Platanthera integrilabia

(Correll) Luer

White Fringeless Orchid

G2Imperiled Found in 22 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
Near threatenedIUCN
Very highThreat Impact
White fringeless orchid (Platanthera integrilabia). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.155927
Element CodePMORC1Y0D0
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
IUCNNear threatened
CITESAppendix II
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassMonocotyledoneae
OrderOrchidales
FamilyOrchidaceae
GenusPlatanthera
Other Common Names
Monkey-face Orchid (EN) white fringeless orchid (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
Treated at the species level as Platanthera integrilabia by Kartesz (1994, 1999). Formerly treated as Habenaria blephariglottis var. integrilabia; if treated as a species in Habenaria, this taxon has the name H. correllii Cronquist.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2024-02-07
Change Date2024-01-01
Edition Date2024-02-16
Edition AuthorsOgle, Y., & P. Somers; rev VEC, rev. Pyne/Maybury (1996), rev. Major & Maybury (2002), rev. L. Oliver (2004), rev. A. Treher (2013), rev. Soteropoulos (2024), rev. SE Ranking Workshop (2024)
Threat ImpactVery high
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank Reasons
Platanthera integrilabia is a perennial herb endemic to seven states in the southeastern United States. It is currently known from 52 populations, primarily on the Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee and Kentucky. Many occurrences consist of fewer than 100 plants, but some have upwards of 1000 plants. The species is rare throughout its range and is extirpated/historical in North Carolina and potentially South Carolina. Many surviving populations are not vigorous and exhibit very poor seed set. The habitat where this species grows has often been drained or turned into farm ponds or hog lots or has experienced residential and commercial construction. Deer browse is a significant problem that decreases seed set. Active management may be required to inhibit woody succession and prevent canopy closure at sites where the species is found but timber harvest must be carried out carefully to protect the plants and their wetland habitat from damage. Development, canopy closure, improper timber harvest techniques, rights-of-way maintenance activities, poaching, and invasive nonnative plants remain threats. Despite protection of several occurrences on federal lands, declines have been observed due to silviculture activities and mismanagement of adjacent properties. Monitoring of populations, including in states where the species has historically occurred, should be conducted to improve our understanding of reproduction, plant abundance, threats, and trends, as well as continuing conservation measures to protect the species.
Range Extent Comments
Platanthera integrilabia occurs in the southeastern United States in six ecoregions across seven states: the Appalachian Plateaus of Kentucky, Tennessee, and Alabama; the Central Appalachians of Kentucky; the Coastal Plain of Alabama and Mississippi; the Blue Ridge Province of Georgia, North Carolina (historic), and Tennessee; the Ridge and Valley Province in Alabama; and the Piedmont of Georgia and South Carolina (FNA 2002a, USFWS 2012, USFWS 2022). The recent finding of this species in the Cumberland Mountains in Kentucky may lead to additional population discoveries and known range expansion (Littlefield, pers. comm., 2024).
Occurrences Comments
By applying a 1 km separation distance to NatureServe Network occurrence data documented between the years of 1995 and 2023, it is estimated that there are 77 occurrences which may be considered 52 populations due to their close proximity, pending further field research and excluding seven sites that were failed to find, one site considered historic, and four sites considered extirpated (NatureServe 2023, USFWS 2022). Most occurrences are located in Kentucky and Tennessee. One occurrence in Tennessee was transplanted to an introduced site within the historic range of the species (USFWS 2022, Wooten et al. 2020). New occurrences continue to be found in Alabama, Kentucky, and Tennessee (Crabtree, Littlefield, and Schotz, pers. comm., 2024). However, occurrences in South Carolina have not been seen in more than twenty years despite repeated surveys (Bradley and Tessel, pers. comm., 2024).
Threat Impact Comments
Threats to Platanthera integrilabia include habitat degradation (alteration, fragmentation, succession, forest management practices, feral hogs, right-of-way maintenance, invasive species, recreation), plant damage (deer browse, poaching), and a low reproductive capacity (Southern Appalachian Species Viability Project 2002, USFWS 2021).

