Asclepias meadii

Torr. ex Gray

Mead's Milkweed

G2Imperiled Found in 3 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
Very highThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.129673
Element CodePDASC02150
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderGentianales
FamilyApocynaceae
GenusAsclepias
Other Common Names
Mead's milkweed (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2021-02-25
Change Date1983-11-10
Edition Date2021-02-25
Edition AuthorsRoth, E., rev. W.R. Ostlie (Midwestern Regional Office), rev. Freeman/Maybury (1996), rev. Treher (2012), rev. Tomaino (2015), A. Treher (2020, 2021)
Threat ImpactVery high
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
Asclepias meadii is a formerly widespread milkweed of the midwestern United States. Historically it ranged over much of the native tallgrass prairie region of the Midwest which has declined due to the extensive destruction and fragmentation of its habitat. Where habitat remains, inadequate management (loss of fire regime; frequent mowing prior to seed set) has threatened the species. There are about 330 remaining occurrences and the species' overall range has shrunk dramatically. It is thought to have disappeared entirely from Wisconsin and Indiana, where it has since been reintroduced. Small population sizes and low recruitment, along with limited sexual reproduction threaten the persistence of the species. Continuing threats include urbanization, conversion to agricultural land, habitat fragmentation, invasive species expansion, lack of prescribed fire, annual hay mowing before completion of reproduction, feral hog habitat destruction, herbicide/pesticide application, predation by weevils, deer, voles, and cattle, and climate change.
Range Extent Comments
Asclepias meadii, historically, ranged throughout the tallgrass prairie region of the United States. In pre-European settlement times, it possessed a wide distribution from northwestern Indiana, southwestern Wisconsin and southern Iowa to southern Illinois, southern Missouri and eastern Kansas (Betz 1989). It was extirpated from Indiana and Wisconsin, but since reintroduced. Range extent including all historical and extirpated occurrences is estimated at 253,000 sq km.
Occurrences Comments
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (2012), estimates 330 occurrences. The NatureServe Network (2021) also reports over 300 occurrences. Over half of these are in Kansas, and a large number (85) are in Missouri. There are 19 introduced populations in three states but none are considered viable by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (2012). There is one in Indiana is doing reasonably well (M. Homoya, pers. comm., 2015) and 7 in Illinois. In Wisconsin, there have been 11 introductions but no flowering has been observed (USFWS 2012). There are many historical occurrences and 13 that are extirpated, mostly over 30 years ago.
Threat Impact Comments
Asclepias meadii’s habitat is threatened with loss, fragmentation, and degradation due to several factors including urbanization, conversion to agricultural land, invasive species expansion, lack of prescribed fire and thus vegetative succession, feral hogs, and climate change. The species is directly threatened by competition with invasive or woody species due to succession, herbicide application, predation by weevils, deer, voles, and cattle, and annual hay mowing which interrupts reproduction.

Loss of habitat and modification appears to be the primary cause of decline (Chaplin et al. 1990). Numerous historical sites have been destroyed through plowing and land conversion throughout its range (Freeman 1988, Kurz and Bowles 1981). Insufficient or inappropriate prairie management or lack of fire leads to a gradual depletion of A. meadii plants through invasion of woody plants and invasive species.

Long-term summer mowing of prairie land has had a negative effect on A. meadii by eliminating seed production (USFWS 2012, Chaplin et al. 1990). Mowing of prairies usually occurs in late June and early July (Freeman 1988) when fruits are present but immature (Chaplin et al. 1990). As a result, recruitment is low, but established plants seem to maintain high survivorship (Alexander et al. 2012).

Habitat fragmentation has resulted in the few remaining populations being separated by long distances, even in states like Kansas where populations are most numerous (Freeman 1988). This action has potentially led to reduced population viability through low levels of cross-pollination, as described in other members of the genus (Shannon and Wyatt 1986, Kephart 1981). Low numbers within a given population may result in decreased visitation rates by pollinators (Betz and Hohn 1981).

Plants are also susceptible to predation. A species of Curculionid and Cerambycid beetle has been shown to cause plant damage by both the larval and adult phases (Betz and Hohn 1978, USFWS 2012). Fungal attack has been reported In Missouri (Eulinger and Skinner 2007 cited by USFWS 2005). Grazing by cattle can negatively impact Mead’s milkweed, especially when grazing occurs during flowering and fruiting periods (Eulinger and Skinner 2007 cited by USFWS 2012). Deer and vole herbivory are additional threats that limit fruit production (Grman and Alexander 2005). Feral hogs have caused habitat destruction in Missouri (USFWS 2012).

