Branchinecta sandiegonensis

Fugate, 1993

San Diego Fairy Shrimp

G2Imperiled Found in 5 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
EndangeredIUCN
HighThreat Impact
San Diego fairy shrimp (Branchinecta sandiegonensis). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.113643
Element CodeICBRA03060
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNEndangered
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumArthropoda
ClassBranchiopoda
OrderAnostraca
FamilyBranchinectidae
GenusBranchinecta
Other Common Names
San Diego fairy shrimp (EN)
Concept Reference
Fugate, M. 1993. Branchinecta sandiegonensis, a new species of fairy shrimp (Crustacea: Anostraca) from Western North America. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 106(2):296-304.
Taxonomic Comments
Previously misidentified as Branchinecta lindahli (see Eriksen and Belk, 1999).
Conservation Status
Review Date2014-08-05
Change Date2014-08-05
Edition Date2011-02-09
Edition AuthorsCordeiro, J. (2011); Rogers, D.C. (2008); Cordeiro, J. (2004)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent250-5000 square km (about 100-2000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 300
Rank Reasons
Limited to the southern California coastal mesa system, an area with significant pressure from urban and industrial development. Vast areas of habitat have been eliminated historically by conversion but restoration and management and a better awareness, plus federal listing and designation of critical habitat have alleviated past declines and populations appear to have stabled somewhat.
Range Extent Comments
Limited to the southern California Coastal Mesa system in Orange and San Diego counties, and adjacent northwestern Baja California, Mexico (USFWS, 1994; Eriksen and Belk, 1999).
Occurrences Comments
Is present in fewer than 70 vernal pools within 11 vernal pool complexes in San Diego County (USFWS, 1994). Unknown how many in Mexico. Number of pools now appears to be around 137, up from 25 when federally listed, but it is believed these are not range expansions, simply pools missed previously due to inadequate survey effort (USFWS, 2008).
Threat Impact Comments
From USFWS (2008):
Development is the greatest threat to the species across its range. The growth rate of the human population and associated urban and road development in southern California and northwestern Baja California is equal to or exceeds that of any other region in California and San Diego is one of the fastest growing counties in the nation (adjacent counties of Riverside and Orange are expected to grow very rapidly as well). Development of border security and associated infrastructure also threatens the species along the international border; which could have direct impacts to fairy shrimp habitat, i.e., destruction of vernal pools or their watersheds, and isolation of pools and fragmentation of pool systems; development can also cause alterations in the hydrology of adjacent pools. There are currently development proposals in place that would partially impact another 24 complexes (approximately) occupied by the fairy shrimp but it is expected that impacts will be minimized by imposing conservation measures along the way. Designation of critical habitat and vernal pool restoration have lessened development pressure. Fragmentation and isolation and associated impacts to hydrology continue to threaten the species throughout its range. Development within a vernal pool watershed can alter the timing, temperature, frequency, and length of inundation of nearby vernal pools; and persistence of this species is dependent on maintaining stable hydrology. Modifications to the uplands surrounding a vernal pool (e.g., grading cuts) can negatively affect the pool's hydrology by accelerating the flow of water into or out of the subsoil, even if such modifications occur outside the pool's surface watershed. Although initially considered a threat, destruction of pools by agriculture has largely been mitigated and is no longer considered a substantial threat. This is also the case for limited livestock grazing, which is also no longer considered the threat it once was. Human disturbance (trampling and vehicle traffic) is a minor threat in small portions of the range. Another threat is invasion by non-native plants including two nonnative wetland grasses: Agrostis avenacea (Pacific bentgrass) and Polypogon monspeliensis (annual rabbits foot grass). These invasives can overtake pools and decrease the number of days of inundation following rain events so pools no longer provide suitable fairy shrimp habitat. Threats of military activities originally identified in the recovery plan (USFWS, 1998) have largely been alleviated by better management practices and partnerships with military bases to better protect the species on military lands. Hybridization and competition with the versatile pool fairy shrimp, Branchinecta lindahli, is also a threat, but only in a few locations of disturbed pools where the species overlap. Herbicide and pesticide use is assumed to be a threat but overall impacts are not well known. Other pollution from runoff and rainwater may also threaten portions of the range. Dumped trash and other litter may decrease water quality as materials dissolve or decompose. Dumped material can also fill pools leaving little or no space for water to collect, or cover the bottom of pools, preventing larvae hatching from cysts from moving from the soil into the water column. Drought was noted in the listing rule as a stochastic (random or unpredictable) event that could have drastic affects on the species given its fragmented and restricted range. As such, climate change is now considered a potential threat. Climate change has the potential to adversely affect the fairy shrimp through changes in vernal pool inundation patterns and consistency. The exact effects are not known but are postulated, based on current climate change models, to be deleterious. Although fire was initially considered a substantial threat, the greater number of newly discovered populations helps alleviate the catastrophic effect fire would have on a single or few closely spaced occurrences. More information is needed on the impacts of fire on newly hatched fairy shrimp.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

See Fugate (1993) for complete scientific description. Mature individuals lack a carapace and have a delicate elongate body, large stalked compound eyes, and 11 pairs of swimming legs. They swim or glide gracefully upside down by means of complex wavelike beating movements of the legs that pass from front to back (FWS, 2003).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Distinguished from males of other area fairy shrimps by differences found at the distal tip of the second antennae. Females are distinguishable from females of other species of Branchinecta by the shape and length of the brood sac, the length of the ovary, and by the presence of paired dorsolateral spines on five of the abdominal segments (FWS, 2003).

