Salvia apiana

Jepson

White Sage

G3Vulnerable Found in 66 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
Very high - highThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.134409
Element CodePDLAM1S030
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderLamiales
FamilyLamiaceae
GenusSalvia
Other Common Names
white sage (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
The Jepson Flora Project (2026) does not recognize the infraspecific taxa (var. apiana and var. compacta).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2026-03-13
Change Date2026-03-13
Edition Date2025-11-14
Edition AuthorsMartinez, M. (TNC-HQ); rev. K. Maybury (6/02), rev. L. Oliver (2025)
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
White Sage (Salvia apiana) is a shrub found in coastal sage scrub, chaparral and in the transition zone to yellow pine communities in southern California, United States, and northern Baja California, Mexico. It is the dominant or co-dominant plant species in the Californian coastal sage scrub habitat, however, this ecosystem has seen extensive historical decline and continues to decline from habitat modification throughout its range. Another ongoing threat is poaching for the commercial smudge stick market. Unsustainable harvest practices from poachers who collect large volumes of White Sage at single poaching events, collect the plant during its reproductive season and remove entire plants, are leading subpopulations to extinction throughout its range. Demand for White Sage smudge sticks is driven by both national and international market demand. There is high demand for White Sage on multiple e-commerce platforms, and only a handful of farms cultivate White Sage, not nearly enough to fulfill intense market demand. Increased demand for White Sage smudge sticks is related to the gain in popularity of newer western religions like New Age and Neopaganism, and the adoption of ritualistic fumigation by wellness companies, which began in the 1980s. Another threat to White Sage is the decline of large bodied bees that effectively pollinate the uniquely structured flower. This species has many medicinal and spiritual uses by Native American tribes, and their use and collection methods are sustainable. This species has declined decline in AOO, number of occurrences, Range Extent and habitat quality, but without immediate action to mitigate threats, especially poaching, declines will lead to further fragmentation of subpopulations.
Range Extent Comments
White Sage (Salvia apiana) occurs in southern California south to Baja California, Mexico. It occupies the following floristic provinces in southwestern California: South Coast, Western Transverse Ranges, San Gabriel Mountains, San Bernardino Mountains, San Jacinto Mountains and the western edge of the Desert Province (Hickman 1993). It is also found sporadically in the southern portion of the South Coast Range Province (Averett 2012). In California, its greatest abundance is in the following counties: Riverside, Orange, San Bernardino and San Diego (Montalvo et al. 2017). In Baja California, Mexico, it occurs throughout the Mediterranean Region (Coastal Sage Scrub, Chaparral, California Mountains and Succulent Scrub ecoregions), and the northern Desert Region (Lower Colorado Desert and Central Desert ecoregions) (Rebman et al. 2016). Range Extent was calculated using herbarium records (SEINet 2025).
Threat Impact Comments

Throughout the Californian distribution of White Sage, land modification for human use, frequent fire, invasive species and air pollution threaten the species’ habitat (Krol et al. 2021, Riordan et al. 2018, Bell et al. 2016). These threats interact to increase the overall severity of threat. For example, increasing fire frequency in southern California is shifting species dominance to nonnative annual grasses that compete for resources with native vegetation (Riordan et al. 2018). For species like White Sage that produce abundant seeds, short return fire intervals enable their establishment in new areas of chaparral, but urbanization and other factors encourage conversion to exotic grassland (Riordan and Rundel 2014). At least 50% of the remaining Coastal Sage Scrub habitat in southern California is degraded (Bell et al. 2016). The remaining White Sage population is at high risk of rapid decline or extinction because the habitats where it occurs are at risk (Krol et al. 2021).

There is concern that White Sage's dispersal ability into new suitable habitat in the lower elevation habitats in southern California is increasingly limited by decline in populations of the larger bodied Bombus and Xylocopa bees that effectively transfer pollen among its uniquely shaped flowers and encourage outcrossing (Montalvo et al. 2017). These larger bees are in decline due to habitat loss, disease and reduced floral resources. In southern California these large-bodied bees are more prone to extinction than other species (Schochet et al. 2016, Murray et al. 2009). Bees in the genera Bombus and Xylocopa have shown declines due to habitat fragmentation from agriculture and urbanization, and therefore their pollination services are reduced. The Bombus in southern California are especially sensitive to development (Montalvo et al. 2017). Displacement of carpenter bees by introduced European honey bees may have negative consequences for recruitment, though large numbers of honey bees may successfully pollinate White Sage flowers, compensating for some native bee losses (Ott et al. 2016).

Poaching of White Sage for commercial sale of smudge sticks is an ongoing driver of population decline and extirpation throughout southern California and Baja California, Mexico. Poachers collect White Sage in the spring when it is blooming because it is easily visible, removing entire plants (R. Ramirez, pers. comm., 2025). These practices not only prevent White Sage from recovering at the subpopulation and population levels but also remove a major food source for its specially adapted pollinators.

Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

White Sage occurs on dry slopes, fans and low gradient deposits along streams, typically on north and south-facing slopes, on coarse-to-loamy soils on a variety of bedrock within coastal sage scrub, chaparral communities and yellow pine forests from southern California south to northern Baja, Mexico (Averett 2012, Montalvo et al. 2017). It occurs at elevations below 1,500 metres (Averett 2012). This species occupies a Mediterranean climate zone. Where it occurs along desert edges less than 10 inches in annual precipitation fall, and along foothills more than 25 inches of precipitation fall annually (Montalvo et al. 2017).

Ecology

The coastal sage scrub habitat experiences frequent fire cycles, historically between 20-150 years; White Sage is adapted to this regime and will resprout from basal burls (Krol et al. 2021).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandForest - ConiferShrubland/chaparralDesert
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
CaliforniaSNRYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.3.2 - Intentional use: large scale (species being assessed is the target) [harvest]Large (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive (71-100%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionPervasive (71-100%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
7.1.1 - Increase in fire frequency/intensityPervasive (71-100%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
7.3 - Other ecosystem modificationsPervasive (71-100%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1.1 - Unspecified speciesPervasive (71-100%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (66)
California (64)
AreaForestAcres
AntimonyLos Padres National Forest40,911
Arroyo SecoAngeles National Forest4,703
Barker ValleyCleveland National Forest11,940
Cactus Springs BSan Bernardino National Forest3,106
Cahuilla MountainSan Bernardino National Forest6,952
CajonSan Bernardino National Forest7,548
CalienteCleveland National Forest5,953
CamuesaLos Padres National Forest8,209
Circle MountainSan Bernardino National Forest6,375
City CreekSan Bernardino National Forest9,997
ColdwaterCleveland National Forest8,402
Crystal CreekSan Bernardino National Forest6,783
Cucamonga AAngeles National Forest1,249
Cucamonga BSan Bernardino National Forest11,933
Cucamonga CSan Bernardino National Forest4,106
Cutca ValleyCleveland National Forest14,530
De La GuerraLos Padres National Forest5,418
Deep CreekSan Bernardino National Forest23,869
Dry LakesLos Padres National Forest17,043
Eagle PeakCleveland National Forest6,481
Fish CanyonAngeles National Forest29,886
Fox MountainLos Padres National Forest52,072
Greenhorn CreekSequoia National Forest28,226
Heartbreak RidgeSan Bernardino National Forest4,455
Hixon FlatSan Bernardino National Forest8,095
Horse Creek RidgeSan Bernardino National Forest8,969
JuncalLos Padres National Forest12,289
La BreaLos Padres National Forest14,031
LaddCleveland National Forest5,300
Little PineLos Padres National Forest1,315
Lpoor CanyonLos Padres National Forest13,762
Magic MountainAngeles National Forest15,542
Malduce BuckhornLos Padres National Forest14,177
ManzanaLos Padres National Forest2,101
MatilijaLos Padres National Forest5,218
Mill PeakSan Bernardino National Forest7,884
MonoLos Padres National Forest28,141
No NameCleveland National Forest4,897
NordhoffLos Padres National Forest12,031
Pine CreekCleveland National Forest503
Pleasant ViewAngeles National Forest26,395
Pyramid Peak BSan Bernardino National Forest7,194
Raywood Flat BSan Bernardino National Forest11,373
Red MountainAngeles National Forest8,034
Rouse HillSan Bernardino National Forest13,745
Salt CreekAngeles National Forest11,022
San DimasAngeles National Forest7,160
San Gabriel AddAngeles National Forest2,527
San Mateo CanyonCleveland National Forest65
San SevaineSan Bernardino National Forest6,866
Santa CruzLos Padres National Forest21,182
Sawmill - BadlandsLos Padres National Forest51,362
Sespe - FrazierLos Padres National Forest106,910
Sespe - FrazierAngeles National Forest4,254
Sheep MountainAngeles National Forest21,098
Sill HillCleveland National Forest5,294
Strawberry PeakAngeles National Forest7,245
SugarloafSan Bernardino National Forest8,206
TequepisLos Padres National Forest9,080
TrabucoCleveland National Forest23,341
TuleAngeles National Forest9,861
WestforkAngeles National Forest4,407
White LedgeLos Padres National Forest18,632
WildhorseCleveland National Forest1,483
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Texas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Big CreekNational Forests in Texas1,447
References (30)
  1. Adams, J.D. and C. Garcia. 2005. Spirit, mind and body in Chumash healing. Evidence-Based Complementary Healing and Alternative Medicine 2(4): 459-463.
  2. Anderson, E., and B. R. Anderson. 1954. Introgression of <i>Salvia apiana</i> and <i>Salvia mellifera</i>. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 41(3): 329-338.
  3. Averett, D. E. 2012. <i>Salvia apiana</i>. Available at: http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/eflora_display.php?tid=43038 (Accessed: 8 November 2018).
