Anthoxanthum odoratum

L.

Sweet Vernal Grass

GNRUnranked Found in 26 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
GNRUnrankedGlobal Rank
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.160120
Element CodePMPOA0F020
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassMonocotyledoneae
OrderCyperales
FamilyPoaceae
GenusAnthoxanthum
Other Common Names
Flouve odorante (FR) sweet vernalgrass (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Review Date1994-03-22
Change Date1994-03-22
Edition Date1988-11-04
Edition AuthorsDON PITCHER MARY J RUSSO (Revision), CAFO
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Range Extent Comments
It ranges from northern Florida to southern Canada along the East Coast and west to the Mississippi River flood plain. It also occurs from northern California to Vancouver Island, Canada (Hitchcock 1971, Grant and Antonovics 1978). It was introduced to North America from Europe in the late 1700s as a meadow grass and has since escaped cultivation (Munz and Keck 1973, Grant and Antonovics 1978).
Threat Impact Comments
ANTHOXANTHUM ODORATUM occurs on Nature Conservancy grassland preserves in Oregon from west of the Cascade Mountains to the coast. At present, it is not a significant threat to California preserves, but where present, as at the Northern California Coast Range Preserve, its elimination is the ultimate goal.
Ecology & Habitat

Diagnostic Characteristics

ANTHOXANTHUM ODORATUM can be distinguished from other grass species by its perennial habit and sweet, vanilla scent, especially when dry.

Habitat

Sweet vernal grass is a native of Eurasia (Hitchcock 1971, Munz and Keck 1973). It occurs on poorer soils in dry fields, lawns, meadows, and waste places (Muenscher 1955).

Ecology

GROWTH AND COMPETITION

When grown with other common pasture grasses, ANTHOXANTHUM ODORATUM is highly competitive. In a North Carolina study, it generally dominated mixtures that included PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA, POA PRATENSIS, SALVIA LYRATA, and RUMEX ACETOSELLA (Fowler 1982).

In a study of competition with LOLIUM PERENNE, DACTYLIS GLOMERATA, and HOLCUS LANATUS (Remison and Snaydon 1978), sweet vernal grass proved highly competitive in the early spring due to its rapid growth and early flowering. Later in the summer it declines in aggressiveness. Among these species, sweet vernal grass is the most highly competitive for potassium (Remison and Snaydon 1978). A Dutch study revealed similar results (Berendse 1983). Even at low densities, competition between ANTHOXANTHUM ODORATUM and PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA is very strong. ANTHOXANTHUM's competitive ability is highest in early spring.

In competition experiments (Remison 1978) with HOLCUS LANATUS and DACTYLIS GLOMERATA, ANTHOXANTHUM ODORATUM had the lowest yield, especially at low densities. It proved most competitive at intermediate densities. Again, however, sweet vernal grass was most competitive early in the growing season, due to its rapid spring growth.

ANTHOXANTHUM ODORATUM roots are quite shallow, absorbing nutrients mainly from the upper 10 cm of soil (Berendse 1982). It commonly occurs on soils that are low in phosphorus (Roberts 1982). On fertilized soils, sweet vernal grass develops a dense surface root mat (Remison and Snaydon 1978). Although ANTHOXANTHUM tillers profusely, its poor root growth reduces its competitive ability (Remison 1978). The ratio of roots to shoots is therefore quite low at 0.(55) (Remison and Snaydon 1978).

In mixed species plots, intraspecific competition is more important than interspecific competition (Berendse 1983). Like many other grasses, sweet vernal grass contains allelopathic chemicals that suppress the growth of other plant species (Scott 1975). It is "allo-inhibited," growing better with exudate from its own and similar species in permanent grasslands (Newman and Rovira 1975).

The decomposing roots of ANTHOXANTHUM ODORATUM have an effect opposite that of the allelopathic leachate. Old roots appear to enhance the growth of other grass species, while decreasing the growth of new ANTHOXANTHUM plants. Phosphorus content in the roots averaged 0.155%, a relatively high level. This is probably one of the factors leading to the increased growth of other species on sites with decomposing sweet vernal grass roots (Newberry 1979).

ANTHOXANTHUM ODORATUM plants average 3.5 leaves per shoot. The individual leaves are unusually short-lived, with a mean survival of only 19 days. Only a few leaves survive for three months. This rapid turnover of leaves is probably a reflection of the plant's rapid growth rate (Sydes 1984).

POPULATION DYNAMICS

The biology of ANTHOXANTHUM ODORATUM populations is complex and depends upon the particular habitat. Different character complexes are favored by different habitat types leading to substantial phenetic differences between ecologically marginal and central populations. Ecologically marginal populations have higher turnover rates than central ones. Individual life expectancy is shorter in marginal populations, while central populations contain a skewed age distribution in favor of older individuals, making them potentially less stable (Grant and Antonovics 1978).

In response to contrasting environments, sweet vernal grass can rapidly differentiate, even without geographic barriers. In one study (Kiang 1982), significant differences in morphology, flowering date, and pollen fertility developed in less than 40 years. Such differences among populations were genetic adaptations to contrasting soil environments. Similar results are reported by Snaydon and Davies (1972, 1976) for populations at distances of less than 30 m apart.

