Macrochelys temminckii

(Troost, in Harlan, 1835)

Alligator Snapping Turtle

G3Vulnerable Found in 38 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G3VulnerableGlobal Rank
EndangeredIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.102590
Element CodeARAAB02010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNEndangered
CITESAppendix III
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassChelonia
OrderTestudines
FamilyChelydridae
GenusMacrochelys
Synonyms
Macrochelys apalachicolaeThomas, Granatosky, Bourque, Krysko, Moler, Gamble, Suarez, Leone, Enge, and Roman, 2014Macroclemys temmincki(Harlan, 1835)Macroclemys temminckii(Harlan, 1835)
Other Common Names
alligator snapping turtle (EN) Western Alligator Snapping Turtle (EN)
Concept Reference
Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
Taxonomic Comments
This concept of Macrochelys temminckii includes M. apalachicolae, and excludes M. suwannniensis following Taggart and Carr (2025) and the Turtle Taxonomy Working Group (2025). Thomas et al. (2014) split M. temminckii into three species (temminckii, apalachicolae, and suwanniensis) based on genetic, morphological, and geographic evidence. Folt and Guyer (2015) supported the recognition of M. suwanniensis but argued that the evidence presented by Thomas et al. (2014) was insufficient to justify naming M. apalachicolae as distinct from M. temminckii. Apodaca et al. (2023) suggested that M. apalachicolae is genetically distinct but held off resurrecting it pending morphological data.

This species represents one of only two living genera in the family. This turtle was previously included in the genus Macroclemys; however, Webb (1995) demonstrated that the generic name Macrochelys has priority over Macroclemys. Crother et al. (2000) and Crother (2008, 2017) agreed with this conclusion and treated this species as a member of Macrochelys. Although Troost coined the species name, it was Harlan (1835) alone who authored the original description (Crother 2017).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2020-07-22
Change Date2020-09-20
Edition Date2020-09-20
Edition AuthorsYoung, B., C. Battaglia, J. Briggler, R. Colvin, P. Crump, M. Fullerton, S. Fulton, M. Howery, D. Jackson, P. Moler, B. O'Hanlon, D. Sollenberger, and T. Wood (2020)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
The species has a large range across many states and encompassing several large river basins. Over the last century, it has undergone declines throughout its range, due mainly to overharvesting and habitat loss and degradation. Restrictions on harvest have apparently started to reverse declines in a few river systems. Overall, the population remains reduced compared to historical levels.
Range Extent Comments
Range is principally in the southeastern United States centered around the Mississippi and Mobile drainage basins. The range extends along the Gulf Coast from eastern Texas through Louisiana (Boundy and Kennedy 2006), Mississippi, Alabama, and into the eastern Florida panhandle, and north to southeastern Kansas, southeastern Iowa, Illinois, and southern Indiana (Conant and Collins 1991, Kessler et al. 2017). The species is very rare in Kentucky (Baxley et al. 2014), and perhaps extirpated in Indiana and Iowa. The Kansas records show no current evidence of a viable breeding population, although a reintroduction effort is underway.
Occurrences Comments
As of 2020, state natural heritage programs have records of at least 120 occurrences with confirmed individuals during the period 2000-2020. This count assumes that all occurrences have been delineated using the appropriate separation distances (1 km of unsuitable habitat and 30 km of river reach uninterrupted by dams).

The state breakdown is as follows: Alabama: 6; Florida: 15; Georgia: 13; Kentucky: 1; Louisiana: 24; Missouri: 28; Mississippi: 5; Oklahoma: 8; Tennessee: 1; Texas: 20. In addition, there are at least two occurrences in Arkansas. Three of the Florida occurrences appear to be within 30 river kilometers of occurrences in Georgia and Alabama, such that they likely do not represent distinct occurrences from the perspective of the global range of the species.
Threat Impact Comments
Ongoing threats include habitat alteration and fragmentation, water pollution, deliberate harvest for human consumption, incidental catch by recreational fishers, and drought. Overharvesting and habitat alteration are or at least were the major threats (Reed et al. 2002, Riedle et al. 2005).

