Xanthium strumarium

L.

Rough Cocklebur

G5Secure Found in 90 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.143046
Element CodePDAST9Z020
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderAsterales
FamilyAsteraceae
GenusXanthium
Other Common Names
Lampourde glouteron (FR) Lampourde ordinaire (FR) rough cocklebur (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-05-13
Change Date1998-08-19
Edition Date1989-02-01
Edition AuthorsDON PITCHER, CAFO (1989)
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Range Extent Comments
XANTHIUM STRUMARIUM is distributed worldwide (53 degrees north to 33 degrees south latitude) but is most common in the temperate zone (Love and Dansereau 1959). It is a serious weed in Australia, India, South Africa, and the Americas.

There has been considerable controversy regarding the origin of cocklebur. Though first described from Europe, it is probably of American origin (Munz and Keck 1973). Love and Dansereau (1959) suggest that the cocklebur subspecies most abundant in North America (CAVANILLESII) originated in Central America. The dates of its introduction to California are not known, but it may be pre-Columbian.
Threat Impact Comments
XANTHIUM STRUMARIUM is considered one of the world's worst weeds (Holm et al. 1977). Cocklebur seeds are easily spread, due to their ability to float and to 'hitchhike' on humans and animals. The plants can quickly become dominant in an area because of their prolific seed production and high germination and survival rates.
Ecology & Habitat

Diagnostic Characteristics

XANTHIUM STRUMARIUM is distinguished from spiny clotbur (X. SPINOSUM) by its broader cockleburs, more ovoid leaves on long petioles, and lack of spines.

Habitat

Cocklebur is often associated with open, disturbed areas, particularly flood-prone areas with good soil moisture (Martin and Carnahan 1982), but it is found in a wide variety of habitats. It frequents roadsides, railway banks, small streams, and riverbanks, as well as the edges of ponds and freshwater marshes and overgrazed pastures. It does not tolerate shading (Sen 1981).

Cocklebur grows on a wide range of soils (sands to heavy clays) and available moisture. On rich soils with abundant moisture and little competition from other plants, it grows tall and luxuriant, forming pure stands. In dry, poor soils, plants may grow to only a few centimeters high, persist through drought, and set seed. The ability to grow under a variety of conditions results in a continuous seed supply, if plants are not controlled (Holm et al. 1977).

Cocklebur withstands partial submergence for six to eight weeks by forming adventitious roots from the submerged portion of the stem. These roots float in water and often get infested with oxygen- producing green algae (DEDOGONIUM) which solves the problem of aeration (Ambasht 1977).

Ecology

POPULATION DYNAMICS

Weaver and Lechowicz (1983) describe two types of cocklebur populations. Populations located along shores or water courses tend to be small, ephemeral, and homogeneous with seed dispersal by wind and water. Populations in ruderal (weedy) habitats, agricultural fields, or waste areas tend to be large, dense, and heterogeneous with tall, vigorous plants producing an abundance of seed. Seed dispersal here is primarily the result of human activities. Both types of populations, however, occupy unstable habitats and are continually shifting to newly disturbed areas.

Cocklebur is an extremely competitive weed in corn, cotton, and soybeans fields, particularly in the southeastern and midwestern U.S. (Miller 1970, Charudattan and Walker 1982). Though not as abundant in California, it is still a serious problem in agricul- tural areas (Vargas 1984), as well as in recreation areas and along reservoirs (Wright and Schweers 1984). Some plants appears to have allelopathic properties (Cutler 1983).

The burs cause an allergic reaction in some people (Parsons 1973) and are toxic to domestic animals (and perhaps to some wildlife). Poisoning threats are greatest in areas where other, more palatable plants have already been consumed (Holm et al. 1977). Ingesting an amount of seeds equal to only 0.3 percent of an animal's body weight will cause toxicity. Still, this rarely occurs as the spiny burs are not palatable to animals.

However, the cotyledons are palatable and also have the highest toxicity. Poisoning generally results when these are eaten. This situation occurs most at the edges of ponds, lakes, flood plains, or other bodies of water where shallow flooding followed by recession of the waterline occurs. Under such conditions seeds germinate readily, constantly supplying new generations of potentially poisonous seedlings as the water source dries out. Animals are attracted to such areas because of their need for drinking water. The problem is accentuated because XANTHIUM seeds do have natural dormancy and germinate over long periods of time. Ingestion of an amount of cotyledons equal to 0.75 to 1.5 percent of the animal's body weight will cause toxicity.

