Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.104328
Element CodeAAABB01080
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAmphibia
OrderAnura
FamilyBufonidae
GenusAnaxyrus
SynonymsBufo hemiophrysCope, 1886
Other Common NamesCrapaud du Canada (FR)
Concept ReferenceFrost, D. R. 1985. Amphibian species of the world. A taxonomic and geographical reference. Allen Press, Inc., and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas. v + 732 pp.
Taxonomic CommentsThe genus Anaxyrus was split from Bufo by Frost et al. (2006). However, taxonomy within the genus Bufo remains controversial and many references still use the long-established Bufo.
Regarded as subspecies of B. americanus in some older literature. Hybridizes with B. americanus in southeastern Manitoba and north-central U.S. (Green 1983, Green and Pustowka 1997). See also Fontenot et al. (2011) for a discussion on the hybridization with eastern members of the Anaxyrus americanus group. Anaxyrus baxteri of Wyoming formerly was included in this species (see Smith et al. 1998).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2015-09-22
Change Date2015-09-22
Edition Date2002-03-29
Edition AuthorsReichel, J. D., and G. Hammerson
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Rank ReasonsFairly large range in south-central Canada and adjacent north-central U.S.; current distribution, abundance, and population trend are not well documented--hence not demonstrably secure.
Range Extent CommentsSouth-central Canada and north-central United States, from southern Northwest Territories through Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba to northern Montana, North Dakota, northeastern South Dakota, and west-central Minnesota (Conant and Collins 1991).
Occurrences CommentsRepresented by many and/or large occurrences throughout most of the range.
Threat Impact CommentsLocal declines and low abundance have been attributed to loss of wetlands and possibly drought (Green 1997).