Malus coronaria

(L.) P. Mill.

Sweet Crabapple

G5Secure Found in 3 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
UnknownThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.960097
Element CodePDROS130H0
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderRosales
FamilyRosaceae
GenusMalus
Synonyms
Pyrus coronariaL.
Other Common Names
American Crabapple (EN) Fragrant Crabapple (EN) Garland Tree (EN) Pommier odorant (FR) Wild Crabapple (EN)
Concept Reference
Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2014b. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 9. Magnoliophyta: Picramniaceae to Rosaceae. Oxford University Press, New York. xxiv + 713 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
This record represents Malus coronaria in the broad sense, following FNA (vol. 9, 2014) including M. angustifolia var. puberula, M. coronaria var. dasycalyx, M. glabrata, and M. glaucescens. In contrast, Kartesz (1994) treats M. coronaria var. coronaria, M. coronaria var. dasycalyx, M. angustifolia var. puberula, M. glabrata, and M. glaucescens as distinct.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-10-23
Change Date2016-02-03
Edition Date2025-10-23
Edition AuthorsSoteropoulos (2025)
Threat ImpactUnknown
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
Malus coronaria is a wide-ranging small tree or shrub found in open woods, forests, oak savannas, occasionally in bottomlands, forest edges, thickets, stream banks, alvars, fields, fencerows, and roadsides. It occurs in eastern North America from southern Ontario, Canada, south through the Great Lakes region to Georgia west to Louisiana. There are over 400 estimated occurrences, which face threats from habitat loss and fragmentation, rights-of-way maintenance, mammal and insect herbivory, hybridization with cultivated apples, and climate change. Little is known about trends. Research is needed to better understand the validity of the purported three Malus taxa in eastern North America, impact of hybridization on native taxa, and threats from nonnative insects.
Range Extent Comments
Malus coronaria occurs in eastern North America from southern Ontario, Canada, south through the Great Lakes region to Georgia west to Louisiana (FNA 2014, Roulston et al. 2025, Weakley and the Southeastern Flora Team 2025). Range extent was estimated to be over 1.5 million square kilometers using herbarium specimens, photo-based observations, and NatureServe Network occurrence data documented between 1994 and 2025 (GBIF 2025, iNaturalist 2025, NatureServe 2025, RARECAT 2025, SEINet 2025).
Occurrences Comments
By applying a 1 km separation distance to herbarium specimens, photo-based observations, and NatureServe Network occurrence data documented between 1994 and 2025, it is estimated that there are over 400 occurrences rangewide (GBIF 2025, iNaturalist 2025, NatureServe 2025, RARECAT 2025, SEINet 2025). This species may be cultivated, and occurrence data was not thoroughly evaluated for evidence of cultivation. Also, difficulty distinguishing this species from other native taxa in eastern North America (M. angustifolia and M. ioensis) may result in an underrepresentation of true abundance.
Threat Impact Comments
Native Crabapples (Malus) in North America face numerous threats. Habitat loss and fragmentation has been the highest threat over time, with additional threats from rights-of-way maintenance, mammal and insect herbivory. New, emerging threats from nonnative insects, hybridization with cultivated apples, and climate change have unknown impacts on future impacts to native Malus populations.

Mammal herbivory has been documented in native populations of Malus in North America. Large mammals, such as deer, moose, and elk, eat nearly all parts of Malus plants, including flowers, fruits, leaves, twigs, and bark; at elevated densities, large mammals can negatively affect populations of Malus by preventing recruitment (Roulston et al. 2025). Small mammals, such as rabbits, hares, squirrels, voles, mice, and porcupines, consume Malus seedlings (Sutton et al. 2014 in Roulston et al. 2025).

Insect herbivory has also been documented in Malus populations. Many insects, including approximately 15% of over 12,000 butterfly and moth species in the United States, use Malus as a host plant (Narango et al. 2020). Most insect herbivory damages leaves, which may reduce photosynthesis but is rarely lethal (Roulston et al. 2025). However, internal insect pests, living within and feeding upon the vascular system of plants, may more acutely impact tree health. There are both native (e.g., Round-headed Apple Tree Borer (Saperda candida, Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)) and nonnative insect pests (e.g., Black Stem Borer (Xylosandrus germanus, Coleoptera: Curculionidae)) that feed on the phloem of Malus (Roulston et al. 2025). Impacts of rapidly expanding nonnative insects, such as Brown Marmorated Stink Bug (Halyomorpha halys Stål, Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), Japanese Beetle (Popillio japonica Newman, Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), and Spotted Lanternfly (Lycorma delicatula White, Hemiptera: Fulgoridae), on wild populations of Malus is largely unknown.

Wild populations of Malus also face threats from introduced genetic material from hybridization with cultivated plants. While the introgression between M. coronaria and cultivated Malus has been quantified in southern Ontario, rangewide impacts are unknown (see references in Roulston et al. 2025). However, hybrid plants do not appear to live to reproductive age or reproduce, possibly due to higher mortality of hybrid plants. Hybridization can lead to population reductions through limiting reproduction, increasing proportions of asexual plants in populations, and decreasing genetic integrity and therefore resilience of plants, impacting their long-term survival.