Toxicity decreases rapidly as true leaves are formed. Evidence of poisoning appears in about 12 to 48 hours, the symptoms being nausea, vomiting, lassitude, depression, weakened muscles, and prostration. Severe poisoning may result in convulsions and spasmodic running movements. Ruminants may not vomit. Death may occur within a few hours or days. Fatty substances such as milk, lard, or linseed oil have been recommended as antidotes (Kingsbury 1964).

Reproduction

Kaul (1971) includes the following reasons for cocklebur's ability to inhabit such a range of habitats: an effective dispersal mechanism, wide ecological amplitude, heavy output of seeds and high viability and germination under varied environments, high reproductive capacity, large seed size and weight, rapid seedling growth, and a well-developed root system.

FLORAL BIOLOGY

XANTHIUM STRUMARIUM is wind-pollinated, self-compatible, and predominately self-pollinated (Love and Dansereau 1959). The staminate heads of X. STRUMARIUM are located above the pistillate heads on the main axis and side shoots, an arrangement favoring inbreeding (Weaver and Lechowicz 1983). Moran and Marshal (1978) found the outcrossing rate in natural populations to be 0 to 12%.

In a Quebec experimental garden, individual plants produced from 611 to 1,488 male inflorescences (Weaver and Lechowicz 1983). The 100-150 male florets in each staminate head begin to shed their pollen from a few days before the stigmata are receptive until all female flowers are ripe. The slightest movement of the plant or a gust of wind causes the pollen to rain down over the exposed stigmata of the female flowers immediately below. The pollen of the plant itself is therefore most likely to ensure the fertiliza- tion of its female flowers, and only an accident, a strong wind, or crowded growth, accomplishes cross-fertilization. In XANTHIUM, inbreeding is thus the rule and outbreeding only an occasional occurrence (Love and Dansereau 1959).

Cocklebur has been widely used as an experimental plant in studies of photoperiod. Love and Dansereau (1959) list 34 articles on XANTHIUM photoperiod, and many more have been written since that time (Cleland and Ajami 1974). According to Salisbury (1969), X. STRUMARIUM is a short-day plant and usually does not flower when day length exceeds 14 hours. However, there is evidence of differences in light response among the complexes, as some plants flower with day lengths as long as 16 hours.

At high latitudes, day length is greater than 14 hours during summer, and therefore, X. STRUMARIUM does not flower until late summer, once day length is short enough to stimulate flowering. Seeds mature late under these conditions, usually in early autumn. These differences are considered to represent genetic adaptations of the reproductive system to environmental variables as a result of natural selection (Ray and Alexander 1966). The cotyledons do not play a role in flower induction (Holm et al. 1977).

SEED PRODUCTION AND DISPERSAL

Open grown X. STRUMARIUM plants produce 500 to 5,400 burs per plant. The number of fruits produced is dependent upon the amount of vegetative growth at the time of floral initiation. On crowded plants, production is reduced to 71 to 586 burs per plant (Weaver and Lechowicz 1983). Burs are buoyant and will float for up to 30 days (Kaul 1961), thus being easily dispersed to beaches and pastures subject to flooding. The burs also become entangled in animal hair or human clothing. The burs are a serious problem in sheep production areas where they become entangled in the wool, reducing its value (Wapshere 1974a). X. STRUMARIUM burs contain a highly toxic substance, carboxyatractyloside, capable of killing hogs, cattle, goats, horses, sheep, and poultry.

SEED VIABILITY AND GERMINATION

Germination of cocklebur seeds has been extensively researched (Crocker 1906, Davis 1930, Katoh and Esashi 1975, Zimmerman and Weis 1983). More than 80% of cocklebur seeds are viable in most populations (Weaver and Lechowicz 1983). Light is not required for germination, but seedlings seldom emerge from seeds lying on the surface or buried more than 15 cm in the soil (Kaul 1965a, Stoller and Wax 1973).

Seeds of XANTHIUM STRUMARIUM have a high moisture requirement for germination and show little germination in soils at less than 75% of field capacity, but they are able to absorb moisture at high osmotic concentrations (Kaul 1968). Cocklebur seed viability decreases over time, and seeds do not survive more than a few years (Wapshere 1974b). Seedlings are unusually large with foliar-type cotyledons that, through early photosynthetic function, enable the young seedling to become quickly established (Polunin 1966). Seedlings may be identified in the cotyledon stage by the presence (below ground) of the persistent bur, which usually remains attached to the seedling (Kingsbury 1964). The species does not reproduce vegetatively (Weaver and Lechowicz 1983).

