Actaea racemosa

L.

Black Cohosh

G3Vulnerable (G3G4) Found in 85 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
High - mediumThreat Impact
black cohosh (Actaea racemosa). Photo by mush13, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
mush13, CC BY 4.0
black cohosh (Actaea racemosa). Photo by Courtney Alley, CC0 1.0, via iNaturalist.
Courtney Alley, CC0 1.0
black cohosh (Actaea racemosa). Photo by hr_dragonfly, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
hr_dragonfly, CC BY 4.0
black cohosh (Actaea racemosa). Photo by hr_dragonfly, CC BY 4.0, via iNaturalist.
hr_dragonfly, CC BY 4.0
black cohosh (Actaea racemosa). Photo by Ken Kneidel, CC0 1.0, via iNaturalist.
Ken Kneidel, CC0 1.0
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.154359
Element CodePDRAN02040
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderRanunculales
FamilyRanunculaceae
GenusActaea
Synonyms
Cimicifuga racemosa(L.) Nutt.
Other Common Names
Black Baneberry (EN) black baneberry (EN) Black Bugbane (EN) Black Snakeroot (EN) Cimicaire à grappes (FR)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. First edition. In: Kartesz, J.T., and C.A. Meacham. Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, N.C.
Taxonomic Comments
Black cohosh, or Actaea racemosa according to Weakley et al. (2024) and Kartesz (1999), is also widely known as Cimicifuga racemosa (Flora of North America 1997). Phylogenetic analyses of Compton et al. (1998) support the inclusion of Cimicifuga within a monophyletic Actaea. Ramsey (in FNA 1997, vol. 3) considers var. dissecta a form of uncertain taxonomic significance and the variety is not recognized as distinct by Weakley et al. (2024). Actaea racemosa can be distinguished from the Appalachian species A. podocarpa (syn. Cimicifuga americana) by the lack of a deep, broad groove on the upper side of lowest petiole (leaf stem). When infertile, Actaea racemosa can be easily confused with Actaea pachypoda, Aruncus dioicus, and Astilbe biternata, as well as other species of Actaea or Cimicifuga.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Biotics v1
Review Date2020-02-13
Change Date2020-02-05
Edition Date2020-02-13
Edition AuthorsJohn R. Boetsch (1/00); rev. Eric Nielsen and L. Morse (1/00), rev. L. Oliver (2020)
Threat ImpactHigh - medium
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of OccurrencesUnknown
Rank Reasons
Black cohosh has a wide range in eastern North America and is particularly abundant in the central and southern Appalachians. It is frequently encountered in a wide variety of wooded habitats across its range. The species is threatened by the general habitat degradation of eastern forests. More significantly, black cohosh is threatened by continuous wild harvest for the medicinal plant industry. Products derived from the dried roots and rhizomes of black cohosh generate over 35 million US dollars annually in retail sales. The vast majority of black cohosh is wild collected since there are no significant sources of cultivated material. This species has been identified as a priority for conservation by many entities including the United Plant Savers, the American Herbal Products Association, the US Forest Service, and the US Fish and Wildlife Service. The conservation status of this species, despite its relative abundance, reflects population declines inferred from continued collection pressure. Comprehensive and systematically sampled population data from across the species' range are needed to quantify current population levels and severity of threats, as well as to prioritize conservation action where it is most needed.
Range Extent Comments
Black cohosh occurs in the eastern United States from New York south to Alabama and west to Arkansas and Missouri. It also occurs in the southeastern tip of Ontario, Canada (Flora North America 1997, Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) 2020, iNaturalist 2020). The main part of the range includes the central and southern Appalachians in West Virginia, the western part of Virginia, Kentucky and Tennessee.
Occurrences Comments
Accurately estimating the number of occurrences is difficult because the species is widespread and not comprehensively monitored or collected.
Threat Impact Comments
The primary threat to black cohosh is the wild harvest of rhizomes and roots for the medicinal plant industry. The majority of wild harvest occurs in the central and southern Appalachians (Kruger et al. 2020). In addition to the harvest pressure, habitat conversion and development are significant direct threats, as is common throughout unprotected areas of eastern forests (Homoya pers. comm., Pittman pers. comm., Kunsman pers. comm., Pearson pers. comm., Frye pers. comm.). Other significant threats include habitat fragmentation and displacement by exotic species (Homoya pers. comm., Penskar pers. comm., Frye pers. comm.).

