Coreopsis rosea

Nutt.

Rose Coreopsis

G3Vulnerable Found in 1 roadless area NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
Near threatenedIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Rose Coreopsis (Coreopsis rosea). Photo by Yianni Laskaris, CC BY-NC 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Yianni Laskaris, CC BY-NC 4.0
Rose Coreopsis (Coreopsis rosea). Photo by Rob Curtis, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Rob Curtis, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Rose Coreopsis (Coreopsis rosea). Photo by Rob Curtis, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Rob Curtis, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Rose Coreopsis (Coreopsis rosea). Photo by Jeremy Collison, CC BY-NC 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Jeremy Collison, CC BY-NC 4.0
Rose Coreopsis (Coreopsis rosea). Photo by ehilley, CC BY-NC 4.0, via iNaturalist.
ehilley, CC BY-NC 4.0
Rose Coreopsis (Coreopsis rosea). Photo by Sean Blaney, CC BY-NC 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Sean Blaney, CC BY-NC 4.0
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.157053
Element CodePDAST2L0T0
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
IUCNNear threatened
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderAsterales
FamilyAsteraceae
GenusCoreopsis
Other Common Names
Coréopsis rose (FR) pink coreopsis (EN) pink tickseed (EN) Pink Tickseed (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2024-09-26
Change Date1990-06-22
Edition Date2024-09-26
Edition AuthorsEdmondson, L. (1983), rev. L. Morse (2000), rev. K. Gravuer (2009), rev. N. Ventrella (2024)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent20,000-200,000 square km (about 8000-80,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
Coreopsis rosea is a perennial forb of the Atlantic Coastal Plain region, found predominantly from eastern Massachusetts and Rhode Island south through southeastern New York, New Jersey, Delaware, and eastern Maryland, with disjunct occurrences found in Nova Scotia, South Carolina, and Georgia. Approximately 98 occurrences are believed extant, the majority of which are found in Massachusetts. Coreopsis rosea is present at nearly all coastal plain ponds in Massachusetts, with plants usually very abundant where habitat is intact, often persisting in small clumps at disturbed and degraded ponds. This species seems better able to persist at very degraded and disturbed coastal plain ponds than other globally rare coastal plain pond associates. Many occurrences contain hundreds or thousands of plants, and the total population may exceed 100,000 plants. Threats to this species are considerable and include habitat destruction from development, soil disturbance due to heavy recreational use particularly by all-terrain vehicles, alteration of the naturally fluctuating hydrological regime due to municipal drawdown or intentional stabilization of lake levels, eutrophication, competition from invasive species, and fire suppression.
Range Extent Comments
Coreopsis rosea is found in eastern North America and is primarily a species of the Atlantic Coastal Plain region, occurring from eastern Massachusetts and Rhode Island south through New York, New Jersey, Delaware, and eastern Maryland in the United States (FNA 2006, Weakley and the Southeastern Flora Team 2024). One occurrence was recorded in eastern Pennsylvania, but it is now believed to be extirpated (PNHP 1986). Disjunct occurrences are also found in southwestern Nova Scotia, Canada, and in South Carolina and Georgia (COSEWIC 2012). The Flora of North America Editorial Committee (2006) states that the "occurrence of C. rosea in South Carolina may represent a human-mediated disjunction; the collection came from a 'lime sink' near a trailer park close to a freeway." However, the South Carolina Natural Heritage Program has mapped several occurrences in the state and considers the species to be native (NatureServe 2024). Range extent was estimated using herbarium specimens and NatureServe Network occurrence data collected between 1993 and 2024 (GBIF 2024, NatureServe 2024, SEINet 2024).
Occurrences Comments
There are an estimated 98 extant, non-historical occurrences in the United States tracked by the NatureServe Network, with the majority occurring in Massachusetts (48) and New York (29) (NatureServe 2024). Using NatureServe's population separation guidelines, there are an estimated six extant occurrences in Canada, and two historical occurrences which are considered extirpated (COSEWIC 2012, NatureServe 2024).
Threat Impact Comments
There are a number of significant threats to this species (Keddy and Wisheu 1989, Wisheu and Keddy 1989, Schuyler 1990, J. Garrett, pers. comm., 2009, S. Young, pers. comm., 2009). Habitat destruction caused by dredging and filling wetland habitats for development is a threat in many parts of the range, and it is considered a primary threat to populations in Massachusetts (MDFW 2015). Soil disturbance due to heavy recreational use, particularly disturbance by all-terrain vehicles, is also an issue at many sites as the gently sloping gravel shorelines that this species prefers are conducive to all-terrain vehicle use (NYNHP 2006, COSEWIC 2012). Alteration of the naturally fluctuating hydrological regime, with underlying causes such as excessive municipal drawdown of the water table or intentional stabilization of lake levels, is leading to decline of some populations as more competitive species such as pitch pine are consequently able to establish and eventually dominate Coreopsis rosea habitat (Craine and Orians 2004). Eutrophication of oligotrophic lakes is also an issue, and it is considered to be the most significant threat to Canadian populations (COSEWIC 2012). Nutrients from sources such as run-off containing fertilizer and pet waste, water contamination from septic systems, and atmospheric deposition enter lake systems and tend to favor more competitive species over species such as C. rosea that are adapted to infertile soils. Invasive plants that occupy the same emergent habitat zone as C. rosea are also a threat at some sites, and Phragmites spp. can cause negative impacts (COSEWIC 2012, MDFW 2015, NYNHP 2024). Fire suppression is also potentially an issue at some sites, as it allows succession to proceed to the detriment of C. rosea (MDFW 2015). Finally, alterations to the hydrological regime that are predicted to occur as a result of climate change could be an issue for this species, as it is adapted to a fairly specific timing of water level flooding and receding.
Ecology & Habitat

