Gopherus morafkai

Murphy, Berry, Edwards, Leviton, Lathrop, and Riedle, 2011

Sonoran Desert Tortoise

G4Apparently Secure Found in 15 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
VulnerableIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.102195
Element CodeARAAF01013
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNVulnerable
CITESAppendix II
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassChelonia
OrderTestudines
FamilyTestudinidae
GenusGopherus
Synonyms
Gopherus agassizii (Sonoran Population)
Other Common Names
Desert Tortoise - Sonoran Population (EN) Morafka's desert tortoise (EN)
Concept Reference
Edwards, T., A.E. Karl, M. Vaughn, P.C. Rosen, C. Melendez Torres, and R.W. Murphy. 2016. The Desert Tortoise trichotomy: Mexico hosts a third, new sister-species of tortoise in the Gopherus morafkai-G. agassizii group. ZooKeys- 562:131-158.
Taxonomic Comments
The Sonoran population of the desert tortoise (east and south of the Colorado River) is recognized as a distinct species (Gopherus morafkai), while the Mohave population (west and north of the Colorado River) retain the name G. agassizii (Murphy et al. 2011). Southernmost populations of G. morafkai in Mexico are recognized as a distinct species (Gopherus evgoodei) by Edwards et al. (2016).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-05-07
Change Date2003-01-23
Edition Date2025-05-07
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G. (2011); rev. R. L. Gundy (2025)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
This species has a limited range in southern Arizona, U.S. and Sonora, México where it occupies Sonoran desert scrub. The population size is large and currently stable, although it faces a number of threats. Increasing temperatures and droughts are likely the greatest threats.
Range Extent Comments
This species is found in Sonoran desert scrub in the southwestern United States and northwestern México. The range extends east and south of the Colorado River in Arizona and south into Sonora (including Isla Tiburon) on the west side of the Sierra Madre Occidental to the vicinity of Hermosillo (Berry et al. 2002, Murphy et al. 2011, Edwards et al. 2016). It can be found near sea level to around 1,420 meters, with individual observation records as high as 2,380 meters (Flesch et al. 2010). Using Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) (2025) records, range extent is estimated to be 257,305 km² (RARECAT 2025).

Natural hybrids with G. agassizii occur in northwestern Arizona where the Mohave and Sonoran ecosystems interdigitate (McLuckie et al. 1999), and with G. evgoodei occur along the ecotone of Sonoran desert scrub and Sinaloan thorn scrub (Edwards et al. 2016).

This tortoise (or its hybrids with G. agassizii) have been introduced in Baja California and probably elsewhere (Murphy et al. 2011). This part of the range is not included in this assessment.
Occurrences Comments
Using GBIF (2025) records, 332 occurrences are estimated (RARECAT 2025).
Threat Impact Comments
Declines have resulted from myriad factors, including habitat loss, degradation, and fragmentation caused by urbanization, agricultural development, livestock and feral burro grazing, invasion of exotic annual plants (which fuel local fires), energy and mineral development, and ORV use, mortality on roads, disease, vandalism (illegal shooting), and collecting. These factors vary regionally in their severity. Heavy grazing, especially by sheep, alters forage availability and protein content, and it also removes the desert soil crust, inducing soil compaction and increasing erosion. A high fiber/low protein diet, as can happen when invasive plants outcompete native food plants, can retard the age of first reproduction of Gopherus tortoises by more than five years, which would have significant demographic consequences (Tracy 1992, USFWS 2021). The increasing frequency and size of wildfires, generally human-induced, is a minor threat due to direct mortality (USFWS 2021). Resultant changes in habitat (e.g., species composition, habitat structure) due to fire do not appear to be threatening this species (Shryrock et al. 2015, USFWS 2021). The increasing frequency and duration of droughts due to climate change is expected to result in moderate reductions in adult survival (USWFS 2021). Though development and conversion to agriculture is increasing in the range, these activities are not expected to cause large declines because they generally take place in flat areas not preferred by this species (USFWS 2021). Roads are generally avoided by this species, which essentially results in habitat fragmentation and can result in decreases or loss of gene flow (USFWS 2021, Sutor et al. 2023, Sutor et al. 2024). Releases of non-native desert tortoises into areas occupied by native populations pose a potential threat because of the possible introduction of disease, competition between released and native tortoises for limited resources, and possible outbreeding depression (Bury et al. 1994).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

This is a typical land-dwelling tortoise with all the diagnostic external features: head is roofed with small unevenly sized scales; front feet are club shaped, scaled, and terminate in unwebbed toes with broad, thick claws; the hindlegs are columnar and elephantine, again with unwebbed broad claws; the carapace is highly domed, steep sided and flattened dorsally, brown (dull yellow to light brown in young), and has prominent growth lines; unhinged plastron is yellowish and generally has prominent growth lines; limbs are stocky; tail is short; adult carapace length 20-36 cm.

