Lonicera japonica

Thunb.

Japanese Honeysuckle

GNRUnranked Found in 40 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
GNRUnrankedGlobal Rank
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.129271
Element CodePDCPR030G0
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderDipsacales
FamilyCaprifoliaceae
GenusLonicera
Other Common Names
Chèvrefeuille du Japon (FR) Japanese honeysuckle (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Review Date1994-03-22
Change Date1994-03-22
Edition Date1987-04-09
Edition AuthorsN. SATHER
Range Extent Comments
Lonicera japonica is native of the Nagasaki area of Japan and was introduced to the United States in 1806 for horticultural purposes (Leatherman 1955). Apparently, Japanese honeysuckle was slow to escape after its first introduction. It was not reported in Chapman's Flora of the Southern States (1884) or the Sixth Edition of Gray's Manual of Botany (1889), but by 1919 was distributed from the Gulf of Mexico to New York and Massachusetts (Andrews 1919). The present range extends from Massachusetts to northern Florida, west to Texas, Kansas and Missouri, and north to Indiana, Illinois and Michigan.
Ecology & Habitat

Diagnostic Characteristics

Lonicera japonica is distinguished from native twining honeysuckles by the fact that members of each pair of its leaves are distinct, whereas at least some of the opposite leaves of native twining species are united (Fernald 1950).

Habitat

Lonicera japonica is generally associated with disturbance and has spread to old fields, roadsides, fence rows, prairies, sand barrens and forest openings. In Pennsylvania, it is a major component of the third stage of succession in old fields, increasing after fields have been abandoned for four years (Keever 1979). Light appears to be the major limiting factor (Andrews 1919, Leatherman 1955, Thomas 1974), but recent studies suggest that Japanese honeysuckle can invade established woodlands when natural processes such as storms or Dutch elm disease create canopy openings (Thomas 1974, Slezak 1976). Invasion is particularly effective in moist woodlands and floodplain forests (Andrew 1919, Snyder pers. comm., Wistendahl 1958). Slezak (1976) found that in poorly drained areas the frequency of Japanese honeysuckle decreased with increasing canopy closure and understory closure had no significant effect. In well-drained areas, however, the frequency of Japanese honeysuckle was inversely correlated with closure of the subcanopy, but canopy coverage was not correlated with honeysuckle frequency (Slezak 1976). Japanese honeysuckle is one of the few species that can withstand pollution from heavy metals and SO2 (Caiazza and Quinn 1980).

Infestations have reached pest proportions in areas with annual precipitation of at least 100 cm and mean January temperatures of at least -1 C and freezing January night temperatures at least 5% of the nights (Leatherman 1955).

No discussion of the habitat of Japanese honeysuckle would be complete without mentioning that Lonicera japonica is still being propagated and promoted for use as a groundcover in areas where it has not reached pest proportions.

Ecology

The invasive ability of Japanese honeysuckle is the result of an interplay of four biological factors: the dispersal of its seeds by birds into light gaps of otherwise closed forests; its ability to propagate by vegetative runners; its particular method of twining, which restricts it to climbing vegetation with a small diameter but prevents its climbing the boles of mature trees; and its persistent evergreen leaves that permit photosynthesis during periods when the invaded vegetation is dormant.

Japanese honeysuckle blooms most prolifically in sunny situations where the opportunity for vegetative proliferation is restricted (Andrews 1919). Although the flower appears to be specialized, the plant is believed not to be dependent on any single insect because its blooming period extends from April to December in Georgia (Andrews 1919) and late May to October in Kentucky (Sather pers. obs.).

The inconspicuous black berries each contain three seeds (USDA 1971), which are dispersed by birds from light gap to light gap in forest (Martin et al. 1951). Seedlings are believed to photosynthesize soon after germination because their food content is low (Leatherman 1955). Despite the abundance of data relating to light requirements, most experimental studies have been conducted on cuttings, with no information on the light requirements for germination. Light requirements are probably not high because seedlings are known to become established in shaded understories. Little and Somes (1967) report that seedling growth is slow for the first two years of life. Because of their slow growth rate, new plants are unable to take advantage of canopy gaps. Once established, honeysuckle can persist at low light levels without noticeable growth and respond to increased light with more vigorous runner production.

In studies designed to measure the effect of shading on forage production in Texas, Blair et al. (1983) grew honeysuckle under light-intensities of 92%, 55%, and 0% of full sunlight. Although shade did not affect the timing of phenological events, there was a significant inverse relationship between leaf dry matter and light intensity at all levels of shading. In the deepest shade, new leaders were formed but died back.

Leatherman (1955) found that about half of her experimental cuttings survived at 10% of full sunlight and that at 25% full sunlight survival was good. There was no significant difference in the dry weight production between plants grown in 25% of full sunlight and those grown in full sunlight (Leatherman 1955).

