Carduus pycnocephalus

L.

Italian Thistle

GNRUnranked Found in 31 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
GNRUnrankedGlobal Rank
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.155762
Element CodePDAST1S050
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderAsterales
FamilyAsteraceae
GenusCarduus
Other Common Names
Italian plumeless thistle (EN) Italian Plumeless-thistle (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Review Date1994-03-22
Change Date1994-03-22
Edition Date1988-10-18
Edition AuthorsDON PITCHER [86-12-04], MARY J. RUSSO (Revision)
Range Extent Comments
Carduus pycnocephalus originated in western and southern Europe but today is widespread throughout temperate parts of the world. It is a serious pest in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Pakistan, Iran, and Europe. In the U.S. it is found in only a few parts of Texas and Arkansas but is rapidly spreading and "out of control" in most of California (Dunn 1976). C. pycnocephalus apparently arrived in California during the 1930s (Goeden 1974).
Ecology & Habitat

Diagnostic Characteristics

Carduus pycnocephalus can be distinguished from other thistle species by its relatively small and few terminal flowerheads and narrow phyllaries with copious tiny, firm, forward-pointing hairs, especially on the midrib (Hitchcock and Cronquist 1973).

Habitat

It displaces desirable forage or cover plants, but more commonly colonizes disturbed habitats where interspecific competition is less intense (Goeden 1974). It is most abundant in coastal areas and occurs as a weed of pastures, ranges, roadsides, rural areas, fallow cropland, railroad rights-of-way, field margins, and ditchbanks (Goeden and Ricker 1978).

However, this weed does displace more desirable forage or cover plants. The blanketing effect of overwintering rosettes can severely reduce the establishment of other plants, as the leaves of the rosette can become erect in dense stands (Parsons 1973). If there is reasonable ground cover during the late summer and autumn the thistle will not invade a site, but it will come in following overgrazing or creation of fire breaks (Parsons 1973). Drought favors a rapid increase in the thistle population. On soils of naturally high fertility, thistle invasion can be expected at an earlier stage than on poorer soils. Thistles will invade basalt soils earlier than granite soils, and granite soils before sedimentary soils (Wheatley and Collett 1981).(Goeden and Ricker 1978).

C. pycnocephalus has been rapidly spreading on rangelands previ- ously dominated by alien annual grasses (Evans et al. 1979). This is partly due to its germination requirements and timing. C. pycnocephalus germinates at temperature and moisture regimes and in seedbed environments which would inhibit the germination of the alien annual grass species that presently dominate California grasslands. The seeds start to germinate in the fall with the first effective rain. Seedlings grow through the winter as rosettes and produce flowering stalks in the late spring before the summer drought.

Reproduction

Carduus pycnocephalus reproduces only by seed. It prefers soils of high fertility, and its seedlings establish best on bare or disturbed sites (Wheatley 1971, Parsons 1973).

C. pycnocephalus seeds are mucilaginous, unlike most other thistles. The mucilage is abundant and adhesive enough to aid in seed dispersal (Evans et al. 1979).

C. pycnocephalus seeds exhibit polymorphism, with brown seeds that have less mucilage and germinate at lower temperatures than silver seeds. The brown seeds do not usually dehisce from the seedheads, and this may be important in the establishment of these seeds in the seedbed litter (Evans et al. 1979). GERMINATION AND GROWTH

Seed germination rate in Carduus pycnocephalus is very high, ranging between 83-96%. The seeds germinate at a wide variety of constant and alternating temperatures. The greatest diurnal fluctuation that supported optimum germination was 10 C for 16 hours and 35 C for 8 hours in each 24-hour period. Even with freezing temperatures during the daily cold period, germination was optimum if warm-period temperatures were from 5 to 20 C (Evans et al. 1979).

No after-ripening is required, and seeds can germinate either rapidly or after a long dormancy period. Seeds of C. pycnocephalus exhibit rapid germination (within 2 weeks) at optimum temperatures (Evans et al. 1979). Bendall (1974) found that 85% of Carduus pycnocephalus seeds produce germination inhibitors, but they are readily leached. The length of time the seeds can survive in the soil is not known but appears to be at least 8 years (Parsons 1973).

C. pycnocephalus can germinate at a variety of soil depths. Generally it does poorly on the surface of a bare seedbed, but on the surface of clay soils it shows 70% germination. At a depth of 0.5-2.0 cm germination is highest, but some seeds germinate to a depth of 8 cm (Evans et al. 1979). Seeds buried 1.3 cm deep show the highest percentage emergence, whereas 20 to 25% of seeds buried 5 to 10 cm deep remain dormant.