Compared to females, adult males average larger in size, have longer gular shields, a larger lump (chin gland) on each side of the lower jaw (especially in the spring), and a concave rather than flat plastron, especially in the posterior/femoral area (Stebbins 1985). Males have broader and thicker tails and thick toenails. Sexing individuals less than 15 years old and/or less than 200mm straight carapace length may be difficult by external morphology alone. See Rostal et al. (1994) for information on the use of plasma testosterone and laparoscopy to identify the sex of neonates (hatchlings) and immatures.

The age of juvenile tortoises up to approximately 20-25 years old may be determined by counting concentric annual rings radiating outward from the areolar center of each shell scute. The second right costal scute is recommended for age accounts. After 25 years shell wear and shedding of juvenile rings may obscure rings previously accrued (Germano 1988). However, such "growth rings" are annular only in localities in which plant forage growth is confined to a single season (Miller 1932). Areas with multiple peaks in primary production (driven by rainfall) in the Sonoran Desert, and captive raised tortoises, may exhibit multiple rings for a given year.

The eggs are pale, elliptical to spherical, brittle shelled, and relatively large (averaging 30-40 mm in diameter, and 20-40 g). Fertile egg shells usually become an opaque chalky white within the week following deposition, but become increasingly pink or gray and translucent if they are infertile or dead.

Diagnostic Characteristics

This species differs from box turtles (genus Terrapene) in lacking a hinged plastron and in having columnar hindlegs with flattened, rather than pointed and tapered, nails. Differs from the Texas tortoise (G. berlandieri) in having a single axillary scute on each side (rather than paired axillary scutes) and the 5th vertebral scute the broadest (rather than the 3rd). Differs from both the gopher tortoise (G. polyphemus) and the Mexican bolson tortoise (G. flavomarginatus) in having relatively larger hind feet (in the desert tortoise, the distance from the base of the first claw to the base of the fourth claw on the forefoot is approximately equal to the same measurement on the hind foot; in the bolson tortoise the measurement is smaller on the hind foot) (Ernst and Barbour 1989).

Box turtles and Texas tortoises have commonly been brought into the Southwest as pets. The southwestern box turtle (Terrapene ornata luteola) is the one terrestrial chelonian which now overlaps geographically and ecologically with the desert tortoise in the vicinity of Tucson, continuing east through Cochise County, Arizona. In recent years the Russian desert tortoise, Agrionemys (Testudo) horsfieldi has been imported by the pet trade in large numbers. While these tortoises resemble the North American species, their maximum size is a smaller 8" straight midcarapace length, their carapaces tend toward olive-gray rather than brown, and the forelimb toes number four rather than five. Other Eurasian tortoises are occasionally imported, but most have vivid carapace blotches of yellow, brown, or black, and/or a high domed rather than flattened top of the carapace.

Gopherus morafkai differs from G. flavomarginatus and G. polyphemus in having relatively smaller front feet. The distance from the bases of the first to fourth claws is the same on all feet in G. morafkai, whereas in the latter two species the distance from the bases of the first and third claws on the forelimb is about the same as the distance between the bases of the first and fourth claws on the hindlimb (Auffenberg and Franz 1978). Gopherus morafkai can be separated from G. berlandieri in having a rounded snout when viewed from above as opposed to a wedge-shaped snout in G. berlandieri (Auffenberg and Franz 1978). Also, the gular projections in G. morafkai normally do not diverge, and morafkai has a single axillary scale preceding each bridge, whereas in G. berlandieri the gular projections often diverge and the axillary scales are often paired (Murphy et al. 2011). Gopherus morafkai can be separated from G. agassizii in having a relatively narrower shell, shorter gular scutes, shorter projections of the anal scutes and in having a flatter, pear-shaped carapace (Murphy et al. 2011). Note that reliable identification of captive tortoises can be impossible due to hybridization or abnormalities resulting from poor nutrition.

