Fluminicola fuscus

(Haldeman, 1847)

Ashy Pebblesnail

G3Vulnerable Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
Near threatenedIUCN
Very high - highThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.943075
Element CodeIMGASG3500
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNNear threatened
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumMollusca
ClassGastropoda
OrderLittorinimorpha
FamilyLithoglyphidae
GenusFluminicola
Synonyms
Fluminicola columbianaHemphill in Pilsbry, 1899Fluminicola columbianusHemphill in Pilsbry, 1899Fluminicola hindsi(Baird, 1863)Lithoglyphus hindsii(Baird, 1863)
Concept Reference
Liu, H.P., Walsh, J. and Hershler, R. 2013. Taxonomic clarification and phylogeography of Fluminicola coloradensis Morrison, a widely ranging western North American pebblesnail. Monographs of the Western North American Naturalist 6(1):87-110.
Taxonomic Comments
The genus Fluminicola is in need of revision because genetic analyses show that the genus is paraphyletic (Hershler and Liu 2012).

The taxonomic treatment of Fluminicola fuscus has undergone several changes since the mid-1990's. Hershler and Frest (1996) determined that Fluminicola hindsi and columbianus (misspelled columbiana in Turgeon et al. 1998) are junior synonyms of F. fuscus. Liu et al. (2013) conducted mtDNA analyses on Fluminicola coloradoensis, which resulted in the unassigned Snake River basin populations being assigned to F. coloradoensis, as well as the re-assignment of the lower Salmon River (Idaho) populations of Fluminicola fuscus to F. coloradoensis.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-04-03
Change Date2025-04-03
Edition Date2025-04-03
Edition AuthorsCordeiro, J. (2009); Jurist, K.; T. Frest (2000); Ormes, M (2015); rev. T. Cornelisse (2025)
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
This species has a large range and a moderate number of occurrences range-wide, but it is subject to many threats and there is evidence of long-term population declines, although short-term population trends are unknown.
Range Extent Comments
This species occurs in Vancouver, Canada and the in northwestern United States from Washington and Oregon, east to Colorado (InvertEbase 2025; RARECAT 2025).
Occurrences Comments
This species is known from at least approximately 103 occurrences using a 1 km separation distance and records from 1994-2025 (RARECAT 2025; InvertEBase 2025).
Threat Impact Comments
This species is threatened by impaired water quality from sedimentation, agricultural runoff, nutrient enhancements, and mining and pulp mill effluents; by habitat fragmentation due to stream modifications, including dams, impoundments, water diversions; by habitat degradation and loss leading to stabilizing riparian vegetation; and likely somewhat by climate change due to increased temperatures, altered flow regimes, and reduced dissolved oxygen (Frest and Johannes 1995, Jordan et al. 2013; Oregon Biodiversity Information Center 2024; WDFW 2025).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

This species is found in small to large rivers, in swift current on stable gravel to boulder substrate in cold, unpolluted, highly oxygenated water (Hershler and Frest 1996).
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN1
ProvinceRankNative
British ColumbiaS1Yes
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
WashingtonS2Yes
OregonS2Yes
IdahoS3Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
9.1 - Domestic & urban waste waterRestricted (11-30%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.1.2 - Run-offRestricted (11-30%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.2 - Industrial & military effluentsRestricted (11-30%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsRestricted (11-30%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
11.1 - Habitat shifting & alterationLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (1)
Washington (1)
AreaForestAcres
Black CanyonOkanogan National Forest9,681
References (19)
  1. Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society (FMCS). 2021. The 2021 checklist of freshwater gastropods (Mollusca: Gastropods) of the United States and Canada. Considered and approved by the Gastropods Names Subcommittee December 2020. Online: https://molluskconservation.org/MServices_Names-Gastropods.html
  2. Frest, T.J. and E.J. Johannes. 1995c. Interior Columbia Basin mollusk species of special concern. Final Report (contract #43-0E00-4-9112) prepared for Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project. Deixis Consultants, Seattle, Washington. 274 pp. + tabs., figs.
  3. Hershler R., and H.-P. Liu. 2012. Molecular phylogeny of the western North American pebblesnails, genus <i>Fluminicola </i>(Rissooidea: Lithoglyphidae), with description of a new species. Journal of Molluscan Studies 78(4):321-329.
  4. Hershler, R. and T. J. Frest. 1996. A review of the North American freshwater snail genus <i>Fluminicola </i>(Hydrobiidae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 583: 1-41.
  5. InvertEBase. 2025. Online. Available: https://invertebase.org/portal/index.php.
  6. Jordan, S.F., S. Jepsen and R. Huff. 2013. Species fact sheet: <i>Fluminicola fuscus</i> (Columbia pebblesnail; Ashy pebblesnail; Columbia River spire snail). Interagency Special Status/Sensitive Species Program (ISSSSP) Conservation Planning Documents, U.S. Forest Service (Pacific Northwest Regional Office) and Bureau of Land Management (Oregon/Washington State Office). Online. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/sfpnw/issssp/planning-documents/species-guides.shtml (Accessed 2015).
  7. Liu, H.P., Walsh, J. and Hershler, R. 2013. Taxonomic clarification and phylogeography of <i>Fluminicola coloradensis</i> Morrison, a widely ranging western North American pebblesnail. Monographs of the Western North American Naturalist 6(1):87-110.
  8. Lysne, S.J. and R. Pierce. 2009. Mollusk survey of Crystal Creek-Spring Creek Ranches, Blaine County, Idaho, USA. Ellipsaria 11(1):20.
  9. Lysne, S.J. and W.H. Clark. 2009. Mollusc survey of the lower Bruneau River, Owyhee County, Idaho, U.S.A. American Malacological Bulletin 27:167-172.
  10. Montana Natural Heritage Program. 2011. Element Subnational Ranking Form in Biotics 5 database. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
  11. Neitzel, D., and T. Frest. 1992. Survey of Columbia River Basin Streams for Columbia pebblesnail <i>Fluminicola</i> <i>columbiana</i> and shortface lanx <i>Fisherola nuttalli</i>. PNL-8229, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.  
  12. Oregon Biodiversity Information Center. 2024. Element Subnational Ranking Form in Biotics 5 database. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
  13. <p>NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2025. Version: 2.1.1 (released April 04, 2025).</p>
  14. Stockton, K.A., Moffitt, C.M., Blew, D.L. and Farmer, C.N. 2012. Acute toxicity of Sodium Fluorescein to Ashy Pebblesnails <i>Fluminicola fuscus</i>. Northwest Science 86(3):190-197.
  15. Turgeon, D. D., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, W. K. Emerson, W. G. Lyons, W. L. Pratt, C. F. E. Roper, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, and J. D. Williams. 1988. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 16. 277 pp.
  16. Turgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
  17. U.S. Forest Service (USFS). 1996. Status of the interior Columbia basin: summary of scientific findings. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-385. Portland, Oregon: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station; U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 144 pp.
  18. Voshell, J.R. 2002. A guide to common freshwater invertebrates of North America. McDonald and Woodward Publishing Company, Granville, Ohio, USA: 442 pp.
  19. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2025. Species & Habitats. Online. Available: https://wdfw.wa.gov/species-habitats