When environmental boundaries are distinct, ANTHOXANTHUM ODORATUM populations can exhibit sharp differences. Plants growing only 0.1 m apart across a sharp environmental boundary that had existed for less than 120 years showed significant differences in height, yield, flowering date, and morphology (Snaydon and Davies 1976).

Reproduction

ANTHOXANTHUM ODORATUM reproduces from seeds, flowering early in the spring and forming distinct, identifiable clumps that do not spread vegetatively (Grant and Antonovics 1978). The plants are generally self-incompatible (Antonovics 1972). Plants in North Carolina were reported to produce from 58 to 1,257 seeds per plant (Grant and Antonovics 1978).

SEED DISPERSAL AND GERMINATION

Seeds with awns are able to move further along the soil surface than awnless seeds. ANTHOXANTHUM ODORATUM seeds have awns that wind and unwind with changes in atmospheric humidity. The movement of seeds by this mechanism is not great, averaging 1.6 cm on dry soil and 1.3 cm on wet soil over a 5-day period, but it may give the seeds a slight advantage in reaching suitable germination sites (Schonfeld and Chancellor 1983).

Harris (1961) found some dormancy in ANTHOXANTHUM ODORATUM seeds. Most germination began the 4th week after sowing and ceased by the 8th week, but a few seeds germinated more than a year later. In experimental studies in England (Williams 1983a), A. ODORATUM seeds stored for 48 weeks in dry storage resulted in 86% germination. There is thus indirect evidence of seed dormancy, which may increase a seed's chance of being incorporated into the soil while still viable. For seeds sown on moist soil, however, emergence occurred rapidly (within three months). Those seeds that did not emerge within 10 months were not viable. Emergence was highest for seeds sown at a depth of 1 cm (75% viable) and decreased to 52% for seeds sown at a depth of 5 cm.