Habitat

This tortoise occurs in upland habitats of the Sonoran desert scrub (Brown et al. 1979) in areas with rocky outcrops and palo verde-saguaro cactus communities and ecoltonal desert grasslands (Van Devender 2002). Within these habitats, it generally occurs along rocky slopes, or bajadas, of desert mountain ranges (Murphy et al. 2011). Low density population occur along alluvial fans and in intermountain valleys where desert washes and associated caliche caves provide suitable habitat and shelters (Riedle et al. 2008, Grandmaison et al. 2010). These lowland population provide important linakes among disjunct mountain ranges (Edwards 2003, Edwards et al. 2004, Averill-Murray and Averill-Murray 2005).

Sonoran tortoises often retreat into rock crevices or small pallets wedged under boulders, rather than digging deep burrows. On the Florence Military Reservation in south-central Arizona, tortoises concentrated around incised washes with dense caliche caves or near a volcanic hill; tortoises selected incised washes over the other habitat types but apparently avoided washes with few caliche caves (Riedle et al. 2008). Thus availability of shelter sites may strongly influence tortoise distribution and abundance (Averill-Murray et al. 2002, Riedle et al. 2008).

Tortoises are often subterranean when inactive. Sonoran Desert winter dens are typically shorter than Sonoran summer dens (Vaughan 1984). In southeastern Arizona, hibernation dens were primarily on steep south-facing slopes and were often associated with live vegetation, dead or downed vegetation, and/or packrat nests; dens varied in length depending on the sex of the occupant (Bailey et al. 1995). Barrett (1990) also found that tortoises in the Sonoran Desert of Arizona hibernated in steep rocky slopes.

Pallets are shallow excavations which often barely cover the tortoise. They provide common summer shelters throughout most of the range and are used as winter shelters only in the southern lowlands (Aufffenberg 1969). Pallets generally are placed under the cover of shrubs. Summer burrows and pallets are particularly fragile and vulnerable to the erosive effects of livestock hoofs, rodent excavation, wind, and rain (Coombs 1977).

Multiple burrow use is common in tortoises, with several burrows utilized by one individual in a single week. In Arizona, individuals used an average of 7.6 dens (Barrett 1990). Winter dens commonly are shared, and even summer burrows temporarily may be cohabited. Therefore, a count of active burrows may not accurately represent local population numbers or densities.

Eggs are laid in shallow depressions, often 3-4 inches deep. In one site in the Sonoran Desert, Arizona, all eggs and hatchlings were observed in washes (Barrett 1990). Nests usually are placed in well-drained, friable soils.

Ecology

The Sonoran Desert populations are patchy (Dodd 1982), occurring on montane foothill islands, but a few southern Arizona sites (5% of total) sustained tortoise densities in excess of 300/sq mi (Burge 1980).

Primary sources of mortality in Arizona include falls in steep rocky habitat, being overturned during combat or mating, and predation by mountain lions (Puma concolor) (Reidle et al. 2010).

A number of organisms are intimately associated with desert tortoise burrows (summarized by Grover and DeFalco 1995): ground squirrels, Peromyscus and pocket mice, kangaroo rats, woodrats, jackrabbits, desert cottontail, domestic cat, spotted skunk, kit fox, burrowing owl, Gambel's quail, poorwill, roadrunner, desert gecko, desert iguana, desert spiny lizard, western whiptail, gopher snake, coachwhip, night snake, Mohave rattlesnake, sidewinder, western rattlesnake, antlion larvae, ground beetles, roaches, silverfish, black widow spider, tarantula, and ticks.

As a result of their unfavorable surface to volume ratio and the high metabolic rate, smaller tortoises are more vulnerable to dehydration (and starvation) than are older/larger individuals. The younger age classes are particularly vulnerable to short-term habitat degradation (occasional overgrazing by livestock) and drought. Immatures lack the lipid reserves and the proportionately larger urinary bladder that allow adults to endure several years of drought with very little effect on physiological homeostasis and reproduction.