Herbicide and pesticide use has impacted Asclepias meadii in railroad prairies (Betz 1989, USFWS 2012) and may potentially impact pollinators.

Climate change may also impact Asclepias meadii through changes in the timing of blooming, loss of suitable habitat, loss of inter-specific relationships with pollinators, and increased threats from invasive species (USFWS 2012).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

"Asclepias meadii has a single slender unbranched stalk, 8 to 16 inches high, without hairs but with a whitish waxy covering. The hairless leaves are opposite, broadly ovate, 2 to 3 inches long, 3/8 to 2 inches wide, also with a whitish waxy covering. A solitary umbel at the top of the stalk has 6 to 15 greenish, cream-colored flowers." (USFWS 2005).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Stem to 2 ft, smooth, containing milky sap. Leaves opposite, simple, narrowly to broadly lance-shaped, toothless, without stalks. Flowers borne in solitary drooping umbel at end of a long stalk. Corolla greenish white, hoods purple or greenish purple. Flowers open in late May and early June.

Habitat

Asclepias meadii is a species of dry-mesic to mesic tallgrass prairies or glade/barren habitat characterized by vegetation adapted for drought and fire (Chaplin et al. 1990; Barbour and Billings 1988, Axelrod 1985; USFWS 2005, 2012). The species has been recorded from chert glades (Steyermark 1977) and sandstone rock-ledges (Voigt and Mohlenbrock 1964). Plants seem to prefer full sun, occupying slopes that grade between 0 and 18% (Chaplin et al. 1990).

Associates include a lengthy list of over 60 prairie plants (Betz 1989). Among the associates are Achillea millefolium, Amorpha canescens, Andropogon gerardii, A. scoparius, Antennaria neglecta, Asclepias viridis, A. tuberosa, Baptisia bracteata, Coreopsis palmata, Dalea candida, D. purpurea, Desmanthus illinoensis, Dichanthelium oligosanthes, Echinacea pallida, Erigeron strigosus, Eryngium yuccifolium, Liatris pycnostachya, Lithospermum canescens, Lobelia spicata, Phlox pilosa, Polytaenia nuttallii, Psoralea tenuiflora, Ratibida pinnata, Scleria triglomerata, Silphium laciniatum, Sisyrinchium campestre, Sorghastrum nutans, Sporobolus heterolepis, Tripsicum dactyloides, and Viola pedatifida (Chaplin et al. 1990, Betz 1989).

In eastern Kansas, populations occur predominantly on the unglaciated terrain of the Kansas River (Chaplin et al. 1990). The majority of known sites are on limestone bedrock, with two exceptions occurring over sandstone (McGregor 1987). These sites are typically well-drained to excessively drained with silty-loam mollisol soils derived from loess residuum, limestone, shale, glacial till or sandstone (Freeman 1988). Populations typically occur in upland tallgrass prairie sites. At such sites, associates frequently include the western prairie fringed orchid and the prairie mole-cricket (Gryllitalpa major) (Busby 1990, Figg and Calvert 1987). A small population was discovered on a sandstone prairie which was invaded heavily by Quercus marilandica, Q. stellata, and Juniperus virginiana (Chaplin et al. 1990).

In Illinois, populations of A. meadii occur in tallgrass prairie and dry barrens (Kurz and Bowles 1981). Populations occur in southern Illinois in the unglaciated Shawnee Hill Division (Mohlenbrock 1986). It is also known from the glaciated portion of east-central Illinois known as the Grand Prairie Division (Mohlenbrock 1986). In the sand barrens of Illinois, trees associated with A. meadii include Quercus marilandica, Q. stellata, Q. velutina, and Juniperus virginiana. Other associated prairie species include: Allium canadense, Anemone cylindrica, Apocynum sibiricum, Aster ericoides, Aster laevis, Cirsium discolor, Convolvulus sepium, Fragaria virginiana, Helianthus maximilliana, Lithospermum canescens, Petalostemum purpureum, Poa compressa, Polygala senega, Sisyrinchium albidum, Solidago rigida, Sporobolus heterolepis, and Stipa spartea (Swink 1974, Litzow 1978, Kurz and Bowles 1981).

Steyermark (1977) stated that A. meadii was rare and local in the southern half of Missouri, occurring in dry upland prairies and chert-lime glades. Currently, it is uncommon in western Missouri, mostly in the Unglaciated Plains Division, in upland prairies and igneous glades (Yatskievych 2006). Most populations are on mollisols and alfisols which formed over loess, glacial till, limestone, sandstone and shale (Morgan 1980).

