Harperocallis flava

McDaniel

Harper's Beauty

G2Imperiled Found in 2 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
Harper's beauty (Harperocallis flava). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.154865
Element CodePMLIL0Y010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassMonocotyledoneae
OrderAlismatales
FamilyTofieldiaceae
GenusHarperocallis
Synonyms
Isidrogalvia flava(McDaniel) Remizowa, D.D. Sokoloff, L.M. Campb., D.W. Stev. & Rudall
Other Common Names
Harper's beauty (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
Previously thought to be a monotypic genus, Campbell and Dorr (2013) and Remizowa et al. (2011), on the basis floral morphology, determined that Harperocallis is congeneric with Isidrogalvia. South American members of two other genera, Asagraea and Tofieldia, were also transferred to Harperocallis. Harperocallis flava is the only member of the genus occurring outside of South America.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2018-04-11
Change Date2018-04-11
Edition Date2018-04-05
Edition AuthorsOliver, L. (2010), rev. Jenkins, A. (2018)
Range Extent250-1000 square km (about 100-400 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank Reasons
Endemic to Franklin, Liberty and Bay (population discovered in 2003) counties in the panhandle of Florida and restricted to open, boggy habitats. Possibly because of the exclusion of periodic fire from much of this region, some of the populations are restricted to the shoulders of a single highway, where competitive shrubs have been eliminated. The total population was estimated at 6000 plants in 1983 by Leonard and Baker. Since then many populations have declined and a number of studies examining the environmental factors that have the greatest influence on the species postulate that precipitation and competition for nutrients may be the most influential. Lack of fire and other disturbance is another possible reason for decline, but in one study where one of the populations was burned, a decline was also observed.

While there are 8 occurrences that are ranked with good viability, this species' intrinsic vulnerability is quite high. Genetic studies revealed that of all of the genetic loci examined, there was no genetic variability detected, which suggests this species is, from a genetic perspective, at a high risk for extinction. In addition, there are other developmental abnormalities that have been observed within the species that suggest genetic instability. Given the very small distribution, the decline in the recent past, the genetic constraints and the anthropogenic threats, this species' future is precarious.
Range Extent Comments
Harperocallis flava is endemic to Florida and occurring in Franklin, Liberty and Bay Counties. In 2003, a population was discovered in Bay County and in 2015, one new Harper's Beauty population was discovered on the east side of the New River, all other populations of this species are west of the New River and east fo the Appalachicola River. Range extent was calculated at 821.1 square km using GeoCat (Bachman et al. 2018).
Occurrences Comments
There are 29 occurrences as of 2018 but three are likely not extant. 24 occurrences have been verified extant by the Florida Natural Areas Inventory between 2013-2017 (NatureServe Network Database as of April 2018).
Threat Impact Comments
The greatest long term threat to this species is loss of habitat (Walker and Silletti 2005), and fire exclusion. Natural populations are severely threatened by fire exclusion (causing woody encroachment) and hydrologic disturbances. Several populations occur along roadsides, so any disruption of roadside vegetation (power pole maintenance, road maintenance activities, etc.) would threaten populations on the road shoulder. This species was discovered to contain no genetic variation, at either the roadside populations or the more natural populations by Godt et al. (1997) and low genetic diversity by von Wettburg (USFWS 2016). The lack of genetic variation affords the species no room to adapt as the environment changes and therefore is more at risk of extinction than other species with similar characteristics. Also, Harper's Beauty exhibits polycarpelly, a condition where flowers produce anywhere from 3 to 6 carpels, and these multicarpellate flowers outnumber the usual tricarpellate flowers. Polycarpelly is thought to be a result of individual instability, and in this species it may be an indication of genetic stress (Godt et al. 1997). It should be pointed out that the study done by Godt et al. (1997) was completed before the Bay Co. population was discovered, so it is unknown what if any genetic variation exists in that population compared to the others.
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

This species occurs in the long-leaf pine ecosystem, in acidic boggy areas in full sun with soils high in sand and peat. Most occurrences are found in open seepage bogs dominated by a suite of herbaceous species and lacking woody vegetation. Some times the species is found growing at the base of woody evergreen shrubs with few herbaceous species (Walker and Silletti 2005). Presettlement habitat was probably open bogs surrounded by buckwheat tree (Cliftonia monophyla) and pine (Pinus serotina, P. elliottii, or P. palustris), and bog-flatwoods ecotones where periodic fire prevented woody succession.

Reproduction

Blooms in mid April to early May, and fruits in July (Walker and Silletti 2005). It is thought that roadside populations of this species are dispersed by water and by lawn mowers (Godt et al. 1997).