Diagnostic Characteristics

Differs from C. linifolia and C. tinctoria in its rose to white instead of yellow, orange-yellow, or purple ray flowers. Differs from C. nuduta in its opposite (vs. alternate) leaves and wingless (vs. winged) achenes (Schuyler 1990).

Habitat

Coreopsis rosea occurs along marsh edges and sandy shores (FNA 2006). In the Inner Coastal Plain region of the southeastern United States, it occupies inland depression ponds (Weakley and the Southeastern Flora Team 2024). In the Outer Coastal Plain region, it occupies drawdown zones on riverbanks, and on pond and river shorelines with fluctuating water levels in eastern Georgia. In the northeastern United States, this species is confined to swales, pond shores, and wet depressions (Native Plant Trust 2024). In Canada, Coreopsis rosea is found exclusively in lakeshore habitats on larger lakes with large upstream catchment areas, where it occupies a zone below the shrubline where flooding is frequent (COSEWIC 2012). Within this zone, plants occur both on exposed substrates and as a shallow-water emergent.

Reproduction

Coreopsis rosea requires at least two full growing seasons before it flowers and sets seed (COSEWIC 2012).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandWoodland - ConiferBarrens
Palustrine Habitats
TEMPORARY POOLHERBACEOUS WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN2
ProvinceRankNative
Nova ScotiaS2Yes
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
GeorgiaS1Yes
PennsylvaniaSXYes
MassachusettsS3Yes
DelawareS1Yes
Rhode IslandS2Yes
New JerseyS2Yes
South CarolinaS1Yes
MarylandS1Yes
New YorkS3Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentPervasive (71-100%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesLarge (31-70%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionUnknownUnknownUnknown
7.1.2 - Suppression in fire frequency/intensityUnknownUnknownUnknown
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.2.11 - Dams (size unknown)Large (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1.2 - Named speciesLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.1 - Domestic & urban waste waterLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.1.2 - Run-offLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)UnknownHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (1)
Georgia (1)
AreaForestAcres
Kelly RidgeChattahoochee National Forest8,325
References (24)
  1. COSEWIC.2012.COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Pink Coreopsis in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xii + 42 pp. Online. Available: <a href="https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/species-risk-public-registry/cosewic-assessments-status-reports/pink-coreopsis.html#_14">www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/species-risk-public-registry/cosewic-assessments-status-reports/pink-coreopsis.html#_14</a> (accessed 2024).
  2. Cosner, M.E., and D.J. Crawford 1994. Comparisons of isozyme diversity in three rare species of <i>Coreopsis </i>(Asteraceae). Systematic Botany 19(3): 350-358.
  3. Craine, S. I. and C. M. Orians. 2004. Pitch pine (<i>Pinus rigida </i>Mill.) invasion of Cape Cod pond shores alters abiotic environment and inhibits indigenous herbaceous species. Biological Conservation 116: 181-189.
  4. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2006c. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 21. Magnoliophyta: Asteridae, part 8: Asteraceae, part 3. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xxii + 616 pp.
  5. Garrett, Jennifer. Personal Communication. Conservation Planning Botanist, Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Westborough, MA.