In Iowa, A. meadii is restricted to the Southern Iowa Drift Plain (Prior 1976). Extant populations occur on clay-loam and silty clay-loam mollisols developed from weathered Kansas age drift covered with a moderate to thick layer of loess (Freeman 1988).

A single historic record of A. meadii exists from Indiana, collected near Crown Point on dry ground in 1888 (IN NHP). Similarly, there is one 1879 record from Lancaster in Wisconsin (WI NHP).

Ecology

Asclepias meadii is a polycarpic perennial (Chaplin et al. 1990). Plants appear to be long-lived and may live for more than a century (Betz and Hohn 1978).

Mead's milkweed reproduces sexually through seed production and vegetatively through spreading rhizomes (Chaplin et al. 1990). Sexual reproduction in A. meadii is apparently rare (Kurz and Bowles 1981), due to a number of factors. In addition to low fruit set, seed viability within A. meadii fruits is typically low and may attribute significantly to the low fruit production found in extant populations (Betz 1988).

Although asexual reproduction is known in A. meadii, little specific information has been accumulated with regards to specific means. The number of rhizomes produced per genet and the extent to which they spread is unknown (Chaplin et al. 1990). The rhizomatous nature of the species has likely sustained it in habitats where mowing (and the subsequent removal of seeds) was a frequent regime (Freeman 1988).

Pollen is shed by pollinaria (Bookman 1981) which are disseminated by insects (Chapman et al. 1990). Relatively few insects have been observed on A. meadii plants, however (Betz 1989).

A two-week difference in flowering time between plants in the south (southern Kansas and Missouri) and the north (northern Illinois) has been noted (Schwegman 1988, Betz 1967). In southern Illinois, A. meadii emerges between April 11-23 and demonstrates slow growth until about 6 cm tall. Between May 15 and June 3 there is rapid stem elongation until mature height (about 0.6 m). Flowering frequently occurs between May 21 and June 18. Single fruits develop from each inflorescence, the follicles or pods observable by late June. By late August the pods have elongated to their maximum size (4 to 8 cm) and are greenish in color. These darken as the fruits mature and dehisce in mid-September to mid-October to release the numerous, hairy seeds. The plants begin to wither with first frosts, and are no longer visible by early November (Biotic Consultants 1976).

Reproduction

Asclepias meadii is self incompatible (Tecic et al. 1998). A. meadii may take 15 years or more to mature from a germinating seed to a flowering plant (USFWS 2005). Observations show that individual plants produce flowers for two or three years and then rest, and in some cases completely disappear for a few years (Harrison, 1987). The low number of individual plants at any one site may not attract potential pollinators, and this may be a cause for low reproductive success (Betz 1989). A. meadii also spreads vegetatively through rhizomes (USFWS 2005).

Asclepias meadii flowers as early as late May in the south through mid to late June in the north (USFWS 2005). Young green fruit pods appear by late June and reach their maximum length of 1.5 to 4 inches by late August or early September (USFWS 2005). The hairy seeds within these pods mature by mid-October (USFWS 2005).