The market demand for black cohosh has resulted in continued wild harvest over the past two decades, and likely previously (Kruger et al. 2020, Small and Chamberlain 2018, AHPA 2012, pers. comm. M. McGuffin). In 2015, the total retail value for black cohosh was over 35 million US dollars, sourced from an estimated 120,207 kg of dried rhizomes and roots. Despite the high retail value of black cohosh, only a small fraction was paid to harvesters for raw material. Harvesters were paid a total of $957,237, averaging of $7.96 per dried kilogram (Kruger et al. 2020, amounts in US dollars and averaged over 2014 between 2015). The price per kilogram of black cohosh is much lower than other species in the same geographic area such as False unicorn root, Chamaelirium luteum ($158.71 per kg) and Virginia snakeroot, Aristolochia serpentaria ($186.23 per kg, Kruger et al. 2020). The lower price per kilogram and overall volume of black cohosh harvest is an indication that it is still relatively easy to find.

Harvest not only impacts existing populations, but also affects the regrowth of those populations. Populations occurring in the central and southern Appalachians, where the species is most abundant and where harvest intensity is highest, are most affected. The immediate effects of harvest include reduced reproduction and growth, both above and below ground (Small and Chamberlain 2018). In a three year study, populations with intense harvest rates (66%) resulted in an 80-90% decrease of foliage and stem density compared to pre-harvest rates (Small and Chamberlain 2018). With moderate harvest rates (33%), foliage decreased by 70-80%, and stem density by 65% from pre-harvest rates. Significant differences between the non-harvested control plots and harvested plots remained evident two years after the study (Small and Chamberlain 2018). The dramatically reduced population regrowth in harvested populations may have lasting consequences to the long-term survival of those populations (Small and Chamberlain 2018).

No large scale cultivation exists for this species (Suggs pers. comm.). Between 1999 – 2010 only between 1 – 5% of black cohosh entering the herbal market was from cultivated sources, based on the self-reporting American Herbal Products Association (AHPA 2012). Demand is high for forest farmed (also called woods-grown) or wild sources due to purported medicinal benefits of slow growth in wild conditions (Corbin pers. comm.). Attempts are being made to cultivate this species on forest farms in Iowa, Kentucky, and Virginia for the medicinal trade (Halvorsen pers. comm., Blakley pers. comm.).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Black cohosh is a perennial species that occurs in rich coves and mesic deciduous forests.

Diagnostic Characteristics

Several plants in North America resemble black cohosh, primarily other species in the genus Actaea that overlap geographically such as A. podocarpa, A. pachypoda, A. rubra and A. rubicola. These species cannot be distinguished from one another by leaf morphology alone. Actaea podocarpa and A. pachypoda are most readily confused with A. racemosa (Predney et al. 2006) but can be distinguished by their seeds. Actaea podocarpa has ovaries attached by a small stem called a stipe, while A. racemosa and A. pachypoda have no stipe. Actaea racemosa flowers from April to August and has dry fruit, while A. pachypoda flowers only April to May and has fleshy fruit (Weakley 2015). More detailed guidance on identification can be found in Weakley (2015) and Flora of North America (1997).

Habitat

The habitat for this species is primarily rich, mesic deciduous forests, forest coves, and ravines with fertile soils and circumneutral to basic soil pH (Small and Chamberlain 2018, Schafale pers. comm., Homoya pers. comm., Frye pers. comm.). It is found in montane oak-hickory forests, high-elevation red oak forests, and northern hardwoods in the southern Blue Ridge (Schafale pers. comm.). It is frequently found in association with ash-beech-sugar maple and tulip poplar (Homoya pers. comm., Frye pers. comm.). In Indiana, this species is mostly associated with limestone substrates and found in unglaciated areas (Homoya pers. comm.).

Ecology

This species has been observed to have greater flower production in slightly disturbed or open wooded slopes (Pittillo pers. comm.). Plants occurring in the southern part of its range require more shade and water (Predney et al. 2006).

