Taeniatherum caput-medusae

(L.) Nevski

Medusa-head

G4Apparently Secure (G4G5) Found in 27 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.127982
Element CodePMPOA5Z010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassMonocotyledoneae
OrderCyperales
FamilyPoaceae
GenusTaeniatherum
Other Common Names
medusahead (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Review Date1997-10-21
Change Date1997-10-21
Edition Date1997-10-21
Edition AuthorsMAURER, TERESA; MARY J. RUSSO (Rev); AUDREY GODELL (Rev) ??
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Rank Reasons
Native range is fairly widespread throughout southern Europe. Habitat is dry fields and rocky places within the native range. No specific information available on abundance.
Range Extent Comments
A winter annual grass native to the Mediterranean region of Eurasia, medusahead was introduced into the United States in the late 1880s and spread rapidly in the 1930s. The first known herbarium specimen was collected near Roseburg, Oregon, in 1887. Furbish (1953) describes the spread of medusahead in California.

In the United States, it has now (as of 1996) been reported as naturalized in California, Connecticut, Idaho, Nevada, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Utah and Washington.
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Medusahead grows where extended periods of extreme cold are lacking. Soils with high clay content, well-developed profiles, and those receiving run-off from infested areas are most susceptible to invasion (Dahl and Tisdale 1975). The species matures later than other annual grasses and may require clay soils for their high water-holding capacity (Young and Evans 1970). Well-drained soils and coarse-textured sands with poorly developed profiles are less likely to be utilized by Taeniatherum caput-medusae. The species overlaps in range and local habitat with Bromus mollis and B. tectorum in California and Oregon (McKell et al. 1962a). Harris (1977) reports that T. caput-medusae is displacing cheat grass on more mesic sites.

Ecology

Medusahead germinates in the fall. Roots begin to grow immediately and continue to grow all winter. Seed dormancy is due to inhibitory substances in the awns of fresh seed which have been removed by early fall (Nelson and Wilson 1969). Laboratory experiments (Harris 1977) showed that germination may be delayed by dryness and cold temperatures but still occurs sooner than cheat grass and bluebunch wheatgrass. Germination rates increased with increases in temperature and water potential. Harris (1977) also found that speed of germination, percent germination, and winter root growth exceeded that of BROMUS TECTORUM (cheat grass) and AGROPYRON SPICATUM (bluebunch wheatgrass), supplementing earlier studies by Hironaka (1961). In Idaho, it was found that seed viability increased from 12% to 78% from late June to early July and reached a maximum viability by the middle of July (Sharp et al. 1957). Germination rates of 98% have been reported (Murphy and Turner 1959). Germination may be observed within 8-10 hours of moistening, and primary root growth occurs rapidly to 18-20 cm before branching (Harris 1977).

Harris and Wilson (1970) found that medusahead effectively removed available soil water at depths where A. SPICATUM roots were growing. These characteristics confer an advantage in fall establishment and allows medusahead to compete successfully for soil moisture with B. TECTORUM and, especially, with A. SPICATUM, which is late germinating and slow growing (Harris 1977).

Seedling emergence and growth were favored in field treatments which included burial in pits and surface burial combined with subsequent soil movement (Evans and Young 1972). Also documented in Evans and Young's study were specific effects of these field microsites on micro-environmental variables important to germination/establishment and comparisons with controlled laboratory treatments.

Plant density after establishment may range from 500 plants per square foot on scablands to 2000 plants per square foot on valley bottom soils (Sharp et al. 1957). Established populations form stem mats 5-12.5 cm thick which decompose slowly. The dense litter cover enhances medusahead germination, may exclude cheat grass (Harris 1965, Evans and Young 1970), ties up soil nutrients, and contributes to fire danger in the summer (Hilken and Miller 1980).

