Chaenotheca chrysocephala

(Turner ex Ach.) Th. Fr.

a stubble lichen

G4Apparently Secure (G4G5) Found in 4 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
HighThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.1040444
Element CodeNLCAL07060
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryFungus
KingdomFungi
PhylumAscomycota
ClassAscomycetes
OrderCaliciales
FamilyConiocybaceae
GenusChaenotheca
Concept Reference
Esslinger, T. L. 2018. A cumulative checklist for the lichen-forming, lichenicolous and allied fungi of the continental United States and Canada, Version 22. Opuscula Philolichenum 17:6-268. [http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/]
Taxonomic Comments
Esslinger (2018) expands the concept of Chaenotheca chrysocephala to include Coniocybe gracilescens, while Esslinger and Egan (1995) treated them as distinct.
Conservation Status
Review Date2006-06-30
Change Date2002-12-02
Edition Date2002-11-22
Edition AuthorsEric B. Peterson
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
This lichen species has a circumpolar boreal distribution. In North America it is known from coniferous forests in New England west to Oregon and south to California, Arizona and Mexico. It grows on bark and exposed roots of conifers and sometimes on conifer wood (Thomson 1997). Although the distribution and population sizes of this species are large enough to qualify for G5, the significant decline of the species since pre-industrial times may justify reducing the rank slightly to G4G5.
Range Extent Comments
Global distribution "Comon over large parts of Finland, Norway and Sweden. Rare in Denmark [...] This species has a very wide distribution in cool temperate to temperate areas of both hemispheres (Eurasia, North America, Africa, Australasia, and Central and South America)" (Tibell 1999). Within North America, widespread in temperate and boreal regions.
Occurrences Comments
Number of known occurences worldwide is probably > 1000 (including many historic); Number of known occurrences in North America is probably > 300 (808 collections in northeastern North America, Selva personal communication) ; Number of known occurrences in California = ca. 1+; Number of known occurrences in Oregon = 21+; Number of known occurrences in Washington = 1+; Number of known occurrences in British Columbia = 28+. Rikkinen (2003?) reports on 30 locations from the region. Although the number of extant occurrences worldwide is unknown, the North American occurrences (collections) are recent and are mostly extant.
Threat Impact Comments
Worldwide, the species has gone through drastic declines since pre-industrial times. The Pacific Northwest, due to logging, has been no exception. However, the rate of loss in the Pacific Northwest has slowed. Although little is known about the reproductive and dispersal biology of this species, it is thought that the species can overcome some habitat fragmentation and, at this point, is secure from extirpation or extinction. The association with late-successional (100 years +) trees as well as old-growth, suggests that if the current late-successional reserves are maintained in the Pacific Northwest, this species may be poised for a come-back.
Ecology & Habitat
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN5
ProvinceRankNative
Prince Edward IslandS4Yes
LabradorSNRYes
AlbertaS2Yes
Island of NewfoundlandSNRYes
British ColumbiaS5Yes
SaskatchewanS3Yes
QuebecSNRYes
Nova ScotiaS5Yes
New BrunswickS5Yes
OntarioS4Yes
United StatesNNR
ProvinceRankNative
PennsylvaniaSNRYes
MinnesotaSNRYes
WashingtonSNRYes
MontanaSNRYes
Plant Characteristics
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (4)
New Hampshire (1)
AreaForestAcres
WatervilleWhite Mountain National Forest4,312
West Virginia (2)
AreaForestAcres
Tea Creek MountainMonongahela National Forest8,295
Turkey MountainMonongahela National Forest6,421
Wisconsin (1)
AreaForestAcres
09182 - Pentoga RoadChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest5,008
References (10)
  1. Esslinger, T. L. 2018. A cumulative checklist for the lichen-forming, lichenicolous and allied fungi of the continental United States and Canada, Version 22. Opuscula Philolichenum 17:6-268. [http://sweetgum.nybg.org/philolichenum/]
  2. Esslinger, T.L. and R.S. Egan. 1995. A sixth checklist of the lichen-forming, lichenicolous, and allied fungi of the continental United States and Canada. The Bryologist 98(4): 467-549.
  3. Hutten, M., U. Arup, O. Breuss, T. L. Esslinger, A. M. Fryday, K. Knudsen, J. C. Lendemer, C. Printzen, H. T. Root, M. Schultz, J. Sheard, T. Tønsberg, and B. McCune. 2013. Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi of Yosemite National Park, California. North American Fungi 8(11): 1-47. doi: http://dx.doi:10.2509/naf2013.008.011
  4. Peterson, E. B., and B. McCune. 2000. Enviornmental Relations of Calicioid Lichens and Fungi in a Temperate Landscape. In: Peterson, E. B. Analysis and prediction of patterns in lichen communities over the western Oregon landscape. Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
  5. Peterson, E. B. (Search of personal herbarium on 1 November, 2002). Address: Nevada Natural Heritage Program, 1550 E. College Parkway, Carson City, NV
  6. Rikkinen, J. 2003. Calicioid lichens and fungi in the forests and woodlands of western Oregon. Acta Botanica Fennica 175: 1-41.
  7. Thomson, J.W. 1997. American Arctic Lichens. 2. The Microlichens. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin. 675 pp.
  8. Tibell, L. 1975. The Caliciales of boreal North America. Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses 21(2): 1-128.
  9. Tibell, L. 1999. Caliciales. Nordic Lichen Flora 1: 20-93.
  10. USDA Forest Service, USDI Bureau of Land Management, USDI Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Interagency Species Management System [ISMS] database. Portland, Oregon.