The growth of C. pycnocephalus is favored more by the addition of nitrogen than by phosphorus or potassium. High pH (6.5) also favors growth (Bendall 1975). SEED DISPERSAL

C. pycnocephalus does not reproduce vegetatively, but its seeds are well equipped for dispersal by wind because of the large pappus and relatively small size. The distance that seeds can be spread by wind is not known, but it is at least several hundred meters. Seeds are also spread when infested pastures are cut and the hay fed to animals on clean areas. Seed dispersal by water and on animals and machinery is less important (Parsons 1973). Ants may also play a role in dispersing the seeds (Uphof 1942).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesNNA
ProvinceRankNative
HawaiiSNANo
New YorkSNANo
AlabamaSNANo
IdahoSNANo
OregonSNANo
CaliforniaSNANo
TexasSNANo
Plant Characteristics
Economic Value (Genus)Yes
Roadless Areas (31)
California (31)
AreaForestAcres
Arroyo SecoAngeles National Forest4,703
Barker ValleyCleveland National Forest11,940
Black ButteMendocino National Forest15,461
CajonSan Bernardino National Forest7,548
CamuesaLos Padres National Forest8,209
City CreekSan Bernardino National Forest9,997
ColdwaterCleveland National Forest8,402
Cucamonga BSan Bernardino National Forest11,933
Devil GulchSierra National Forest30,490
Fish CanyonAngeles National Forest29,886
Kings RiverSierra National Forest52,999
LaddCleveland National Forest5,300
Malduce BuckhornLos Padres National Forest14,177
MosesSequoia National Forest22,077
NordhoffLos Padres National Forest12,031
Pine CreekCleveland National Forest503
Red MountainAngeles National Forest8,034
San DimasAngeles National Forest7,160
San SevaineSan Bernardino National Forest6,866
Santa CruzLos Padres National Forest21,182
Sespe - FrazierAngeles National Forest4,254
Sespe - FrazierLos Padres National Forest106,910
Sheep MountainAngeles National Forest21,098
Sill HillCleveland National Forest5,294
Slate Mtn.Sequoia National Forest12,299
Stanley MountainLos Padres National Forest14,674
TequepisLos Padres National Forest9,080
TrabucoCleveland National Forest23,341
TuleAngeles National Forest9,861
WestforkAngeles National Forest4,407
White LedgeLos Padres National Forest18,632
References (34)
  1. Baloch, G.M., A.G. Khan, and M. Mushtaque. 1971. Biological control of CARDUUS spp. (Compositae: I. Insects associated with these in West Pakistan). Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Technical Bulletin 14:51-58.
  2. Baloch, G.M., and A.G. Khan. 1973. Biological control of CARDUUS species. II. Phenology, biology and host-specificity of TERELLIA SERRATULAE L. (Diptera: Trypetidae). Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Technical Bulletin 16:11-22.
  3. Batra, S.W.T., J.R. Coulson, P.H. Dunn, and P.E. Boldt. 1981. Insects and fungi associated with CARDUUS thistles (Compositae). USDA Technical Bulletin No. 1616. 100 pp.
  4. Bendall, G.M. 1974. Slender thistles in pasture: control by grazing management. Tasmanian Journal of Agricultural Research 45:62-63.
  5. Bendall, G.M. 1975. Some aspects of the biology, ecology, and control of slender thistle, CARDUUS PYCNOCEPHALUS L. and C. TENUIFLORUS Curt. (Compositae), in Tasmania. Journal of Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 41:52-53.
  6. Bendall, G.M. 197. The control of slender thistle, CARDUUS PYCNOCEPHALUS L. and CARDUUS TENUIFLORUS Curt. (Compositae), in pasture by grazing management. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 24:831-837.
  7. Bolt, P.E., G. Campobasso, and E. Colonnelli. 1980. Palearctic distribution and host plants of CEUTORHYNCHS TRIMACULATUS and TRICHOSIROCALUS HORRIDUS (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 73:694-698.
  8. Dunn, P.H. 1976. Distribution of CARDUUS NUTANS, C. ACANTHOIDES, C. PUCNOCEPHALUS, and C. CRISPUS, in the United States. Weed Science 24:518-524.
  9. Evans, R.A., J.A. Young, and R. Hawkes. 1979. Germination characteristics of Italian thistle (CARDUUS PYCNOCEPHALUS) and slenderflower thistle (CARDUUS TENUIFLORUS). Weed Science 27:327-332.
