Pholis laeta

(Cope, 1873)

Crescent Gunnel

G5Secure Found in 41 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.106013
Element CodeAFCQR01070
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderPerciformes
FamilyPholidae
GenusPholis
Concept Reference
Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
Formerly Centronotus laeta. Yatsu (1981) included this species in a new nominal genus Allopholis, based on differences in the number of infraorbital bones and presence or absence of a median interorbital head pore. Peden and Hughes (1984) observed overlap in the number of infraorbital bones between Pholis and the proposed Allopholis species and believed these characters were not distinct enough to support grouping in a new genus. Most authors (Robins et al. 1991, Mecklenburg et al. 2002, Mecklenburg 2003) use Pholis laeta. The crescent gunnel is closely related and very similar in appearance to the saddleback gunnel (Pholis ornata). Alaskan specimens collected in the 1990s and previously identified as P. ornata are now believed to be P. laeta (Mecklenburg et al. 2002).
Conservation Status
Review Date2008-01-25
Change Date2005-12-09
Edition Date2008-01-25
Rank Reasons
Apparently widespread throughout the North Pacific Ocean; trend unknown. Pollution by oiling and other contaminants and habitat destruction due to coastal urbanization are of concern.
Range Extent Comments
North Pacific: Aleutian Islands and east along northern Alaska Peninsula to Port Heiden, and Gulf of Alaska shores to northern California at Crescent City; Commander Islands and southeastern Kamchatka (Mecklenburg et al. 2002).
Threat Impact Comments
Intertidal habitats may be threatened by pollution from timber harvest, mining, and agricultural runoff, oil and gas development, oil spills, seafood processing, beachfront development, and sewage discharge (Tindall 2004). Natural perturbations such as earthquakes and scouring incurred by major storms are also potential threats. Although little understood, the effects of climate change will likely result in changes in ocean temperatures, and intertidal community structure and diversity may be affected. In California, researchers have already attributed a reduction in cold-water intertidal species to warming water temperatures (Tindall 2004).
Ecology & Habitat
Other Nations (2)
United StatesNNR
ProvinceRankNative
AlaskaS4Yes
CanadaN5
ProvinceRankNative
British ColumbiaSNRYes
Roadless Areas (41)
Alaska (41)
AreaForestAcres
AnanTongass National Forest36,666
Behm IslandsTongass National Forest4,777
ChichagofTongass National Forest555,858
Chilkat-West Lynn CanalTongass National Forest199,772
Chugach-12Chugach National Forest8,116
Chugach-13Chugach National Forest13,337
College FiordChugach National Forest1,130,818
Copper River WetlandsChugach National Forest85,972
Douglas IslandTongass National Forest28,065
DukeTongass National Forest45,091
EudoraTongass National Forest195,022
Fidalgo-GravinaChugach National Forest257,968
Freshwater BayTongass National Forest44,933
FrostyTongass National Forest39,941
Game CreekTongass National Forest54,469
GravinaTongass National Forest37,381
Green RocksTongass National Forest11,093
HardingTongass National Forest174,349
Juneau UrbanTongass National Forest101,581
Juneau-Skagway IcefieldTongass National Forest1,187,268
KekuTongass National Forest10,869
Kenai MountainsChugach National Forest306,600
LindenbergTongass National Forest25,855
Mansfield PeninsulaTongass National Forest54,991
Nellie JuanChugach National Forest713,697
North BaranofTongass National Forest314,089
North KupreanofTongass National Forest114,660
North RevillaTongass National Forest215,430
Outer IslandsTongass National Forest99,862
Pavlof-East PointTongass National Forest5,399
Port AlexanderTongass National Forest120,681
Prince William Sound Is.Chugach National Forest118,698
RedoubtTongass National Forest68,347
RhineTongass National Forest23,010
Sheridan GlacierChugach National Forest224,683
Sitka SoundTongass National Forest13,459
Sitka UrbanTongass National Forest112,003
South RevillaTongass National Forest52,105
SpiresTongass National Forest533,746
Taku-SnettishamTongass National Forest664,928
Twenty MileChugach National Forest198,775
References (9)
  1. Mecklenburg, C.W. 2003. Family Pholidae Gill 1893. California Academy of Sciences annotated checklists of fishes, No. 9.
  2. Mecklenburg, C. W., T. A. Mecklenburg, and L. K. Thorsteinson. 2002. Fishes of Alaska. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. xxxvii + 1,037 pp.
  3. Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Perez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, and J. D. Williams. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 29, Bethesda, Maryland. 386 pp.
  4. Page, L. M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Seventh edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 34, Bethesda, Maryland.
  5. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.
  6. Peden, A.E., and G.W. Hughes. 1984. Distribution, morphological variation, and systematic relationship of <i>Pholis laeta </i>and <i>P. ornata </i>(Pisces: Pholididae) with a description of the related form <i>P. nea </i>n. sp. Canadian Journal of Zoology 62:291-305.
  7. Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
  8. Tindall, B. 2004. Tidal attraction. Sierra. May/June 2004: 48-55; 64.
  9. Yatsu, A. 1981. A revision of the gunnel family Pholididae (Pisces, Blennioidei). Bull. Natn. Sci. Mus. Ser. A (Zool.), 7:165-190.