Fritillaria gentneri

Gilkey

Gentner's Fritillary

G2Imperiled Found in 9 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
Very high - highThreat Impact
Gentner''s fritillary (Fritillaria gentneri). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.158328
Element CodePMLIL0V080
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassMonocotyledoneae
OrderLiliales
FamilyLiliaceae
GenusFritillaria
Other Common Names
Gentner's Fritillaria (EN) Gentner's fritillary (EN) Gentner's Missionbells (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
FNA (vol. 26, 2002) indicates that Fritillaria gentneri is a restricted endemic closely allied with F. recurva and F. affinis, with which it can be confused. Some evidence suggests that it may represent a hybrid between those two species. More study is needed to determine whether it should remain recognized as a distinct species.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2020-12-29
Change Date2020-12-29
Edition Date2021-03-31
Edition AuthorsRoth, E., rev. S. Vrilakas 9/96, slightly rev. Vrilakas/Kagan/Maybury (10/96), rev. R. Bittman, rev. M.J. Russo (2011), rev. A. Tomaino (2011), rev. Treher (2020, 2021)
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent5000-20,000 square km (about 2000-8000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank Reasons
Fritillaria gentneri occurs in the northwestern United States where it is endemic to southwestern Oregon in Jackson and Josephine counties and Siskiyou County, California in the Rogue and Klamath River watersheds of the Pacific Northwest (U.S.A.). There are over 100 sites in Oregon and two in California which are grouped into 4 recovery units by the USFWS. The total number of plants is difficult to assess but is estimated to be around 142,000 but less than 3,000 were flowering during monitoring. The species' habitat is disappearing as a result of fire suppression, urban expansion and agricultural conversion, and logging activities. Additional threats include plant destruction from road construction, widening, and maintenance, city waterline construction, invasive plant species and associated herbicide use to control them, and fungal diseases.
Range Extent Comments
Fritillaria gentneri occurs at scattered localities in southwest Oregon (U.S.A.) along the Rogue and Illinois River drainages in Josephine and Jackson Counties. It is also known from two sites, about one mile apart, in far northern California.
Occurrences Comments
Oregon has 156 occurrence records, some of which might be considered one population. California has 2 occurrences (EO data in the NatureServe central database as of March 2020). The USFWS (2016) breaks the sites into 4 management units.
.
Threat Impact Comments
This species is threatened by habitat loss associated with rapidly expanding residential and agricultural development, alteration of habitat by invasive weeds, successional encroachment by trees and shrubs due to fire suppression, and habitat disturbance from timber harvest and recreational activities (USFWS 2003). Bulb collecting for gardens is believed to be a very minor threat. Herbivory by deer and other animals and livestock likely have a minimal impact at low to moderate levels, since the species primarily reproduces asexually (USFWS 2016). Fungal diseases have been noted as a threat (USFWS 1999). Road construction, widening, and maintenance, city waterline construction,and other activities threaten the species through the disruption of habitat which leads to the invasion of non-native species (USFWS 2016). Invasion by Centaurea solstitialis (yellow star thistle) and associated herbicide use to control this thistle is also a threat (USFWS 1999). Low intensity fires can maintain favorable habitat for the species but high intensity, long burning fires, can kill the bulbs, a detriment to the species.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

This lily-like plant has 1/2 inch long (4 cm) deep red to maroon flared bell-shaped flowers with yellow mottling on flowering stems that grow up to 28 inches tall (70 cm). Stamens are shorter than petals. Stems and leaves are waxy bluish green to purple mottled. Leaves usually grow in two whorls of three with additional scattered pairs along the stem; the largest nearest the base are up to 6 inches long (15 cm) by 1/2 inch wide (1.5 cm). Nonflowering individuals are recognizable only by their single basal leaves. The dry capsule is roundish with broad thin papery edges.

Diagnostic Characteristics

Deep red to maroon flared bell-shaped flowers with yellow mottling, and its tall stature up to 28 inches (70 cm) tall. Individuals of this species can be distinguished from similar congeners by comparing the nectary gland length/tepal length ratio and the extent of style branching. The nectaries of F. gentneri generally extend ¼ to ½ the length of the tepals, while those of F. recurva extend ¼ or less, and the long glands of F. affinis extend ½ or more of the tepal length. The style of F. affinis is divided for ½ of its length or more, with widely spreading branches, while only the tip (¼ or less) of F. recurva's style is divided, with erect branches. The style of F. gentneri is intermediate between the two, with somewhat spreading branches extending slightly less than ½ the length of the style. These two characters, when evaluated in combination with flower color (scarlet in F. recurva, maroon in F. gentneri, and purplish-brown in F. affinis), adequately differentiate these three species.