XANTHIUM STRUMARIUM plants produce seeds of two types (termed somatic polymorphism). Each bur contains two seeds, with the smaller one often pushed upwards toward the beaked end of the fruit. The lower seed has a shorter dormant period and germinates first. Dormancy in XANTHIUM involves the presence of a different water-soluble germination inhibitor in each seed type, to which the testa are impermeable. The presence of oxygen causes degradation of these two inhibitors and subsequent rupture of the seed coat, but apparently at very different rates in the two types. Thus at least two batches of seeds are present in each generation to assure germination in the event the immediate environment happens to be unsuitable (Redosevich and Holt 1984).
Terrestrial Habitats
Grassland/herbaceousUrban/edificarian
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLANDFORESTED WETLAND
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN5
ProvinceRankNative
ManitobaS4Yes
Prince Edward IslandS4Yes
QuebecS4Yes
New BrunswickS4Yes
SaskatchewanS4Yes
AlbertaS3Yes
British ColumbiaS4Yes
Nova ScotiaS4Yes
OntarioS5Yes
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
KansasS5Yes
OklahomaSNRYes
FloridaSNRYes
CaliforniaSNRYes
MichiganSNANo
IndianaS5Yes
MissouriSNRYes
South CarolinaSNRYes
LouisianaSNRYes
UtahSNRYes
GeorgiaSNRYes
New YorkS5Yes
North DakotaSNRYes
OhioSNRYes
WashingtonSNRYes
ColoradoS4Yes
TennesseeSNRYes
PennsylvaniaSNANo
NevadaS4Yes
KentuckyS5Yes
TexasSNRYes
MississippiSNRYes
ConnecticutSNRYes
WyomingS5Yes
VirginiaS5Yes
New MexicoSNRYes
OregonSNRYes
IdahoSNRYes
HawaiiSNANo
New HampshireSNRYes
South DakotaSNRYes
DelawareS5Yes
New JerseySNRYes
NebraskaSNRYes
ArizonaSNRYes
IllinoisSNRYes
MaineSNRYes
WisconsinSNRYes
West VirginiaS5Yes
MarylandSNRYes
Rhode IslandSNRYes
MinnesotaSNRYes
ArkansasSNRYes
AlabamaSNRYes
MassachusettsSNRYes
MontanaSNRYes
IowaSNANo
VermontS5Yes
District of ColumbiaSNRYes
North CarolinaSNANo
Plant Characteristics
DurationANNUAL, SUMMER-FLOWERING
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (90)
Arizona (12)
AreaForestAcres
Black CrossTonto National Forest5,966
BoulderTonto National Forest40,359
Catalina St. Pk. Roadless AreaCoronado National Forest951
GaliuroCoronado National Forest28,333
GoldfieldTonto National Forest15,257
Lime CreekTonto National Forest42,568
MazatzalTonto National Forest16,942
Middle Dragoon RoadlessCoronado National Forest10,543
Middle Romero WSRCoronado National Forest60
MuldoonPrescott National Forest5,821
Oracle RoadlessCoronado National Forest22,365
WhetstoneCoronado National Forest20,728
California (41)
AreaForestAcres
Bear MountainLos Padres National Forest913
Black ButteLos Padres National Forest5,116
Black CanyonInyo National Forest32,421
CajonSan Bernardino National Forest7,548
CamuesaLos Padres National Forest8,209
ChannellSequoia National Forest45,429
City CreekSan Bernardino National Forest9,997
ColdwaterCleveland National Forest8,402
Coyote SoutheastInyo National Forest53,159
Cucamonga AAngeles National Forest1,249
Deep CreekSan Bernardino National Forest23,869
Dry LakesLos Padres National Forest17,043
Eagle PeakCleveland National Forest6,481
Fish CanyonAngeles National Forest29,886
Garcia MountainLos Padres National Forest7,850
La BreaLos Padres National Forest14,031
Little French CShasta-Trinity National Forest11,529
Magic MountainAngeles National Forest15,542
No NameCleveland National Forest4,897
NordhoffLos Padres National Forest12,031
Oat Mtn.Sequoia National Forest12,223
Onion SpringsLassen National Forest2,421
Orleans Mtn. BSix Rivers National Forest17,183
PaiuteInyo National Forest58,712
PantherShasta-Trinity National Forest12,016
Pine CreekCleveland National Forest503
Red MountainAngeles National Forest8,034
Salt CreekAngeles National Forest11,022
San Gabriel AddAngeles National Forest2,527
Santa CruzLos Padres National Forest21,182
Sespe - FrazierLos Padres National Forest106,910
Sheep MountainAngeles National Forest21,098
Sill HillCleveland National Forest5,294
Soldier CanyonInyo National Forest40,589
Strawberry PeakAngeles National Forest7,245
TequepisLos Padres National Forest9,080
