Athearnia anthonyi

(Redfield, 1854)

Anthony's Riversnail

G1Critically Imperiled Found in 6 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G1Critically ImperiledGlobal Rank
VulnerableIUCN
Very high - highThreat Impact
Anthony's riversnail (Athearnia anthonyi). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.111216
Element CodeIMGASK5260
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNVulnerable
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumMollusca
ClassGastropoda
OrderCaenogastropoda
FamilyPleuroceridae
GenusAthearnia
Synonyms
Leptoxis crassa anthonyi(Redfield, 1854)
Concept Reference
Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Athearnia anthonyi is treated as a full species by some (e.g., Dillon and Ahlstedt 1997, Mirarchi et al. 2004, Garner and Johnson 2017, FMCS 2021) and as a subspecies of Athearnia crassa by others (Turgeon et al. 1998, Minton and Savarese 2005). In this database, we follow the former treatment. Two studies have confirmed that Athearnia anthonyi is a distinct species from Leptoxis praerosa (Dillon and Ahlstedt 1997, Minton and Savarese 2005).
Conservation Status
Review Date2010-04-15
Change Date2004-09-17
Edition Date2010-04-15
Edition AuthorsCordeiro, J.
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent100-250 square km (about 40-100 square miles)
Number of Occurrences1 - 20
Rank Reasons
Because of pollution, heavy siltation, and habitat modification or destruction (e.g., inundation by reservoirs), this snail has been extirpated from almost its entire historic range (greater than 80% decline), with most of the decline occurring historically as the result of impoundment. Currently populations remain stable as far back as 1996. Currently it is known from five or perhaps a few more occurrences (3 rivers) in a range extent of less than 250 square km and area of occupancy less than 100 square km although a captive breeding and reintroduction program is underway and has shown some success.
Range Extent Comments
Historically distributed from the lower French Broad and Clinch rivers to the vicinity of Muscle Shoals, this species was originally described from the Holston River near Knoxville, Tennessee (USFWS, 1996). It was once widespread in the Tennessee River system, where it was associated with shoal areas in the main stem of the Tennessee River from Knoxville (Knox Co., Tennessee) downstream to Muscle Shoals (Colbert and Lauderdale Cos., Alabama) and lower reaches of its tributaries in eastern Tennessee, northern Alabama, and northwestern Georgia (USFWS, 1996). Extirpated from much of the Tennessee River and tributaries following impoundment. Presently known from the extreme lower sections of only four streams: a stretch of the Sequatchie and Little Sequatchie Rivers, Marion County, Tennessee; Limestone Creek, Limestone County, Alabama, and in the main channel of the Tennessee River near the Alabama and Tennessee state line (Mirarchi et al., 2004; Minton and Savarese, 2005). Populations all found to be genetically distinct from one another (Minton and Savarese, 2005; TN NHP, pers. comm., 2007).
Occurrences Comments
At present, 5 occurrences are known in three streams. There is a very slight possibility for a few others. Known from the extreme lower sections of only three streams: a single stretch of the Sequatchie River, Marion County, Tennessee; Limestone Creek, Limestone County, Alabama, and in the main channel of the Tennessee River near the Alabama (Jackson Co.) and Tennessee (Marion Co.) state line (Mirarchi et al., 2004; Minton and Savarese, 2005). Populations all found to be genetically distinct from one another each with unique haplotype and all individuals from a population sharing the same haplotype (Minton and Savarese, 2005). Also reintroduction efforts in Tennessee River, downstream of Wilson Dam. A new site with good viability was reported in 2007 in the Little Sequatchie River where the species may have been documented historically (D. Withers, TN NHP, pers. comm., 2007).
Threat Impact Comments
The former mainstream habitat for this species has been eliminated by the impoundment of the Tennessee River (Bogan and Parmalee, 1983). Most historical populations were lost when much of the Tennessee River was impounded as the species is not tolerant of impoundment. Historical impoundments resulted in current fragmentation and isolation of populations. Additional population losses and declines are attributable to general deterioration of water quality due to inadequate erosion and sedimentation control during mining, agricultural, timbering, and construction activities; run-off and discharge of agricultural, municipal, and industrial point and nonpoint source pollution; and habitat alteration from channelization and dredging (USFWS, 1996). Increasing urbanization within the Limestone Creek watershed may pose a future threat (Garner and Haggerty, 2010).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

