Hershler, Frest, Johannes, Bowler, and F.G. Thompson, 1994
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.117701
Element CodeIMGASX1020
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
IUCNVulnerable
Endemicendemic to a single state or province
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumMollusca
ClassGastropoda
OrderLittorinimorpha
FamilyAmnicolidae
GenusTaylorconcha
Concept ReferenceTurgeon, D. D., J. F. Quinn, Jr., A. E. Bogan, E. V. Coan, F. G. Hochberg, W. G. Lyons, P. M. Mikkelsen, R. J. Neves, C. F. E. Roper, G. Rosenberg, B. Roth, A. Scheltema, F. G. Thompson, M. Vecchione, and J. D. Williams. 1998. Common and scientific names of aquatic invertebrates from the United States and Canada: Mollusks. 2nd Edition. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 26, Bethesda, Maryland. 526 pp.
Taxonomic CommentsBased on genetics and morphology, populations ot Taylorconcha from the Middle Owyhee River and lower Snake River in Idaho were found to represent a new species, Taylorconcha insperata, and not a range expansion of T. serpenticola (Hershler et al., 2006).
Conservation Status
Review Date2010-03-22
Change Date1999-09-14
Edition Date2010-03-22
Edition AuthorsCordeiro, J. (2010); Morrison, M. (1996)
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent<100-250 square km (less than about 40-100 square miles)
Number of Occurrences6 - 20
Rank ReasonsOne of the few remaining Lake Idaho endemics. This species is restricted to several river stretches and springs with exceptional water quality. Decreasing water quality and competition from the the introduced New Zealand hydrobiid snail currently threaten its survival. Genetic variation was found to be uniform, however, among the three isolated occurrences (formerly united but now saprated by impoundments).
Range Extent CommentsHistorically ranged discontinuously over 204 river miles in the main stem Middle Snake River and associated springs in south-central Idaho (USFWS, 1992; Hershler et al., 1994), but recently found to occupy only a short reach (about 138 river km) of the river (USFWS, 2005). It was known historically from the main stem middle Snake River and associated springs between Indian Cove Bridge (Rkm 845.6) and Twin Falls (Rkm 982.5) (Hershler et al., 1994) but remnant populations remain in Idaho, inhabiting approximately an 80 km stretch of the Snake River upstream and downstream of Hagerman, Idaho in the Thousands Springs reach of the Snake River (Richards and Arrington, 2008).
Occurrences CommentsHistorically ranged discontinuously over 204 river miles in the main stem Middle Snake River and associated springs in south-central Idaho (USFWS, 1992; Hershler et al., 1994), but recently found to occupy only a short reach (about 138 river km) of the river (USFWS, 2005). Hershler et al. (2005) lists 12 sites (total < about 50 km apart) within the Middle Snake River and a few tributaries. It was known historically from the main stem middle Snake River and associated springs between Indian Cove Bridge (Rkm 845.6) and Twin Falls (Rkm 982.5) (Hershler et al., 1994) but remnant populations remain in Idaho, inhabiting approximately an 80 km stretch of the Snake River upstream and downstream of Hagerman, Idaho in the Thousands Springs reach of the Snake River (Richards and Arrington, 2008).
Threat Impact CommentsPotential threats include oxygen depletion, water pollution from agricultural runoff, irrigation, and competition from the introduced snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum (USFWS, 2005). Richards and Arrington (2008) analyzed susceptibility to desiccation during hydroelectric drawdowns and suggest that desiccation could impact populations if snails become stranded on dry substrates during rapid water-level fluctuations of the Snake River, particularly during subzero winter or extreme high summer temperatures. Despite fragmentation of the population due to dam construction, Liu and Hershler (2009) assessed genetic variation in 29 samples (820 snails) from across the range and found no evidence of reduced genetic diversity attributable to segmentation of the Snake River by dams and genetic variation among portions of drainage separated by dams was not significant.