Oncorhynchus tshawytscha

(Walbaum, 1792)

Chinook Salmon

G5Secure Found in 104 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
PSESA Status
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.102499
Element CodeAFCHA02050
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderSalmoniformes
FamilySalmonidae
GenusOncorhynchus
USESAPS
COSEWICPS:E,T,SC,NAR,DD
Other Common Names
King Salmon (EN) Saumon chinook (FR)
Concept Reference
Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
See Utter et al. (1989) for information on genetic differences among populations in the Pacific Northwest. In the Nanaimo River, British Columbia, within-stock variation in age of seaward migration of juveniles is a genetic adaptation to local rearing environments; fishes with different life histories had biochemical and morphological differences that were linked to increased fitness in different rearing habitats (see Nehlsen et al. 1991). Waples and Teel (1990) found substantial allele frequency changes over 2-4 years in hatchery, but not wild, populations along the Pacific coast of Oregon.

Has hybridized with pink salmon in the St. Marys River, Michigan (Rosenfield 1998).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2017-12-28
Change Date1996-03-08
Edition Date2010-01-21
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Rank Reasons
Still widespread and locally numerous in large range in the North Pacific Ocean and associated streams; many stocks have been extirpated and many others have declined; habitat has been degraded by logging and other activities, and dams have impeded movements; releases of hatchery stock probably have masked declines/extirpations of some native stocks; see separate files for various chinook salmon populations.
Range Extent Comments
Native range includes the Pacific Ocean and tributary drainages, in North America presently from the Sacramento-San Joaquin system (sometimes farther south) north to Point Hope, Alaska, and in northeastern Asia, from northern Japan to the Anadyr River. The species has been widely stocked elsewhere.

In the Columbia River basin, the Hanford Reach supports the largest population of fall chinook salmon; annual production is an estimated 20-25 million subyearling salmon (P. Hoffarth, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, unpublished data).
Occurrences Comments
In a survey of populations in the contiguous U.S., Huntington et al. (1996) identified 32 healthy native stocks of fall chinook, all in Washington and Oregon, and 3 healthy native stocks of spring or summer chinook, all in Washington.
Threat Impact Comments
Initial cause of decline was adverse effects of logging, mining, irrigation withdrawals, and overfishing, then construction of hydroelectric dams blocked migrations and resulted in high mortality of smolts in turbines (Nehlsen et al. 1991, Williams et al. 1992). Spawning runs continue to be threatened by construction of dams and degradation of natural environment. Extinctions or large declines of some local native populations in recent decades may have been masked by releases of non-native hatchery stock (Williams et al. 1992).

Juveniles incur high mortality as they migrate through today's river systems and out to sea. Sources of mortality include hydroelectric turbines, mechanical bypass facilities (including transportation by barge or truck), and predation by non-native fishes. Gas bubble trauma (GBT)associated with total dissolved gas supersaturation (TDGS) at spillways also causes mortality and detrimental sublethal effects, but passage of juveniles through spillways may be the least damaging of the routes for juvenile passage at dams (Backman et al. 2002). In the Columbia River basin, adults were rarely observed with GBT, despite high TDGS levels (Backman and Evans 2002).

Concurrent with the construction of fish hatcheries, bacterial kidney disease became prevalent and may now play a significant role in mortality.

A change in climate, beginning around 1977, led to poor ocean survival.

See also threats comments for individual populations (ESUs).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Numerous scales; one dorsal fin plus one adipose fin; no spines in fins; irregular black spots on back, both lobes of tail fin, dorsal fin, and adipose fin; gums black at base of teeth. In the ocean, chinook salmon are blue, green, or gray on the upper side, silvery-white on the flanks and belly. During the spawning season, chinook salmon are olive brown, red, or purplish, the color change being more pronounced in males than in females. Young have 6-12 large parr marks on each side. Total length to around 150 cm.

Diagnostic Characteristics

Differs from other Oncorhynchus by large size (to 45 kg), small black spots on both lobes of the caudal fin, black pigment along the base of the teeth, large number of pyloric caeca (>100), and variable flesh color (white to pink or red); fry and parr have large parr marks extending well below the lateral line (Healey 1991).

Habitat

Chinook salmon generally spend most (often 2-4 years but up to 6 years) of their lives in the ocean. For spawning, they migrate up to several hundred kilometers upstream to their natal stream, where eggs are deposited in gravel bottoms of large streams and rivers.

