Asclepias viridula

Chapman

Southern Milkweed

G2Imperiled Found in 2 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
Very high - highThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.154257
Element CodePDASC02280
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderGentianales
FamilyApocynaceae
GenusAsclepias
Other Common Names
Bog Milkweed (EN) Green Milkweed (EN) Little Green Milkweed (EN) southern milkweed (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-04-09
Change Date1984-06-07
Edition Date2025-04-09
Edition AuthorsWhite, D.L., rev. L. Oliver (2004), rev. L. Oliver (2016), rev. Soteropoulos (2025)
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent5000-20,000 square km (about 2000-8000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences21 - 80
Rank Reasons
Asclepias viridula is a perennial herb of wet, open habitats, including meadows, pitcherplant bogs, seepage slopes, longleaf pine savannas, and flatwoods, that is endemic to the southeastern United States. It is historically found disjunctly in northeastern Florida and the Florida Panhandle and adjacent southeastern Alabama, and while southern Georgia has been included in some flora distributions, no specimens exist. Over half of the Florida counties where this species has been documented may now be historical or extirpated, including all seven counties in northeastern Florida. There are an estimated 36 occurrences remaining, many of which are located on protected lands within Apalachicola National Forest and Fort Gadsden State Historic Site, with additional populations at Eglin Air Force Base and Tyndall Air Force Base. Occurrences face threats from development, conversion to pine plantation and site preparation for forestry management, fire suppression, rights-of-way maintenance, and invasive species. Habitat of protected occurrences could be improved by burning every two to three years and thinning overstory to decrease competition. Searching for new occurrences in northeastern Florida, southern Georgia, and southeastern Alabama is a high priority.
Range Extent Comments
Asclepias viridula is endemic to the southeastern United States where it was historically found disjunctly in northeastern Florida and the Florida Panhandle (fifteen counties total) and adjacent southeastern Alabama (Houston County); while southern Georgia has been included in some flora distributions, no specimens exist (Chafin 2000, FNA 2023, Weakley and the Southeastern Flora Team 2025). Range extent was estimated to be 13,003 square kilometers using herbarium specimens, photo-based observations, and NatureServe Network occurrence data documented between 1994 and 2025 (GBIF 2025, iNaturalist 2025, NatureServe 2025, RARECAT 2025, SEINet 2025).
Occurrences Comments
By applying a 1 km separation distance to herbarium specimens, photo-based observations, and NatureServe Network occurrence data documented between 1994 and 2025, it is estimated that there are 36 occurrences rangewide (GBIF 2025, iNaturalist 2025, NatureServe 2025, RARECAT 2025, SEINet 2025). The most recent observation in 1994 from northeastern Florida in Clay County has a closed canopy based on aerial imagery and may no longer have open habitat to support this species (Orzell and Bridges 22791 (USF), Rosner-Katz, pers. comm., 2025).
Threat Impact Comments
This species faces threats from habitat loss and degradation. Loss of habitat may be due to development or conversion of pine flatwoods to slash pine plantations. Intense site preparation for forestry management, including dozing, root raking, or chopping, have negative impacts on this species, exacerbated by canopy closure from planted pines (Kral 1983). Places where there is residential development also have fire suppression, interconnecting the highest threats (A. Schotz, pers. comm., 2016).

The primary habitat degradation threats are fire suppression and rights-of-way maintenance. Fire suppression is likely to degrade existing habitat, increasing woody encroachment and possibly invasive species cover, resulting in the possible loss of populations (Kral 1983, NatureServe 2025). Even where habitat is managed, burning takes place at less frequent intervals than what is ideal. At least seven occurrences are located within roadside or powerline rights-of-way, and maintenance activities, such as herbicide and mowing, may negatively impact populations; however, mowing outside the flowering period may be beneficial to reduce woody plant encroachment (NatureServe 2025). Additional habitat degradation threats include invasive species, such as feral hogs and black titi (Cliftonia monophylla) (NatureServe 2025).
Ecology & Habitat

Diagnostic Characteristics

Asclepias viridula is superficially much like A. longifolia in habit, leaf character and flower size. However A. longifolia has anther longer than the corolla and the corolla is somewhat broader and lacks horns (Kral, 1983).