In another British study (Williams 1983b), ANTHOXANTHUM ODORATUM was compared with eight other grassland species. It showed a greater ability to germinate under constant conditions than when conditions were varied. When A. ODORATUM seeds were stored for 28 weeks, a much higher percentage of the seeds germinated when stored at constant temperatures.
Terrestrial Habitats
Grassland/herbaceous
Other Nations (2)
United StatesNNA
ProvinceRankNative
DelawareSNANo
New JerseySNANo
ColoradoSNANo
IllinoisSNANo
New MexicoSNANo
MontanaSNANo
MissouriSNANo
MassachusettsSNANo
HawaiiSNANo
AlaskaSNANo
West VirginiaSNANo
South CarolinaSNANo
IndianaSNANo
MaineSNANo
GeorgiaSNANo
MississippiSNANo
CaliforniaSNANo
WyomingSNANo
PennsylvaniaSNANo
VermontSNANo
New HampshireSNANo
MinnesotaSNANo
District of ColumbiaSNANo
North CarolinaSNANo
WisconsinSNANo
OregonSNANo
ArkansasSNANo
WashingtonSNANo
OhioSNANo
MarylandSNANo
ConnecticutSNANo
AlabamaSNANo
MichiganSNANo
TennesseeSNANo
KentuckySNANo
IdahoSNANo
Rhode IslandSNANo
LouisianaSNANo
VirginiaSNANo
New YorkSNANo
CanadaNNA
ProvinceRankNative
Prince Edward IslandSNANo
British ColumbiaSNANo
OntarioSNANo
QuebecSNANo
Island of NewfoundlandSNANo
Nova ScotiaSNANo
New BrunswickSNANo
Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, SPRING-FLOWERING
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (26)
Alaska (1)
AreaForestAcres
MadanTongass National Forest68,553
California (1)
AreaForestAcres
SoliderSix Rivers National Forest14,918
Idaho (1)
AreaForestAcres
North Lochsa SlopeNez Perce-Clearwater National Forest117,662
New Hampshire (1)
AreaForestAcres
Kinsman MountainWhite Mountain National Forest8,999
North Carolina (3)
AreaForestAcres
BearwallowPisgah National Forest4,113
Jarrett CreekPisgah National Forest7,485
South Mills RiverPisgah National Forest8,588
Oregon (8)
AreaForestAcres
Bull Of The WoodsMt. Hood National Forest8,843
Gordon MeadowsWillamette National Forest9,463
Hebo 1aSiuslaw National Forest13,930
Mt. JeffersonDeschutes National Forest2,282
Opal CreekWillamette National Forest5,417
TenmileSiuslaw National Forest10,818
West - South BachelorDeschutes National Forest25,994
WoahinkSiuslaw National Forest5,309
Tennessee (1)
AreaForestAcres
Beaver Dam CreekCherokee National Forest5,070
Virginia (5)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekJefferson National Forest18,274
Beards MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,505
Beaver Dam CreekJefferson National Forest1,135
North MountainJefferson National Forest8,377
Three RidgesGeorge Washington National Forest4,745
Washington (4)
AreaForestAcres
BackboneGifford Pinchot National Forest1,201
Glacier Peak KMt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest47,269
Mt. Baker WestMt Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest25,390
South QuinaultOlympic National Forest11,081
West Virginia (1)
AreaForestAcres
Seneca CreekMonongahela National Forest22,287
References (33)
  1. Abrams, L. 1940. Illustrated flora of the Pacific states: Washington, Oregon, and California. Vol. 1. Ophioglossaceae to Aristolochiaceae. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, California. 538 pp.
  2. Antonovics, J. 1972. Population dynamics of the grass Anthoxanthum odoratum on a zinc mine. J. Ecology. 60:351-365.
  3. Antonovics, J. 1984. Genetic variation within populations. Pp. 229-241 in R. Dirzo and J. Sarukhan (ed.), Perspectives of plant population ecology. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
  4. Berendse, F. 1982. Competition between plant populations with different rooting depths. III. Field experiments. Oecologia 53:50-55.
  5. Berendse, F. 1983. Interspecific competition and niche differentiation between Plantango lanceolata and Anthoxanthum odoratum in a natural hay field. J. Ecology 71:379-390.
  6. Beste, C. E. 1983. Herbicide handbook. Weed Science Society of America, Herbicide Handbook Committee. Champagne, IL.
  7. Dwire, K. A. 1983. Dispersal and colonization of the invading perennial grass, Anthoxanthum odoratum, in annual patches in a California coastal grassland. MS thesis. Univ. of California, Davis.
  8. Fowler, N. 1982. Competition and coexistence in a North Carolina Grassland. III. Mixtures of component species. J. Ecology 70:77-92.
  9. Fryer, J. D. and R. J. Makepeace. 1978. Weed control handbook. Vol. II. Recommendations. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, England.
  10. Grant, M. C., and J. Antonovics. 1977. Biology of ecologically marginal populations of <i>Anthoxanthum odoratum</i>: I. phenetics and dynamics. Evolution 32(4):822-838.
  11. Harris, G. S. 1961. The periodicity of germination in some grass species. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 4:253-260.
  12. Hitchcock, A.S. 1951. Manual of the grasses of the United States. 2nd edition revised by Agnes Chase. [Reprinted, 1971, in 2 vols., by Dover Publications, Incorporated, New York.]
  13. Jepson, W.L. 1925. A manual of the flowering plants of California. Independent Pressroom: San Francisco, CA.
  14. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  15. Kinag, Y. T. 1982. Local differentiation of <i>Anthoxanthum odoratum</i> populations on roadsides. American Midland Naturalist 107:340-350.
  16. Macdonald, C. 1988. Oregon Land Steward, The Nature Conservancy. Memorandum to M. J. Russo, The Nature Conservancy, Western Regional Office. September 11, 1988.
  17. McHenry, J. 1985. University of California, Davis, CA. Personal communication to Don Pitcher.
  18. Muenscher, W. C. 1955. Weeds. The MacMillan Co., New York.
  19. Munz, P.A., and D.D. Keck. 1973. A California Flora and Supplement. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. 1905 pp.
  20. Newberry, D. M. 1979. The effects of decomposing roots on the growth of grassland plants. J. Applied Ecology 16:613-622.
  21. Newman, E. I., and A. D. Rovira. 1975. Allelopathy among some British grassland plants. J. of Ecology 63:727-737.
  22. Remion, S. U. 1978. The effects of decomposing roots on the growth of grassland plants. J. Applied Ecology 16:613-622.
  23. Remison, S. U. and R. W. Snaydon. 1978. Yield, seasonal changes in root competitive ability and competition for nutrients among grass species. J. Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90:115-124.
  24. Roberts, H. A., ed. 1982. Weed control handbook: principles. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, England.
  25. Schonfeld, M. A. and R. J. Chacellor. 1983. Factors influencing seed movement and dormancy in grass seeds. Grass and Forage Science 38:234-250.
  26. Scott, D. 1975. Allelopathic interactions of resident tussock grassland species on germination of oversown seed. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 3:135-141.
  27. Snaydon, R. W. 1970. Rapid population differentiation in a mosaic environment. The response of Anthoxanthum odoratum to soils. Evolution 24:257-269.
  28. Snaydon, R. W. and M. S. Davies. 1972. Rapid population differentiation in a mosaic environment. II. Morphological variation in Anthoxanthum odoratum. Evolution 26:390-405.
  29. Snaydon, R.W. and M. S. Davies. 1976. Rapid population differentiation in a mosaic environment. IV. Populations of Anthoxanthum odoratum at sharp boundaries. Heredity 37:9-25.
  30. Sydes, C. L. 1984. A comparative study of leaf demography in limestone grassland. J. Ecology 72:331-345.
  31. Tuner, C. 1985. USDA Biocontrol Lab in Albany, California. Personal communication to Don Pitcher.
  32. Williams, E.D. 1983a. Germinability and enforced dormancy in seeds of species of indigenous grassland. Annals of Applied Biology 102:557-566.
  33. Williams, E. D. 1983b. Effects of temperature, light, nitrate and pre-chilling on seed germination of grassland plants. Annals of Applied Biology 103:161-172.