Populations may differ dramatically in the timing of adult migration and, to a lesser extent, timing of spawning. There are two basic behavioral forms, stream-type and ocean-type. Stream-type chinook are typical of northern populations (i.e., Alaska and northern B.C.) and headwater (high elevation) tributaries of southern populations. These spend one full year as juveniles rearing in fresh water before migrating to sea, perform extensive offshore oceanic migrations, and typically return to their natal river in spring or summer, several months prior to spawning; occasionally males mature without ever going to sea. The ocean-type is typical of populations on the North American coast south of 56 degrees north latitude; these migrate to sea during their first year of life (normally within 3 months of emerging from spawning gravel), spend most of their ocean life in coastal waters, then return to their natal river in fall, a few weeks before spawning.

Reproduction

Overall, chinook salmon generally spawn at 2-7 years of age (typically 3-5) in fall, depending on the population. A small proportion of males (called jacks) mature after only spending about 6 months or 18 months at sea, and still others mature without having migrated to sea at all. Eggs hatch in about 2-3 months and alevins complete development in another 1-2 months (depending on temperature, hence related to latitude and elevation). Juveniles stay in fresh water for a few days or 1 year (rarely more). Adults die soon after spawning. Several distinct spawning populations may occur in one stream; these may differ in duration of juvenile rearing, size and date of ocean entrance, timing of adult return and spawning, age composition of spawners, fecundity, and egg size (see Nehlsen et al. 1991).
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN4B,N5N
ProvinceRankNative
QuebecSNANo
British ColumbiaSNRYes
Nova ScotiaSNANo
Yukon TerritoryS2Yes
OntarioSNANo
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
IllinoisSNANo
MontanaSNANo
NevadaSXYes
MichiganSNANo
PennsylvaniaSNANo
OregonS4Yes
IdahoSNRYes
WashingtonS3Yes
AlaskaS4Yes
South DakotaSNANo
MaineSNANo
New YorkSNANo
WisconsinSNANo
North DakotaSNANo
CaliforniaSNRYes
IndianaSNANo
Roadless Areas (104)
Alaska (33)
AreaForestAcres
Behm IslandsTongass National Forest4,777
ChichagofTongass National Forest555,858
Chilkat-West Lynn CanalTongass National Forest199,772
CrystalTongass National Forest18,972
Douglas IslandTongass National Forest28,065
EudoraTongass National Forest195,022
GravinaTongass National Forest37,381
Green RocksTongass National Forest11,093
Juneau UrbanTongass National Forest101,581
Juneau-Skagway IcefieldTongass National Forest1,187,268
KartaTongass National Forest52,117
Kenai LakeChugach National Forest213,172
Kenai MountainsChugach National Forest306,600
LindenbergTongass National Forest25,855
MadanTongass National Forest68,553
Mansfield PeninsulaTongass National Forest54,991
Nellie JuanChugach National Forest713,697
North KupreanofTongass National Forest114,660
North RevillaTongass National Forest215,430
North WrangellTongass National Forest8,091
Port AlexanderTongass National Forest120,681
RatzTongass National Forest5,325
ResurrectionChugach National Forest224,615
RevillaTongass National Forest29,298
RhineTongass National Forest23,010
Roaded DonutChugach National Forest968
South KruzofTongass National Forest55,193
Taku-SnettishamTongass National Forest664,928
Tenakee RidgeTongass National Forest20,527
Thorne RiverTongass National Forest72,983
Twenty MileChugach National Forest198,775
Upper SitukTongass National Forest16,789
Yakutat ForelandsTongass National Forest323,648
California (18)
AreaForestAcres
Cow CreekShasta-Trinity National Forest22,627
East GirardShasta-Trinity National Forest27,894
IshiLassen National Forest21,805
KangarooKlamath National Forest40,617
KellySix Rivers National Forest5,195
Little French CShasta-Trinity National Forest11,529
Mill CreekLassen National Forest7,587
North Fork SmithSix Rivers National Forest37,898
Orleans Mtn.Klamath National Forest49,090
Orleans Mtn. BSix Rivers National Forest17,183
Orleans Mtn. CSix Rivers National Forest15,589
PacksaddleSix Rivers National Forest3,862
PantherShasta-Trinity National Forest12,016
PattisonShasta-Trinity National Forest29,299
Pilot CreekSix Rivers National Forest9,192
PortugueseKlamath National Forest18,915
Siskiyou BSix Rivers National Forest18,871
West GirardShasta-Trinity National Forest37,516
Idaho (5)
AreaForestAcres
Bighorn - WeitasNez Perce-Clearwater National Forest254,845
