Erythronium elegans

Hammond & Chambers

Coast Range Fawnlily

G2Imperiled Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
UnknownThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.129526
Element CodePMLIL0U0K0
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassMonocotyledoneae
OrderLiliales
FamilyLiliaceae
GenusErythronium
Other Common Names
Coast Range fawnlily (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
A DNA study investigating the origins of Erythronium elegans was recently completed (Allen 2008). ITS sequences indicated that the diploid species E. revolutum and E. oregonum gave rise (at least in part) to tetraploid E. elegans. Erythronium elegans also yielded chloroplast DNA haplotypes of two distinct types; one plastid haplotype matched the most common haplotype of E. revolutum, while other haplotypes were similar to those of E. oregonum. Results were consistent with derivation of the plastid genomes of different polyploid populations from either E. revolutum or E. oregonum (or their respective recent ancestors), and suggest recurrent formation of E. elegans (Allen 2008).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2010-04-20
Change Date2010-04-20
Edition Date2022-05-26
Edition AuthorsS. Vrilakas and K. Maybury, rev. K. Gravuer (2009), rev. Treher (2022)
Threat ImpactUnknown
Range Extent250-1000 square km (about 100-400 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 20
Rank Reasons
Endemic to high elevation peaks in the northern Coast Range of Oregon, Erythronium elegans is known from 11 largely disjunct occurrences. Just two occurrences are on lands managed solely or primarily for conservation purposes, although a few others are on Federal lands on which the species is designated Sensitive. Habitat disturbance from logging is a threat at some sites. Other relatively low-level threats include road construction, recreation, collection, elk herbivory, and habitat degradation due to Douglas fir blight. The species appears to be somewhat of a poor competitor that does best in sites with a sparse herbaceous layer, although it seems to be less specific in its canopy cover and soil moisture requirements. Historically, fire may have play an important role in maintaining the species habitat. Simulated disturbance or selective clearing may be necessary to maintain, healthy reproductive populations. It is unknown whether E. elegans has always been rare, or has declined from historical levels.
Range Extent Comments
Erythronium elegans occurs in western Oregon in the United States, where it is endemic to high elevation peaks of the northern Coast Range in Lincoln, Polk, Tillamook, and Yamhill Counties.
Occurrences Comments
There are around 11 extant occurrences. Three occurrences were discovered through a distribution modeling study that focused search in potential habitat; the habitat of this species is receptive to GIS-based modeling (Tobalske and Buechling 2008).
Threat Impact Comments
Habitat disturbance from logging operations is a threat at some sites. Because some extant sites are located in formerly clearcut areas, it does not appear that tree removal per se is highly problematic. However, impacts may result from associated disturbance (heavy equipment use, etc.). Some sites are impacted by the encroachment of shrubs and trees which may impact plant reproductions; plants growing in more forested areas are more often non-reproductive. Historically, fire would have likely played a role in maintaining favorable habitat (Cushman et al. 2009). One site has been impacted by road construction, and one site by human recreation (camping, etc.). Other reported threats include plant collection for horticultural purposes, herbivory (e.g. by elk), and fungal infection (Douglas fir blight) (Guerrant 2007). As a species of comparatively mesic sites at high elevations, it is vulnerable to climate change (Cushman et al. 2009).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

This lily-like plant has white to pink flowers (1 to 4) gracefully nodding on a stem 16-30 cm long. Petals strongly arch back in sunlight, are nearly 5 cm long and have a narrow yellow band at the base. A pair of plain green to slightly mottled leaves up to 10 cm long and with very short stalks are found at the base of flowering plants.

Diagnostic Characteristics

Differs from E. quinaultense (endemic to the Olympic Mountains of Washington) by its smaller stature; white to pinkish tepals, the outer ones generally more strongly colored, especially on outer surface (vs. tepals white near base, shading to pink at margins and tips in E. quinaultense); its white anther filaments 0.8-1.4 mm wide (vs. often pink-tinged anther filaments 1.0-1.8 mm wide); its tepal length and width; its outer tepal length-to-width ratio; and its filament length (Allen 2001). Differs from E. revolutum by its white to pinkish tepals (vs. uniformly clear pink in E. revolutum); by its linear-lanceolate anther filaments 0.8-1.8 mm wide (vs. lanceolate anther filaments 1.5-3.0 mm wide); by its leaf mottling generally faint, sometimes absent in juveniles (vs. leaf mottling distinct); and by its tendency to be found above 800 m (Allen 2001). Differs from E. montanum (of the Cascade Mountains) by its white to pinkish tepals (vs. white in E. montanum); by its linear-lanceolate anther filaments 0.8-1.8 mm wide (vs. linear anther filaments < 0.8 mm wide); and by its leaves irregularly mottled (at least faintly) with brown or white (vs. uniformly green) (Allen 2001). E. oregonum is distinguished from E. elegans by its white-cream colored flowers, pronounced brown spots on the leaves, and tendency to be found at lower elevations; E. grandiflorum is differentiated from E. elegans by its yellow flowers and blue-green leaves.