TrabucoCleveland National Forest23,341
TuleAngeles National Forest9,861
WestforkAngeles National Forest4,407
WildhorseCleveland National Forest1,483
WoolstaffSequoia National Forest41,445
Montana (6)
AreaForestAcres
East PioneerBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest145,082
HoodooLolo National Forest105,162
North SiegelLolo National Forest9,208
Patricks Knob - North CutoffLolo National Forest16,970
South Siegel - South CutoffLolo National Forest13,474
West Big HoleBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest133,563
Nevada (1)
AreaForestAcres
PotosiHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest5,145
New Mexico (7)
AreaForestAcres
Alamo CanyonSanta Fe National Forest8,639
Candian RiverCibola National Forest7,149
Chama WS RiverSanta Fe National Forest4,168
Chama WildernessSanta Fe National Forest1,295
Contiguous To Gila Wilderness & Primitive AreaGila National Forest79,049
Gila BoxGila National Forest23,759
Virgin CanyonSanta Fe National Forest6,068
North Dakota (3)
AreaForestAcres
BlacktailDakota Prairie Grasslands8,620
Long X DivideDakota Prairie Grasslands10,099
SheyenneDakota Prairie Grasslands14,537
Oregon (4)
AreaForestAcres
Cook RidgeWallowa-Whitman National Forest19,617
Imnaha FaceWallowa-Whitman National Forest29,575
Mountain SheepWallowa-Whitman National Forest19,457
Snake RiverWallowa-Whitman National Forest31,229
South Dakota (3)
AreaForestAcres
Cheyenne RiverBuffalo Gap National Grassland7,572
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Red ShirtBuffalo Gap National Grassland17,007
Texas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Big CreekNational Forests in Texas1,447
Utah (6)
AreaForestAcres
418022Uinta National Forest17,289
418025Uinta National Forest32,698
Casto BluffDixie National Forest87,466
Lone Peak ContiguousWasatch-Cache National Forest874
Upper South ForkWasatch-Cache National Forest16,811
WellsvilleWasatch-Cache National Forest1,717
Virginia (3)
AreaForestAcres
Gum RunGeorge Washington National Forest12,620
Kelley MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,590
SkidmoreGeorge Washington National Forest5,641
Washington (2)
AreaForestAcres
Black CanyonOkanogan National Forest9,681
Dry Canyon BreaksColville National Forest4,821
West Virginia (1)
AreaForestAcres
Dry River (WV)George Washington National Forest7,331
References (66)
  1. Abrams, L. 1940. Illustrated flora of the Pacific states: Washington, Oregon, and California. Vol. 1. Ophioglossaceae to Aristolochiaceae. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, California. 538 pp.
  2. Alcorn, J. L. 1975. A new disease of Noogoora burr. Queensland Agricultural J. 101:162.
  3. Ambasht, R. S. 1977. Observations on the ecology of noxious weeds on Ganga River banks at Varanasi, India. Vol. 1, p. 109-115 in 6th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Indonesia. 365 pp.
  4. Anderson, R. N. 1982. Variation in growth habit and response to chemicals among three common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) selections. Weed Science 30:339-343.
  5. Baloch, G. M., A. I. Mohyuddin, and M. A. Ghani. 1968. <i>Xanthium strumarium</i> L.--insects and other organisms with it in West Pakistan. Commonwealth Institute Biological Control Technical Bulletin 10:103-111.
  6. Baloch, G. M. and M. A. Ghani. 1969. The present status of biological control of <i>Xanthium </i>(Compositae). PANS 15:154-159.
  7. Beste, C. E. 1983. Herbicide handbook. Weed Science Society of America, Herbicide Handbook Committee. Champagne, IL.
  8. Charudattan, R. and H. L. Walker. 1982. Biological control of weeds with plant pathogens. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 293 pp.
  9. Cleland, C. F. and A. Ajami. 1974. Identification of the flower-inducing factor isolated from aphid honeydew as being salicylic acid. Plant Physiology 54:904-906.
  10. Cole, R. J., B. P. Stuart, J. A. Lansden, R. H. Cox. 1980. Isolation and redefinition of the toxic agent from cocklebur (Xanthium struamrium). J. Agric. Food Chemistry 28:1330-1332.