Reproduction

Black cohosh flowers from June to September and sets seed from June to August. Seedpods can be found on the raceme while the plant is still flowering. Seed dormancy is typically six months, and seeds require warm and cold stratification to germinate (Predney et al. 2006). Viability in the seed bank is relatively short. While black cohosh reproduces both sexually and asexually, population growth typically occurs by clonal reproduction via bud regrowth from rhizomes. Population growth from sexual reproduction is limited by seed dormancy and seedling mortality, both of which increase in dry conditions (Small and Chamberlain 2018).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - Hardwood
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN2
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioS2Yes
QuebecSNANo
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
MassachusettsS1Yes
ArkansasSNRYes
PennsylvaniaS5Yes
OhioSNRYes
TennesseeSNRYes
DelawareS4Yes
MichiganSHYes
New JerseyS4Yes
New YorkS4Yes
IndianaS4Yes
MissouriSNRYes
West VirginiaS4Yes
KentuckyS5Yes
North CarolinaS4Yes
VirginiaS4Yes
AlabamaSNRYes
South CarolinaS4Yes
IllinoisS2Yes
GeorgiaS4Yes
ConnecticutSNRYes
MississippiS1Yes
District of ColumbiaSNRYes
IowaSHYes
MaineSNANo
MarylandSNRYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentLarge - restrictedModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasLarge - restrictedModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
5.2 - Gathering terrestrial plantsLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)
8.2.1 - Unspecified speciesRestricted - smallModerate - slightHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, Long-lived
Economic Value (Genus)Yes
Roadless Areas (85)
Arkansas (2)
AreaForestAcres
Clifty CanyonOzark-St. Francis National Forest1,963
Dismal CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest9,160
Georgia (8)
AreaForestAcres
Cedar MountainChattahoochee National Forest1,083
Helton CreekChattahoochee National Forest2,348
Joe GapChattahoochee National Forest5,321
Kelly RidgeChattahoochee National Forest8,325
Miller CreekChattahoochee National Forest701
Patterson GapChattahoochee National Forest1,186
Pink KnobChattahoochee National Forest12,127
Rocky MountainChattahoochee National Forest4,269
New Hampshire (2)
AreaForestAcres
Presidential - Dry River ExtWhite Mountain National Forest10,555
Wild RiverWhite Mountain National Forest46,878
North Carolina (19)
AreaForestAcres
Bald MountainPisgah National Forest11,085
Balsam ConePisgah National Forest10,591
BearwallowPisgah National Forest4,113
Cheoah BaldNantahala National Forest7,795
Cherry Cove (addition)Nantahala National Forest836
Chunky Gal (addition)Nantahala National Forest3,336
Craggy MountainPisgah National Forest2,657
Graveyard Ridge (addition)Pisgah National Forest1,958
Harper CreekPisgah National Forest7,325
Jarrett CreekPisgah National Forest7,485
Laurel MountainPisgah National Forest5,683
Linville Gorge AdditionPisgah National Forest2,809
Lost CovePisgah National Forest5,944
Mackey MountainPisgah National Forest5,934
Tusquitee BaldNantahala National Forest13,670
Wesser BaldNantahala National Forest4,061
Wilson CreekPisgah National Forest4,863
Woods MountainPisgah National Forest9,602
Yellowhammer Branch (add.)Nantahala National Forest1,255
Pennsylvania (4)
AreaForestAcres
Allegheny FrontAllegheny National Forest7,430
CornplanterAllegheny National Forest2,929
Hearts ContentAllegheny National Forest221
Tracy RidgeAllegheny National Forest9,034
Tennessee (8)
AreaForestAcres
Bald MountainCherokee National Forest11,743
Brushy RidgeCherokee National Forest7,469
Flint Mill GapCherokee National Forest9,494
Joyce Kilmer Slickrock Add.Cherokee National Forest1,396
London Bridge BranchCherokee National Forest3,387
Sampson Mountain AdditionCherokee National Forest3,064
Stone MountainCherokee National Forest5,367
Sycamore CreekCherokee National Forest6,984
Virginia (36)
AreaForestAcres
Adams PeakGeorge Washington National Forest7,135
Beards MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,505
Beaver Dam CreekJefferson National Forest1,135
Broad RunJefferson National Forest10,971
Brush MountainJefferson National Forest6,002
Brush Mountain EastJefferson National Forest4,916
Brushy MountainJefferson National Forest4,168