Habitat modification is the greatest threat to Platanthera integrilabia especially actions like logging operations, development (commercial, residential), road projects, pond construction (related to agriculture), and beaver activities which can alter sites to become unnaturally wet by damming drainage. These activities disrupt and alter hydrological regimes, which have the most severe and long-term impacts on P. integrilabia populations (Shea 1992). Although P. integrilabia may show an increase in reproduction and growth immediately after logging activities, which can continue for several years, the long-term effects have not been well studied (Shea 1992, Williams 2000). Logging activities lead to erosion, runoff, and alteration of hydrology for the surrounding landscape, especially sensitive habitats where P. integrilabia grows. Additionally, shrubby secondary growth often follows logging, which may result in a decline due to shading and competition. The opening of the forest canopy may also provide habitat for aggressive non-native plant species, and the following non-native invasive species have been documented as problematic: Lespedeza bicolor, Ligusteum sinense, Microstegium vimineum, and Perilla frutescens. Habitat changes from non-native invasives may be more severe than outcompetition, and it has been documented that Microstegium vimineum increases soil pH (McGrath and Binkley 2009), which may reduce habitat quality for P. integrilabia. In 2000, M. Williams noted native species such as sedges, grasses, and other herbaceous species can out compete P. integrilabia in sites lacking an overstory. Other activities that disrupt surface water flow include ATVs, off-highway vehicles, and horseback riding.

Damage to plants occurs through illegal harvest, herbivory by deer, feral hogs that uproot plants, aphids, disease, and use of herbicides. In 1991, at least two nurseries in TN were reported to have collected Platanthera integrilabia plants for sale. It has been suggested the type locality in KY was extirpated by plant collectors (Ettman and McAdoo 1979). Observations of herbivory by deer are common: deer favor the flowering stalks which decreases seed set. In addition, many orchids cannot replace loss of tissue until the next growing season. The loss of tissue from foraging animals could result in death for the plant (Sheviak 1990). In addition to lowering fruit set, herbivory can have a long-term negative impacts upon the site viability for the species (Zettler and Fairley 1990). Recently, as much of 20% of some populations in Kentucky have been noted to abort flowering in conjunction with aphids observed in stems (Littlefield, pers. comm., 2024). Many sites occur in right-of-ways and these sites are subjected to herbicides to control vegetative growth. The manual or mechanical clearing of vegetation from the right-of-ways seems to benefit the species (Shea 1992), though care needs to be taken to avoid impacts from machinery and timing of treatments.

Platanthera integrilabia is susceptible to fungal infections (Zettler and Fairley 1990).

Threats are compounded by low reproductive capacity and isolated populations. It is unclear how much low seed set may be related to herbivory and lack of successful pollinators (Zettler and Fairley 1990, Shea 1992, Williams 2000, Bailey 2001).

This species has been ranked as "highly vulnerable" to climate change (Glick et al. 2015), predicting a decrease in species's abundance and range extent by 2050. Drought events may increase mortality, reduce seed set, and reduce germination and recruitment (USFWS 2021). Increased storm intensity could erode habitat and increase sedimentation (USFWS 2021).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

A perennial herb that grows from a single tuber. The light green stem is smooth and often reaches a height of 60 cm. White flowers grow in loose, round to elongate cluster at the top of the stem. There are normally 6-15 flowers in each cluster. The flower petals are oblong, 7 mm long and 2.5 mm wide; the lowermost "lip" petal is narrow at the top and broad at its base and is about 13 mm long and 3 mm wide. The edges of the petals are wavy but smooth. A thin spur, 4-5 cm long, curves forward from behind the "lip" petal. The species has 2-3 large leaves with bases that loosely wrap around the lower portion of the stem. These leaves are long and narrow (20 cm long, 3 cm wide) with a smooth edge. The leaves higher up the stem are much smaller. The fruit is ellipsoid, about 15 mm long and 3 mm wide. Seeds are released when the fruit dries and its walls break open (Shea 1992; Fernald 1970; Gleason and Cronquist 1991; Bailey 2001).

Diagnostic Characteristics

When in flower, Platanthera integrilabia is very distinguishable from associated Platanthera species. Distinguishing characteristics are the presence of a fringeless, serrated, lower lip and white flowers. Platanthera blephariglottis is taxonomically most similar to P. integrilabia, but lacks an entire lower lip. The distribution of P. integrilabia is well defined and does overlap with P. blephariglottis var. conspicua. When compared to P. blephariglottis var. conspicua, the plants are small, bearing one or two leaves on a flowering stem; the others are reduced to bracts. Platanthera nivea and P. clavellata are also similar to P. integrilabia and the ranges do overlap. Platanthera nivea can be distinguished by its broad lip with a smooth margin as compared to P. integrilabia's log, narrow lip with finely serrated margin. Platanthera clavellata has greenish flowers, which distinguish it from the bright white flowers of P. integrilabia. Species of P. ciliaris and P. clavellata can occur in the same habitat as P. integrilabia, and are not distinguishable without flowers or buds (Luer 1975; Shea 1992).