  11. Conners, I. L. 1967. An annotated index of plant diseases in Canada and fungi recorded on plants in Alaska, Canada and Greenland. Can Dept. Agric. Publ. 1251. Ottawa, Ont. 381 pp.
  12. Crocker, W. 1906. Pole of seed coat in delayed germination. Botanical Gazette 42:265-291.
  13. Crockett, L. J. 1977. Wildly successful plants. McMillan Publishing Co., New York. 268 pp.
  14. Cutler, H. G. 1983. Carboxyatractyloside: a compound from Xanthium strumarium and Atractylis gummifera with plant growth inhibiting properties. The probable "Inhibitor A." J. Natural Products 46:609-613.
  15. Davis, W. E. 1930. The development of dormancy in seed of cocklebur (Xanthium). American Journal of Botany 17:77-87.
  16. Deshpande, K. 1982. Biocontrol of Parthenium hysterophorous L. and Xanthium strumarium L. through phytopathogens. In: Abstracts of papers, annual conference of Indian Society of Weed Science. p. 48.
  17. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2006c. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 21. Magnoliophyta: Asteridae, part 8: Asteraceae, part 3. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xxii + 616 pp.
  18. Foote, B. A. 1984. Host plant records for North American ragweed flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Entomological News 95:51-54.
  19. Hare, D. J. 1977. The biology of Phaneta imbridana (lepidoptera: Tortricidae) a seed predator of Xanthium strumarium (Compositae). Psyche 84:179-182.
  20. Hare, D. J. 1980. Variation in fruit size and susceptibility to seed predation among and within populations of the cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L. Oecologia 46:217-222.
  21. Hare, D. J. and D. J. Futuyma. 1978. Different effects of variation in Xanthum strumarium L. (Compositae) on two insect seed predators. Oecologia 37:109-120.
  22. Hasan, S. 1974. Recent advances in the use of plant pathogens as biocontrol agent of weeds. Pest Articles and New Summaries 20:437-443.
  23. Haseler, W. H. 1970. Insects in Noogoora burr control. Queensland Agriculture Journal 96:191-193.
  24. Hilgendorf, H. H. and R. D. Goeden. 1983. Phytophagous insect faunas of spiny clotbur, Xanthium spinosum, and cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium. Environmental Entomolgy 12:404-411.
  25. Hilgendorf, J. H. and R. D. Goeden. 1982. Phytophagous insects reported worldwide from the noxious weeds spiny clotbur, Xanthium spinosum, and cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium. Entomological Society of America 28:147-152.
  26. Holm, L.G., P. Donald, J.V. Pancho, and J.P. Herberger. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. The University Press of Hawaii: Honolulu, Hawaii. 609 pp.
  27. Jadhav, A. N. and R. B. Somani. 1978. Puccinia Xanthii--a report from India. Indian Phytopathology 31:369-371.
  28. Jepson, W. L. 1951. Manual of the flowering plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley.
  29. Julien, M. H., J. E. Boradbent, and N. C. Matthews. 1979. Effects of Puccinia xanthii on Xanthium strumarium (Compositae). Entomophaga 24:29-34.
  30. Kalidas, D. 1981. Phytopathogens as weed control agents. Proceedings 8th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, pp. 157-159.
  31. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  32. Katoh, H. and Y. Esashi. 1975. Dormancy and impotency of cocklebur seeds. I. CO2, C2H4, O2, and high temperature. Plant and Cell Physiology 16:72-87.
  33. Kaul, V. 1961. Water relations of Xanthium strumarium L. Sci. Cult. 27:495-497.
  34. Kaul, V. 1965a. Physiological-ecology of <i>Xanthium strumarium</i> L. I. Seasonal morphological variants and distribution. Tropical Ecology 6:72-87.
  35. Kaul, V. 1965b. Physiological-ecology of <i>Xanthium strumarium</i> L. II. Physiology of seeds in relation to its distribution. J. Indian Bot. Soc. 44:365-380.
  36. Kaul, V. 1968. Physiological-ecology of Xanthium strumarium L. V. Water relations. Tropical Ecology 9:88-102.
  37. Kaul, V. 1971. Physiological-ecology of Xanthium strumarium L. IV. Effect of climatic factors on growth and distribution. New Phytologist 70:799-812.
  38. Kelly, S. G. 1931. The control of Noogoora and Bathurst burr by insects. J. Counc. Sci. Ind. Res. (Australia) 4:161-172.