North Lochsa SlopeNez Perce-Clearwater National Forest117,662
Peace RockBoise National Forest191,734
SeceshPayette National Forest248,088
West Meadow CreekNez Perce-Clearwater National Forest115,949
Montana (1)
AreaForestAcres
West Big HoleBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest133,563
Oregon (24)
AreaForestAcres
Beaver CreekWallowa-Whitman National Forest12,973
Castle Rock AppendageUmpqua National Forest4,649
Cook RidgeWallowa-Whitman National Forest19,617
Drift CreekSiuslaw National Forest6,333
EagleMt. Hood National Forest16,841
Grande RondeWallowa-Whitman National Forest5,650
Grande RondeUmatilla National Forest12,296
HellholeUmatilla National Forest65,679
HuckleberryWallowa-Whitman National Forest11,238
LarchMt. Hood National Forest12,961
Little SheepWallowa-Whitman National Forest5,238
LookingglassUmatilla National Forest4,859
Mclennon MountainWillamette National Forest8,085
Mountain SheepWallowa-Whitman National Forest19,457
Mt. HagenWillamette National Forest6,406
Mt. Hood AdditionsMt. Hood National Forest13,061
Roaring RiverMt. Hood National Forest27,316
Salmon - HuckleberryMt. Hood National Forest17,570
TenmileSiuslaw National Forest10,818
Umpqua SpitSiuslaw National Forest2,090
Upper Catherine CreekWallowa-Whitman National Forest6,446
Upper Grande RondeWallowa-Whitman National Forest11,723
Wind CreekMt. Hood National Forest5,438
WoahinkSiuslaw National Forest5,309
Washington (23)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekGifford Pinchot National Forest7,980
Boulder RiverMt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest32,563
ChelanWenatchee National Forest74,650
Glacier Peak IMt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest15,175
Glacier Peak JMt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest26,482
Granite MountainOkanogan National Forest27,428
Green MountainOlympic National Forest4,617
Madison CreekOlympic National Forest1,223
ManastashWenatchee National Forest11,155
Mt. Baker MaMt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest24,847
Mt. Baker Noisy - DiobsudMt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest56,039
Mt. Baker WestMt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest25,390
Mt. ZionOlympic National Forest3,544
Pasayten RimOkanogan National Forest17,074
Red MountainGifford Pinchot National Forest2,992
SawtoothOkanogan National Forest122,194
Silver StarGifford Pinchot National Forest7,779
SiouxonGifford Pinchot National Forest12,773
South QuinaultOlympic National Forest11,081
Spencer RidgeGifford Pinchot National Forest5,880
TaneumWenatchee National Forest26,140
TeanawayWenatchee National Forest72,849
Thorp Mtn.Wenatchee National Forest22,717
References (53)
  1. Allen, Chris (Fisheries Biologist, USFWS). 2000. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Anthony E. Zammit, ABI. March 2000.
  2. Allendorf, F. W., D. Bayles, D. L. Bottom, K. P. Currens, C. A. Frissell, D. Hankin, J. A. Lichatowich, W. Nehlsen, P. C. Trotter, and T. H. Williams. 1997. Prioritizing Pacific salmon stocks for conservation. Conservation Biology 11:140-152.
  3. Backman, T.W.H., A. F. Evans, and M. S. Robertson. 2002. Gas bubble trauma incidence in juvenile salmonids in the lower Columbia and Snake rivers. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:965-972.
  4. Backman, T.W.H., and A. F. Evans. 2002. Gas bubble trauma incidence in adult salmonids in the Columbia River basin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:579-584.
  5. Berg, D. R. 1995. Riparian silvicultural system design and assessment in the Pacific Northwest Cascade Mountains, USA. Ecological Applications 5:87-96.
  6. Bersine, K., V.E.F. Brenneis, R.C. Draheim, A.M.W. Rub, J.E. Zamon, R.K. Litton, S.A. Hinton, M.D. Sytsma, J.R. Cordell, and J.W. Chapman. 2008. Distribution of the invasive New Zealand mudsnail (<i>Potamopyrgus antipodarum</i>) in the Columbia River Estuary and its first recorded occurrence in the diet of juvenile Chinook salmon (<i>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</i>). Biological Invasions 10(8):1381-1388.
  7. Brown, Larry (U.S. Geological Survey, WRD). 2000. Review and annotation of fish watershed distribution maps. Review requested by Anthony E. Zammit, TNC. June 2000.
  8. California Department of Fish and Game (CDF&G). 1990. 1989 annual report on the status of California's state listed threatened and endangered plants and animals. 188 pp.
  9. Healey, M. C. 1991. Life history of chinook salmon (<i>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</i>). Pages 311-393 in C. Groot and L. Margolis, editors. Pacific salmon life histories. University of British Columbia Press, University of British Columbia, Vancouver. xv + 564 pp.