Habitat

Platanthera integrilabia is generally found in wet, flat, boggy areas in acidic muck or sand with low fertility and low organic matter content, and in partially, but not fully shaded areas at the head of streams or seepage slopes. Common associates include Sphagnum spp., Osmunda cinnamonea, Woodwardia areolata, and Thelyptris novaboracensis (USFWS 2012). It is associated with sandstones of the Appalachian Plateaus of Kentucky, Tennessee, and Alabama; the Central Appalachians in Kentucky; the Coastal Plain of Alabama and Mississippi; the Blue Ridge Province of Georgia, North Carolina and Tennessee; the Ridge and Valley Physiographic Province in Alabama; and the Piedmont of Georgia and South Carolina (USFWS 2012, USFWS 2022).

Ecology

Platanthera integrilabia is a mycotrophic perennial herb that is an obligate wetland species. Research on the mycorrhizal fungal relationships of P. integrilabia suggests that the symbiont's, specifically Epulorhiza inquilina, presence may play a key role in the rate of seed germination (Currah, Zettler and McInnis 1997; Yoder et al. 2000).

Reproduction

Platanthera integrilabia flowers from late July through early September but as early as June in the southern portion of its range (Alabama). Fruits usually mature in October (Luer 1975; Gleason & Cronquist 1991; Shea 1992). Each plant grows from a single rootstock or tuber. In the winter season, two tubers can be found on one plant; one large tuber and a smaller more recently formed tuber. By spring, the tuber from the previous season (larger) will dieback, and the new smaller tuber will supply energy for the upcoming growing season. The formation of the "same" plant from a new tuber can cause the vegetative shoot to "move" up to 15 cm from the previous year's locale (Shea 1992; Zettler & Fairley 1990). The percentage of individuals flowering within a population is generally very low. Like many orchids, P. integrilabia has pollinia (pollen sacs which adhere to pollinators) that transfer pollen from plant to plant. The primary chemical attractant, which is common, in orchid nectars with strong evening odors is linalool (Hill 1968). Only about 3% of the wind-dispersed seeds germinate, which means plants have to produce copious amounts of seeds to overcome the high seed/seedling mortality. Recent studies of the other factors leading to low reproductive capacity are herbivory, inbreeding depression, and lack of effective pollinators (Bailey 2001; Zettler & Fairley 1996).
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLANDFORESTED WETLANDBog/fenRiparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
North CarolinaSHYes
KentuckyS1Yes
AlabamaS2Yes
GeorgiaS1Yes
South CarolinaSHYes
MississippiS1Yes
TennesseeS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh - moderate
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
2.2 - Wood & pulp plantationsRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
2.2.3 - Scale unknown/unrecordedRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
2.3 - Livestock farming & ranchingSmall (1-10%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
2.3.4 - Scale unknown/unrecordedSmall (1-10%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningSmall (1-10%)Extreme - seriousModerate (short-term)
3.1 - Oil & gas drillingSmall (1-10%)Extreme - seriousModerate (short-term)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsLarge (31-70%)Extreme - seriousHigh - moderate
4.1 - Roads & railroadsRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
4.2 - Utility & service linesLarge (31-70%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useLarge (31-70%)Extreme - seriousHigh - moderate
5.2 - Gathering terrestrial plantsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh - moderate
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingLarge (31-70%)Extreme - seriousHigh - moderate
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesRestricted (11-30%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
6.2 - War, civil unrest & military exercisesSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateModerate (short-term)
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge (31-70%)Extreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1.2 - Suppression in fire frequency/intensityLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useSmall (1-10%)Extreme - seriousHigh - moderate
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1.1 - Unspecified speciesRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1.2 - Named speciesRestricted (11-30%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
8.2.1 - Unspecified speciesSmall (1-10%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.2.2 - Named speciesLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
8.6 - Diseases of unknown causeRestricted - smallUnknownHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherLarge (31-70%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
