Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.102187
Element CodeAMAJB01020
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
CITESAppendix II
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassMammalia
OrderCarnivora
FamilyUrsidae
GenusUrsus
USESAPS:E,T,XN
COSEWICX,SC
Other Common Namesbrown bear (EN) Grizzly Bear (EN) Mexican Grizzly Bear (EN) Ours brun (FR) Ours grizzli (FR)
Concept ReferenceWilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.
Taxonomic CommentsGenetic studies of brown bears indicate that the traditional morphology-based taxonomy of brown bears is highly discordant with bear phylogeny as indicated by geographic patterns of mtDNA variation. Based on recent and permafrost-preserved Pleistocene material, there is no genetic (mtDNA) support for the validity of any of the commonly recognized North American subspecies (e.g., horribilis, middendorffi), and North American brown bears do not represent a distinct lineage with respect to brown bears in Northern Asia and Europe (Waits et al. 1998, Leonard et al. 2000, Barnes et al. 2002). If a subspecific name is to be applied to North American brown bears, it should be Ursus arctos arctos, a taxon whose range encompasses both North America and parts of Eurasia. This name has been adopted for North American brown bears by ITIS (http://www.itis.usda.gov/index.html), which lists U. a. horribilis and U. a. nelsoni as invalid because they are junior synonyms of U. a. arctos.
There are six recovery ecosystems for grizzly bears in the lower-48 US states: The Greater Yellowstone (GYE), the Northern Continental Divide (NCDE), the North Cascades (NCE), the Selkirks (SE), the Cabinet-Yaak (CYE), and the Bitterroot (BE).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2022-07-25
Change Date1996-11-18
Edition Date2022-07-25
Edition AuthorsCannings, S. G., and G. Hammerson; rev. B. Young (2022)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank ReasonsThis species has a very large Holarctic range where it has declined in Europe and North America and faces numerous threats. However, large portions of the range are in remote areas where there is little evidence of population declines. Intensive management in Europe and North America have helped stabilize and recover some subpopulations.
Range Extent CommentsFormerly throughout western North America, north from northern Mexico; northwestern Africa, all of the Palearctic from western Europe, Near and Middle East through the northern Himalayas to western and northern China and Chukot (Russia) and Hokkaido (Japan) (Wozencraft, in Wilson and Reeder 1993); see Pasitschniak-Arts (1993) for additional details. In North America, present range includes Alaska, northern and western Canada, northern Continental Divide in Montana, Cabinet/Yaak mountains in Montana/Idaho, and Yellowstone area, Wyoming/Montana/Idaho, USA. Common only in Alaska, parts of the Yukon, northern and coastal British Columbia, and portions of the northern Rocky Mountains. In Europe, apart from northern Europe, distribution has shrunk to a few isolated populations in the Pyrenees, the Apenines, the Alps, the Balkan Peninsula, and the Carpathians (Hartl and Hell 1994), although reintroductions have bolstered subpopulations in some areas (Barba et al. 2010).
Occurrences CommentsThis species is known from hundreds of distinct localities, which approximate occurrences, with records from the period 2000-2022 (GBIF 2022).
Threat Impact CommentsHistorical decline due to habitat loss and fragmentation and killing by humans. Primary threats are habitat alienation, alteration, and loss; increased access to wilderness; and hunting (both legal and illegal). Increased access increases human-bear contacts, some of which result in destruction of bears. Alien species threaten food resources in some areas; in Montana, white pine blister rust has killed whitebark pines (seeds serve as food for bears) and knapweed have displaced native plants that serve as foods for bears and their prey. See Horejsi (1989) for a discussion of land-use threats (petroleum and natural gas development, grazing by domestic stock) and excessive bear mortality in southwestern Alberta. See also Matthews and Moseley (1990) for discussion of threats. Several large mines in Montana, if approved, may pose a threat (USFWS 1999). Forestry, mining, recreation, and road building also affect habitat in British Columbia where the two portions of this distinct population segment are connected (USFWS 1999, Proctor et al. 2022).