Tortoises are effective in retaining water under desert conditions. They have some capacity to switch from water-demanding urea to more conserving uric acid for nitrogen waste elimination when such conservation is needed. In addition, they are more vulnerable to water loss during surface activity when their eyes are open, pulmonary gas exchange is rapid, and the head is extended than when resting or hibernating in a burrow (see Cloudsley-Thompson 1971, Minnich 1977, Schmidt-Nielsen and Bentley 1969, and Nagy and Medica 1986).

Ravens, along with coyotes, feral dogs, and cats are "subsidized" predators that have semi-urban populations enlarged by feeding on the refuse and rodents associated with human garbage dumps and backyards. They may be significant predators on young (< 7 years old or 120 mm plastron length) tortoises. However, in the south-central Mojave Desert, Bjurlin and Bissonette (2004) found that neonatal desert tortoises (G. agassizii) are less susceptible to predation than was previously thought, perhaps because of their cryptic coloration and secretive habits. The common raven was not found to be a source of neonate mortality.

Reproduction

Courtship and breeding occur in July-September (Averill-Murray et al. 2002). Adult females produce a single clutch in late spring every 1-2 years (Averill-Murray 2002). Clutch size is 1-12 (mean around 6) (Averill-Murray 2002).

Estimate of mean age of sexual maturity was 15.7 years in the Sonoran Desert (Germano 1994). Tortoises with straight plastron midline lengths larger than 200 mm are generally sexually mature, including males in which plastron concavity is not conspicuous.
Terrestrial Habitats
Desert
Other Nations (1)
United StatesNNR
ProvinceRankNative
New MexicoSNANo
ArizonaS4Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentSmall (1-10%)Negligible or <1% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasSmall (1-10%)Negligible or <1% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureSmall (1-10%)Negligible or <1% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsSmall (1-10%)Negligible or <1% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningNegligible (<1%)Negligible or <1% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
3.1 - Oil & gas drillingSmall (1-10%)Negligible or <1% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
3.2 - Mining & quarryingSmall (1-10%)Negligible or <1% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1.1 - Increase in fire frequency/intensityRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11.2 - DroughtsPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11.3 - Temperature extremesPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (15)
Arizona (15)
AreaForestAcres
Black CanyonPrescott National Forest10,683
Black CrossTonto National Forest5,966
BoulderTonto National Forest40,359
Butterfly Roadless AreaCoronado National Forest42,296
Catalina St. Pk. Roadless AreaCoronado National Forest951
Cdo WsaCoronado National Forest1,955
GaliuroCoronado National Forest28,333
GoldfieldTonto National Forest15,257
Happy ValleyCoronado National Forest7,972
Horse MesaTonto National Forest9,146
Lime CreekTonto National Forest42,568
Lower RinconCoronado National Forest3,278
Middle Dragoon RoadlessCoronado National Forest10,543
Oracle RoadlessCoronado National Forest22,365
Upper Romero WsrCoronado National Forest150
References (41)
  1. Auffenberg, W., and R. Franz. 1978. Gopherus berlandieri. Cat. Am. Amph. Rep. 213.1-213.2.
  2. Averill-Murray, R. C. 2002. Reproduction of <i>Gopherus agassizii </i>in the Sonoran Desert, Arizona. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 4:295-301.
  3. Averill-Murray, R. C., and A. Averill-Murray. 2005. Regional-scale estimation of density and habitat use of the desert tortoise (<i>Gopherus agassizii</i>) in Arizona. Journal of Herpetology 39:65-72.
  4. Averill-Murray, R. C., A. P. Woodman, and J. M. Howland. 2002b. Population ecology of the Sonoran desert tortoise in Arizona. Pages 109-134 in Van Devender, T. R., editor. The Sonoran Desert tortoise: natural history, biology, and conservation. University of Arizona Press and Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum, Tucson.