A serious problem is removal of immature fruits/seeds by haying, thus precluding recruitment of new individuals. Studies by Tecic et al. (1998) and Bowles et al. (1998) showed that sites that were annually mowed had largely clonal, genetically depauperate populations of Asclepias meadii. In contrast, sites that were burned but not mowed had much greater genetic variation (Bowles et al. 1998; Tecic et al. 1998; Yatskievych 2006).
Terrestrial Habitats
Grassland/herbaceous
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
MissouriS2Yes
WisconsinSXYes
IowaS1Yes
IllinoisS1Yes
IndianaSXYes
KansasS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquaculturePervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh - low
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsPervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh - low
2.1.4 - Scale unknown/unrecordedPervasive - largeSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh - low
4 - Transportation & service corridorsLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsLarge (31-70%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsPervasive (71-100%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionPervasive (71-100%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.2.1 - Unspecified speciesLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
9.3.3 - Herbicides and pesticidesLarge - restrictedSerious - moderateHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, Long-lived
Economic Value (Genus)Yes
Roadless Areas (3)
Idaho (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekCaribou-Targhee National Forest118,582
Illinois (1)
AreaForestAcres
Eagle CreekShawnee National Forest38
Missouri (1)
AreaForestAcres
Anderson Mountain Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest2,741
References (76)
  1. Alexander, H.M., A.W. Reed, W.D. Kettle, N.A. Slade, S.A. Bodbyl Roels, C.D. Collins, and V. Salisbury. 2012. Detection and plant monitoring programs: lessons from an intensive survey of <i>Asclepias meadii </i>with five observers. PLoS ONE 7(12): 1-7.
  2. Alexander, H.M., N.S. Slade, and W.D. Kettle. 1997. Application of mark-recapture models to estimation of the population size of plants. Ecology 78: 1230-1237.
  3. Alexander, H. M., N. S. Slade, W. D. Kettle, G. L. Pittman, and A. R. Reed. 2009. Detection, survival rates and dynamics of a cryptic plant, <i>Asclepias meadii</i>: applications of mark-recapture methods to long-term monitoring studies. Journal of Ecology 97: 267–276.
  4. Alverson, B. 1979. Wisconsin status report: Cirsium pitcheri. Unpublished Wisconsin DNR report. 3 pp.
  5. Axelrod, D.I. 1985. Rise of the grassland biome, central North America. Bot. Rev. 51:163-201.
  6. Barbour, M.G., and W.D. Billings, eds. 1988. North American terrestrial vegetation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 434 pp.
  7. Bell, T. J., M. L. Bowles, and A. K. McEachern. 2003. Projecting the success of plant population restoration with viability analysis. Pages 313–348 in C. A. Brigham and M. W. Schwartz, editors. Population viability in plants: conservation, management, and modeling of rare plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
  8. Betz, R. F. 1989. Ecology of Mead's milkweed (<i>Asclepias meadii </i>Torrey). Pages 187–191 in T. B. Bragg and J. Stubbendieck, editors. Proceedings of the eleventh North American prairie conference. University of Nebraska Lincoln, Nebraska, August 7–11, 1988. University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
  9. Betz, R.F., and H.F. Lamp. 1990. Flower, pod, and seed production in eighteen species of milkweeds (<i>Asclepias</i>). Pages 25–30 in D.D. Smith and C.A. Jacobs, editors. Proceedings of the twelfth North American prairie conference. University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa, August 5-9, 1990. University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa, USA.
  10. Betz, R.F. and J.E. Hohn. 1978. Status report of Asclepias meadii. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver. 9pp.
  11. Betz, R.F., R.D. Struven, J.E. Wall and F.B. Heitler. 1994. Insect pollinators of 12 milkweed (<i>Asclepias</i>) species, p. 45–60. In: T. B. Bragg and J. Stubbendieck (eds.). Proceedings of the Thirteenth North American Prairie Conference. Department of Parks and Recreation, Windsor, Ontario, Canada.
  12. Biotic Consultants, Inc. 1976. Endangered, threatened, and rare plants of the Shawnee National Forest (Illinois). Carbondale, IL. 39 pp.
  13. Bowles, M., J. McBride, and T. J. Bell. 2001. Restoration of the federally threatened Mead’s milkweed. Ecological Restoration 19:235–241.
  14. Bowles, M. L., J. L. McBride, and R. F. Betz. 1998. Management and restoration ecology of the federal threatened Mead’s milkweed, <i>Asclepias meadii </i>Torrey (Asclepiadaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85:110–125.
  15. Bowles, M.L., J.L. McBride, and T.J. Bell. 2015. Long-term processes affecting restoration and viability of the federal threatened Mead’s milkweed (<i>Asclepias meadii </i>). Ecosphere 6(1): 1-22.