Commercial exploitation and other harvest for human consumption (and to a much lesser extent the pet trade) undoubtedly reduced populations of this species in much of its range historically (Pritchard 1992, Trauth et al. 1998, Reed et al. 2002, Riedle et al. 2005, Shipman and Riedle 2008). Commercial harvest is now illegal throughout the range, and only Louisiana and Mississippi still permit recreational take (Berry 2019, Huntzinger et al. 2019), but illegal harvest continues to some degree. Unattended fishing gear (e.g. trotlines and limblines) inadvertently snag and drown turtles, or cause turtles to ingest hooks (Santhuff 1993, Mays et al. 2015, Steen and Robinson 2017, Enge et al. 2019, Huntzinger et al. 2019). Turtles can also drown when they enter fish traps.

Dams have blocked passage on many rivers, but it is unclear how effective dams may be in isolating populations and preventing gene exchange; for example, populations can survive in impoundments. However, Riedle et al. (2005) noted a drastic decline of alligator snapping turtles in Oklahoma, due in part to thermal alteration by hypolimnetic releases from impoundments.

Water pollution and erosion associated with agriculture may have altered the food chain and otherwise degraded the habitat to the turtle's detriment in some areas (Heck 1998, Riedle et al. 2005).

Dredging river bottoms to maintain shipping channels likely destroys habitat, although the subsequent spoil may be utilized for nesting along certain rivers. Riedle et al. (2005) noted a drastic decline of alligator snapping turtles in Oklahoma, due in part to habitat degradation because of stream channelization. In southeastern Missouri, Shipman and Riedle (2008) found that most sites had been manipulated for channelization or drained and converted to agricultural fields.

Human disturbance may cause females to abandon nesting attempts; each re-nesting attempt increases exposure of the nests to predators.

Strikes by motorboat are unlikely to be a major threat due to the species' habit of walking along the bottom of water bodies (Hollender et al. 2018).

Droughts may restrict areas of suitable habitat in the southern part of the range.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

This is a very large turtle with a huge head, strongly hooked jaws, an extra row of scutes along each side of the shell (between the costals and marginals), three keels along the carapace, and a long tail; adult carapace length usually 38-66 cm (to 80 cm), mass 16-68 kg (to 143 kg); young are brown, with a very rough shell and long tail, 3-4.4 cm at hatching (Conant and Collins 1991). See also Lovich (1993).

Diagnostic Characteristics

This species differs from the snapping turtle in its larger head, extra row of scutes along the sides of the shell, lack of a saw-toothed middorsal tail ridge, more lateral position of the eyes, and presence of a wormlike lure on the upper surface of the tongue.

Habitat

Habitat consists of slow-moving, deep water of rivers, sloughs, oxbows, and canals or lakes associated with rivers (e.g., large impoundments including reservoirs) (Ernst et al. 1994); also swamps, bayous, and ponds near rivers, and shallow creeks that are tributary to occupied rivers, sometimes including swift upland streams (Phelps 2004). This turtle sometimes enters brackish waters near river mouths. Usually it occurs in water with a mud bottom and some aquatic vegetation but uses sand-bottomed river and creeks in Florida (P. Moler, pers. comm., 2020). Within streams, alligator snapping turtles may occur under or in logjams, beneath undercut banks, under rock shelters, or in deep holes (Jensen et al. 2008). These turtles are highly aquatic and rarely are found out of water (except during nesting). In Tennessee, F. Scott (pers. comm., 1992) most often found radio-tagged turtles in less than 3 meters of water. In northeast Louisiana, Sloan and Taylor (1987) found that native turtles preferred flotant (dense floating vegetation mat) with cypress or buttonbush habitat. The turtles frequently used openings in the flotant beneath cypress trees. In the same region, Harrel et al. (1996) documented a preference for bald cypress forest by subadults; most occupied sites were associated with logs. In Missouri, higher abundance was associated with submerged physical structures, deeper water, higher levels of detritus, and warmer water (Lescher et al. 2013).

