. Rust, A.C. Christian, W.R. Posey II, C.L. Davidson, and G.L. Harp. 1997. Revised status of rare and endangered Unionacea (Mollusca: Margaritiferidae, Unionidae) in Arkansas. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, 51: 66-89.
  14. Heath, D.J., R.L. Benjamin, M.B. Endris, R.L. Kenyon and M.C. Hove. 2000. Determination of basic reproductive characteristics of the winged mapleleaf mussel (Quadrula fragosa) relevant to recovery. Job 1: Determination of gravidity period. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin. 17 pp.
  15. Hoke, E. 2004. The freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Little Blue River drainage of northeastern Kansas and southeastern Nebraska. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences, 29: 7-24.
  16. Hoke, E. 2005b. The unionid mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionidae) of the Big Blue River basin of northeastern Kansas and southeastern Nebraska. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences, 30: 33-57.
  17. Hornbach, D.J., J.G. March, T. Deneka, N.H. Troelstrup, and J.A. Perry. 1996. Factors influencing the distribution and abundance of the endangered winged mapleleaf <i>Quadrula fragosa</i> in the St. Croix River, Minnesota and Wisconsin. American Midland Naturalist, 136(2): 278-286.
  18. Hove, Mark C. (Mollusk Collection Manager, Bell Museum of Natural History, University of Minnesota). 1997. Review and annotation of mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Christine O'Brien, USGS-BRD. June 1997.
  19. Hove, M.C., J.R. Medland, D.J. Hornbach, M.P. Cliff, M.G. Haas, A.R. Kapuscinski, R.K. Whaley, B.N. Karns, D.C. Allen, R.S. Derhak, K.M. Swensen, and J.E. Thomas. 2002. Federally endangered winged mapleleaf mussels cultured and placed in the St. Croix River, Minnesota. Engangered Species Update, 19(1): 3-4.
  20. Hove, M., D. Heath, R. Benjamin, M. Endris, B. Karns, R. Kenyon, B. Whaley, J. Woods, and A. Kapuscinski. 2000. Winged mapleleaf glochidia metamorphose on channel catfish. Triannual Unionid Report, 19: 18.
  21. Hove, M., J. Medland, P. Cliff, M. Haas, B. Whaley, J. Woods, and A. Kapuscinski. 2001. Winged mapleleaf glochidial metamorphosis on channel catfish verified. Ellipsaria, 3(1): 16-17.
  22. Hove, M., M. Berg, J. DeMarre, K. Dietrich, C. Gonzales, K. Westberg, and D. Hornbach. 2003b. Historical range expansion of winged mapleleaf provides possibilities for additional reintroduction sites. Ellipsaria 5(3): 17-18.
  23. Hove, M., M. Berg, K. Dietrich, C. Gonzales, D. Hornbach, K. Juleen, M. Ledford, M. Marzec, M. McGill, C. Nelson, B.J. Ritger, J. Selander, and A. Kapuscinski. 2003c. High school students participate in snuffbox host suitability trials. Ellipsaria 5(3): 19-20.
  24. Howard, A. D. 1915. Some exceptional cases of breeding among the Unionidae. The Nautilus 29:4-11.
  25. James, M.R. 1987. Ecology of the freshwater mussel <i>Hyridella menziesi</i> in a small oliogotrophic lake. Archives of Hydrobiology 108:337-348.
  26. Johnson, S.L. 1995. Instream flow requirements of Quadrula fragosa and the aquatic community in the lower St. Croix River downstream of the Northern States Power Company hydroelectric dam as St. Croix Falls, Wisconsin, Unpublished report to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul, Minnesota.
  27. Lefevre, G. and W. T. Curtis. 1912. Studies on the reproduction and artificial propagation of fresh-water mussels. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries 30:102-201.
  28. Lopez, G.R. and I.J. Holopainen. 1987. Interstitial suspension-feeding by <i>Pisidium </i>spp. (Pisidiiae: Bivalvia): a new guild in lentic benthos? American Malacological Bulletin, 5: 21-29.
  29. Missouri Natural Heritage Program. 2006. Personal communication with Jay Cordeiro (NatureServe) about the distribution of <i>Quadrula fragosa</i> in Missouri.
  30. MolluscaBase eds. 2024. MolluscaBase. Accessed at https://www.molluscabase.org
  31. Moyle, P., and J. Bacon. 1969. Distribution and abundance of molluscs in a fresh water environment. Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science 35(2/3):82-85.
  32. Neel, J.K. 1941. A Taxonomic study of <i>Quadrula quadrula</i> (Rafinesque). Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 448(96): 1-8.
  33. Oesch, R.D. 1995. Missouri Naiades. A Guide to the Mussels of Missouri. Second edition. Missouri Department of Conservation: Jefferson City, Missouri. viii + 271 pp.
  34. Oetker, S.R., N. Rowse, and G. Wege. 2005. Winged mapleleaf juveniles successfully propagated in cages. Ellipsaria, 7(3): 4-5.
  35. Ortmann, A.E. 1925. The naiad fauna of the Tennessee River system below Walden Gorge. The American Midland Naturalist, 9(7): 321-371.
  36. Parmalee, P.W. and A.E. Bogan. 1998. The Freshwater Mussels of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press: Knoxville, Tennessee. 328 pp.