Slezak (1976) divided honeysuckle-infested plots into density and vigor classes and found that vigor (measured by the number of vegetative runners) was adversely affected by shading of less than 3% of full sunlight, but density was unaffected. In experimental studies at Theodore Roosevelt Island National Park, Thomas (1980b) demonstrated that Japanese honeysuckle produced good growth at 47% of full sun and found from winter light measurements that all closed forest in the park had light levels between 49% and 86% of full sun during the winter months. Japanese honeysuckle is thus well adapted to persist in deciduous forests at low summer light intensities and put on growth when canopy gaps occur or at winter light levels.

Japanese honeysuckle has a long photosynthetic season. In the south, the plant is evergreen. In Illinois leaves fall when winter temperatures reach around 17 centigrades (Schwegman pers. comm. 1987). In areas where it is facultatively deciduous, it is one of the first plants to leaf in the spring. In New Jersey, leaf production begins when soil temperatures are between 1 and 9 centigrades (Leatherman 1955). In Illinois, Japanese honeysuckle produces leaves with the spring ephemerals and retains its leaves through November, allowing at least three months for photosynthesis in otherwise shaded deciduous forests (Schwegman pers. comm. 1987).

Thomas (1980b) calculated that in the Washington, D.C. area there are an average of 52 days a year between first and last frost when temperature and light conditions in closed canopy forests are adequate for honeysuckle photosynthesis. The combination of honeysuckle's ability to photosynthesize at winter temperatures and light levels and its ability to persist under summer shade appear to be the major factors contributing to its destructiveness. In areas where winter temperatures fall too low for the late season photosynthesis to occur, the species is less of a problem.

Japanese honeysuckle produces long twining vegetative runners. Little (1961) found that the combined length of lateral and sublateral runners from one sprout in one year reached 15 meters. In well-lit areas, Slezak (1976) found that 7% of sampled plots contained over 50% plants with seven or more runners over 60 cm in length. These runners serve a dual function. Wherever they come in contact with the soil, runners can produce roots at the nodes, producing dense mats of plants. In addition to their ability to root, the runners create new habitat by their twining habit. Unlike Virginia creeper, which climbs its host by holdfast, or grapevine, which possesses tendrils, honeysuckle climbs by twining around its host. This twining habit limits the diameter of accessible hosts, which may nonetheless be as great as 15 centimeters (Andrews 1919). Honeysuckle is unable to climb boles of mature trees although it uses other lianas to reach the canopy where they are available (Andrews 1919).

The root system of mature Japanese honeysuckle plants has been reported to reach depths as great as a meter and horizontal lengths up to 3 meters (Leatherman 1955). Wherever aboveground runners contact the ground they will root. Once runners from a single parent plant have established roots, they will resprout as separate individual plants if their aboveground parts are severed. Little and Somes (1967) report that it took only two years for honeysuckle to reach pre-treatment densities from root sprouts after a variety of herbicide applications.