11.1 - Habitat shifting & alterationLarge (31-70%)UnknownHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (22)
Alabama (3)
AreaForestAcres
Blue MountainTalladega National Forest4,986
Cheaha ATalladega National Forest236
Cheaha BTalladega National Forest741
Georgia (7)
AreaForestAcres
Big MountainChattahoochee National Forest1,974
Ellicott Rock AdditionChattahoochee National Forest690
Joe GapChattahoochee National Forest5,321
Kelly RidgeChattahoochee National Forest8,325
Patterson GapChattahoochee National Forest1,186
Sarah's CreekChattahoochee National Forest6,888
Tate BranchChattahoochee National Forest1,069
North Carolina (2)
AreaForestAcres
Overflow CreekNantahala National Forest3,379
SnowbirdNantahala National Forest8,489
South Carolina (1)
AreaForestAcres
Big MountainSumter National Forest2,337
Tennessee (9)
AreaForestAcres
Bald River Gorge AdditionCherokee National Forest1,728
Big Frog AdditionCherokee National Forest369
Brushy RidgeCherokee National Forest7,469
Devil's BackboneCherokee National Forest4,287
Joyce Kilmer Slickrock Add.Cherokee National Forest1,396
Little Frog Addition NECherokee National Forest321
Little Frog Addition NWCherokee National Forest628
Sycamore CreekCherokee National Forest6,984
Upper Bald RiverCherokee National Forest9,202
References (46)
  1. Argue, C.L. 2011. The Pollination Biology of North American Orchids: Volume 1: North of Florida and Mexico. Springer, New York, NY. 240 pp.
  2. Bailey Jr., C. 2001. Conservation strategy for Platanthera integrilabia (white fringeless orchid) Report to the Cherokee National Forest.
  3. Bradley, Keith. Personal communication. Senior Botanist, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Heritage Trust Program, Columbia, South Carolina.
  4. Bryan, H. 1987. White fringeless orchid. Kentucky Native Plant Society Newsletter 2(3): 7.
  5. Chester, E.W., B.E. Wofford, R. Kral, H.R. DeSelm, and A.M. Evans. 1993. Atlas of Tennessee vascular plants: Vol. 1. Pteridophytes, Gymnosperms, Angiosperms: Monocots. Austin Peay State Univ., Clarksville, Tennessee. 118 pp.
  6. Correll, D. S. 1941. Harvard University Botanical Museum Leaflets 9: 152-157.
  7. Crabtree, Todd. Personal communication. Botanist, Tennessee Division of Natural Areas, Tennessee Department of Environmental Conservation, Nashville, TN.
  8. Currah, R.S., L.W. Zettler, and T.M. Mcinnis. 1997. <i>Epulorhiza inquilina </i>sp. nov. from Platanthera (Orchidaceae) and a key to <i>Epulorhiza </i>species. Mycotaxon 61: 335-342.
  9. Ettman, J.K., and D.R. McAdoo. 1978. An annotated catalog and distribution account of the Kentucky Orchidaceae. Kentucky Society of Natural History Charitable Trust. Louisville, Kentucky.
  10. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2002a. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 26. Magnoliophyta: Liliidae: Liliales and Orchidales. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xxvi + 723 pp.
  11. Gleason, H.A., and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York. 910 pp.
  12. Glick, P., S. R. Palmer, and J. P. Wisby. 2015. Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment for Tennessee Wildlife and Habitats. Report prepared by the National Wildlife Federation and The Nature Conservancy – Tennessee for the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency, Nashville, Tennessee. 108 pp.
  13. Hills, H.G., N.H. Williams, and C.H. Dodson. 1968. Identification of some orchid fragrance components. Am. Orchid Soc. Bull. 37:967-971.
  14. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  15. Kartesz, J.T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. First edition. In: Kartesz, J.T., and C.A. Meacham. Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, N.C.
  16. Kral, R. 1983a. A report on some rare, threatened or endangered forest related vascular plants of the south. USFS technical publication R8-TP2, Atlanta, GA. Vol. 1: 718 pp.
  17. Kral, R. 1983c. A report on some rare, threatened, or endangered forest-related vascular plants of the South. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Forest Service Technical Publication R8-TP2, Athens, GA. 1305 pp.
  18. Littlefield, Tara. Personal communication. Botanist, Kentucky Natural Heritage Program, Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort , KY.
  19. Luer, C.A. 1975. The native orchids of the United States and Canada excluding Florida. New York Botanical Garden. 361 pp.
  20. McGrath, D. A. and M. A. Binkley. 2009. <i>Microstegium vimineum </i>invasion changes soil chemistry and soil microarthropod communities in Cumberland Plateau forests. Southeastern Naturalist 8: 141-156.
  21. Medley, M.E. 1980. Status report on Platanthera integrilabia. Prepared under contract # 14-16-0004-79-105 for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Unpaginated.
  22. Mississippi Natural Heritage Program. 1991. Museum of Natural Science. Jackson, Mississippi.