Gum RunGeorge Washington National Forest12,620
Hoop HoleJefferson National Forest4,652
Horse HeavenJefferson National Forest4,748
JerkemtightGeorge Washington National Forest16,687
Kelley MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,590
Little AlleghanyGeorge Washington National Forest10,215
Little Dry Run AdditionJefferson National Forest2,204
Little RiverGeorge Washington National Forest27,292
Little Walker MountainJefferson National Forest9,818
Little Wilson Creek Addition BJefferson National Forest1,725
Long SpurJefferson National Forest6,417
Mill MountainGeorge Washington National Forest10,840
Mountain Lake Addition AJefferson National Forest1,469
Mountain Lake Addition CJefferson National Forest494
Mt. PleasantGeorge Washington National Forest8,933
New London Bridge BranchJefferson National Forest844
North MountainJefferson National Forest8,377
Northern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest9,444
Oak KnobGeorge Washington National Forest10,882
Oliver MountainGeorge Washington National Forest13,090
Peters Mountain Addition BJefferson National Forest2,909
Raccoon BranchJefferson National Forest4,388
Ramseys Draft AdditionGeorge Washington National Forest12,781
Seng MountainJefferson National Forest6,428
Shawvers Run AdditionJefferson National Forest1,927
SkidmoreGeorge Washington National Forest5,641
Southern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest11,985
The PriestGeorge Washington National Forest5,737
Three RidgesGeorge Washington National Forest4,745
West Virginia (6)
AreaForestAcres
Dolly Sods Roaring PlainMonongahela National Forest13,392
Dry River (WV)George Washington National Forest7,331
Mcgowan MountainMonongahela National Forest10,504
Middle MountainMonongahela National Forest19,020
Seneca CreekMonongahela National Forest22,287
Tea Creek MountainMonongahela National Forest8,295
References (43)
  1. American Herbal Products Association.Tonnage Surveys of Select North American Wild-Harvested Plants, 2006-2010. Silver Spring (MD): American Herbal Products Association; 2012.
  2. APSU Center for Field Biology and University of Tennessee Herbarium. 1999. October 6-last update. Atlas of Tennessee Vascular Plants. Online. Available: http://www.bio.utk.edu/botany/herbarium/vascular/atlas.html. Accessed 2000-Jan.
  3. Bittner, M., R. Schenk, and M. Melzig. 2016b. Alternative approach to species identification of <i>Actaea racemosa </i>L. (syn. <i>Cimicifuga racemosa</i> (L.) Nutt., black cohosh) herbal starting material: UV spectroscopy coupled with LDA. Phytochemistry Letters 18: 220-225.
  4. Bittner, M., R. Schenk, A. Springer, and M. Melzig. 2016a. Economical, plain, and rapid authentication of <i>Actaea racemosa </i>L. (syn. <i>Cimicifuga racemosa, </i>Black Cohosh) herbal raw material by resiliet RP-PDA-HPLC and chemometric analysis. Phytochemical Analysis 27: 318-325.
  5. Blakley, Tim. National Center for the Preservation of Medicinal Herbs, Rutland, OH.
  6. Brumback, W.E., and L.J. Mehrhoff. 1996. Flora Conservanda: New England. The New England Plant Conservation Program list of plants in need of conservation. Rhodora 98 (895): 235-361.
  7. Compton, J. A., A. Culham and S.L. Jury. 1998. Reclassification of <i>Actaea</i> to include <i>Cimicifuga</i> and <i>Souliea</i> (Ranunculaceae): phytogeny inferred from morphology, nrDNA ITS, and cpDNA trnL-F sequence variation. Taxon 47:593-634.
  8. Corbin, Jim. Plant Specialist, NC Department of Agriculture.
  9. Dellinger, Bob. GSMNP Fire Effects Biologist.
  10. Edward J. Fletcher Strategic Sourcing, Inc.
  11. Enser, Rick. RI Heritage Program Botanist.
  12. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 1997. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 3. Magnoliophyta: Magnoliidae and Hamamelidae. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xxiii + 590 pp.
  13. Foster, S. 2013. Exploring the peripatetic maze of Black Cohosh adulteration: a review of the nomenclature, distribution, chemistry, market status, analytical methods and safety. HerbalGram 98: 32-51. Accessed online on 1/13/2020 at: <a href="http://cms.herbalgram.org/herbalgram/issue98/hg98feat-blackcohosh.html?ts=1578952023&amp;signature=7fdeb121a08536a7c14d4ee924266845">http://cms.herbalgram.org/herbalgram/issue98/hg98feat-blackcohosh.html?ts=1578952023&amp;signature=7fdeb121a08536a7c14d4ee924266845</a>
