Theliderma sparsa

(Lea, 1841)

Appalachian Rockshell

G1Critically Imperiled Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G1Critically ImperiledGlobal Rank
Critically endangeredIUCN
Very high - highThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.120629
Element CodeIMBIV39150
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNCritically endangered
CITESAppendix I
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumMollusca
ClassBivalvia
OrderUnionoida
FamilyUnionidae
GenusTheliderma
Synonyms
Quadrula sparsa(I. Lea, 1841)
Other Common Names
Appalachian Monkeyface (EN) Appalachian Monkey-Face Pearly Mussel (EN)
Concept Reference
Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Placed in the genus Theliderma following Williams et al. (2017). Theliderma was not recognized by Turgeon et al. (1998) but was resurrected from synonymy by Graf and Cummings (2007) to accommodate a monophyletic clade of five species recognized by Turgeon et al. (1998) under Quadrula (Q. cylindrica, Q. intermedia, Q. metanevra, Q. sparsa, and Q. stapes; see Serb et al. 2003). Theliderma is the oldest available name for this clade and has T. metanevra as its type species. Williams et al. (2017) recognize placement of all five of these species in Theliderma.

Distributional records became confused when Ortmann (1914; 1918) lumped Quadrula sparsa and Quadrula tuberosa under Quadrula intermedia (Bogan and Parmalee 1983, Parmalee and Bogan 1998). Historical records for Q. tuberosa from the Cumberland River are therefore also included with historical records for Q. sparsa (USFWS 1984) but if these are distinct species, then Q. sparsa was not present in the headwaters of the Cumberland River (Parmalee and Bogan 1998).
Conservation Status
Review Date2012-01-17
Change Date1996-11-25
Edition Date2012-01-17
Edition AuthorsCordeiro, J. (2012); Morrison, M. (1997)
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent<100 square km (less than about 40 square miles)
Number of Occurrences1 - 5
Rank Reasons
This species has been reduced to one or two populations in only two rivers that continue to be threatened by alteration of habitat and poor land use practices that increase the transport of silt and pollution. Viability is questionable at the few remaining sites.
Range Extent Comments
Historically, this species was thought to have been widespread in the tributaries of the upper Tennessee and Cumberland river systems (including the Tennessee River, Holston River, Powell River, Clinch River, Cumberland River, Big South Fork Cumberland River, and Caney Fork) (USFWS, 1984). Distributional records became confused when Ortmann (1914; 1918) lumped Quadrula sparsa and Quadrula tuberosa under Quadrula intermedia (Bogan and Parmalee, 1983; Parmalee and Bogan, 1998). Historical records for Q. tuberosa from the Cumberland River are therefore also included with historical records for Q. sparsa (USFWS, 1984) but if these are distinct species, then Q. sparsa was not present in the headwaters of the Cumberland River and they can be attributed to Q. tuberosa (Parmalee and Bogan, 1998). Parmalee and Bogan (1998) claim the only confirmed records from Tennessee are from the Holston River, the upper Powell River (Claiborne and Hancock Cos.), and the unimpounded portion of the Clinch River above Norris Dam. Currently, it is restricted to free-flowing reaches of the upper Powell and Clinch Rivers above Norris Reservoir in (Hancock and Claiborne Cos.) Tennessee (USFWS, 1984; Parmalee and Bogan, 1998) and in one section of the Powell and Clinch rivers in Virginia (Neves, 1991; Ahlstedt, 1991) but has nearly disappeared from this latter locality (Parmalee and Bogan, 1998). Recent archaeological records have shown this species occurrence at Muscle Shoals and Hobbs Island in Madison Co., Alabama, but it is now extirpated from that state (Mirarchi et al., 2004; in appendix 1.2 published separately; Williams et al., 2008), as well as archaeological specimens from the lower Clinch River in Roane Co., Tennessee and Hiwassee River in Bradley Co., Tennessee (Parmalee and Bogan, 1998).
Occurrences Comments
Probably two or three occurrences remain (USFWS, 1984) in the Holston, Clinch, and upper Powell Rivers. The population in the Clinch River (between Cleveland and Craft Mill, Virginia) is of questionable viability due to low numbers and isolated distribution (Neves, 1991; Parmalee and Bogan, 1998). The population in the upper Powell River (about a 40-50 mile stretch above Norris Reservoir), Claiborne and Hancock Cos., Tennessee has nearly disappeared and all remaining populations in Tennessee are extirpated (Parmalee and Bogan, 1998). It appears since 1989, range in the Powell River has declined by 19.4 linear km and overall the species occurs in portions of a 100 km reach of the river, however age studies indicate little recruitment outside a small 0.8 km linear stretch of the river in recent years (Johnson, 2011).
Threat Impact Comments
Threats and causes of decline listed in the recovery plan (USFWS, 1984) include impoundment (for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power, and recreation), siltation (due to strip mining, coal washing, dredging, farming, logging, and road construction), and pollution (municipal, agricultural, and industrial waste discharges, chemical spills) (USFWS, 1984).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