T. caput-medusae has root development and anatomy suitable for later reproductive phenology and matures later than other annual species (Harris 1977). Sharp et al. (1957) found that medusahead reaches maturity two to three weeks later than cheat grass. Medusahead requires a cold treatment and possibly a light stimulus after seed germination for seed formation to occur. Medusahead sends up culms with seed heads in May (Lusk et al. 1961) and reaches full flowering by mid-June, about the time that the root system has reached full development (Hironaka 1961). Young et al. (1970) found seasonal, seed source location, garden location, and yearly differences of as much as two to three weeks in the phenology of medusahead. The number of seeds per head ranges from 5.6 in drier areas to 8.7 in wetter ones (Sharp et al. 1957).

Long distance dispersal is primarily by travel in coats of livestock, especially sheep. Local dispersal from established patches is by wind and water (Furbish 1953).

Although a few reports indicate that medusahead is palatable in early spring before maturity (Lusk et al. 1961), most grazing animals rarely eat it unless under forced or fertilized grazing conditions. Livestock are often injured by its awns and seeds, and the seeds are least preferred by wild birds (Goebel and Berry 1976).
Other Nations (1)
United StatesNNA
ProvinceRankNative
UtahSNANo
PennsylvaniaSNANo
WyomingSNANo
ConnecticutSNANo
OregonSNANo
IdahoSNANo
ColoradoSNANo
WashingtonSNANo
CaliforniaSNANo
MontanaSNANo
NevadaSNANo
New YorkSNANo
Plant Characteristics
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (27)
California (16)
AreaForestAcres
Callahan FlowModoc National Forest6,618
ChanchelullaShasta-Trinity National Forest3,915
DiableLos Padres National Forest19,597
Dry LakesLos Padres National Forest17,043
EagleShasta-Trinity National Forest6,553
Fox MountainLos Padres National Forest52,072
LavasModoc National Forest25,864
Little French CShasta-Trinity National Forest11,529
MatilijaLos Padres National Forest5,218
MonoLos Padres National Forest28,141
RubiconEldorado National Forest4,872
Sawmill - BadlandsLos Padres National Forest51,362
Skeleton GladeMendocino National Forest9,237
South ForkShasta-Trinity National Forest16,786
Thomes CreekMendocino National Forest16,616
Timbered CraterLassen National Forest4,096
Nevada (9)
AreaForestAcres
Cabin CreekHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest10,706
Rose - Alum CreekHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest853
Rose - EvansHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest4,782
Rose - Hunter EastHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest54
Rose - VerdiHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest1,155
Rose - Whites CanyonHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest2,568
Santa RosaHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest54,555
South Fork QuinnHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest40,535
Staunton RidgeHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest10,328
Oregon (2)
AreaForestAcres
Crane MountainFremont National Forest23,096
South KalmiopsisSiskiyou National Forests104,477
References (34)
  1. Christensen, M.D., J.A. Young, and R.A. Evans. 1974. Control of annual grasses and revegetation in ponderosa pine woodlands. J. Range Management 27: 143-145.
  2. Cronquist, A., A.H. Holmgren, N.H. Holmgren, J.L. Reveal, and P.K. Holmgren. 1977. Intermountain flora: vascular plants of the intermountain West, U.S.A. Vol. Six. Monocotyledons. Columbia Univ. Press, New York. 584 pp.
  3. Dahl, B.E., and E.W. Tisdale. 1975. Environmental factors related to medusahead distribution. J. Range Management 28: 463-468.
  4. Evans, R.A., and J.A. Young. 1972. Microsite requirements for establishment of annual rangeland weeds. Weed Science 20: 350-356.
  5. Evans, R. and J. Young. 1970. Plant litter and establishment of alien annual weed species in rangeland communities. Weed Science 18(6): 697-702.
