Silybum marianum

(L.) Gaertn.

Blessed Milk-thistle

GNRUnranked Found in 26 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
GNRUnrankedGlobal Rank
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.143221
Element CodePDAST8M010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderAsterales
FamilyAsteraceae
GenusSilybum
Other Common Names
blessed milkthistle (EN) Chardon Marie (FR)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Review Date1994-03-22
Change Date1994-03-22
Edition Date1985-09-12
Edition AuthorsCAITLIN BEAN
Rank Reasons
Status in native range is not known. Exotic in the United States.
Range Extent Comments
The origins of SILYBUM MARIANUM lie in the region of Southern Europe, the Mediterranean and Northern Africa. Its current distribution includes most temperate areas of the world. It is common in the Western U.S. as a weed afflicting pastures, wastelands and irrigation banks (Parsons 1973). It is believed to have been introduced in cattle feed.

SILYBUM MARIANUM spread through both the southern and northern Central Valley of California during the 1940s, demonstrating a remarkable adaptation for colonizing. "The agricultural environment that was invaded had been dominated by alien weeds for 180 years. For a species without vegetative propagation to invade a community of annuals underscores the competitive advantage of its germination characteristics" Young et al. 1978). It is now common in both coastal and inland valleys.
Ecology & Habitat

Diagnostic Characteristics

SILYBUM MARIANUM can be distinguished from other California thistles by its distinctive white-mottled leaves. There is only one species of SILYBUM established in California. "The seed leaves (cotyledons) are large from 1/2 to 3/4 inch wide and 3/4 to 1 inch long, rather thick, succulent and light green. The first leaves are very conspicuously white-netted along the veins and have short yellowish prickles" (A.H. Lange et al., 1983).

Habitat

SILYBUM MARIANUM is mainly confined to high fertility soils. It frequently establishes on river flats, sheep camps, around stock yards and any other area of higher than normal soil nitrogen levels, especially if the area has been disturbed.

Ecology

Each terminal head of the plant produces approximately 100 seeds; 10 to 50 heads are produced per plant (Young et al. 1978). Seed weight is approximately 22 mg (Wheatley 1971). "From this we can calculate 10-50 grams of seed produced per plant. With a conservative average density of 2 plants/square meter theoretical seed production reaches 500 kg/ha" (Young et al. 1978).

Seed dispersal is the only means by which the milk thistle spreads. The seeds are equipped with a large pappus which allows effective spread by wind (Parsons 1973). Spread can also be attributed to their presence in grain and fodder (Wheatley 1971). Other means of dispersal include water, mud, agricultural produce, vehicles, machinery and animals (Parsons 1973).

The seeds of SILYBUM MARIANUM germinate in the fall after the first rains. "Plants develop slowly through the seedling stage, becoming flat rosettes by late autumn/early winter. Growth is rapid in late winter and early spring producing large cabbage-like plants up to 3 feet in diameter from which center stems develop in spring. Flowering commences in late spring and continues into early summer" (Parsons 1973).

The seedlings prefer disturbed soils which provide suitable bare areas for litter-free germination. Therefore, sheep camps, rabbit warrens, cultivated fire breaks, roadsides, overgrazed pastures and the like are ideal propagation sites. Seedlings do not establish in perennial pastures if the soil is well covered with vegetation during late summer and autumn. Litter seems to be a highly important inhibitive factor in the germination ecology of milk thistle seed. Because its germination is reduced by accumulations of grass litter, milk thistle is not adapted as a landscape dominant in areas where there is a continuous ground cover provided by existing vegetation. This can also hold true for annual rangelands if they are managed properly (Young et al. 1978). However, if there is an absence of pasture or litter cover in late summer and early fall, infestations of thistle may develop. This occurs especially in periods of drought which reduce the persistence of many pasture species (Michael 1968).

SILYBUM seed has the potential to remain viable in the soil for up to 9 years. The percentage of germination varies from year to year and can be less than 50% (Parsons 1973). In an article on germination requirements of this species, written in 1978 by Young et al., the following results were recorded.

"One month after harvest, milk thistle seeds had afterripening requirements related to germination temperature that limited germination to 10-20 C degrees. The time required to satisfy afterripening requirements was dependent on germination temperature. Generally the higher the incubation temperature during germination, the longer the afterripening requirement (up to a maximum of 5 months). Once afterripening requirements were satisfied, milk thistle seeds germinated over a temperature range of from 0-30 C degrees. Optimum germination occurred with 16 hour cold periods of 2-15 C degrees alternating with 8 hour warm periods of 10-30 C degrees. Emergence of milk thistle seedlings decreased with increased burial depth, but substantial emergence occurred from a depth of 8 cm. Germination on the surface of the soil or litter was greatly reduced compared to that with slight soil or litter coverage."

Once SILYBUM has found a niche it is a competitive thistle and it tends to establish in tall dense patches that eliminate other plant species either by shading or by competition for moisture and nutrients.

In areas of continual disturbance, eradication of SILYBUM is virtually impossible until the factors which cause the disturbance are removed. SILYBUM will stay localized in these areas unless disturbance becomes more widespread. Over-grazing and fire are two factors which encourage the spread of SILYBUM in large areas.