  37. Perkins III, K. and D.C. Backlund. 2003. A survey for winged mapleleaf (<i>Quadrula fragosa</i>) and scaleshell (<i>Leptodea leptodon</i>) in the James River, South Dakota. South Dakota Game, Fish and Parks, Pierre, South Dakota, Report GFP 2003-17. 21 pp.
  38. Posey, W.R., II, J.L. Harris and G.L. Harp. 1996a. New distributional records for freswater mussels in the Ouachita River, Arkansas. Proceedings of the Arkansas Academy of Science 50: 96-98.
  39. Sietman, B.E. 2003. Field Guide to the Freshwater Mussels of Minnesota. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources: St. Paul, Minnesota. 144 pp.
  40. Skadsen, D.R. and K. Perkins III. 2000. Unionid mussels of the Big Sioux River and tributaries: Moody, Minnehaha, Lincoln, and Union Counties, South Dakota. GFP Report 2000-9 to the South Dakota Department of Game, Fish, and Parks, Pierre, South Dakota. 52 pp.
  41. Springer, C. 2007. Mussels on road to recovery at Genoa NFH. Endangered Species Bulletin, 32(1): 31-32.
  42. Steingraeber, M., M. Hove, M. Bartsch, D. Hornbach, C. Nelson, T. Newton, J. Kalas, A. Kapuscinski, and E. Simonsen. 2004. Two fish species identified as hosts for winged mapleleaf (<i>Quadrula fragosa</i>). Ellipsaria, 6(1): 7-8.
  43. Steingraeber, M.T., M.R. Bartsch, J.E. Kalas, and T.J. Newton. 2007. Thermal criteria for early life stage development of the winged mapleleaf mussel (<i>Quadrula fragosa</i>). American Midland Naturalist, 157: 297-311.
  44. Strayer, D. 1983. The effects of surface geology and stream size on freshwater mussel (Bivalvia, Unionidae) distribution in southeastern Michigan, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology 13:253-264.
  45. Strayer, D. L. 1999. Use of flow refuges by unionid mussels in rivers. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18(4):468-476.
  46. Strayer, D. L., and J. Ralley. 1993. Microhabitat use by an assemblage of stream-dwelling unionaceans (Bivalvia) including two rare species of <i>Alasmidonta</i>. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12(3):247-258.
  47. Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
  48. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1997. Winged mapleleaf mussel (Quadrula fragosa) recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ft. Snelling, Minnesota. 69 pp. + app.
  49. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2001. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; establishment of nonessential experimental population status for 16 freshwater mussels and 1 freshwater snail (Anthony's Riversnail) in the free-flowing reach of the Tennessee River below the Wilson Dam, Colbert and Lauderdale Counties, Alabama. Federal Register, 66(115): 32250-32264.
  50. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2015. 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. Winged Mapleleaf (Quadrula fragosa). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Twin Cities Field Office, Bloomington, Minnesota. 71 pp.
  51. Van der Schalie, H. 1938. The naiad fauna of the Huron River in southeastern Michigan. Miscellaneous Publication of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 40:7-78.
  52. Vaughn, Caryn C. (Coordinator and Zoologist, Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory). 1997. Review and annotation of mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Christine O'Brien, USGS-BRD. June 1997.
  53. Watters, G.T. 1992b. Distribution of the Unionidae in south central Ohio. Malacology Data Net 3(1-4):56-90.
  54. Watters, G. T. 1992. Unionids, fishes, and the species-area curve. Journal of Biogeography 19:481-490.
  55. Watters, G.T. 1995a. A field guide to the freshwater mussels of Ohio. revised 3rd edition. Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife, Columbus, Ohio. 122 pp.
  56. Watters, G.T. and S.H. O'Dee. 2000. Glochidial release as a function of water temperature: beyond bradyticty and tachyticty. Pages 135-140 in R.A. Tankersley, D.I. Warmolts, G.T. Watters, B.J. Armitage, P.D. Johnson, and R.S. Butler (eds.). Freshwater Mollusk Symposia Proceedings. Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus, Ohio. 274 pp.
  57. Watters, G. Thomas (Ohio Biological Survey). 1997. Review and annotation of mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Christine O'Brien, USGS-BRD. May 1997.
  58. Watters, G.T., M.A. Hoggarth, and D.H. Stansbery. 2009b. The Freshwater Mussels of Ohio. Ohio State University Press: Columbus, Ohio. 421 pp.
  59. Williams, J.D., A.E. Bogan, and J.T. Garner. 2008. Freshwater Mussels of Alabama & the Mobile Basin in Georgia, Mississippi & Tennessee. University of Alabama Press: Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 908 pp.
  60. Williams, J. D., A. E. Bogan, R. S. Butler, K. S. Cummings, J. T. Garner, J. L. Harris, N. A. Johnson, and G. T. Watters. 2017. A revised list of the freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 20:33-58.
  61. Williams, J. D., M. L. Warren, Jr., K. S. Cummings, J. L. Harris, and R. J. Neves. 1993. Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 18(9):6-22.
  62. Wilson, C.B., and H.W. Clark. 1914. The Mussels o Cumberland River and its tributaries. U.S. Bureau of Fisheries, Document, 781: 53-54.