  39. Kingsbury, J. M. 1964. Poisonous plants of the U.S. and Canada. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 626 pp.
  40. Love, D. and P. Dansereau. 1959. Biosystematic studies on Xanthium: toxonmic appraisal and ecological status. Candian J. Botany 37:173-208.
  41. Martin, R. J. and J. A. Carnahan. 1982. Distribution and importance of Noogoora and Bathurst burrs in eastern Australia. Austrailian Weeds 2:27-32.
  42. McHenry, Jim. 1985. Extension Weed Scientist, University of California, Davis, Cooperative Extension, CA. Personal communication. May 1985.
  43. McMillan, C. 1975. The Xanthium strumarium complexes in Australia. Australian J. Botany 23:173-192.
  44. Miller, J. F. 1970. Cocklebur. Crops and Soils 22:15-17.
  45. Moran, G. F. and D. R. Marshal. 1978. Allozyme uniformity within and variation between races of the colonizing species Xanthium strumarium L. (Noogoora burr). Australian J. Biological Science 31:283-291.
  46. Munz, P.A., and D.D. Keck. 1973. A California Flora and Supplement. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. 1905 pp.
  47. O'Connor, B. A. 1952. An introduced parasite of Noogoora burr. Agricultural Journal, Department of Agriculture, Fiji 23:105-106.
  48. O'Connor, B. A. 1960. A decade of biological control work in Fiji. Agricultural Journal, Department of Agriculture, Fiji 30:44-54.
  49. Parsons, W. T. 1973. Noxious weeds of Victoria. Inkata Press, Ltd., Melbourne, Australia. 300 pp.
  50. Polunin, N. (ed.) 1966. Weeds of the world: biology and control. Gramian Press, Inc., London. 526 pp.
  51. Ray, P. M. and W. E. Alexander. 1966. Photoperiodic adaption to latitude in Xanthium stumarium. American Journal of Botany 53:806-816.
  52. Redosevich, S. R. and J. S. Holt. 1984. Weed ecology. John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York.
  53. Robbins, W. W. 1940. Alien plants growing without cultivation in California. California Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 637:1-128.
  54. Robbins, W.W., M.K. Bellue, and W.S. Ball. 1970. Weeds of California. State of California, Department of Agriculture. 547 pp.
  55. Salisbury, F. B. 1969. Xanthium strumarium L. pp. 14-16 in: L. Evans, ed. The induction of flowering: some case histories. MacMillan, Melbourne. 488 pp.
  56. Sen, D. N. 1981. Ecological approaches to Indian weeds. Geobios International, Jodhpur, India. 301 pp.
  57. Sharma, A. K. 1981. The powdery mildew of Xanthium strumarium from J and K state. Indian Journal of Mycology and Plant Pathology 11:92-95.
  58. Siddiqui, I. A., A. A. Sher, and A. M. French. 1973. Distribution of plant parasitic nematodes in California. California Department of Food and Agriculture, Sacramento. 324 pp.
  59. Stoller, W. W. and L. M. Wax. 1973. Periodicity of germination and emergence of some annual weeds. Weed Science 21:574-580.
  60. Vargas, R. 1984. Weed management systems for cotton. Pp.52-56 in: Proceedings 36th Annual California Weed Conference. 164 pp.
  61. Wapshere, A. J. 1974a. The regions of infestation of wool by Noogoora bur (<i>Xanthium strumarium</i>), their cliamtes and the biological control of the weed. Australian J. Agricultural Research 25:775-81.
  62. Wapshere, A. J. 1974b. An ecological study of an attempt at biological control of Noooora burr (<i>Xanthium strumarium</i>). Australian J. Agricultural Research 25:275-92.
  63. Weaver, S. E., and M. J. Lechowicz. 1983. The biology of Canadian weeds. 56. <i>Xanthium strumarium</i> L. Canadian J. Plant Science 63:211-225.
  64. Wilson, F. 1960. A review of the biological control of insects and weeds in Australia and Australian New Guinea. Commonwealth Institute Biological Control Technical Communication No. 1:1-102.
  65. Wright, S. D. and V. H. Schweers. 1984. Control of cocklebur at Lake Success, California. Proceedings of the Western Society of Weed Science 37:215-217.
  66. Zimmerman, J. K. and I. M. Weis. 1983. Fruit size variation and its effects on germination and seedling growth in <i>Xanthium strumarium</i>. Canadian J. Botany 61:2309-2315.