"Shell rhomboidly ovate, covered with an olivaceous-yellowish epidermis, beneath which usually appear two purplish bands encircling the body whorl; spire short; whorls about four, the upper ones much eroded, the upper portion of the last whorl" (i.e., body whorl) "is shouldered by a series of large, obtuse, and irregular tubercles, about four or five in number, there is also a slight tendency towards thickening in the ventral portion of the whorl; aperture ovate, effuse above and below; right lip thin; columellar lip usually stained with purple above and below, reflected so as partially to cover a deep umbilical depression, which, however, is continued towards the base, forming a channel much resembling that of the umbilical region in Leptaxis natica" (Redfield, 1854)

Diagnostic Characteristics

This species resembles Lithasia geniculata (Haldeman, 1840) and Lithasia salebrosa (Conrad, 1834), but surviving populations do not appear to be sympatric with either Lithasia. Redfield (1854) notes that the tubercles on the shoulder of the body whorl are "larger, more obtuse, and irregular, and fewer in number" than those of L. salebrosa. The tubercles are larger and the aperture differently shaped in L. geniculata. The length of the aperture is 16 mm. and the width of the aperture is 8 mm.

Habitat

Preferred habitat appears to be larger rivers, but lower stretches of larger creeks are also inhabited. Usually the snail was found on cobble/boulder substrates in the vicinity of riffles, historically, although not always, in strongly flowing sections (USFWS, 1996)