  10. Huntington, C., W. Nehlsen, and J. Bowers. 1996. A survey of healthy native stocks of anadromous salmonids in the Pacific Northwest and California. Fisheries 21(3):6-14.
  11. Lee, D. C., and J. Hyman. 1992. The stochastic life-cycle model (SLCM): simulating the population dynamics of anadromous salmonids. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Paper INT-459, Ogden, Utah. 30 pp.
  12. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.
  13. Lufkin, A., editor. 1991. California's salmon and steelhead, the struggle to restore an imperiled resource. University of California Press, Berkeley. 305 pp.
  14. Master, L. L. 1996. Synoptic national assessment of comparative risks to biological diversity and landscape types: species distributions. Summary Progress Report submitted to Environmental Protection Agency. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia. 60 pp.
  15. Master, L. L. and A. L. Stock. 1998. Synoptic national assessment of comparative risks to biological diversity and landscape types: species distributions. Summary Report submitted to Environmental Protection Agency. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA. 36 pp.
  16. Meffe, G. K. 1992. Techno-arrogance and halfway technologies: salmon hatcheries on the Pacific coast of North America. Conservation Biology 6:350-354.
  17. Morgan, J. D., J. O. T. Jensen, and G. K. Iwama. 1992. Effects of salinity on aerobic metabolism and development of eggs and alevins of steelhead trout (<i>Oncorhynchus mykiss</i>) and fall chinook salmon (<i>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</i>). Canadian Journal of Zoology 70(7):1341-1346.
  18. Moyle, P. B. 1976a. Inland fishes of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. 405 pp.
  19. Moyle, P. B. 2002. Inland fishes of California. Revised and expanded. University of California Press, Berkeley. xv + 502 pp.
  20. Moyle, Peter B. (Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, UC-Davis). 2000. Review requested by Anthony E. Zammit, TNC. April 2000.
  21. Muir, W. D., S. G. Smith, J. G. Williams, E. E. Hockersmith, and J. R. Skalski. 2001. Survival estimates for migrant yearling chinook salmon and steelhead tagged with passive integrated transponders in the lower Snake and lower Columbia rivers. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21:269-282.
  22. Myers, J. M., R. G. Kope, G. J. Bryant, D. Teel, L. J. Lierheimer, T. C. Wainwright, W. S. Grant, F. W. Waknitz, K. Neely, S. T. Lindley, and R. S. Waples. 1998. Status review of chinook salmon from Washington, Oregon, and California. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-35. 443 pp.
  23. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2021. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife; 90-Day Finding on a Petition To List Southern Oregon and Northern California Coastal Spring-Run Chinook Salmon as Threatened or Endangered Under the Endangered Species Act. Federal Register 86(49):14407-14414.
  24. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2021. Listing Endangered and Threatened Wildlife; 12-Month Findings on Petitions To List Spring-Run Oregon Coast Chinook Salmon and SpringRun Southern Oregon and Northern California Coastal Chinook Salmon as Threatened or Endangered Under the Endangered Species Act. Federal Register 86(156):45970-45974.
  25. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2022.Endangered and Threatened Species: Designation of a Nonessential Experimental Population of Central Valley Spring-Run Chinook Salmon in the Upper Yuba River Upstream of Englebright Dam, Authorization for Release, and Adoption of Limited Protective Regulations Under the Endangered Species Act. Final rule. Federal Register 87(248):79808-79818.
  26. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2025. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Notice of 12-Month Finding on a Petition To List the Oregon Coast and Southern Oregon and Northern California Coastal Chinook Salmon Evolutionarily Significant Units Under the Endangered Species Act. Federal Register 90(234):56993-57011.
  27. Nehlsen, W., J. E. Williams, and J. A. Lichatowich. 1991. Pacific salmon at the crossroads: stocks at risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Fisheries 16(2):4-21.
  28. Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Perez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, and J. D. Williams. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 29, Bethesda, Maryland. 386 pp.