Habitat

This species grows in a variety of more or less open sites including meadows, open rocky slopes, rocky outcrops, balds, cliffs, bog edges, forest edges, forests, brushlands, and road cuts. Know sites vary greatly in their herbaceous and canopy cover as well as their soil moisture but it is typically found on sites where snow cover is usually present in the winter and precipitation is very heavy except in summer. Associated species include Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas fir), Abies amabilis (Pacific silver fir), Thuja plicata (Western redcedar), Picea sp. (spruce), Maianthemum dilatatum (false lily-of-the-valley), Erythronium grandiflorum var. pallidum (California glacier lily), Fragaria sp. (strawberry), Gaultheria sp. (snowberry), Vaccinium sp. (blueberry), Lupinus sp. (lupine), and various grasses and mosses.

Ecology

In a demographic study, the site with the greatest population growth had, on average, the lowest levels of most of the soil nutrients assayed (phosphorous, potassium, calcium, magnesium, ammonium, nitrate) (Guerrant 1999 cited in Guerrant 2007). According to Guerrant, one hypothesis is that E. elegans is at a competitive disadvantage relative to its associated species, and therefore may do better in poor soil conditions where it may be able to obtain sufficient nutrients whereas competitors cannot. Guerrant's studies also suggested that interactions between nutrients, light levels, herbivory, and ground cover most likely determine where E. elegans will thrive. Given that E. elegans may be a poor competitor, Guerrant hypothesizes a lack of intense competition from the herbaceous plant layer may be a key site feature promoting success (Guerrant 1999 cited in Guerrant 2007).

Reproduction

Of the four sites studied by Guerrant (1999 cited in Guerrant 2007), one had low sexual reproduction but high vegetation reproduction relative to the other sites. Guerrant hypothesizes that the plants may be capable of responding adaptively when sexual reproduction is limited by allocating more resources to vegetative reproduction. Vegetative spread is through offset bulbs.
This species likely has low seed dispersal capacity. Related species of Erythronium are dispersal limited: western Erythronium catapult their seeds short distances without further dispersion of significance by animals (Guppy 2007, Weiblen and Thomson 1995).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandForest - ConiferForest EdgeShrubland/chaparralGrassland/herbaceousBare rock/talus/scree
Palustrine Habitats
Bog/fen
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
OregonS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
5 - Biological resource useLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.1 - Hunting & collecting terrestrial animalsNegligible (<1%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.1.1 - Intentional use (species being assessed is the target)Negligible (<1%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1.2 - Suppression in fire frequency/intensityLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (1)
Oregon (1)
AreaForestAcres
Hebo 1aSiuslaw National Forest13,930
References (13)
  1. Allen, G. A. 2001. Hybrid speciation in <i>Erythronium </i>(Liliaceae): a new allotetraploid species from Washington state. Systematic Botany 26(2):263-272.
  2. Allen, G. A. 2008. The origins of polyploids in western North American fawn-lilies (<i>Erythronium</i>). Canadian Journal of Botany 86(8): 835-845.
  3. Cushman, K., R. Exeter, and M. Stein. 2009. Conservation Assessment for Elegant Fawn Lily (<i>Erythronium elegans</i>). Report for USDA Forest Service Region 6 and Bureau of Land Management, Oregon and Washington.
  4. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2002a. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 26. Magnoliophyta: Liliidae: Liliales and Orchidales. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xxvi + 723 pp.
  5. Grothaus, M. M. 2001. The genus <i>Erythronium</i>. Pgs. 139-150 in Bulbs of North America, McGary, M. J., ed. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  6. Guerrant, E. 2007, 19 November last update. National Collection Plant Profile: <i>Erythronium elegans</i>. Center for Plant Conservation. Online. Available: www.centerforplantconservation.org/ASP/CPC_ViewProfile.asp?CPCNum=1839 (Accessed 2009).
  7. Guppy, A. 2007. Ants and a New Look at <i>Erythronium</i>. Bulletin of the North American Rock Garden Society 65(3):265-274.
  8. Hammond, P.C., and K. Chambers. 1985. A new species of Erythronium (Liliaceae) from the coast range of Oregon. Madrono 32(1): 49-56.
  9. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  10. Oregon Flora Project. 2009 last update. Rare Plant Guide. Online. Available: http://www.oregonflora.org/rareplants/index.php (Accessed 2009).
  11. Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center. 2009. Oregon threatened or endangered plant field guide. Online. Available: http://oregonstate.edu/ornhic/plants/view_plants2.php (Accessed 2009).
  12. Tobalske, C. and A. Buechling. 2008. Predicting Rare Plant Occurrence in the Pacific Northwest. Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center, Portland, OR. Presentation at West Region Natural Heritage Conference, Tahoe City, California, April 2008. Online. Available: www.natureserve.org/visitLocal/westregional/presentations/habitatModelingRarePlants.ppt (Accessed 2009).
  13. Weiblen G.D., and J.D. Thomson. 1995. Seed dispersal in Erythronium grandiflorum (Liliaceae). Oecologia 102(2):211-219.