Arundo donax

L.

Giant Reed

G5Secure Found in 23 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.151208
Element CodePMPOA0R010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
IUCNLeast concern
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassMonocotyledoneae
OrderCyperales
FamilyPoaceae
GenusArundo
Other Common Names
giant reed (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
Kartesz 1994 recognized two varieties of Arundo donax; Kartesz 1999 no longer distinguishes between varieties.
Conservation Status
Review Date1994-03-22
Change Date1994-03-22
Edition Date1986-09-03
Edition AuthorsMARC HOSHOVSKY, CAFO
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Range Extent Comments
ARUNDO DONAX is a native to the countries surrounding the Mediterranean Sea. From this area it has become widely dispersed, mostly through intentional introduction by man, into all of the subtropical and warm temperate areas of the world.
Threat Impact Comments
Arundo can rapidly invade streambanks and roadside habitats from a few planted individuals. When established, it has a strong ability to outcompete and completely suppress native vegetation. Because it propagates vegetatively, it can form rather pure stands, often at the expense of other plants (Wells et al. 1980). In some areas it may so totally invade irrigation ditches as to reduce their water-carrying capacity (Robbins et al. 1951).

A survey of 48 public agencies listed arundo as one of the top 53 weed species of concern (Armer 1964). Arundo was nominated for Element Stewardship Abstract research by preserve managers from Santa Rosa Plateau and Creighton Ranch.
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

ARUNDO DONAX has been widely planted throughout the warmer areas of the U.S. as an ornamental. It is especially popular in the Southwest where it is used along ditches for erosion control (Perdue 1958). In California, giant reed has escaped cultivation and has become established in moist places, such as ditches, streams, and seeps in arid and cismontane regions (Robbins et al. 1951). As early as 1820 it was so plentiful along the Los Angeles River that it was gathered for roofing materials (Robbins et al. 1951). A. DONAX tolerates a wide variety of ecological conditions. It is reported to flourish in all types of soils, from heavy clays to loose sands and gravelly soils.

Plants grow best in well-drained soils where abundant moisture is available (Perdue 1958). It can spread from the water's edge up the banks and far beyond the zone previously occupied by riparian woody vegetation (Wells et al. 1980). ARUNDO DONAX was observed to grow well where water tables were close to, or at, the soil surface (Rezk and Edany 1979). Individual plants can tolerate excessive salinity (Perdue 1958).

Giant reed can be seriously retarded by lack of moisture during its first year, but drought causes no great damage to patches two- to three-years old (Perdue 1958). Individuals will survive extended periods of severe drought accompanied by low-pressure humidity or periods of excessive moisture (Perdue 1958). Arundo's ability to tolerate or even grow well under conditions of extreme drought is due to the development of coarse, drought- resistant rhizomes and deeply penetrating roots that can reach moisture at depth. A. DONAX can survive very low temperatures when dormant but is subject to serious damage by frosts after the start of spring growth (Perdue 1958).

Giant reed has played an important role in the culture of the western world through its influence on the development of music, which can be traced back 5000 years. The basis for the origin of the most primitive pipe organ, the Pan pipe or syrinx, was made from A. DONAX. Reeds for woodwind musical instruments are still made from the culms and no satisfactory substitutes have been developed (Perdue 1958).

Even before its musical qualities were appreciated, Egyptians used giant reed as early as 5000 B.C. to line underground grain storage. Mummies of the Fourth Century A.D. were wrapped in arundo leaves. Other uses for giant reed include: basket-work, garden fences and trellises, chicken pens, crude shelters, fishing rods, arrows, erosion control, livestock fodder, pulp and ornamental plants. Medicinally, the rhizome has been used as a sudorific, a diuretic, as an antilactant and in the treatment of dropsy (Perdue 1958).

Reproduction

Very little information is available in the literature regarding the biology of A. DONAX.

Perdue (1958) reports that arundo does not produce viable seeds in most areas where it is apparently well-adapted, although plants have been grown in scattered locations from seed collected in Asia.

Wind dispersal of seeds is facilitated by having a dense seed head on the end of a tall, flexible culm, presumably catapulting the seeds a fair distance. The importance of sexual reproduction to the species, as well as seed viability, dormancy, germination and seedling establishment, have yet to be studied and published.

Much of the cultivation of arundo throughout the world is initiated by planting rhizomes which root and sprout readily. Wild stands in the U.S. have been reported to yield 8.3 tons of oven-dry cane per acre (Perdue 1958).