Climate change is likely to have a strong impact on Malus populations. The life history of Malus species, as woody perennials with long generation times and extended juvenile phases, may inhibit adaption to climate change. Milder winters may reduce cold hardiness, shifting to earlier timing of plant phenology (such as earlier flowering, potentially mismatching with pollinator availability), increasing damage to flowers or flower buds from late-spring frosts, and increasing abundance or expanding distribution of pests and pathogens (Roulston et al. 2025). Alteration in rainfall patterns and water availability during the growing season may lead to increased droughts or prolonged wetness (Volk et al. 2015a). Range shift models predict poleward expansion to entirely new ranges by 2070 (Roulston et al. 2025).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Malus coronaria grows in open woods, forests, oak savannas, occasionally in bottomlands, forest edges, thickets, stream banks, alvars, fields, fencerows, and roadsides (FNA 2014, Roulston et al. 2025, Weakley and the Southeastern Flora Team 2025). It grows in a variety of soil conditions, preferring well-drained soils but tolerating clay-rich soils and occasionally wet conditions (Roulston et al. 2025).

Reproduction

This species has perfect flowers with light pink to white petals, which are self-fertile. The fruits are pomes, which are green or yellow-green, changing to yellow when ripe (FNA 2014, Roulston et al. 2025). Mammals and birds regularly eat the fruits and disperse seeds (FNA 2014).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandForest - HardwoodForest - MixedForest EdgeWoodland - HardwoodWoodland - MixedShrubland/chaparralSavannaOld field
Palustrine Habitats
Riparian
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
PennsylvaniaSNRYes
MarylandSNRYes
LouisianaSNRYes
DelawareSNRYes
IndianaSNRYes
MichiganSNRYes
AlabamaSNRYes
WisconsinSNRYes
GeorgiaSNRYes
New YorkS4Yes
New JerseySNRYes
TennesseeSNRYes
KansasSNRYes
West VirginiaS5Yes
IllinoisSNRYes
North CarolinaSNRYes
ArkansasSNRYes
VirginiaSNRYes
District of ColumbiaSNRYes
MississippiSNRYes
MissouriSNRYes
South CarolinaSNRYes
OhioSNRYes
KentuckySNRYes
CanadaN4
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioS4Yes
Threat Assessments

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, DECIDUOUS, SPRING-FLOWERING
Economic Value (Genus)Yes
Roadless Areas (3)
Virginia (3)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekJefferson National Forest18,274
Mt. PleasantGeorge Washington National Forest8,933
Shawvers Run AdditionJefferson National Forest1,927
References (16)
  1. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2014b. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 9. Magnoliophyta: Picramniaceae to Rosaceae. Oxford University Press, New York. xxiv + 713 pp.
  2. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2025. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2025).
  3. iNaturalist. 2025. Online. Available: https://www.inaturalist.org (accessed 2025).
  4. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  5. Khoury, C. K., S. Greene, J. Wiersema, N. Maxted, A. Jarvis, and P. C. Struik. 2013. An inventory of crop wild relatives of the United States. Crop Science 53(4):1496-1508.
  6. Narango, D.L., Tallamy, D.W., and K.J. Shropshire. 2020. Few keystone plant genera support the majority of Lepidoptera species. Nature Communications 11(1): 5751. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19565-4.
  7. NatureServe. 2025. NatureServe Network Biodiversity Location Data. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
  8. Plants for a Future (PFAF). 2025. Plants for a future database. Online. Available: https://pfaf.org/user/Default.aspx (accessed 2025).
  9. <p>NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2025. Version: 2.1.1 (released April 04, 2025).</p>
  10. Roulston, T.T., Armstrong, C.G., Batstone, M., Bobiwash, K., Borda, S.G., Bunsha, D., Ciotir, C., Husband, B.C., Manning, P., Moreau, T.L., and A.S. Singh. 2025. Conservation challenges and opportunities for native apple (<i>Malus</i>) species in Canada. Plants, People, Planet.
  11. Southwest Environmental Information Network (SEINet). 2025. Collections Databases. Online. Available: https://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/collections/index.php (accessed 2025).
  12. USDA, Agricultural Research Service, National Plant Germplasm System (USDA ARS NPGS). 2025. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN Taxonomy). National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland. Online. Available:https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearchcwr (accessed 2025).
  13. Volk, G.M., Chao, C.T., Norelli, J., Brown, S.K., Fazio, G., Peace, C., McFerson, J., Zhong, G.Y., and P. Bretting. 2015. The vulnerability of US apple (<i>Malus</i>) genetic resources. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 62(5): 765–779.
  14. Volk G.M., Henk, A.D., Baldo, A., Fazio, G., Chao, C.T., and C.M. Richards. 2015. Chloroplast heterogeneity and historical admixture within the genus <i>Malus</i>. American Journal of Botany 102: 1198–1208.
  15. Weakley, A.S., and Southeastern Flora Team. 2025. Flora of the southeastern United States Web App. Edition of February 18, 2025. University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU), North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Online. Available: https://fsus.ncbg.unc.edu (accessed 2025).
  16. Wildflower Center. 2025. Native Plant Database. Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center. Austin Texas. Online. Available: https://www.wildflower.org/plants/ (accessed 2025).