Foeniculum vulgare

P. Mill.

Sweet Fennel

GNRUnranked Found in 32 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
GNRUnrankedGlobal Rank
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.159195
Element CodePDAPI12010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderApiales
FamilyApiaceae
GenusFoeniculum
Other Common Names
Fenouil commun (FR) sweet fennel (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Review Date1994-03-22
Change Date1994-03-22
Edition Date1985-04-30
Edition AuthorsCaitlin Bean, Mary J. Russo (revision).
Rank Reasons
Native to southern Europe and the Mediterranean region; widely cultivated and naturalized in other temperate areas, including the United States.
Range Extent Comments
Foeniculum vulgare is native to southern Europe and the Mediterranean region (Parsons 1973). It has been used for medicinal and culinary purposes at least since Roman times (Garland 1979). It has become naturalized in temperate areas around the world, especially in limey soil near the sea (Garland 1979). It escaped cultivation in the early history of the United States and is now a weed of waste places, roadsides, riverbanks, and other nonagricultural situations (Parsons 1973). Little is known about its introduction to California, where it has become quite abundant. It is especially well established in the central and southern areas of the state (Robbins et al. 1941).
Ecology & Habitat

Diagnostic Characteristics

In California, fennel can be distinguished from other members of the Umbelliferae by its strong anise-like odor. Seedlings have strap-shaped cotyledons that are several times longer than wide. The first and subsequent leaves are pinnately compound into filiform divisions, as are the adult leaves.

Habitat

Foeniculum vulgare seems to tolerate sandy dry soil better than fertile loam, and it seems to prefer acid rather than alkaline soil. Germination occurs within about two weeks at a temperature of 18 C. It can tolerate a range of annual precipitation from 0.3 to 2.6 m and soil pH from 4.8 to 8.3 (Simon et al. 1984).

Reproduction

Foeniculum vulgare has the capacity to reproduce from both its crown and its seeds. "The seeds germinate at almost any time of the year, but plants generally do not flower until 18 months to 2 years. Once a plant is established, flowering stems are produced from the perennial crown each spring. Flowering commences in May and may continue into September. Seeds are produced during the summer and autumn, and the flowering stems die back during winter to be replaced by new growth in late winter. Some stems stay alive towards the base and produce new leaves from nodes along the stems during the winter. New leaves are also produced in winter at the base of the plant" (Parsons 1973).

Dispersal of the seeds by water is of considerable importance and accounts for the occurrence of Foeniculum vulgare along watercourses. Other means of dispersal include vehicles, machinery, wool, animal skins, clothing, mud, and agricultural produce (Parsons 1973).

Reproduction by root division is common knowledge among gardeners interested in increasing their supply of Foeniculum vulgare. This adaptation allows the species to become well established and invade new areas. Occasionally, pieces of fennel crown or root are dragged by cultivation equipment or spread by earthmoving machinery into uninfested areas (Parsons 1973). More commonly, water systems will spread fennel root systems during times of high water.
Other Nations (2)
United StatesNNA
ProvinceRankNative
UtahSNANo
New JerseySNANo
KentuckySNANo
CaliforniaSNANo
New YorkSNANo
South CarolinaSNANo
NevadaSNANo
WashingtonSNANo
MarylandSNANo
TexasSNANo
MaineSNANo
North CarolinaSNANo
MichiganSNANo
OhioSNANo
OregonSNANo
LouisianaSNANo
ArizonaSNANo
DelawareSNANo
FloridaSNANo
GeorgiaSNANo
PennsylvaniaSNANo
ConnecticutSNANo
IowaSNANo
West VirginiaSNANo
New MexicoSNANo
Rhode IslandSNANo
IllinoisSNANo
MassachusettsSNANo
HawaiiSNANo
NebraskaSNANo
TennesseeSNANo
VirginiaSNANo
MissouriSNANo
CanadaNNA
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioSNANo
QuebecSNANo
British ColumbiaSNANo
Plant Characteristics
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (32)
California (23)
AreaForestAcres
Barker ValleyCleveland National Forest11,940
Big Butte ShinboneMendocino National Forest4,265
Big RocksLos Padres National Forest11,866
CajonSan Bernardino National Forest7,548
CamuesaLos Padres National Forest8,209
ColdwaterCleveland National Forest8,402
Cucamonga BSan Bernardino National Forest11,933
De La GuerraLos Padres National Forest5,418
Dry LakesLos Padres National Forest17,043
JuncalLos Padres National Forest12,289
La BreaLos Padres National Forest14,031
LaddCleveland National Forest5,300
Malduce BuckhornLos Padres National Forest14,177
MatilijaLos Padres National Forest5,218
NordhoffLos Padres National Forest12,031
Orleans Mtn. CSix Rivers National Forest15,589
Santa CruzLos Padres National Forest21,182
Sespe - FrazierLos Padres National Forest106,910
Tepusquet PeakLos Padres National Forest5,821
TequepisLos Padres National Forest9,080
TrabucoCleveland National Forest23,341
West GirardShasta-Trinity National Forest37,516
White LedgeLos Padres National Forest18,632
Georgia (1)
AreaForestAcres
Lance CreekChattahoochee National Forest9,025
Idaho (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekCaribou-Targhee National Forest118,582
Montana (1)
AreaForestAcres
North AbsarokaCuster National Forest21,063
Nevada (1)
AreaForestAcres
Alta T - WestHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest3,445
Oregon (1)
AreaForestAcres
North KalmiopsisSiskiyou National Forests91,560
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Texas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Big CreekNational Forests in Texas1,447
Utah (1)
AreaForestAcres
Lewis PeakWasatch-Cache National Forest11,616
Wyoming (1)
AreaForestAcres
Teton Corridor TrailheadsBridger-Teton National Forest286
References (8)
  1. Garland, S. 1979. The complete book of herbs and spices. Viking Press, New York. 287 pp.
  2. Gupta, J. H. and V.P. Srivastava. 1976. A new root rot of fennel caused by FUSARIUM SOLANI. Indian Journal of Mycological Plant Pathology 8: 206.
  3. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  4. Munz, P.A., and D.D. Keck. 1973. A California Flora and Supplement. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. 1905 pp.
  5. Parsons, W. T. 1973. Noxious weeds of Victoria. Inkata Press, Ltd., Melbourne, Australia. 300 pp.
  6. Patterson, T. M. 1967. Departmental trials with Tordon. Weed Abstracts Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, 16 (ref #524).
  7. Robbins, W. W., M.K. Bellue, and W.S. Ball. 1941. Weeds of California. California Dept. of Agriculture. 491 pp.
  8. Simon, J. E., A. F. Chadwick, and L. E. Craker. 1984. Herbs, an indexed bibliography 1971-1980. Archon Books, Hamden, Connecticut.