  5. Averill-Murray, R. C., B. E. Martin, S. J. Bailey, and E. B. Wirt. 2002a. Activity and behavior of the Sonoran desert tortoise in Arizona. Pages 135-158 in Van Devender, T. R., editor. The Sonoran Desert tortoise: natural history, biology, and conservation. University of Arizona Press and Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum, Tucson.
  6. Berry, K. H., D. J. Morafka, and R. W. Murphy. 2002. Defining the desert tortoise(s): our first priority for a coherent conservation strategy. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 4:249-262.
  7. Brown, D. E., C. H. Lowe, and C. P. Pase. 1979. A digitized classification system for the biotic communities of North America with community (series) and association examples for the Southwest. Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science 14:1-16.
  8. Bury, R. B., and D. J. Germano. 1994. Biology of North American tortoises. USDI National Biological Survey, Fish and Wildlife Research 13. vi + 204 pp.
  9. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  10. Edwards, T. 2003. Desert tortoise conservation genetics. M.S. thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson.
  11. Edwards, T., A.E. Karl, M. Vaughn, P.C. Rosen, C. Melendez Torres, and R.W. Murphy. 2016. The Desert Tortoise trichotomy: Mexico hosts a third, new sister-species of tortoise in the <i>Gopherus </i><i>morafkai</i>-<i>G</i><i>. agassizii</i> group. ZooKeys- 562:131-158.
  12. Edwards, T., A. E. Karl, M. Vaughn, P. C. Rosen, C. Meléndez Torres, and R. W. Murphy. 2016. The desert tortoise trichotomy: Mexico hosts a third, new sister-species of tortoise in the <i>Gopherus morafkai–G. agassizii </i>group. ZooKeys 562: 131-158. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.562.6124
  13. Edwards, T., C. R. Schwalbe, D. E. Swann, and C. S. Goldberg. 2004. Implications of anthropogenic landscape change on inter-population movements of the desert tortoise (<i>Gopherus agassizii</i>). Conservation Genetics 5:485-497.
  14. Esque, T. C., C. R. Schwalbe, L. A. DeFalco, R. B. Duncan, and T. J. Hughes. 2003. Effects of desert wildfires on desert tortoise (<i>Gopherus agassizii</i>) and other small vertebrates. Southwestern Naturalist 48:103-111.
  15. Flesch, A. D., D. E. Swann, D. S. Turner, and B. F. Powell. 2010. Herpetofauna of the Rincon Mountains, Arizona. Southwestern Naturalist 55:240-253.
  16. Germano, D. J. 1993. Shell morphology of North American tortoises. American Midland Naturalist 129:319-335.
  17. Germano, D. J. 1994a. Growth and age at maturity of North American tortoises in relation to regional climates. Canadian J. Zoology 72:918-931.
  18. Germano, D. J. 1994b. Comparative Life Histories of North American Tortoises. Pp. 175-85 in Bury, R. B. and D. J. Germano (eds.). Biology of North American tortoises. National Biological Survey, Fish and Wildlife Research 13.
  19. Germano, D. J., and R. B. Bury. 1994. Research on North American tortoises: a critique with suggestions for the future. Pages 187-204 in R. B. Bury and D. J. Germano, editors. Biology of North American tortoises. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fish and Wildlife Research 13.
  20. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2025. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2025).
  21. Grandmaison, D. D., M. F. Ingaldi, and C. R. Peck. 2010. Desert tortoise microhabitat selection on the Florence Military Reservation, south-central Arizona. Journal of Herpetology 44:581-590.
  22. Grover, M. C., and L. A. DeFalco. 1995. Desert tortoise (<i>Gopherus agassizii</i>): status of knowledge outline with references. U.S. Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-GTR-316. 135 pp.
  23. Lamb, T., J. C. Avise, and J. W. Gibbons. 1989. Phylogeographic patterns in mitochondrial DNA of the desert tortoise (<i>Xerobates agassizii</i>) and evolutionary relationships among the North American gopher tortoises. Evolution 43:76-87.
  24. McLuckie, A. M., T. Lamb, C. R. Schwalbe, and R. D. McCord. 1999. Genetic and morphometric assessment of an unusual tortoise (<i>Gopherus agassizii</i>) population in the Black Mountains of Arizona. Journal of Herpetology 33:36-44.
  25. Murphy, R. W., K. H. Berry, T. Edwards, A. E. Leviton, A. Lathrop, and J. D. Riedle. 2011. The dazed and confused identity of Agassiz's land tortoise, Gopherus agassizii (Testudines, Testudinidae) with the description of a new species, and its consequences for conservation. ZooKeys 113:39-71.