  6. Furbish, P. 1953. Control of medusahead on California ranges. J. Forestry 51: 118-121.
  7. Goebel, C.J., and G. Berry. 1976. Selectivity of range grass seeds by local birds. J. Range Management 29: 393-395.
  8. Harris, G.A. 1965. Medusahead competition. Proceedings of the Cheatgrass Symposium, Vale, Oregon: 66-69. Bureau of Land Management, Portland, Oregon.
  9. Harris, G.A. 1977. Root phenology as a factor of competition among grass seedlings. J. Range Management 30: 172-177.
  10. Harris, G.A., and A.M. Wilson. 1970. Competition for moisture among seedlings of annual and perennial grasses as influenced by root elongation at low temperature. Ecology 51: 530-534.
  11. Hilken, T.O., and R.F. Miller. 1980. Medusahead (Taeniatherum asperum Nevski): a review and annotated bibliography. Oregon State University, Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 644.
  12. Hironaka, M. 1961. The relative rate of root development of cheat grass and medusahead. J. Range Management 14: 263-267.
  13. Hironaka, M., and B.W. Sindelar. 1973. Reproductive success of squirreltail in medusahead-infested ranges. J. Range Management 26: 219-221.
  14. Hironaka, M., and B.W. Sindelar. 1975. Growth characteristics of squirreltail seedlings in competition with medusahead. J. Range Management 28: 283-285.
  15. Hironaka, M., and E.W. Tisdale. 1963. Secondary succession in annual vegetation in southern Idaho. Ecology 44: 810-812.
  16. Hitchcock, A.S. 1951. Manual of the grasses of the United States. 2nd edition revised by Agnes Chase. [Reprinted, 1971, in 2 vols., by Dover Publications, Incorporated, New York.]
  17. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  18. Lusk, W.C., M.B. Jones, D.T. Torell, and C.M. McKell. 1961. Medusahead palatability. J. Range Management 14: 248-251.
  19. Macdonald, C. 1988. Oregon Land Steward, The Nature Conservancy. Memorandum to M. J. Russo, The Nature Conservancy, Western Regional Office. September 11, 1988.
  20. McKell, C.M., A.M. Wilson, and B.L. Kay. 1962b. Effective burning of rangelands infested with medusahead. Weeds 10: 125-131.
  21. McKell, C.M., J.P. Robison, and J. Major. 1962a. Ecotypic variation in medusahead, an introduced annual grass. Ecology 43: 686-698.
  22. Munz, P.A., and D.D. Keck. 1973. A California Flora and Supplement. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. 1905 pp.
  23. Murphy, A.H., and D. Turner. 1959. A study of the germination of medusahead seed. California Department of Agriculture Bulletin 48: 6-10.
  24. Murphy, A.H., and W.C. Lusk. 1961. Timing medusahead burns to destroy more seed--save good grasses. California Agriculture 15: 6-7.
  25. Nelson, J.R., and A.M. Wilson. 1969. Influence of age and awn removal and dormancy of medusahead seeds. J. Range Management 22: 289-290.
  26. Robocker, W.C. 1973. Production potential of four winter annual grasses. J. Range Management 26: 69-70.
  27. Sharp, L.A., M. Hironaka, and E.W. Tisdale. 1957. Viability of medusahead seed collected in Idaho. J. Range Management 10: 123-126.
  28. Torell, P.J., L.C. Erickson, and R.H. Hass. 1961. The medusahead problem in Idaho. Weeds 9: 124-131.
  29. Turner, R.B., C.E. Poulton, and W.L. Gould. 1963. Medusahead threat to Oregon rangeland. Oregon State University, Agricultural Experiment Station, Special Report 149.
  30. Young, J.A., and R.A. Evans. 1970. Invasion of medusahead into the Great Basin. Weed Science 18: 89-97.
  31. Young, J.A., and R.A. Evans. 1971. Medusahead invasion as influenced by herbicides and grazing on low sagebrush sites. J. Range Management 24: 451-454.
  32. Young, J.A., and R.A. Evans. 1972. Conversion of medusahead to downy brome communities with Diuron. J. Range Management 25: 40-43.
  33. Young, J.A., R.A. Evans, and B.L. Kay. 1970. Phenology of reproduction of medusahead. Weed Science 18: 451-454.
  34. Young, J.A., R.A. Evans, and J. Robison. 1972. Influence of repeated annual burning on a medusahead community. J. Range Management 25: 372-375.