Reproduction

Assumed to be oviparous (as other Pleuroceridae). It probably lays eggs only for a very short period annually. New recruits appear between May and July with many individuals suspected of having at least two breeding seasons (Garner and Haggerty, 2010).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN1
ProvinceRankNative
AlabamaS1Yes
IowaSUYes
GeorgiaSHYes
TennesseeS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightLow (long-term)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightLow (long-term)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
2.2 - Wood & pulp plantationsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh - moderate
3.2 - Mining & quarryingRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh - moderate
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.2 - Industrial & military effluentsLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (6)
North Carolina (1)
AreaForestAcres
SnowbirdNantahala National Forest8,489
Tennessee (5)
AreaForestAcres
Bald River Gorge AdditionCherokee National Forest1,728
Brushy RidgeCherokee National Forest7,469
Joyce Kilmer Slickrock Add.Cherokee National Forest1,396
Sycamore CreekCherokee National Forest6,984
Upper Bald RiverCherokee National Forest9,202
References (26)
  1. Bogan, A.E. and P.W. Parmalee. 1983. Tennessee's rare wildlife. Vol. 2: The mollusks. Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency and the Tennessee Conservation Department: Nashville, Tennessee. 123 pp.
  2. Bogan, A.E. and P.W. Parmalee. 1983. Tennessee's Rare Wildlife: Volume II: The Mollusks. Report to the Tennessee Natural Heritage Program and Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency: Nashville, Tennessee. 123 pp.
  3. Burch, J.B. 1982. Freshwater Snails (Mollusca: Gastropoda) of North America. Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio. 294 pp.
  4. Dillon, R.T., Jr. and S.A. Ahlstedt. 1997. Verification of the specific status of the endangered Anthony's river snail, <i>Athearnia anthonyi</i>, using allozyme electrophoresis. The Nautilus, 110(3): 97-101.
  5. Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society (FMCS). 2021. The 2021 checklist of freshwater gastropods (Mollusca: Gastropods) of the United States and Canada. Considered and approved by the Gastropods Names Subcommittee December 2020. Online: https://molluskconservation.org/MServices_Names-Gastropods.html
  6. Garner, J.T and P.D. Johnson. 2017. Anthony Riversnail, <i>Athearnia anthonyi</i>. Pages 23-24 in Shelton-Nix, editor. Alabama Wildlife, Volume 5. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 372 pp.
  7. Garner, J.T. and T.M. Haggerty. 2010. Distribution, density, and population dynamics of the Anthony riversnail (<i>Athearnia anthonyi</i>) in Limestone Creek, Limestone County, Alabama. American Malacological Bulletin 28:121-126.
  8. Goodrich, C. 1931. The Pleurocerid genus <i>Eurycaelon</i>. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 223: 1-9.
  9. Goodrich, C. 1940. The Pleuroceridae of the Ohio River drainage system. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 417: 1-21.
  10. Goodrich, C. 1941c. Studies of the gastropod family Pleuroceridae, VIII. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 447: 1-13.
  11. Haldeman. 1841. A monograph of the Limnaides and other freshwater univalve shells of North America, no.4. Printed for author, Philadelphia.
  12. Hickman, M.E. 1937. A contribution to the Mollusca of eastern Tennessee. MS Thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee. 165 pp.
  13. Minton, R.L. and S.P. Savarese, Jr. 2005. Consideration of genetic relationships in management decisions for the endangered Anthony's riversnail, <i>Leptoxis crassa anthonyi </i>(Redfield, 1854) (Gastropoda: Pleuroceridae). The Nautilus, 119(1): 11-14.
  14. Mirarchi, R.E., J.T. Garner, M.F. Mettee, and P.E. O'Neil. 2004b. Alabama wildlife. Volume 2. Imperiled aquatic mollusks and fishes. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. xii + 255 pp.
  15. Mirarchi, R.E., M.A. Bailey, J.T. Garner, T.M. Haggerty, T.L. Best, M.F. Mettee, and P. O'Neil. 2004d. Alabama Wildlife. Volume Four: Conservation and Management Recommendations for Imperiled Wildlife. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 221 pp.
  16. Morrison, J.P.E. 1971. <i>Athearnia</i>, a new name for a genus of pleurocerid snails. The Nautilus, 84: 110-111.
  17. Redfield, J.H. 1854. Descriptions of new species of shells. Annals of the Lyceum of Natural History of New York, 6: 130-132.
  18. Tryon, G.W. 1873. Land and fresh-water shells of North America, Part 4: Streptomatidae. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 253: 1-435.
  19. Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
  20. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1994. Determination of Endangered status for the royal snail and Anthony's riversnail. Final Rule. Federal Register, Department of the Interior, 59(73): 17994-17998.
  21. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1994. Uncompahgre Fritillary Recovery Plan. Denver Colorado, 20 pp.
  22. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1996. Recovery Plan for Anthony's Riversnail (<i>Athearnia anthonyi</i>). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, Georgia. 21 pp.
  23. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2001. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; establishment of nonessential experimental population status for 16 freshwater mussels and 1 freshwater snail (Anthony's Riversnail) in the free-flowing reach of the Tennessee River below the Wilson Dam, Colbert and Lauderdale Counties, Alabama. Federal Register, 66(115): 32250-32264.
  24. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2006. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; establishment of nonessential experimental population status for 15 freshwater mussels, 1 freshwater snail, and 5 fishes in the lower French Broad River and in the lower Holston River, Tennessee; Proposed Rule. Federal Register, 71(113): 34195-34230.
  25. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2018. Anthony's riversnail (<i>Athearnia anthonyi</i>), 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southeast Region, Tennessee Ecological Services Field Office, Cookeville, Tennessee.
  26. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022. Initiation of 5-Year Status Reviews for 35 Southeastern Species. Notice of initiation of reviews; request for information. Federal Register 87(93): 29364-29366.