  16. Bowles, M. L., R. F. Betz, and M. M. DeMauro. 1993. Propagation of rare plants from historic seed collections: implications for species restoration and herbarium management. Restoration Ecology 1: 101–106.
  17. Braker, Nancy. Former Director of Stewardship and Registry, Wisconsin Field Office, The Nature Conservancy.
  18. Busby, W.H. 1990. An inventory of three prairie animals in eastern Kansas. Kansas Dept. Wildlife and Parks. 17pp.
  19. Chaplin, S., R. Betz, C. Freeman, D. Roosa and T. Toney. 1990. Recovery plan for Mead's milkweed (Ascleias meadii Torr.). Technical Draft. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Twin Cities, MN. 30pp.
  20. Eulinger, K., and M. Skinner 2007. A Survey Of Three Federally Listed Plant Species In Southwest Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation.
  21. Figg, D. E., and Calvert, P. D. 1987. Status, distribution and life history of the prairie mole cricket, <i>Gryllotalpa major</i> Saussure. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri. 40 pp.
  22. Freeman, C.C. 1988. ESIS workbook for Asclepias meadii. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
  23. Freeman, Craig. Personal communication. Botanist, Kansas Natural Features Inventory. Kansas Biological Survey, Lawrence, KS.
  24. Gleason, H.A. 1952. The new Britton and Brown illustrated flora of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. 3 volumes. Hafner Press, New York. 1732 pp.
  25. Great Plains Flora Association (R.L. McGregor, coordinator; T.M. Barkley, ed., R.E. Brooks and E.K. Schofield, associate eds.). 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas. 1392 pp.
  26. Grman, E. L., and H. M. Alexander. 2005. Factors limiting fruit production in <i>Asclepias meadii </i>in northeastern Kansas. American Midland Naturalist 153: 245–256.
  27. Harrison, W.F. 1987. Proposal to determine <i>Asclepias meadii</i> (Mead's milkweed) to be a threatened species. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Federal Register 52(203): 39255-39258.
  28. Herkert, J., ed. 1991c. Endangered and threatened species of Illinois: Status and distribution. Volume 1 - Plants. Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board, Springfield. 158 pp.
  29. Homoya, Mike. Personal communication. Botanist/Plant Ecologist. Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Nature Preserves. Indianapolis, IN.
  30. Honnay, O., and B. Bossuyt. 2005. Prolonged clonal growth: escape route or route to extinction? Oikos 108(2): 427-432.
  31. Jog, S., K. Kindscher, E. Questad, B. Foster, and H. Loring. 2006. Floristic quality as an indicator of native species diversity in managed grasslands. Natural Areas Journal 26(2): 149-167.
  32. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  33. Kartesz, J.T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. First edition. In: Kartesz, J.T., and C.A. Meacham. Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, N.C.
  34. Kellner K.F., and R.K. Swihart. 2014. Accounting for imperfect detection in ecology: a quantitative review. PLoS ONE 9(10): 1-8.
  35. Kephart, S.R. 1981. Breeding systems in Asclepias incarnata, Asclepias syriaca and Asclepias verticillata. Am. J. Bot. 68:226-232.
  36. Kephart, S.R. and C.B. Heiser, Jr. 1980. Reproductive isolation in Asclepias: Lock and key hypothesis reconsidered. Evolution 34:738-746.
  37. Kettle, W. D., H. M. Alexander, and G. L. Pittman. 2000. An 11-year ecological study of a rare perennial (<i>Asclepius meadii</i>): implications for monitoring and management. American Midland Naturalist 144(1): 66–66.
  38. Kindscher, K., Q. Long, and L. Byczynski. 2008. Mead’s Milkweed Reintroduction Plan for Marais des Cygnes National Wildlife Refuge. Open-File Report No. 152. Kansas Biological Survey. Lawrence, Kansas. 12 pp.
  39. Kurz, D.R. and M.L. Bowles. 1981. Status report of Asclepias meadii. Illinois Dept. of Conservation, Springfield. 8pp.
  40. Ladd, D. Director of Science, Stewardship, and Registration. Missouri Field Office, The Nature Conservancy.
  41. Leoschke, M.J. 1990. Botanist, Iowa Natural Areas Inventory.
  42. Litzow, M. 1978. Asclepias meadii Torr.: A summary of the literature. Univ. of Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, unpubl. report. 4pp.
  43. Lowe, D.W., J.R. Matthews, and C.J. Moseley, eds. 1990. The official World Wildlife Fund guide to endangered species of North America. Beacham Publishing, Washington, D.C. 1180 pp.
  44. McGregor, R.L. 1987. Vascular flora of Kansas: New records and notes for 1986. Contr. Univ. Kansas Herb. 21:1-8.
  45. McGregor, R.L. University of Kansas Herbarium, Lawrence.
  46. Mohlenbrock, R.H. 1983. Where have all the wildflowers gone? A region-by-region guide to threatened or endangered U.S. wildflowers. Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc., New York. 239 pp.
  47. Mohlenbrock, R.H. 1986. Guide to the vascular flora of Illinois. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL.