Ewert (1976) provided a description of nesting habitat. He observed 16 nests from the Apalachicola River, Florida, and one from Lake Iamonia which adjoins the Ochlockonee River, Florida. The turtles chose a variety of situations for nesting, from sand mounds along the river banks to sandbars within the stream, to a 1.5 m high steep cut bank. Conditions at the Apalachicola sites included xeric exposed sites (three nests), more mesic sites with trees nearby but open above (three nests), partially shaded sites (4 nests), and deeply shaded sites (six nests, one well within a three to five m cane stand with a completely closed canopy). Ewert suggested that many of the turtles emerged from quiet backwaters of the flooded forest, rather than the river proper. The Apalachicola nests' distance from the nearest water averaged 12 m. The one nest on an island in Lake Iamonia was in the open and was 72 m from the nearest water. Ewert and Jackson (1994) expanded this data set but not greatly altered these proportions. Jackson and Jensen (2003) reported nest sites that were about 30 and 70 m from streams.

Ecology

Alligator snapping turtles are highly aquatic, emerging from water only for nesting or, uncommonly, basking (Carr et al. 2011). The turtle is secretive, a trait making it difficult to observe, and particularly difficult to find where it is also rare.

The principal predators of adults have historically been humans. Nest predation likely takes a heavy toll, and raccoons are a major factor (Sanspree et al 2016). Raccoons and river otters were the major source of mortality of released immature turtles in a study in Illinois, Oklahoma, and Louisiana (Dreslik et al. 2017). American alligators are also documented to feed on juveniles (Sanspree et al. 2016).

Reproduction

Mating takes place from February to April in Florida, followed by nesting from late April through mid-May along the Apalachicola River (Pritchard 1978; Ewert and Jackson 1994, Ewert et al. 2006). Oviposition apparently occurs from April through early May in Manchac, Louisiana, and from mid-May through early June near Jonesville, Louisiana (Dobie 1971). Nesting was observed in June in Butler County, Missouri (Figg 1991). Eggs number from 9 to 61 (average around 25-35) per nest, the number being related to the size of the female. In Florida, females laid 17-52 eggs (Ewert et al. 2006). Females produce only one clutch per year, and sometimes skip a year between clutches (Pritchard 1992, Ewert et al. 2006). Eggs hatch in 15-18 weeks (Ewert et al. 2006). Hatching extends throughout August in northwestern Florida, where hatching success in protected nests was 66-78% over two years (Ewert and Jackson 1994). Sex of hatchlings is influenced by incubation temperature (Ewert et al. 2006). Maturity is reached at 11 to 13 years at the earliest (Dobie 1971, Pritchard 1978). The older, larger turtles may be disproportionately important in population maintenance. Minimum temperature (especially in the northern portion of the range) and precipitation can have a large impact on nesting success (Thompson et al. 2017).

Adults may live many years. One female found in Kansas was aged (by counting annuli on scutes) at 45 years (Shipman et al 1991). Captives have lived more than 70 years (Trauth et al. 2004). Generation time is estimated to be 31.2 years (Folt et al. 2016).
Palustrine Habitats
FORESTED WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
KentuckyS1Yes
LouisianaS2Yes
TexasS2Yes
TennesseeS2Yes
OklahomaS1Yes
MissouriS2Yes
MississippiS3Yes
AlabamaS3Yes
FloridaS3Yes
KansasS1Yes
IllinoisS1Yes
IndianaSHYes
IowaSUYes
ArkansasS3Yes
GeorgiaS2Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
4 - Transportation & service corridorsRestricted (11-30%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4.3 - Shipping lanesRestricted (11-30%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.4 - Fishing & harvesting aquatic resourcesRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceRestricted (11-30%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesLarge (31-70%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
8.2 - Problematic native species/diseasesLarge - restrictedModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherRestricted (11-30%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11.2 - DroughtsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
11.4 - Storms & floodingRestricted (11-30%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineLow (long-term)