  10. Goeden, R.D. 1974. Comparative survey of the phytophagous insect faunas of Italian thistle, CARDUUS PYCNOCEPHALUS in southern California and southern Europe relative to biological weed control. Environmental Entomology 3:464-474.
  11. Goeden, R.D. 1978. Initial analyses of RHINOCYLLUS CONICUS (Froelich)(Col. Curculionidae) as an introduced natural enemy of milk thistle (SILYBUM MARIANUM (L.)Gaertner) and Italian thistle (CARDUUS PYCNOCEPHALUS L.) in southern California. Pages 39-50 in K.E. Frick. Biological control of thistles in the genus CARDUUS in the United States.
  12. Goeden, R.D., and D.W. Ricker. 1978. Establishment of RHINOCYLLUS CONICUS (Col. Corculionidae) on Italian thistle in southern California. Environmental Entomology 7:787-789.
  13. Harris, P., and H. Zwolfer. 1971. CARDUUS ACANTHOIDES L., welted thistle, and C. NUTANS L., nodding thistle (Compositae). Pages 76-79 in Biological control programmes against insects and weeds in Canada 1959-68. Tech. Commun. Commonw. Inst. Biological Control 4.
  14. Hawkes, R.B., C.A. Andres, and P.H. Dunn. 1972. Seed weevil released to control milk thistle. California Agriculture, December, p.14.
  15. Hawkes, R.B., L.A. Andres, P.H. Dunn, and D.M. Maddox. 1978. Biological control of problem weeds in non-cropland areas. Pages 71-75 in Proc. 30th Anniversary California Weed Conference.
  16. Hitchcock, C.L., and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest: An Illustrated Manual. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington. 730 pp.
  17. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  18. Kok, L.T. 1979. Influence of temperature and photoperiod on the mortality of diapausing RHINOCYLLUS CONICUS (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 72:206-208.
  19. Kok, L.T. 1980. Compatibility of RHINOCYLLUS CONICUS, TRICHOSIROCALUS HORRIDUS and 2,4-D for CARDUUS thistle control. Proc. V Int. Symp. Biol. Contr. Weeds, Brisbane, Australia:441-445.
  20. Kok, L.T., T.J. McAvoy, G.R. Johnson, and P.H. Dunn. 1982. Further tests on CEUTORHYNCHUS TRIMACULATUS R. as a candidate for the biological control of CARDUUS thistles. Crop Protection 1:67-74.
  21. McHenry, J. 1985. University of California, Davis. Personal communication.
  22. Munz, P.A., and D.D. Keck. 1973. A California Flora and Supplement. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. 1905 pp.
  23. Oliveri, I. 1984. Effect of PUCCINIA CARDUI-PYCNOCEPHALI on slender thistles (CARDUUS PYCNOCEPHALUS and C. TENUIFLORUS). Weed Science 32:508-510.
  24. Parsons, W. T. 1973. Noxious weeds of Victoria. Inkata Press, Ltd., Melbourne, Australia. 300 pp.
  25. Schroeder, D. 1980. The biological control of thistles. Biocontrol News and Information 1:9-26.
  26. Tasmanian Department of Agriculture. 1977. Annual report 1976-77. Tasmania, Government Printer. No. 64. 88 pp.
  27. Taylor, R.L. 1977. Control of winged and slender winged thistles. Proc. 30th New Zealand Weed and Pest Control Conference: 38-41.
  28. Trumble, J.T., and L.T. Kok. 1980a. Impact of 2,4-D on CEUTHORHYNCHIDIUS HORRIDUS (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and their compatibility for integrated control of CARDUUS thistles. Weed Research 20:73-75.
  29. Trumble, J.T., and L.T. Kok. 1980b. Integration of thistle-head weevil and herbicide for CARDUUS thistle control. Protection Ecology 2:57-64.
  30. Turner, Charles. 1985. USDA Biological Control Lab, Albany, California. Personal Communication.
  31. Uphof, J. C. Th. 1942. Ecological relations of plants with ants and termites. The Botanical Review 8(9):563-598.
  32. Wheatley, W. M. 1971. Thistles - Prickly problem of pasture improvement. The Agricultural Gazette of New South Wales 82(5): 258-261.
  33. Wheatley, W.M., and I.J. Collett. 1981. Winning the thistle war. Agricultural Gazette of New South Wales 92:25-28.
  34. Wolley, G. 1986. Former Preserve Manager, The Nature Conservancy, Ring Mountain Preserve, California. Personal communication.