  4. Bell, C., Allen, E. B., Weathers, K.A., and M. McGiffen, Jr. 2016. Simple approaches to improve restoration of Coastal sage scrub habitat in southern California. Natural Areas Journal 36(1): 20-28.
  5. Bittman, Roxanne. Personal Communication. Botanist, California Natural Diversity Database, Sacramento, Calif.
  6. CalFlora. 2002. Information on California plants for conservation, research, and education. Available at: http://www.calflora.org/. Accessed June 19, 2002.
  7. Escofet, A. and I. Espejel. 1999. Conservation and management-oriented ecological research in the coastal zone of Baja California, Mexico. Journal of Coastal Conservation 5: 43-50.
  8. Franklin, J. 2002. Enhancing a regional vegetation map with predictive models of dominant plant species in chaparral. Applied Vegetation Science 5(1): 135-146.
  9. Geertsma, I. P., Zandstra, B. E., Stefanki, A., and T. R. van Andel. 2024. Commercialized "smudge sticks" used as incense in the Netherlands: and inventory of plants and trends behind a New Age fashion. Plants 13(3003): 1-15.
  10. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2025. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2025).
  11. Hickman, J. C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. 1400 pp.
  12. Jepson Flora Project (eds.) 2026. Jepson eFlora. Online. Available: https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/ (accessed 2026).
  13. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  14. Krol, A., Kokotkiewicz, A., and M. Luczkiewicz. 2021. White Sage (<i>Salvia apiana</i>) - a ritual and medicinal plant of the chaparral: plant characteristics in comparison with other <i>Salvia</i> species. Planta med 88: 604-627.
  15. Leopold, S., and W.A. Chioffi. 2022. North American case studies of medicinal plant conservation. Pages 263-274 in Pullanikkatil, D., and K. Hughes, editors. Socio-Ecological Systems and Decoloniality: Convergence of Indigenous and Western Knowledge. Cham: Springer International Publishing, Switzerland.
  16. Medicinal Plant Working Group. 2002. Green medicine. Available at: http://www.nps.gov/plants/medicinal/index.htm. Accessed June 19, 2002.
  17. Moerman, D. 2018. Native American Ethnobotany. A Database of Foods, Drugs, Dyes and Fibers of Native American Peoples, Derived from Plants. Dearborn Available at: http://naeb.brit.org/. (Accessed: 15 August 2018).
  18. Montalvo, A. M., Riordan, E. C., and J. L. Beyers. 2017. Plant profile for <i>Salvia apiana</i>. Native Plant Recommendations for Southern California Ecoregions. Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District And U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. Riverside, CA.
  19. Montalvo, A. M., Riordan, E. C., and J. L. Beyers. 2018. Plant Profile for <i>Prunus ilicifolia</i>. Native Plant Recommendations for Southern California Ecoregions. Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Riverside, CA. Online. Available: https://www.rcrcd.org/plant-profiles (accessed 2025).
  20. Murray, T., Kuhlmann, M., and S. G. Potts. 2009. Conservation ecology of bees: populations, species and communities. Apidologie 40: 211-236.
  21. Ott, D., Hühn, P., and Claßen-Bockhoff, R. 2016. <i>Salvia apiana</i> -- A carpenter bee flower? Flora 221: 82-91.
  22. Ramirez, R., Small, D., and California Native Plant Society. 2024. Saging the World. Documentary film. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_V7NoB1UPU8.
  23. Rebman, J. P., J. Gibson, and K. Rich. 2016. Annotated checklist of the vascular plants of Baja California, Mexico. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History. 45: 1-352. Accessed online at: https://sdplantatlas.org/pdffiles/BajaChecklist2016.pdf
  24. Riordan, E. C., and P.W. Rundel. 2009. Modelling the distribution of a threatened habitat: the California sage scrub. Journal of Biogeography 36: 2176-2188.
  25. Riordan, E. C., and P.W. Rundel. 2014. Land use compounds habitat losses under projected climate change in a threatened California ecosystem. PLoS ONE 9(1): e86487.
  26. Rose, J. P., Kriebel, R., Sytsma, K. J., and B. T. Drew. 2024. Phylogenomic perspectives on speciation and reproductive isolation in a North American biodiversity hot spot: and example using California sages ((<i>Salvia</i>) subgenus Audbertia: Lamiaceae). Annals of Botany 134: 295-310.
  27. Schochet, A. B., Hung, K. J., and D. A. Holway. 2016. Bumble bee species exhibit divergent responses to urbanisation in Southern California landscape. Ecological Entomology 41: 685-692.
  28. Southwest Environmental Information Network (SEINet). 2025. Collections Databases. Online. Available: https://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/collections/index.php (accessed 2025).
  29. Verges, F. A. R., Velazques, A., Bocco, G., and I. Espejel. 2013. Multi-scale land cover dynamics of semiarid scrubland in Baja California, Meixco. Regional Environmental Change 14: 1315-1328.
  30. Walker, J. B., Drew, B. T., and K. J. Sytsma. 2015. Unraveling species relationships and diversification with iconic California floristic province sages (<i>Salvia</i> subgenus <i>Audibertia</i>, Lamiaceae). Systematic Botany 40(3): 826-844.