Roadless Areas (38)
Alabama (4)
AreaForestAcres
Blue MountainTalladega National Forest4,986
Cheaha ATalladega National Forest236
Cheaha BTalladega National Forest741
Reed BrakeTalladega National Forest621
Arkansas (14)
AreaForestAcres
Bear MountainOuachita National Forest1,910
Blue MountainOuachita National Forest9,755
Brush HeapOuachita National Forest4,205
Clifty CanyonOzark-St. Francis National Forest1,963
Devils CanyonOzark-St. Francis National Forest1,877
Dismal CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest9,160
East ForkOzark-St. Francis National Forest13,037
Gee CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest7,957
Hurricane CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest2,279
Indian CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest7,855
Little BlakelyOuachita National Forest3,342
Pedestal RocksOzark-St. Francis National Forest21,957
PenhookOzark-St. Francis National Forest6,566
Richland CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest571
Florida (4)
AreaForestAcres
Clear LakeApalachicola National Forest5,592
Gum BayApalachicola National Forest11,645
Long BayApalachicola National Forest5,726
SavannahApalachicola National Forest1,927
Illinois (2)
AreaForestAcres
Clear SpringsShawnee National Forest11
Ripple HollowShawnee National Forest3,788
Louisiana (2)
AreaForestAcres
Cunningham Brake Research Natural AreaKisatchie National Forest1,797
Saline Bayou W & S River CorridorKisatchie National Forest5,355
Mississippi (1)
AreaForestAcres
Sandy Creek Rare Ii AreaHomochitto National Forest2,620
Missouri (5)
AreaForestAcres
Anderson Mountain Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest2,741
Big Creek Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest9,277
Irish Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest1,226
Spring Creek Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest4,899
Swan Creek Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest7,310
Oklahoma (1)
AreaForestAcres
Beech CreekOuachita National Forest8,303
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Texas (4)
AreaForestAcres
Big CreekNational Forests in Texas1,447
Big WoodsNational Forests in Texas1,320
Little Lake CreekNational Forests in Texas596
Winters BayouNational Forests in Texas730
References (96)
  1. Apodaca, J. J., A. R. Krohn, L. Collins, J. C. Godwin, L. Pearson, and A. D. Walde. 2023. Population structure and genetic differentiation in extant Alligator Snapping Turtles (genus <i>Macrochelys</i>) with implications for taxonomy and conservation. Southeastern Naturalist 22(Special Issue 12):1-24.
  2. Barbour, R. W. 1971. Amphibians and reptiles of Kentucky. Univ. Press of Kentucky, Lexington. x + 334 pp.
  3. Baxley, D. L., J. O. Barnard, and H. Venter. 2014. A survey for the Alligator Snapping Turtle (<i>Macrochelys temminckii</i>) in western Kentucky. Southeastern Naturalist 13(2):337-346.
  4. Berry, G. 2019. The ecology and evolution of the freshwater turtles of Southern Mississippi. Master's Thesis, The University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi. 176 pp.
  5. Bluett, R. D., D. A. Woolard, J. G. Palis, and J. A. Kath. 2011. Survey for <i>Macrochelys temminckii</i> in southern Illinois: implications for recovery actions. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science 104(1&amp;2):63-70.
  6. Boundy, J., and C. Kennedy. 2006. Trapping survey results for the alligator snapping turtle (<i>Macrochelys temminckii</i>) in southeastern Louisiana, with comments on exploitation. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 5:3-9.
  7. Buhlmann, K. A., and J. W. Gibbons. 1997. Imperiled aquatic reptiles of the southeastern United States: historical review and current conservation status. Pages 201-232 in G. Benz and D. E. Collins, editor. Conference on aquatic fauna in peril: the southeastern perspective. Southeast Aquatic Research Institute, Lenz Design & Communications, Decatur, GA. 554 pp.
  8. Capron, M. B. 1987. A study to determine the current presence and numbers of the alligator snapping turtle at selected localities in southeastern Kansas. Unpublished report to the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks, Agency Contract No. 153.
