Fraxinus uhdei

(Wenzig) Lingelsh.

Shamel Ash

GNRUnranked Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
GNRUnrankedGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.152937
Element CodePDOLE040J0
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
IUCNLeast concern
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderScrophulariales
FamilyOleaceae
GenusFraxinus
Other Common Names
shamel ash (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Review Date1994-03-22
Change Date1994-03-22
Edition Date1991-08-12
Edition AuthorsTim Tunison
Range Extent Comments
Native to western and southern Mexico, it was introduced to Hawaii originally as a shade tree.
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Fraxinus uhdei was planted extensively starting in the 1920's as a watershed species, and in the 1960's as a potential timber species. Over 700,000 trees were planted, all apparently from the same seed source, two trees on Oahu planted in the 1890's (Little and Skolmen 1989).

Fraxinus uhdei appears to have a rather broad range of tolerance. It has been planted and escaped from plantings in wet and mesic environments. It grows best between 1,000 and 1,700 m elevation but also up to 2,000 m (Smith 1985). Nelson and Schubert (1976) report that it grows best from 450-1500 m in moist, well-drained sites. In mesic and dry areas, it is usually confined to gulches and wet areas (Skolmen, pers. comm., 1991).

Reproduction

Fraxinus uhdei regenerates mostly or possibly exclusively from seed (Skolmen, pers. comm., 1991). Seed production is copious. Although fruits are apparently adapted for wind-dispersal, establishments appear to be rather short range, suggesting that wind dispersal infrequent. Seeds banks may survive up to eight years, as suggested by continued seedling recruitment in populations controlled at Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. Its success as an invading species is probably due to copious seed production, ability to regenerate under its own canopy, shade tolerance of young plants, and rapid growth of seedlings, saplings, and poles.
Other Nations (1)
United StatesNNA
ProvinceRankNative
HawaiiSNANo
Plant Characteristics
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (1)
California (1)
AreaForestAcres
LaddCleveland National Forest5,300
References (6)
  1. Houck, C. A. 1987. Study of the Mexican ash, Fraxinus uhdei (Wenzig) Lingelsheim, on The Nature Conservancy's Kamakou Preserve, Moloka'i, Hawai'i. A report submitted to the Department of Biology, The Colorado College and available in Kamakou Preserve files. 66 pp.
  2. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  3. Little, E. L., Jr., and R. G. Skolmen. 1989. Common Forest Trees of Hawaii (Introduced and Native). United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Agric. Handbook No. 679. 321 pp.
  4. Nelson, R. E., and T. H. Schubert. 1976. Adaptability of selected tree species planted in Hawaii forests. USDA Forest Service Resource Bulletin PSW-14. 22 pp.
  5. Skolmen, R. 1991. Retired USDA Forest Service forester. Telephone conversation with Tim Tunison, P. O. Box 754 Volcano, Hawaii, 96785. May 31.
  6. Smith, C. W. 1985. Impact of alien plants on Hawaii's native biota. pp. 180-250. in C. P. Stone and J. M. Scott (eds.). Hawaii's terrestrial ecosystems: preservation and management. Univ. Hawaii Coop. Natl. Park Resour. Studies Unit, University of Hawaii Press. 584 pp.