Giant reed grows rapidly. Growth rates up to 0.7 meters/week over a period of several months under favorable conditions is not unusual. Young culms develop the full diameter of mature canes; further growth involves thickening of the walls. The new growth is soft, very high in moisture and has little wind resistance (Perdue 1958).
Terrestrial Habitats
Suburban/orchardUrban/edificarian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesNNA
ProvinceRankNative
ColoradoSNANo
TennesseeSNANo
HawaiiSNANo
North CarolinaSNANo
ArizonaSNANo
West VirginiaSNANo
LouisianaSNANo
MarylandSNANo
AlabamaSNANo
GeorgiaSNANo
IllinoisSNANo
VirginiaSNANo
MissouriSNANo
KentuckySNANo
KansasSNANo
ArkansasSNANo
TexasSNANo
OklahomaSNANo
MississippiSNANo
NevadaSNANo
South CarolinaSNANo
FloridaSNANo
CaliforniaSNANo
New MexicoSNANo
UtahSNANo
Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, SPRING-FLOWERING, SUMMER-FLOWERING
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (23)
Arizona (5)
AreaForestAcres
Blind Indian CreekPrescott National Forest26,847
GoldfieldTonto National Forest15,257
Lime CreekTonto National Forest42,568
PinalenoCoronado National Forest130,920
TumacacoriCoronado National Forest44,594
California (16)
AreaForestAcres
CajonSan Bernardino National Forest7,548
ColdwaterCleveland National Forest8,402
Cucamonga BSan Bernardino National Forest11,933
Fish CanyonAngeles National Forest29,886
LaddCleveland National Forest5,300
Magic MountainAngeles National Forest15,542
Malduce BuckhornLos Padres National Forest14,177
NordhoffLos Padres National Forest12,031
Red MountainAngeles National Forest8,034
San Gabriel AddAngeles National Forest2,527
San SevaineSan Bernardino National Forest6,866
Sespe - FrazierAngeles National Forest4,254
Sespe - FrazierLos Padres National Forest106,910
TrabucoCleveland National Forest23,341
WestforkAngeles National Forest4,407
WildhorseCleveland National Forest1,483
Louisiana (1)
AreaForestAcres
Saline Bayou W & S River CorridorKisatchie National Forest5,355
New Mexico (1)
AreaForestAcres
Virgin CanyonSanta Fe National Forest6,068
References (24)
  1. Ahmed, M., A. Jabbar, and K. Samad. 1977. Ecology and behavior of Zyginidia guyumi (Typholocyloinae:Cicadellidae) in Pakistan. Pak. J. Zool. 9(1): 79-85.
  2. Andres, L. 1979. Untitled. Unpublished manuscipt. Copy on file at the Nature Conservancy, California Field Office, 785 Market Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103.
  3. Armer, A. 1964. Report by the statewide control committee of the California State Chamber of Commerce.
  4. Arnold, W. J. and L. E. Warren. 1966. Dowpon C. Grass Killer - a new product for controlling perennial grasses such as Johnson grass and Bermuda grass. Down to Earth 21(4):14-16.
  5. Cozzo, D. 1972. [Initial behavior of Ailanthus altissima in experimental plantation]. Revista Forestal Argentina 16(2):47-52 (in Spanish).
  6. Daar, S. 1983. Using goats for brush control. The IPM Practioner 5(4):4-6.
  7. Dufay, C. 1979. [Phothedes dulcis, new record for the French fauna (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)]. Alexanor 11(2):82-84 (in French).
  8. Fratteggiani-Bianchi, R. 1963. [Possibilities of using the leaves of the common cane (A. donax) in animal feeding]. Riv. Zootec., Milano 36(6):343-353.
  9. Fuller, T. C. and G. D. Barbe. 1985. The Bradley method of eliminating exotic plants from natural reserves. Fremontia 13:(2): 24-26.
  10. Horng, L. C. and L. S. Leu. 1979. Control of five upland perennial weeds with herbicides. Pp. 165-167 in Proc. 7th Asian-Pacific Weed Sci. Soc. Conference.
  11. Jones and Stokes Associates. 1984. Transmission right-of-way vegetation management program: analysis and recommendations. Prepared for Seattle City Light, Seattle, Washington. Copy on file at The Nature Conservancy, California Field Office, 785 Market Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103.
  12. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  13. Kartesz, J.T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. First edition. In: Kartesz, J.T., and C.A. Meacham. Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, N.C.
  14. Perdue, R. E. 1958. Arundo donax - source of musical reeds and industrial cellulose. Econ. Bot. 12(4):368-404.
  15. Rezk, M. R. and T. Edany. 1979. Comparative responses of two reed species to water table levels. Egypt. J. Bot. 22(2):157-172.
  16. Robbins, W. W., M. K. Bellue, and W. S. Ball. 1951. Weeds of California. California Dept. Agric., Sacramento.
  17. Tucker, R. W. E. 1940. An account of Dicatraea saccharalis with special refernce to its occurrence in Barbados. Trop. Agric., Trinidad 17:133-138.
  18. United States Department of Agriculture. 1984. Pesticide background statements. Vol. I: Herbicides. Agric. Handbook No. 633, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
  19. Veselack, M. S. and J. J. Nisbet. 1981. The distribution and uses of Arundo donax (abstract). Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 90:92.
  20. Watson, H. K. 1977. Present weed control projections for the year 2001. Unpublished manuscript. Copy on file at The Nature Conservancy, California Field Office, 785 Market Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103.
  21. Weed Science Society of America. 1983. Herbicide handbook.
  22. Wells, M. J., K. Duggan, and L. Henderson. 1980. Woody plant invaders of the central Transvaal. Pp. 11-23 in Proc. 3rd National Weeds Conf. South Africa.
  23. Wynd, F. L., G. P. Steinbauer, and N. R. Diaz. 1948. <i>Arundo donax</i> as a forage grass in sandy soils. Lloydia 11(3):181-184.
  24. Zuniga, G.E., V. H. Argandona, H. M. Niemeyer, and L. J. Corcuera. 1983. Hyroxamic content in wild and cultivated Gramineae. Phytochemistry 22(12):2665-2668.