  9. Carr, J. L., S. R. Holcomb, and M. J. Ray. 2011. Basking in the alligator snapping turtle, <i>Macrochelys temminckii</i> (Testudines: Chelydridae). Reptiles and Amphibians, Conservation and Natural History 18(1):2-5.
  10. Collins, J. T. 1993. Amphibians and reptiles in Kansas. Third edition, revised. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History, Public Education Series No. 13. xx + 397 pp.
  11. Conant, R. and J. T. Collins. 1991. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 450 pp.
  12. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84. Online with updates at: http://www.ssarherps.org/pages/comm_names/Index.php
  13. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  14. Crother, B. I., J. Boundy, J. A. Campbell, K. de Queiroz, D. R. Frost, R. Highton, J. B. Iverson, P. A. Meylan, T. W. Reeder, M. E. Seidel, J. W. Sites, Jr., T. W. Taggart, S. G. Tilley, and D. B. Wake. 2000 [2001]. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Herpetological Circular No. 29. 82 pp.
  15. Dobie, J. L. 1971. Reproduction and growth in the alligator snapping turtle, <i>Macroclemys temminckii</i> (Troost). Copeia 1971: 645-658.
  16. Dreslik, M. J., J. L. Carr, D. B. Ligon, and E. J. Kessler. 2017. Recovery of the Alligator Snapping Turtle (<i>Macrochelys temminckii</i>) in the Mississippi River Valley Drainages of Southern Illinois, Oklahoma, and Louisiana. Illinois Natural History Survey Technical Report 2017(28):1-112.
  17. Enge, K. M., E. T. Stonecypher, E. P. Hill, J. D. Mays, and M. T. Fedler. 2019. Status and distribution of alligator snapping turtles in Florida’s panhandle. Project Number 9157-295-4375. Reptile and Amphibian Subsection Wildlife Research Section, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Submitted August 13, 2019. 44 pp.
  18. Ernst, C. H., and R. W. Barbour. 1972. Turtles of the United States. Univ. Press of Kentucky, Lexington. x + 347 pp.
  19. Ernst, C. H., and R. W. Barbour. 1989a. Turtles of the world. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. xii + 313 pp.
  20. Ernst, C. H., R. W. Barbour, and J. E. Lovich. 1994. Turtles of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. xxxviii + 578 pp.
  21. Ewert, M. A. 1976. Nests, nesting and aerial basking of <i>Macroclemys </i>under natural conditions, and comparisons with <i>Chelydra </i>(Testudines: Chelydridae). Herpetologica 32:150-156.
  22. Ewert, M. A., and D. R. Jackson. 1994. Nesting ecology of the alligator snapping turtle (<i>Macroclemys</i> <i>temminckii</i>) along the lower Apalachicola River, Florida. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Nongame Wildlife Program, Final Report. Tallahassee, Florida. vi + 45 pp.
  23. Ewert, M. A., D. R. Jackson, and P. E. Moler. 2006.<i> Macrochelys temminckii</i> - alligator snapping turtle. In P. A. Meylan (ed.), Biology and Conservation of Florida Turtles. Chelonian Research Monographs No. 3:58-71.
  24. Feist, S. M., R. L. Jones, J. L. Copley, L. S. Pearson, G. A. Berry, and C. P. Qualls. 2018. Development and validation of an environmental DNA method for detection of the alligator snapping turtle (<i>Macrochelys temminckii</i>). Chelonian Conservation and Biology 17:271-279.
  25. Figg, D. E. 1991. Missouri Department of Conservation Annual Nongame and Endangered Species Report July 1990 - June 1991. ii + 35 pp.
  26. Figg, D. E. 1993. Missouri Department of Conservation wildlife diversity report, July 1992-June 1993. 75 pp.
  27. Figg, D. E., and C. M. Bessken. 1995[?]. Missouri Department of Conservation wildlife diversity report: July 1994 - June 1995. v + 104 pp. [perhaps date is 1996]
  28. Folt, B., and C. Guyer. 2015. Evaluating recent taxonomic changes for alligator snapping turtles (Testudines: Chelydridae). Zootaxa 3947(3):447–450.
  29. Folt, B., and J. C. Godwin. 2013. Status of the Alligator Snapping Turtle (<i>Macrochelys temminckii</i>) in south Alabama with comments on its distribution. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 12(2):211-217.