Levels of viability were high (>95%) and germination ranged from 5-95% depending on temperature and seed source (Gardner 2017) and variable results of 0% and 51% were found in Historic Bok Sanctuary germination trials (USFWS 2016). Based on seed germination and seedling recruitment research, Gardner (2017) concluded that in situ conservation may not be feasible, ex situ conservation may be possible if seedlings are grown in controlled conditions, and long term seed storage in gene banks seems possible.
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandWoodland - MixedSavannaGrassland/herbaceous
Palustrine Habitats
TEMPORARY POOLBog/fen
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
FloridaS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
4 - Transportation & service corridorsRestricted (11-30%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsRestricted (11-30%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useSmall (1-10%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineLow - insignificant/negligible
5.2 - Gathering terrestrial plantsSmall (1-10%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineInsignificant/negligible or past
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceNegligible (<1%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesNegligible (<1%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive (71-100%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionPervasive (71-100%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useUnknownSerious - moderateUnknown

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (2)
Florida (2)
AreaForestAcres
Gum BayApalachicola National Forest11,645
SavannahApalachicola National Forest1,927
References (21)
  1. Bachman, S., J. Moat, A.W. Hill, J. de la Torre, and B. Scott. Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. In: Smith, V., and L. Penev (Eds). 2011. e-Infrastructures for data publishing in biodiversity science. ZooKeys 150:117-126. Version BETA. Accessed online: http://geocat.kew.org/editor
  2. Campbell, L.M., and L.J. Dorr. 2013. A synopsis of Harperocallis (Tolfieldiaceae, Alismatales) with ten new combinations. PhytoKeys 21:37-52.
  3. Clewell, A.F. 1985. Guide to vascular plants of the Florida panhandle. Florida State Univ. Press, Tallahassee, Florida. 605 pp.
  4. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2002a. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 26. Magnoliophyta: Liliidae: Liliales and Orchidales. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xxvi + 723 pp.
  5. Gardner, A. 2017. Using seed biology to conserve Harperocallis flava, a federally endangered endemic plant of the Florida Panhandle. M.S. Thesis. University of Florida. Gainesville, FL. 120 pp.
  6. Godt, M. W., J. Walker and J. L. Hamrick. 1997. Genetic diversity of the endangered lily <i>Haperocallis flava </i> and a close relative, <i>Tofieldia racemosa. </i> Conservation Biology 11(2) 364-366.
  7. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  8. Keppner, L. A. and L. C. Anderson. 2008. Notes on Harper's Beauty, <i>Harperocallis flava </i> (Tofieldiaceae), in Bay County, Florida. Notes of the Southearn Naturalist 7(1):180-185.
  9. Kral, R. 1983c. A report on some rare, threatened, or endangered forest-related vascular plants of the South. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Forest Service Technical Publication R8-TP2, Athens, GA. 1305 pp.
  10. Leonard, S.W., and W.W. Baker. 1983. Additional populations of Harperocallis flava McDaniel (Liliaceae). Castanea 48(2): 151-152.
  11. McDaniel, S. 1968. Harperocallis, a new genus of the Liliaceae from Florida. J. Arnold Arboretum 49: 35-40.
  12. Morse, Larry E. Personal Communication. North American Botanist, NatureServe, Arlington, VA. Formerly Chief Botanist, The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA.
  13. Pitts-Singer, T. L., J. L. Hanula, and J. L. Walker. 2002. Insect pollinators of three rare plants in Florida longleaf pine forest. Florida Entomoligist 85(2):308-316.
  14. Radford, A.E., H.E. Ahles, and C.R. Bell. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. Univ. North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC. 1183 pp.
  15. Remizowa, M.V., D.D. Sokoloff, L.M. Campbell, D.W. Stevenson, and P.J. Rudall. 2011. <i>Harperocallis</i> is congeneric with<i> Isidrogalvia</i> (Tofieldiaceae, Alismatales): Evidence from comparative floral morphology. Taxon 60(4):1076-1094.
  16. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1983. Harper's beauty (<i>Harperocallis flava</i>) recovery plan. U.S. Dep. Inter., Fish and Wildl. Serv. Atlanta, GA. 32 p.
  17. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2016 Haperocallis flava (Harper's Beauty), 5-Year Review. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region, Panama City Field Office.
  18. Walker, J. L. and A. M. Silletti. 2005. A three-year demographic study of Harper's Beauty (<i>Harperocallis flava </i> McDaniel), an endangered Florida endemic. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 132 (4): 551-560.
  19. Ward, D.B., ed. 1979. Rare and endangered biota of Florida. Vol. 5: Plants. Univ. Presses of Florida, Gainesville.
  20. White, Deborah. Personal communication. Botanist, Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort, KY.
  21. Wunderlin, R.P. 1982. Guide to the vascular plants of central Florida. Univ. Presses Florida, Gainesville. 472 pp.