Habitat

Occurs in vernal pools and similar ephemeral wetland types, including artifical habitats. habitat is typically shallow (<30 cm) (Fugate, 1993). All known localities below 701 meters elevation and within 64 km of the Pacific Ocean (USFWS, 2003). The species is generally found in vernal pool complexes, which average 5 to 50 pools, although some contain as few as 2 and a few contain several hundred, that are generally hydrologically connected (USFWS, 2008).

Reproduction

Females carry eggs in an oval or elongate ventral brood sac. Adults observed from January to March, however, in years with early or latge rainfall, the hatching period may be extended. Species hatches and matures within 7 to 14 days, depending on water temperature. Eggs are either dropped to the pool bottom or remain in the brood sac until the female dies and sinks. "Resting eggs", or "cysts", are capable of withstanding temperature extremes and prolonged drying. When pools refill in the same or subsequent rainy seasons, some but not all of the eggs may hatch. Fairy shrimp egg banks in the soil may be composed of eggs from several years of breeding (FWS, 2003). In good pool filling events, population growth rate very high and egg bank is increased dramatically. Under unfavorable conditions, best for shrimp to hatch from eggs as soon as possible. However, under a regime where failed reproductive events were common, best to hatch after several pool fillings. Because conditions change from favorable to unfavorable unpredictably, variation in age within the egg bank appears to be critical for the persistence of the population (Ripley et al., 2004).
Palustrine Habitats
TEMPORARY POOL
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
CaliforniaS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentLarge (31-70%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasLarge (31-70%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh (continuing)
2.2 - Wood & pulp plantationsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh - moderate
6.1 - Recreational activitiesRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh - moderate
6.2 - War, civil unrest & military exercisesRestricted - smallSlight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh - moderate
7 - Natural system modificationsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightModerate - low
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightModerate - low
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh - moderate
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh - moderate
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesSmall (1-10%)Moderate - slightHigh - moderate
8.3 - Introduced genetic materialLarge - restrictedUnknownModerate (short-term)
9 - PollutionRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh - moderate
9.1 - Domestic & urban waste waterRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh - moderate
9.2 - Industrial & military effluentsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh - moderate
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh - moderate
9.4 - Garbage & solid wasteRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh - moderate
11 - Climate change & severe weatherLarge (31-70%)UnknownModerate - low
11.1 - Habitat shifting & alterationLarge (31-70%)UnknownModerate - low
11.2 - DroughtsLarge (31-70%)UnknownModerate - low
11.3 - Temperature extremesLarge (31-70%)UnknownModerate - low
11.4 - Storms & floodingLarge (31-70%)UnknownModerate - low

Roadless Areas (5)
California (5)
AreaForestAcres
ColdwaterCleveland National Forest8,402
LaddCleveland National Forest5,300
San Mateo CanyonCleveland National Forest65
TrabucoCleveland National Forest23,341
WildhorseCleveland National Forest1,483
References (10)
  1. Bohonak, A.J. 2005. Genetic testing of the endangered fairy shrimp species <i>Branchinecta sandiegoensis</i>. Final report to City of San Diego and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Appendix to the City of San Diego's Vernal Pool Inventory): San Diego, California. 10 pp. + app.
  2. Eriksen, C. H. and D. Belk. 1999. Fairy Shrimps of California's Puddles, Pools, and Playas. Mad River Press: Eureka, California.196 pp.
  3. Fugate, M. 1993. <i>Branchinecta sandiegonensis</i>, a new species of fairy shrimp (Crustacea: Anostraca) from Western North America. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 106(2):296-304.
  4. McLaughlin, P. A., D. K. Camp, M. V. Angel, E. L. Bousfield, P. Brunel, R. C. Brusca, D. Cadien, A. C. Cohen, K. Conlan, L. G. Eldredge, D. L. Felder, J. W. Goy, T. Haney, B. Hann, R. W. Heard, E. A. Hendrycks, H. H. Hobbs III, J. R. Holsinger, B. Kensley, D. R. Laubitz, S. E. LeCroy, R. Lemaitre, R. F. Maddocks, J. W. Martin, P. Mikkelsen, E. Nelson, W. A. Newman, R. M. Overstreet, W. J. Poly, W. W. Price, J. W. Reid, A. Robertson, D. C. Rogers, A. Ross, M. Schotte, F. Schram, C. Shih, L. Watling, G. D. F. Wilson, and D. D. Turgeon. 2005. Common and Scientific Names of Aquatic Invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Crustaceans. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 31. 545 pp.
  5. Ripley, B.J., J. Holtz, and M.A. Simovich. 2004. Cyst bank life-history model for a fairy shrimp from ephemeral ponds. Freshwater Biology, 49: 221-231.
  6. Rogers, D. C. 2013. Anostraca catalogus (Crustacea: Branchiopoda). The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 61(2):525–546.
  7. Rogers, D.C. and B.J. Hann. 2016. Class Branchiopoda (in Chapter 16, Phylum Arthropoda). Pages 437-477 in J.H. Thorp and and D.C. Rogers (Editors), Thorp and Covich’s Freshwater Invertebrates, 4th edition, Volume II: Keys to Nearctic Fauna. Academic Press.
  8. U.S. Fish and Widllife Service (USFWS). 2003. Endangered and Threatened Widllife and Plants; designation of critical habitat for the San Diego fairy shrimp (<i>Branchinecta sandiegoensis</i>); proposed rule. Federal Register 68(77): 19888-19917.
  9. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1994. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; proposed rule to list the San Diego fairy shrimp as Endangered. Federal Register 59(149):39874-78.
  10. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2008. San Diego fairy shrimp (Branchinecta sandiegoensis) 5-year review: Summary and evaluation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Carlsbad, California. 56 pp. + app.