Habitat

Asclepias viridula grows in wet, open habitats including meadows, pitcherplant bogs, seepage slopes, longleaf pine savannas, and flatwoods (Chafin 2000, FNA 2023, Weakley and the Southeastern Flora Team 2025). It "is usually found in large or small clearings dominated by grasses and sedges or in large, fire created savannas dotted with slash and longleaf pine with an understory of saw palmetto interspersed with gallberry and wax myrtle or, in wetter places with shrubby Hypericum or titi-black gum. Its substrate is typically a highly humified, thus blackish, fine sand which remains moist or wet for most of the year. Thus it is a plant of high hydroperiod soil which undergoes gleization," and frequently associated with other narrow endemics such as Chapman's crownbeard (Verbesina chapmanii), thick leaved water-willow (Justicia crassifolia), and telephus spurge (Euphorbia telephioides) (Kral 1983).

Ecology

This species has "been maintained historically by naturally caused, periodic, and doubtlessly sometimes intense, fire. This burning reduces shrub competition, together with that of grasses and sedges, opens up the overstory of pine thus admitting the light this plant needs. Most of the collections of this plant show remnants of burned bases, and have been made from burned over savanna" (Kral 1983).

Reproduction

The most observed visitors for the genus were bees, butterflies and beetles, though types of visitors depended upon whether or not the flower had pollina. Birds (Trochil.) only visited flowers without pollina.
Terrestrial Habitats
Woodland - ConiferWoodland - MixedSavannaGrassland/herbaceous
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLANDFORESTED WETLANDBog/fen
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
FloridaS2Yes
AlabamaS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted (11-30%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureRestricted - smallSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.2 - Wood & pulp plantationsRestricted - smallSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.2.3 - Scale unknown/unrecordedRestricted - smallSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsRestricted (11-30%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
4.2 - Utility & service linesSmall (1-10%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionLarge - restrictedSerious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1.2 - Named speciesSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, SPRING-FLOWERING, SUMMER-FLOWERING
Economic Value (Genus)Yes
Roadless Areas (2)
Florida (2)
AreaForestAcres
Gum BayApalachicola National Forest11,645
SavannahApalachicola National Forest1,927
References (18)
  1. Chafin, L. G. 2000. Field guide to the rare plants of Florida. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee. [https://www.fnai.org/]
  2. Clewell, A.F. 1985. Guide to vascular plants of the Florida panhandle. Florida State Univ. Press, Tallahassee, Florida. 605 pp.
  3. Duncan, W.H., and J.T. Kartesz. 1981. Vascular Flora of Georgia: An annotated checklist. Univ. Georgia Press, Athens. 143 pp.
  4. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2023. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 14. Magnoliophyta: Gentianaceae to Hydroleaceae. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xxiv + 505 pp.
  5. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2025. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2025).
  6. Godfrey, R.K., and J.W. Wooten. 1981. Aquatic and wetland plants of southeastern United States: Dicotyledons. Univ. Georgia Press, Athens. 933 pp.
  7. iNaturalist. 2025. Online. Available: https://www.inaturalist.org (accessed 2025).
  8. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  9. Kral, R. 1983c. A report on some rare, threatened, or endangered forest-related vascular plants of the South. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Forest Service Technical Publication R8-TP2, Athens, GA. 1305 pp.
  10. NatureServe. 2025. NatureServe Network Biodiversity Location Data. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
  11. <p>NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2025. Version: 2.1.1 (released April 04, 2025).</p>
  12. Rosner-Katz, Hanna. Personal Communication. Botanist. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.
  13. Schotz, Al. Personal Communication. Botanist, Alabama Natural Heritage Program.
  14. Small, J.K. 1933. Manual of the southeastern flora. Two volumes. Hafner Publishing Company, New York.
  15. Southwest Environmental Information Network (SEINet). 2025. Collections Databases. Online. Available: https://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/collections/index.php (accessed 2025).
  16. Ward, D.B., ed. 1979. Rare and endangered biota of Florida. Vol. 5: Plants. Univ. Presses of Florida, Gainesville.
  17. Weakley, A.S., and Southeastern Flora Team. 2025. Flora of the southeastern United States Web App. Edition of February 18, 2025. University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU), North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Online. Available: https://fsus.ncbg.unc.edu (accessed 2025).
  18. Wunderlin, R.P. 1982. Guide to the vascular plants of central Florida. Univ. Presses Florida, Gainesville. 472 pp.