  29. Nielsen, J. L., editor. 1995. Evolution and the aquatic ecosystem: defining unique units in population conservation. American Fisheries Society Symposium 17, Bethesda, Maryland. xii + 435 pp.
  30. NOAA Fisheries. 2024. Species Directory. Chinook Salmon (Protected). National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). Online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/chinook-salmon-protected (Accessed October 17, 2024).<br/>
  31. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 432 pp.
  32. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.
  33. Page, L. M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Seventh edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 34, Bethesda, Maryland.
  34. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.
  35. Ratner, S., R. Lande, and B. B. Roper. 1997. Population viability analysis of spring chinook salmon in the South Umpqua River, Oregon. Conservation Biology 11:879-889.
  36. Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
  37. Rodriguez, M. A. 2002. Restricted movement in stream fish: the paradigm is complete, not lost. Ecology 83(1):1-13.
  38. Rosenfield, J. A. 1998. Detection of natural hybridization between pink salmon (<i>Oncorhynchus gorbuscha</i>) and chinook salmon (<i>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</i>) in the Laurentian Great Lakes using meristic, morphological, and color evidence. Copeia 1998:706-714.
  39. Scott, W. B., and E. J. Crossman. 1973. Freshwater fishes of Canada. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Bulletin 184. 966 pp.
  40. Slaney, T. L., K. D. Hyatt, T. G. Northcote, and R. J. Fielden. 1996. Status of anadromous salmon and trout in British Columbia and Yukon. Fisheries 21(10):20-35.
  41. Stearley, R. F. 1992. Historical ecology of Salmoninae, with special reference to <i>Oncorhynchus</i>. Pages 622-658 in R.L. Mayden, editor. Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. xxvi + 969 pp.
  42. Stow, C. A., S. R. Carpenter, L. A. Eby, J. F. Amrhein, and R. J. Hesselberg. 1995. Evidence that PCBc are approaching stable concentrations in Lake Michigan fishes. Ecological Applications 5:248-260.
  43. Thomas, J. W., Ward, J., Raphael, M.G., Anthony, R.G., Forsman, E.D., Gunderson, A.G., Holthausen, R.S., Marcot, B.G., Reeves, G.H., Sedell, J.R. and Solis, D.M. 1993. Viability assessments and management considerations for species associated with late-successional and old-growth forests of the Pacific Northwest. The report of the Scientific Analysis Team. USDA Forest Service, Spotted Owl EIS Team, Portland Oregon. 530 pp.
  44. Tiffan, K. F., R. D. Garland, and D. W. Rondorf. 2002. Quantifying flow-dependent changes in subyearling fall chinook salmon rearing habitat using two-dimensional spatially explicit modeling. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:713-726.
  45. Torgersen, C. E., D. M. Price, H. W. Li, and B. A. McIntosh. 1999. Multiscale thermal refugia and stream habitat associations of chinook salmon in northeastern Oregon. Ecological Applications 9:301-319.
  46. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1996. Recovery plan for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta native fishes. USFWS, Portland, Oregon.
  47. Utter, F., G. Milner, G. Stahl and D. Teel. 1989. Genetic population structure of chinook salmon, <i>Oncorhynchus tshawytscha</i>, in the Pacific Northwest. Fishery Bulletin 87:239-264.
  48. Visser, R., D. D. Dauble, and D. R. Geist. 2002. Use of aerial photography to monitor fall chinook salmon spawning in the Columbia River. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 131:1173-1179.
  49. Waples, R. S. 1990a. Conservation genetics of Pacific salmon. II. Effective population size and the rate of loss of genetic variability. Journal of Heredity 81:267-276.
  50. Waples, R. S. 1990b. Conservation genetics of Pacific salmon. III. Estimating effective population size. Journal of Heredity 81:277-289.
  51. Waples, R. S., and D. J. Teel. 1990. Conservation genetics of Pacific salmon. I. Temporal changes in allele frequency. Conservation Biology 4:144-156.
  52. Williams, J. E., J. A. Lichatowich, and W. Nehlsen. 1992b. Declining salmon and steelhead populations: new endangered species concerns for the West. Endangered Species Update 9(4):1-8.
  53. Wydoski, R. S., and R. R. Whitney. 1979. Inland fishes of Washington. The University of Washington Press, Seattle. 220 pp.