Hesperoleucus symmetricus

(Baird and Girard, 1854)

California Roach

GNRUnranked Found in 3 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
GNRUnrankedGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.1203043
Element CodeAFCJB19040
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassActinopterygii
OrderCypriniformes
FamilyLeuciscidae
GenusHesperoleucus
Concept Reference
Baumsteiger, J. and P. M. Moyle. 2019. A reappraisal of the California Roach/Hitch (Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae, Hesperoleucus/Lavinia) species complex. Zootaxa 4543(2):221-240.
Taxonomic Comments
Based on morphological (Brown et al. 1992) and genetic analyses (Aguilar and Jones 2009; Baumsteiger et al. 2017), the Central Valley and coastal populations of Hesperoleucus symmetricus are recognized as distinct species. Hesperoleucus venustus applies to the populations in the coastal drainages and H. symmetricus to populations in the Central Valley drainages (Baumsteiger and Moyle 2019).

While there is still uncertainty about recognizing Lavinia and Hesperoleucus as distinct genera (e.g., Aguilar and Jones 2009, Schönhuth et al. 2012), genomic analyses by Baumsteiger et al. (2017) supported recognition of distinct lineages, despite occasional hybridization between them.
Conservation Status
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Range Extent Comments
The range of this species includes the Sacramento-San Joaquin river drainage in California, including the Pit River and tributaries to Goose Lake in Oregon. Introduced populations include Soquel Creek (Santa Cruz County) and Cuyama River (San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara counties, where possibly native), California (Moyle 2002, Baumsteiger and Moyle 2019).
Threat Impact Comments
Many populations have declined and in some areas have been eliminated, probably in part due to habitat alteration (barriers to migration; water diversions; pumping from aquifers that feed small streams; reduced water availability, loss of riparian cover, and siltation resulting from development or intense livestock grazing; stream channelization; pollution; logging; road building) and introduction of predatory fishes, especially green sunfish (Moyle 2002).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Habitat includes rocky pools of headwaters, creeks, and small to medium rivers (Page and Burr 2011). This species is a habitat generalist; usually it is found in small, warm, intermittent tributaries to larger streams, but it also occurs in cold trout streams, human-modified habitats, and in the main channels of rivers (Moyle et al. 1989); dense populations are often in isolated, well-shaded pools. It is most abundant in mid-elevation streams in the Sierra foothills (Moyle 1976). It is capable of withstanding extreme environmental conditions. In the Clear Lake region, habitats range from cool headwater streams to lower warmwater reaches; most abundant in pools and slow waters of the low to mid-elevation streams with high pH, conductivity, and temperature and with little cover or canopy (Taylor et al. 1982). Spawning occurs in shallow flowing areas with a substrate of small rocks. Adhesive eggs stick to rocks. Newly hatched fry stay in rock crevices or vegetation until large enough to move around actively (Moyle 1976).

Reproduction

Spawns in schools, mainly March-June. Adhesive eggs hatch in 2-3 days. Sexually mature by about the second year, probably earlier in some populations. Lifespan usually 3 years or less.
Other Nations (1)
United StatesNNR
ProvinceRankNative
OregonSNANo
CaliforniaSNRYes
Roadless Areas (3)
California (3)
AreaForestAcres
De La GuerraLos Padres National Forest5,418
Slate Mtn.Sequoia National Forest12,299
Snow MountainMendocino National Forest14,457
References (10)
  1. Aguilar, A. and W.J. Jones. 2009. Nuclear and mitochondrial diversification in two native California minnows: insights into taxonomic identity and regional phylogeography. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 51: 373-381.
  2. Baumsteiger, J. and P. M. Moyle. 2019. A reappraisal of the California Roach/Hitch (Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae, <i>Hesperoleucus</i>/<i>Lavinia</i>) species complex. Zootaxa 4543(2):221-240.
  3. Baumsteiger, J., P.B. Moyle, A. Aguilar, S.M. O’Rourke, and M.R. Miller. 2017. Genomics clarifies taxonomic boundaries in a difficult species complex. PloS One 12(12): e0189417.
  4. Brown, L. R., P. B. Moyle, and W. A. Bennett. 1992. Implications of morphological variation among populations of California roach <i>Lavinia symmetricus</i> (Cyprinidae) for conservation policy. Biological Conservation 62:1-10.
  5. Moyle, P. B. 1976a. Inland fishes of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. 405 pp.
  6. Moyle, P. B., J. E. Williams, and E. D. Wikramanayake. 1989. Fish species of special concern of California. Final report submitted to California Dept. of Fish and Game, Inland Fisheries Division, Rancho Cordova. 222 pp.
  7. Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.
  8. Page, L. M., K. E. Bemis, T. E. Dowling, H.S. Espinosa-Pérez, L.T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, K. E. Hartel, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, M. A. Neigbors, J. J. Schmitter-Soto, and H. J. Walker, Jr. 2023. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Eighth edition. American Fisheries Society (AFS), Special Publication 37, Bethesda, Maryland, 439 pp.
  9. Schönhuth, S., D.M. Hillis, D.A. Neely, L. Lozano-Vilano, A. Perdices, and R.L. Mayden. 2012. Phylogeny, diversity, and species delimitation of the North American round-nosed minnows (Teleostei: Dionda), as inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 62(1): 427-446.
  10. Taylor, T. L., P. B. Moyle, and D. G. Price. 1982. Fishes of the Clear Lake Basin. Univ. California Publ. Zool. 115:171-224.