This species inhabits fast-flowing, headwaters sections of rivers in shallow riffles and runs (USFWS, 1984).

Reproduction

The glochidial host is not known.
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
AlabamaSXYes
TennesseeS1Yes
VirginiaS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
3 - Energy production & miningLarge - restrictedExtreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
3.2 - Mining & quarryingLarge - restrictedExtreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
9.1 - Domestic & urban waste waterLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
9.2 - Industrial & military effluentsLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (1)
Idaho (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekCaribou-Targhee National Forest118,582
References (32)
  1. Ahlstedt, S.A. 1991b [1992]. Twentieth century changes in the fresh-water mussel fauna of the Clinch River (Tennessee and Virginia). Walkerana 5(13): 73-122.
  2. Bogan, A.E. and P.W. Parmalee. 1983. Tennessee's rare wildlife. Vol. 2: The mollusks. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency and the Tennessee Conservation Department: Nashville, Tennessee. 123 pp.
  3. Bogan, Art (Curator of Aquatic Invertebrates, North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences). 1997. Review and annotation of mussel watershed distribution maps for TN. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC. September 1997.
  4. Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society (FMCS). 2023. The 2023 checklist of freshwater bivalves (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Considered and approved by the Bivalve Names Subcommittee October 2023. Online: https://molluskconservation.org/MServices_Names-Bivalves.html
  5. Graf, D.L. and K.S. Cummings. 2007. Review of the systematics and global diversity of freshwater mussel species (Bivalvia: Unionoida). Journal of Molluscan Studies, 73: 291-314.
  6. Graf, D.L. and K.S. Cummings. 2021. A 'big data' approach to global freshwater mussel diversity (Bivalvia: Unionoida), with an updated checklist of genera and species. Journal of Molluscan Studies 87(1):1-36.
  7. Howard, A. D. 1915. Some exceptional cases of breeding among the Unionidae. The Nautilus 29:4-11.
  8. Johnson, M.S. 2011. A quantitative survey of the freshwater mussel fauna in the Powell River of Virginia and Tennessee, and life history study of two endangered species, <i>Quadrula sparsa</i> and <i>Quadrula intermedia</i>. M.S. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institution. 171 pp.
  9. Lefevre, G. and W. T. Curtis. 1912. Studies on the reproduction and artificial propagation of fresh-water mussels. Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries 30:102-201.
  10. Major, Smoot (Tennessee Division of Natural Heritage). 1997. Review and annotation of fish and mussel watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Ruth Mathews, TNC on 19 August 1997.
  11. Mirarchi, R.E., J.T. Garner, M.F. Mettee, and P.E. O'Neil. 2004b. Alabama wildlife. Volume 2. Imperiled aquatic mollusks and fishes. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. xii + 255 pp.
  12. MolluscaBase eds. 2024. MolluscaBase. Accessed at https://www.molluscabase.org
  13. Morrison, J.P.E. 1942. Preliminary report on mollusks found in the shell mounds of the Pickwidk Landing basin in the Tennessee River valley. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin, 129: 339-392.
  14. Moyle, P., and J. Bacon. 1969. Distribution and abundance of molluscs in a fresh water environment. Journal of the Minnesota Academy of Science 35(2/3):82-85.