Reproduction

Japanese honeysuckle produces long twining vegetative runners. Wherever they come in contact with the soil, runners can produce roots at the nodes, producing dense mats of plants; once runners from a single parent plant have established roots, they will resprout as separate individual plants if their aboveground parts are severed. It blooms most prolifically in sunny situations where the opportunity for vegetative proliferation is restricted (Andrews 1919). The inconspicuous black berries each contain three seeds (USDA 1971), which are dispersed by birds from light gap to light gap in forest (Martin et al. 1951).
Other Nations (2)
United StatesNNA
ProvinceRankNative
LouisianaSNANo
UtahSNANo
West VirginiaSNANo
OklahomaSNANo
Rhode IslandSNANo
MassachusettsSNANo
New JerseySNANo
TennesseeSNANo
HawaiiSNANo
New MexicoSNANo
ConnecticutSNANo
New HampshireSNANo
MissouriSNANo
PennsylvaniaSNANo
FloridaSNANo
WisconsinSNANo
ArizonaSNANo
TexasSNANo
NebraskaSNANo
NevadaSNANo
ArkansasSNANo
MississippiSNANo
KansasSNANo
District of ColumbiaSNANo
OhioSNANo
IndianaSNANo
VirginiaSNANo
CaliforniaSNANo
IowaSNANo
MaineSNANo
DelawareSNANo
South CarolinaSNANo
New YorkSNANo
AlabamaSNANo
MichiganSNANo
KentuckySNANo
GeorgiaSNANo
North CarolinaSNANo
IllinoisSNANo
MarylandSNANo
CanadaNNA
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioSNANo
Plant Characteristics
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (40)
Arkansas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Gee CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest7,957
California (1)
AreaForestAcres
Table Mtn.Inyo National Forest4,215
Georgia (2)
AreaForestAcres
Indian Grave GapChattahoochee National Forest1,020
Rocky MountainChattahoochee National Forest4,269
Idaho (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekCaribou-Targhee National Forest118,582
Indiana (1)
AreaForestAcres
Mogan RidgeHoosier National Forest8,435
Kentucky (1)
AreaForestAcres
WolfpenDaniel Boone National Forest2,835
North Carolina (10)
AreaForestAcres
BearwallowPisgah National Forest4,113
Cheoah BaldNantahala National Forest7,795
Harper CreekPisgah National Forest7,325
Jarrett CreekPisgah National Forest7,485
Laurel MountainPisgah National Forest5,683
Middle Prong AdditionPisgah National Forest1,852
Pond Pine BCroatan National Forest2,961
South Mills RiverPisgah National Forest8,588
Tusquitee BaldNantahala National Forest13,670
Wilson CreekPisgah National Forest4,863
Tennessee (5)
AreaForestAcres
Big Laurel Branch AdditionCherokee National Forest5,577
Devil's BackboneCherokee National Forest4,287
Flint Mill GapCherokee National Forest9,494
Sampson Mountain AdditionCherokee National Forest3,064
Stone MountainCherokee National Forest5,367
Texas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Winters BayouNational Forests in Texas730
Utah (3)
AreaForestAcres
418024Uinta National Forest51,699
Lewis PeakWasatch-Cache National Forest11,616
South FrancisWasatch-Cache National Forest3,374
Virginia (14)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekJefferson National Forest18,274
Beards MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,505
Beaver Dam CreekJefferson National Forest1,135
Broad RunJefferson National Forest10,971
Dolly AnnGeorge Washington National Forest7,855
Gum RunGeorge Washington National Forest12,620
Kelley MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,590
Mountain Lake Addition AJefferson National Forest1,469
North MountainJefferson National Forest8,377
Northern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest9,444
Oak KnobGeorge Washington National Forest10,882
Oliver MountainGeorge Washington National Forest13,090
Southern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest11,985
Three SistersGeorge Washington National Forest8,149
References (19)
  1. Andrews, E. F. 1919. The Japanese honeysuckle in the eastern United States. Torreya 19: 37-43.
  2. Blair, R. M., R. Alcaniz, and A. Harrell. 1983. Shade intensity influences the nutrient quality and digestibility of southern deer browse leaves. Journ. Range Mang. 36: 257-264.
  3. Caiazza, N. A., and J. A. Quinn. 1980. Leaf morphology in Arenaria patula and Lonicera japonica along a pollution gradient. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club 107: 9-18.
  4. Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray's manual of botany. 8th edition. Corrected printing (1970). D. Van Nostrand Company, New York. 1632 pp.
  5. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  6. Keever, C. 1979. Mechanisms of plant succession on old fields of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. Bull Torrey Bot. Club 106: 299-308.
  7. Leatherman, A. D. 1955. Ecological life-history of Lonicera japonica thunb. Ph.D. thesis, University of Tennessee. 97 pp.
  8. Little, S. 1961. Recent tests in controlling Japanese honeysuckle. The Hormolog 3(1): 8-10.
  9. Little, S., and H. A. Somes. 1967. Results of herbicide trials to control Japanese honeysuckle. U.S. Forest Service, Northeast Forest Exp. Sta. Res. Note 62: 18.
  10. Little, S., and H. A. Somes. 1968. Herbicide treatments of Japanese honeysuckle for releasing desirable reproduction or for site preparation. USDA, Forest Service. Northeastern Forest Exper. Sta., Research Note NE-83.
  11. Martin, A.C., H.S. Zim, and A.L. Nelson. 1951. American wildlife and plants: A guide to wildlife food habits. Dover Publications, Inc., New York, NY. 500 pp.
  12. Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles, and C.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. Univ. North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 1183 pp.
  13. Schwegman, J. 1987. Illinois Dept. of Conservation, Springfield, Illinois. Telephone conversation with N. Sather, TNC, MRO. February 10.
  14. Slezak, W. F. 1976. Lonicera japonica Thunb., an aggressive introduced species in a mature forest ecosystem. M. S. Thesis, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey. 81 pp.
  15. Strausbaugh, P.D., and E.L. Core. 1978. Flora of West Virginia. Seneca Books, Inc., Grantsville, WV. 1079 pp.
  16. Thomas, L. K. 1980a. The impact of three exotic plant species on a Potomac island. National Park Service scientific monograph series; No. 13. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 179 pp.
  17. Thomas, L. K., Jr. 1980b. Winter growth of Japanese honeysuckle (<i>Lonicera japonica</i> Thunb.) on Theodore Roosevelt Island, District of Columbia. In Proc. 2nd Conf. on Sci. Res. in the National Parks. Vol. 8: 408-418.
  18. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Services. 1971. Common Weeds of the United States. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
  19. Wistendahl, W. A. 1958. The flood plain of the Raritan River, New Jersey. Ecol. Mon. 28: 143-151.