  14. Frye, Chris. Maryland Heritage Program Botanist.
  15. Halvorsen, Thorn. Buyer/Herbalist, HerbParm, Williams, Oregon.
  16. Homoya, Mike. Personal communication. Botanist/Plant Ecologist. Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Nature Preserves. Indianapolis, IN.
  17. Kartesz, J.T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. First edition. In: Kartesz, J.T., and C.A. Meacham. Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, N.C.
  18. Kauffman, Gary. Personal Communication. Botanist. USDA Forest Service, Nantahala National Forest, Highlands, NC.
  19. Kruger, S., J. Munsell, J. Chamberlain, J. Davis and R. Huish. 2020. Projecting medicinal plant trade volume and value in deciduous forests of the eastern United States. Forests 11(74): 1-20.
  20. Kunsman, J. Botanist, Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory-East.
  21. McCoy, J.A., J. M. Davis, N.D. Camper, and K. I. A Bharathi. 2007. Influence of rhizome propagule size on yields of triterpene glycosides concentrations of black cohosh (<i>Actaea racemosa </i>L. syn. <i>Cimicifuga racemose</i> (L.) Nuttal.) HortScience 42: 61-64.
  22. McGuffin, Michael. Personal communication. American Herbal Products Association, Silver Spring MD
  23. National Center for the Preservation of Medicinal Herbs. 1999. Black Cohosh. Online. Available: http://www.ncpmh.org/blacoh.html. Accessed 2000-Jan.
  24. Naud, L., A. Olivier, and A. Lapointe. 2010. Medicinal understory herbaceous species cultivated under different light and soil conditions in maple forests in southern Quebec, Canada. Agrofor Syst 79: 303-326.
  25. Ode, David. Botanist/Ecologist, South Dakota Natural Heritage Database. Personal communication.
  26. Pearson, John. Iowa Heritage Program Botanist.
  27. Pengelly, A., and K. Bennett. 2012. Appalachian plant monographs. Black cohosh <i>Actaea racemosa </i>L. Published online at http://www.frostburge.edu/aces/appalachian-plants/
  28. Penskar, Mike. Personal communication. Botanist, Michigan Natural Features Inventory. Lansing, MI.
  29. Pittillo, J. Dan. Professor, Western Carolina University.
  30. Pittman, Bert. SC Heritage Program Botanist.
  31. Predny, M. L., P. De Angelis and J. L. Chamberlain. 2006. Black cohosh <i>(Actaea racemosa): </i>an annotated bibliography. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-97. Ashevulle, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 99p.
  32. Punter, C. Elizabeth. Special Projects Botanist, Manitoba Conservation Data Centre. Personal communication.
  33. Schafale, Mike. Community Ecologist, North Carolina Heritage Program.
  34. Schotz, Al. Personal Communication. Botanist, Alabama Natural Heritage Program.
  35. Small, C. J. and J. L. Chamberlain. 2018. Experimental harvest and growth in Appalachian black cohosh (<i>Actaea racemosa, </i>Ranunculaceae) populations: implications for sustainable management of a medicinal forest herb. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 145(2): 109-128.
  36. Small, C. J., J. L. Chamberlain, and C. M. Nuckols. 2014. Failure of black cohosh (<i>Actaea racemosa </i>L.) rhizome transplants: potential causes and forest farming implications. Agroforest Syst. 88: 815-822.
  37. Small, C. J., J. L. Chamberlain and D. S. Matthews. 2011. Recovery of black cohosh (<i>Actaea racemosa </i>L.) following experimental harvest. American Midland Naturalist 166: 339-348.
  38. Smith, Tim. Personal communication. Botanist, Missouri Department of Conservation. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, MO
  39. Suggs, Robin. Executive Director, Yellow Creek Botanical Institute, Robbinsville, NC.
  40. United Plant Savers. Online. Available: http://www.plantsavers.org. Accessed 2000-Jan.
  41. University of Maryland Sustainable Development and Conservation Biology Problem Solving Group. 1999. Review of four species for potential listing on the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, Appendix II. Unpublished report.
  42. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 1999. November 3-last update. The PLANTS database. Online. Available: http://plants.usda.gov/plants. Accessed 2000-Jan.
  43. Warren County Nursery, McMinnville, TN.