  15. Neves, R.J. 1991. Mollusks. Pages 251-320 in K. Terwilliger (ed.). Virginia's Endangered Species. Proceedings of a Symposium, Department of Game and Inland Fisheries. McDonald and Woodward Publishing Company, Blacksburg, Virginia. 672 pp.
  16. Neves, R.J. 1993. A state-of-the unionid address. Pages 1-10 in K.S. Cummings, A.C. Buchanan, and L.M. Koch (eds.) Conservation and management of freshwater mussels. Proceedings of a UMRCC symposium, October 1992, St. Louis, Missouri. Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, Rock Island, Illinois.
  17. Neves, R.J. and J.C. Widlak. 1987. Habitat ecology of juvenile freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in a headwater stream in Virginia. American Malacological Bulletin 5:1-7.
  18. Parmalee, P.W. and A.E. Bogan. 1998. The Freshwater Mussels of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press: Knoxville, Tennessee. 328 pp.
  19. Serb, J.M., J.E. Buhan, and C. Lydeard. 2003. Molecular systematics of the North American freshwater bivalve genus <i>Quadrula </i>(Unionidae: Ambleminae) based on mitochondrial ND1 sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 28: 1-11.
  20. Stansbery, D. 1976c. Status of endangered fluviatile mollusks in central North America: <i>Quadrula sparsa</i> (Lea, 1841). Ohio State University Research Foundation, Columbus, Ohio. 6 pp.
  21. Strayer, D. 1983. The effects of surface geology and stream size on freshwater mussel (Bivalvia, Unionidae) distribution in southeastern Michigan, U.S.A. Freshwater Biology 13:253-264.
  22. Strayer, D. L. 1999. Use of flow refuges by unionid mussels in rivers. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 18(4):468-476.
  23. Strayer, D. L., and J. Ralley. 1993. Microhabitat use by an assemblage of stream-dwelling unionaceans (Bivalvia) including two rare species of <i>Alasmidonta</i>. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12(3):247-258.
  24. Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
  25. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2006. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; establishment of nonessential experimental population status for 15 freshwater mussels, 1 freshwater snail, and 5 fishes in the lower French Broad River and in the lower Holston River, Tennessee; Proposed Rule. Federal Register, 71(113): 34195-34230.
  26. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Technical Amendments for Southeastern Mussels, Snails, and a Reptile. Federal Register 87(33):8960-8967.
  27. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (S. Ahlsedt). 1984. Recovery plan for the Appalachian monkeyface pearly mussel: <i>Quadrula sparsa</i> (Lea, 1841). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia. 55 pp.
  28. Van der Schalie, H. 1938. The naiad fauna of the Huron River in southeastern Michigan. Miscellaneous Publication of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 40:7-78.
  29. Watters, G. T. 1992. Unionids, fishes, and the species-area curve. Journal of Biogeography 19:481-490.
  30. Williams, J.D., A.E. Bogan, and J.T. Garner. 2008. Freshwater Mussels of Alabama & the Mobile Basin in Georgia, Mississippi & Tennessee. University of Alabama Press: Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 908 pp.
  31. Williams, J. D., A. E. Bogan, R. S. Butler, K. S. Cummings, J. T. Garner, J. L. Harris, N. A. Johnson, and G. T. Watters. 2017. A revised list of the freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionida) of the United States and Canada. Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 20:33-58.
  32. Williams, J. D., M. L. Warren, Jr., K. S. Cummings, J. L. Harris, and R. J. Neves. 1993. Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 18(9):6-22.