  23. NatureServe. 2023. NatureServe Network Biodiversity Location Data. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
  24. Radcliffe, Carrie. Personal Communication. Restoration Coordinator, Department of Science and Conservation, Atlanta Botanical Garden.
  25. Ratzlaff, A. 2001. Candidate and listing priority assignment form: <i>Platanthera integrilabia</i>. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Asheville, North Carolina Field Office.
  26. Schotz, Al. Personal Communication. Botanist, Alabama Natural Heritage Program.
  27. Shea, M. 1992. Status Survey Report on Platanthera integrilabia. Technical Report to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Asheville, North Carolina.
  28. Sheviak, C.J. 1990. Biological Considerations in the mangement of temperate terrestrial Orchid habitats. Ecosystem Management: Rare Species and Signifiacant Habitats. New York State Museum Bulletin 471. 1990.
  29. Southern Appalachian Species Viability Project. 2002. A partnership between the U.S. Forest Service-Region 8, Natural Heritage Programs in the Southeast, NatureServe, and independent scientists to develop and review data on 1300+ regionally and locally rare species in the Southern Appalachian and Alabama region. Database (Access 97) provided to the U.S. Forest Service by NatureServe, Durham, North Carolina.
  30. Sutter, R.D., V. Frantz, and K.A. McCarthy. 1988. Atlas of rare and endangered plant species in North Carolina. North Carolina Dept. Agriculture, Plant Protection Section, Conservation Program, Raleigh, North Carolina. 174 pp.
  31. Tessel, Samantha. Personal communication. Upstate Botanist, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Heritage Trust Program, Clemson, SC.
  32. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2004. Species assessment and listing priority assignment form. <i>Platanthera integrilabia.</i> 10 pp.l
  33. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2012. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service species assessment and listing priority assignment form for <i>Platanthera integrilabia</i>. Region 4 (Southeast Region), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Office.
  34. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2013. Review of Native Species That are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notice of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions. Federal Register 78(226):70104-70162.
  35. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2015. Threatened Species Status for <i>Platanthera integrilabia </i>(White Fringeless Orchid). Federal Register 80(178): 55304-55321.
  36. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2016. Threatened Species Status for <i>Platanthera integrilabia</i> (White Fringeless Orchid). Final Rule. Federal Register 81(177): 62826-62833.
  37. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021. Species Status Assessment Report for White Fringeless Orchid (<i>Platanthera integrilabia</i>). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, South Atlantic-Gulf Region, Atlanta, GA. 112 pp. https://ecos.fws.gov/ServCat/DownloadFile/197254
  38. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022. White Fringeless Orchid (<i>Platanthera integrilabia</i>) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Cookeville, TN.
  39. Weakley, A.S. 2020. Flora of the Southeastern United States. 20 October 2020 Edition. University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU), North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
  40. White, D. 1998. Candidate and listing priority form. USFWS form.
  41. Williams, M. W. 2000b. <i>Platanthera integrilabia</i> Survey in Tennessee. Tennessee Department of Environment &amp; Conservation, Division of Natural Heritage.
  42. Wooten, S., G. Call, A. Dattilo, J. Cruse-Sanders, and J.N. Boyd. 2020. Impacts of forest thinning and white-tailed deer herbivory on translocation of the rare terrestrial orchid <i>Platanthera integrilabia</i>. Diversity 12(11):412. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12110412
  43. Yoder, J. A., L. W. Zettler, and S. L. Scott. 2000. Water regulation of terrestrial and epiphytic orchid seeds and seedlings, and evidence water uptake by means of mycotrtophy.Plant Science 156. 2000 145-150.
  44. Zettler, L.W. and J.E. Farley, III. 1990. The status of Platanthera integrilabia, an endangered terrestrial orchid. Lindleyana 5(4): 212-217.
  45. Zettler, L. W. and T. M. McInnis, Jr. 1992. Propagation of <i>Platanthera integrilabia</i> (Correll) Luer, an endangered terrestrial orchid through symbiotic seed germination. Lindleyana 7: 154-161.
  46. Zettler, L.W., N.S. Ahuja, and T.M. Mcinnis, Jr. 1996. Insect pollination of the endangered monkey-face orchid (Platanthera integrilabia) in McMinn County, Tennessee - One last glimpse of a once common spectacle. Castanea 61(1):14-24.