  6. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2024. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2024).
  7. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  8. Kartesz, J.T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. First edition. In: Kartesz, J.T., and C.A. Meacham. Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, N.C.
  9. Keddy, P. A. 1985. Lakeshores in the Tusket River Valley, Nova Scotia: Distribution and status of some rare species, including <i>Coreopsis rosea</i> Nutt. and <i>Sabatia kennedyana</i> Fern. Rhodora 87:309-320.
  10. Keddy, P.A. and I.C. Wisheu. 1989. Ecology, biogeography, and conservation of coastal plain plants: some general principles from the study of Nova Scotian wetlands. Rhodora 91(865):72-94.
  11. Lusk, J. M. and E. G. Reekie. 2007. The effect of growing season length and water level fluctuations on growth and survival of two rare and at risk Atlantic Coastal Plain flora species, <i>Coreopsis rosea </i>and <i>Hydrocotyle umbellata</i>. Canadian Journal of Botany 85: 119-13.
  12. Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife (MDFW). 2015. Rose coreopsis (<i>Coreopsis rosea</i>) fact-sheet. Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, Westborough, MA. Online. Available: https://www.mass.gov/files/documents/2016/08/wh/coreopsis-rosea_0.pdf /(accessed 2024).
  13. Morse, Larry E. Personal Communication. North American Botanist, NatureServe, Arlington, VA. Formerly Chief Botanist, The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA.
  14. Native Plant Trust. 2024. Go Botany website. Online. Available: https://gobotany.newenglandwild.org (accessed 2024).
  15. NatureServe. 2024. NatureServe Network Biodiversity Location Data. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
  16. New Jersey Natural Heritage Program (NJNHP). 1989. Element Subnational Ranking Form: <i>Coreopsis rosea</i> in Biotics 5 database. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia (accessed 26 Sept 2024).
  17. New York Natural Heritage Program (NYNHP). 2006. Element Subnational Ranking Form: <i>Coreopsis rosea</i> in Biotics 5 database. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia (accessed 26 Sept 2024).
  18. New York Natural Heritage Program (NYNHP). 2024. Online Conservation Guide for <i>Coreopsis rosea</i>. Online. Available: https://guides.nynhp.org/rose-coreopsis/ (accessed 2024).<br/>
  19. Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program (PNHP). 1986. Element Subnational Ranking Form: Coreopsis rosea in Biotics 5 database. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia (accessed 26 Sept 2024).
  20. Schuyler, A. E. 1990. Element Stewardship Abstract for <i>Coreopsis rosea. </i>Stewardship Abstract No. 006. State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy, Division of Parks and Forestry. [http://www.nj.gov/dep/parksandforests/natural/heritage/textfiles/coreoros.txt]
  21. Southwest Environmental Information Network (SEINet). 2024. Collections Databases. Online. Available: https://swbiodiversity.org/seinet/collections/index.php (accessed 2024).
  22. Weakley, A.S., and Southeastern Flora Team. 2024. Flora of the southeastern United States. Edition of March 4, 2024. University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU), North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 2203 pp.
  23. Wisheu, I.C. and P.A. Keddy. 1989. The conservation and management of a threatened coastal plain plant community in eastern North America (Nova Scotia, Canada). Biological Conservation 48:229-338.
  24. Young, Steve. Personal communication. Botanist, New York Natural Heritage Program.