  26. <p>NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2025. Version: 2.1.1 (released April 04, 2025).</p>
  27. Riedle, J. D., R. C. Averill-Murray, and D. D. Grandmaison. 2010. Seasonal variation in survivorship and mortality of desert tortoises in the Sonoran Desert, Arizona. Journal of Herpetology 44:164-167.
  28. Riedle, J. D., R. C. Averill-Murray, C. L. Lutz, and D. K. Bolen. 2008. Habitat use by desert tortoises (<i>Gopherus agassizii</i>) on alluvial fans in the Sonoran Desert, south-central Arizona. Copeai 2008:414-420.
  29. Rostal, D. C., E. D. McCoy, and H. R. Mushinsky, eds. 2014. Biology and Conservation of North American Tortoises. John Hopkins University Press. 208 pp.
  30. Shryock, D. F., T. C. Esque, and F. C. Chen. 2015. A 30-year chronosequence of burned areas in Arizona—Effects of wildfires on vegetation in Sonoran Desert Tortoise (<i>Gopherus morafkai</i>) habitats: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2015-1060, 61 pp. doi: 10.3133/ofr20151060.
  31. Sutor, S., N. E. McIntyre, and K. L. Griffis-Kyle. 2023. Characterizing range-wide impacts of anthropogenic barriers on structural landscape connectivity for the Sonoran desert tortoise (<i>Gopherus morafkai</i>). Landscape Ecology 38: 1729–1746.
  32. Sutor, S., N. E. McIntyre, and K. L. Griffis-Kyle. 2024. Vegetation cover, topography, and low-traffic roads influence Sonoran desert tortoise (<i>Gopherus morafkai</i>) movement and habitat selection. Movement Ecology 12: 68. doi: 10.1186/s40462-024-00503-8
  33. The Nature Conservancy. 1990. The Desert Tortoise Habitat Conservation Plan: A Status Report to the National Board of Governors. The Nature Conservancy, Great Basin Field Office.
  34. Tracy, C. R. 1992. Modeling the consequences of long length of life and temporal environmental heterogeneity for the herbivorous Mojave desert tortoise, GOPHERUS AGASSIZII. Abstract, 6th Annual Meeting of the Society for Conservation Biology, p. 125.
  35. Turtle Taxonomy Working Group (TTWG) [Rhodin, A. G. J., J. B. Iverson, R. Bour, U. Fritz, A. Georges, H. B. Shaffer, and P. P. van Dijk]. 2021. Turtles of the World: Annotated Checklist and Atlas of Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution, and Conservation Status (9th Ed.). In: Rhodin, A. G. J., J. B. Iverson , P. P. van Dijk, C. B. Stanford, E. V. Goode, K. A. Buhlmann, and R. A. Mittermeier (Eds.). Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group. Chelonian Research Monographs 8:1–472. doi: 10.3854/crm.8.checklist.atlas.v9.2021.
  36. Turtle Taxonomy Working Group [van Dijk, P.P., Iverson, J.B., Shaffer, H.B., Bour, R., and Rhodin, A.G.J.]. 2012. Turtles of the world, 2012 update: annotated checklist of taxonomy, synonymy, distribution, and conservation status. In: Rhodin, A.G.J., Pritchard, P.C.H., van Dijk, P.P., Saumure, R.A., Buhlmann, K.A., Iverson, J.B., and Mittermeier, R.A. (Eds.). Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group. Chelonian Research Monographs No. 5:000.243-000.328. Online. Available: www.iucn-tftsg.org/cbftt/.
  37. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2021. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service species assessment and listing priority assignment form, <i>Gopherus morafkai</i>. Legacy Region 2 – Southwest Region, Arizona Ecological Services Office. 42 pp.
  38. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2020. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Domestic Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notification of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions. Federal Register 85(221):73164-73179.
  39. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 12-Month Finding for the Sonoran Desert Tortoise. Federal Register 87(26):7077-7079.
  40. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022. Review of Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notification of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions. Notification of Review Federal Register 87(85): 26152-26178.
  41. Van Devender, T. R. 2002. Natural history of the Sonoran tortoise in Arizona. Pages 3-28 in Van Devender, T. R., editor. The Sonoran Desert tortoise: natural history, biology, and conservation. University of Arizona Press and Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum, Tucson.