Reproduction

Seed dispersal is the only means by which the milk thistle spreads. The seeds are equipped with a large pappus which allows effective spread by wind (Parsons 1973). Spread can also be attributed to their presence in grain and fodder (Wheatley 1971). Other means of dispersal include water, mud, agricultural produce, vehicles, machinery and animals (Parsons 1973).
Other Nations (2)
CanadaNNA
ProvinceRankNative
QuebecSNANo
SaskatchewanSNANo
Nova ScotiaSNANo
British ColumbiaSNANo
OntarioSNANo
New BrunswickSNANo
AlbertaSNANo
United StatesNNA
ProvinceRankNative
MichiganSNANo
LouisianaSNANo
IndianaSNANo
New MexicoSNANo
ConnecticutSNANo
West VirginiaSNANo
New HampshireSNANo
OklahomaSNANo
CaliforniaSNANo
WashingtonSNANo
NevadaSNANo
ArizonaSNANo
MassachusettsSNANo
TexasSNANo
AlabamaSNANo
MarylandSNANo
OregonSNANo
New YorkSNANo
TennesseeSNANo
PennsylvaniaSNANo
OhioSNANo
VirginiaSNANo
ArkansasSNANo
District of ColumbiaSNANo
VermontSNANo
Plant Characteristics
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (26)
Arizona (2)
AreaForestAcres
GaliuroCoronado National Forest28,333
Santa TeresaCoronado National Forest8,929
California (22)
AreaForestAcres
Arroyo SecoAngeles National Forest4,703
Bear MountainLos Padres National Forest913
Black Mtn.Sequoia National Forest15,102
ColdwaterCleveland National Forest8,402
Devil GulchSierra National Forest30,490
Ferguson RidgeSierra National Forest6,104
Horseshoe SpringsLos Padres National Forest14,089
IshiLassen National Forest21,805
LaddCleveland National Forest5,300
Malduce BuckhornLos Padres National Forest14,177
ManzanaLos Padres National Forest2,101
MosesSequoia National Forest22,077
No NameCleveland National Forest4,897
NordhoffLos Padres National Forest12,031
Red MountainAngeles National Forest8,034
San DimasAngeles National Forest7,160
Santa CruzLos Padres National Forest21,182
Sespe - FrazierLos Padres National Forest106,910
Sheep MountainAngeles National Forest21,098
Strawberry PeakAngeles National Forest7,245
TequepisLos Padres National Forest9,080
White LedgeLos Padres National Forest18,632
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Texas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Big CreekNational Forests in Texas1,447
References (20)
  1. Auld, B. A., K.M. Menz, and R.W. Medd. 1979. Bioeconomic model of weeds in pastures. Agro-Ecosystems 5: 69-84.
  2. Edelbrock, J. 1978. Thistle Management in Marin Headlands, Golden Gate National Recreation Area. Unpublished Manuscript.
  3. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2006a. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 19. Magnoliophyta: Asteridae, part 6: Asteraceae, part 1. Oxford University Press, New York. xxiv + 579 pp.
  4. Goeden, R. D. 1971. The phytophagous insect fauna of milk thistle in southern California. Journal of Environmental Entomology 64(5): 1101-1104.
  5. Goeden, R. D. 1976. The paleartic insect fauna of milk thistle, SILYBUM MARIANUM as a source of biological control agents for California. Journal of Environmental Entomology 5(2): 345-353.
  6. Goeden, R. D. and D.W. Ricker. 1974. Imported seed weevil attack on Italian and milk thistle in southern California. California Agriculture January, p.8-9.
  7. Goeden, R. D. and D.W. Ricker. 1977. Establishment of RHINOCYLLUS CONICUS on milk thistle in southern California. Weed Science 25(3): 288-292.
  8. Goeden, R. D. and D.W. Ricker. 1980. Mortality of RHINOCYLLUS CONICUS in milk thistle flowerheads in southern California. Protection Ecology 2: 47-56.
  9. Goeden, R. D., L.A. Andres, T.E. Freeman, P. Harris, R.L. Pienkowski, and C.R. Walker. 1974. Present staturs of projects on the biological control of weeds with insects and plant pathogens in the United States and Canada. Weed Science 22(5): 490-495.
  10. Hawkes, R.B., C.A. Andres, and P.H. Dunn. 1972. Seed weevil released to control milk thistle. California Agriculture, December, p.14.
  11. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  12. Knott, S. G. 1971. Nitrite poisoning in livestock. Queensland Agricultural Journal, 97(9): 485-489.
  13. Lange, A. H., B.B. Fischer and J. McCaskill. 1983. Milk thistle - SILYBUM MANANUM (L.) Gaertn., thistle family. In index to the Growers Weed Identification Handbook (Sheets WI-1 through WI-215), Cooperative Extension, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
  14. Macadam, J. F. 1966. Some poisonous plants in the northwest. Agricultural Gazette of New South Wales, 77(2): 73-78.
  15. Meissner, R. and C. Mulder. 1974. Research note, herbicidal control of volunteer SILYBUM MARIANUM in wheat. Agroplantae 6:87-88.
  16. Michael, P. W. 1968. Perennial and annual pasture species in the control of SILYBUM MARIANUM. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, 8(30):101-105.
  17. Parsons, W. T. 1973. Noxious weeds of Victoria. Inkata Press, Ltd., Melbourne, Australia. 300 pp.
  18. Turner, C. Botanist, USDA Biocontrol. Albany, California. Personal communication.
  19. Wheatley, W. M. 1971. Thistles - Prickly problem of pasture improvement. The Agricultural Gazette of New South Wales 82(5): 258-261.
  20. Young, J. A., R.A. Evans, and R.B. Hawkes. 1978 Milk thistle (SILYBUM MARIANUM) seed germination. Weed Science 26(4): 395-398.