  48. Monks, L., D. Coates, T. Bell, and M. Bowles. 2012. Determining success criteria for reintroductions of threatened long-lived plants. Chapter 11. pp 189-208. In Plant Reintroductions in a Changing Climate: Promises and Perils. J. Maschinski and K.E. Haskins (editors). Island Press, Washington, DC.
  49. Moore, C.T., C.J. Fonnesbeck, K. Shea, K. J. Lah, P.M. McKenzie, L.C. Ball, M.C. Runge, and H.M. Alexander. 2011. An adaptive decision framework for the conservation of a threatened plant. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management: 2(2): 247-261.
  50. Morgan, S.W. 1980. Status report on Asclepias meadii Torr. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City. 15pp.
  51. Natural Land Institute. 1981. Endangered and threatened vertebrate animals and vascular plants of Illinois. Illinois Department of Conservation. 190 pp.
  52. Perkins, W.E. 1989. Director of Science, Stewardship and Registry, Iowa Field Office, The Nature Conservancy.
  53. Prior, J.C. 1976. A regional guide to Iowa landforms. Iowa Geol. Survey, Education Series 3, Iowa City. 72 pp.
  54. Read, R. H. 1976. Endangered and threatened vascular plants of Wisconsin. Technical Bulletin No. 92, Scientific Areas Preservation Council, Department of Natural Resources, Madison, WI. 58 pp.
  55. Roels, S. M. 2013. Influence of seed characteristics and site conditions on establishment of the threatened prairie milkweed <i>Asclepias meadii</i>. American Midland Naturalist 170(2): 370–381.
  56. Schwegman, J. 1987. Procedures for census, demographic monitoring, compiling life history information, and development of management guidelines for special plants. Unpublished report, Illinois Department of Conservation, Springfield. 21pp.
  57. Schwegman, J. 1990a. Preliminary results of a program to monitor plant species for management purposes. Pp. 113-116. In Ecosystem Management: Rare Species and Significant Habitats. New York State Mus. Bull 471.
  58. Schwegman, J. 1990b. Illinois 1990 endangered and threatened plant status. Illinois Department of Conservation, Springfield. 7pp.
  59. Schwegman, John. Director, Botany Program. Illinois Dept. Conservation, Springfield IL
  60. Shannon, T.R. and R. Wyatt. 1986. Pollen germinability of Asclepias exaltata: effects of flower age, drying time, and pollen source. Syst. Bot. 11:322-325.
  61. Slade, N.A., H.M. Alexander, and W.D. Kettle. 2003. Estimation of population size and probabilities of survival and detection in mead’s milkweed. Ecology 84(3): 791-797.
  62. Steenbergh, W.F. and C.H. Lowe. 1977. Ecology of the Saguaro: II. Reproduction, germination, establishment, growth, and survival of the young plant. National Park Service and Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ. 207 pp.
  63. Steyermark, J. A. 1977. Flora of Missouri. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
  64. Swink, F. 1974. Plants of the Chicago Region, 2nd ed., The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, Illinois. 474 pp.
  65. Tecic, D. L., J. L. McBride, M. L. Bowles, and D. L. Nickrent. 1998. Genetic variability in the federal threatened Mead’s milkweed, <i>Asclepias meadii </i>Torrey (Asclepiadaceae), as determined by allozyme electrophoresis. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 97–109.
  66. Thurman, Carolyn M. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA., Falls Church, VA, Shawnee, Kansas
  67. Thurman, C.M. 1989. Final Report. A Missouri survey of six species of federal concern. Missouri Dept. of Conservation. 99 pp.
  68. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1980. <i>Asclepias meadii</i> Torr. Redbook for Threatened and Endangered Species. 2 pp.
  69. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1987. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: Proposal to determine <i>Asclepias meadii </i>(Mead's milkweed) to be threatened species. Federal Register 52(203):39255-39258.
  70. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1987. Listing protection is proposed for seven species. Endangered Species Tech. Bull. 12(11-12):5-6.
  71. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2005. Mead's Milkweed (<i>Asclepias meadii</i>) Fact Sheet. 2 pp. [http://www.fws.gov/Midwest/endangered/plants/pdf/meads-fs.pdf]
  72. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2012. Mead's Milkweed (<i>Asclepias meadii</i>) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chicago Illinois Field Office, Barrington, Illinois.
  73. Voigt, J.W. and R.H. Mohlenbrock. 1964. Plant communities of southern Illinois. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale. 202 pp.
  74. Willson, M.F., and P.W. Price. 1980. Resource limitation of fruit and seed production in some <i>Asclepias </i>species. Canadian J. Botany 58:2229-2233.
  75. Woodson, Jr., R. E. 1954. The North American species of Asclepias L. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 41: 1-203.
  76. Yatskievych, G. 2006. Steyermark's Flora of Missouri, revised edition. Volume 2. The Missouri Botanical Garden Press in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Conservation, St. Louis, MO. 1181 pp.