Habitat

This species occurs on dry hillsides in open canopies of oak and mixed-species woodlands and chaparral shrub communities, mixed hardwood forests, coniferous forests and grasslands at elevations from 300 to 1,230 m (USFWS 2003, 2016). The plant appears to have specific moisture and light requirements that may be provided by a variety of habitat types or successional stages, and has been reported in association with sixteen habitat types: Oregon white oak woodland; Oregon white oak - Douglas fir ecotone; Dry Douglas fir forest; Moist riparian Douglas fir - white fir forest; Mixed hardwood / conifer with black oak, Oregon white oak, Douglas fir, ponderosa pine, and wedgeleaf ceanothus - whiteleaf manzanita in shrub layer; Oregon white oak / birchleaf mahogany - wedgeleaf ceanothus ecotonal chaparral; Ponderosa pine - Douglas fir forest; Oregon white oak / wedgeleaf ceanothus dry chaparral; Black oak forest with silktassle, poison oak, mountain mahogany, serpentine influence; Grassland / meadow; Moist riparian shrub community; Moist chaparral with black oak, silktassle, birchleaf mountain mahogany, whiteleaf manzanita, serpentine influence; Jeffrey pine - whiteleaf manzanita serpentine site; Ecotone between Oregon white oak / serviceberry chaparral and white fir - Douglas fir forest; Oregon white oak / Klamath plum woodland; and Opening in white fir - Douglas fir forest (Brock and Callagan 2001 cited by USFWS 2003).

Reproduction

The species flowers sparingly, with less than 1 to 3.1 percent of plants flowering in any one year. The number of flowering plants can fluctuate and the cause is not certain. Flowers are believed to be self-incompatible. Each year the plant produce “rice-grain” bulblets from its bulb (USFWS 2016).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandWoodland - HardwoodWoodland - ConiferShrubland/chaparral
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
OregonS1Yes
CaliforniaS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.3.4 - Scale unknown/unrecordedRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.2 - Gathering terrestrial plantsNegligible (<1%)Negligible or <1% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingUnknownModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive (71-100%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionPervasive (71-100%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive (71-100%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesPervasive (71-100%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1.1 - Unspecified speciesPervasive (71-100%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (9)
California (7)
AreaForestAcres
BoulderKlamath National Forest435
Box CampKlamath National Forest858
Condrey Mtn.Klamath National Forest2,923
KangarooKlamath National Forest40,617
KelseyKlamath National Forest3,237
MuseKlamath National Forest238
Tom MartinKlamath National Forest9,031
Oregon (1)
AreaForestAcres
North KalmiopsisSiskiyou National Forests91,560
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
References (10)
  1. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2002a. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 26. Magnoliophyta: Liliidae: Liliales and Orchidales. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xxvi + 723 pp.
  2. Giles-Johnson, D.E.L, A.S. Thorpe and T.N. Kaye, 2009. <i>Fritillaria gentneri </i>population monitoring at Pickett Creek, Josephine County, Oregon. Institute for Applied Ecology, Corvallis, Oregon and USDI Bureau of Land Management, Medford District. iv + 11 pp. [http://appliedeco.org/reports/FRGE09.pdf]
  3. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  4. Meinke, R.J. 1982. Threatened and Endangered Vascular Plants of Oregon: An Illustrated Guide. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1, Portland, Oregon. 326 pp.
  5. Oregon Biodiversity Information Center. 2008. 15 July last update. Field guide to threatened and endangered plants of Oregon. Online. Available: http://orbic.pdx.edu/plants/view_plants2.php (accessed 2011).
  6. Peck, M.E. 1961. A manual of the higher plants of Oregon. 2nd edition. Binsford &amp; Mort, Portland, Oregon. 936 pp.
  7. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2016. Lakeside Daisy (<i>Tetraneuris herbacea</i>) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ohio Field Office Columbus, Ohio.
  8. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1999. Final Rule Designating Federal Endangered Status for Gentner's Fritillary. Federal Register 64:69195-69203.
  9. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2003. Recovery plan for <i>Fritillaria gentneri</i> (Gentner's fritillary). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon.
  10. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2016. <i>Fritillaria gentneri</i> (Gentner’s fritillary) Endangered 5-Year Review: Summary and January 25, 2016. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon Field Office, Portland, Oregon.