  30. Folt, B., J. B. Jensen, A. Teare, and D. Rostal. 2016. Establishing reference demography for conservation: a case study of <i>Macrochelys temminckii</i> in Spring Creek, Georgia. Herpetological Monographs 30:21-33.
  31. George, G. 1988. The current status of the alligator snapping turtle, <i>Macroclemys temmincki</i>, with a review of its natural history. Internat. Herpetol. Symp. Captive Propagation and Husbandry 11:75-81.
  32. Godwin, J. C. 1996. Survey for the alligator snapping turtle (<i>Macroclemys temminckii</i>) in Alabama, 1995-96. Final report. Alabama Natural Heritage Program, Montgomery, Alabama. 13 pp.
  33. Harrel, J. B., C. M. Allen, and S. J. Hebert. 1996. Movements and habitat use of subadult alligator snapping turtles (Macroclemys temminckii) in Louisiana. American Midland Naturalist 135:61-67.
  34. Heck, B. A. 1998. The alligator snapping turtle (<i>Macroclemys temminckii</i>) in southeast Oklahoma. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science 78:53-58.
  35. Hollender, E. C., T. L. Anthony, and D. B. Ligon. 2018. Motorboat injury rates and patterns in aquatic turtle communities. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 17(2):298-302.
  36. Huntzinger, C. C., I. Louque, W. Selman, P. V. Lindeman, and E. K. Lyons. 2019. Distribution and abundance of the alligator snapping turtle (<i>Macrochelys temminckii</i>) in southwestern Louisiana. Southeastern Naturalist 18(1):65-75.
  37. Jackson, D. R., and J. B. Jensen. 2003. <i>Macrochelys temminckii</i> (alligator snapping turtle). Reproduction. Herpetological Review 34:363-363.
  38. Jensen, J. B., and W. S. Birkhead. 2003. Distribution and status of the alligator snapping turtle (<i>Macrochelys temminckii</i>) in Georgia. Southeastern Naturalist 2:25-34.
  39. Jensen, J. B., C. D. Camp, W. Gibbons, and M. J. Elliot, editors. 2008. Amphibians and reptiles of Georgia. University of Georgia Press, Athens. xvii + 575 pp.
  40. Johnson, S. 1989. Population status of the alligator snapping turtle (<i>Macroclemys temminckii</i>) in the Flint River. Annual performance report, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Forsyth, GA. 11 pp.
  41. Johnson, T. R. 1987. The amphibians and reptiles of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City. 368 pp.
  42. Kessler, E. J., C. A. Phillips, S. R. Ballard, and M. J. Dreslik. 2017. The first record of an alligator snapping turtle (<i>Macrochelys temminckii</i>) in Illinois in 30 years. Southeastern Naturalist 16(3):29-35.
  43. King, F. W., and R. L. Burke, editors. 1989. Crocodilian, tuatara, and turtle species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Association of Systematics Collections, Washington, D.C. 216 pp.
  44. King, R. L., B. P. Hepler, L. L. Smith, and J. B. Jensen. 2016. The status of <i>Macrochelys temminckii</i> (Alligator Snapping Turtle) in the Flint River, GA, 22 years after the close of commercial harvest. Southeastern Naturalist 15(4):575-585.
  45. Lane, J. J., and W. A. Mitchell. 1997. Species profile: alligator snapping turtle (<i>Macroclemys temminckii</i>) on military installations in the southeastern United States. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station (Vicksburg, Mississippi) Technical Report SERDP-97-9.
  46. Lescher, T. C., J. T. Briggler, and Z. Tang-Martínez. 2013. Relative abundance, population structure, and conservation of alligator snapping turtles (<i>Macrochelys temminckii</i>) in Missouri between 1993–1994 and 2009. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 12(1):163-168.
  47. Lescher, T. C., Z. Tang-Martínez, and J. T. Briggler. 2013. Habitat use by the alligator snapping turtle (<i>Macrochelys temminckii</i>) and eastern snapping turtle (<i>Chelydra serpentina</i>) in southeastern Missouri. The American Midland Naturalist 169(1):86-96.
  48. Lodato, M. J., L. T. Grannan, Jr., and R. Anderson. 1992. Geographic distribution: <i>Macroclemys temminckii</i>. Herpetological Review 23:88.
  49. Lovich, J. E. 1993. <i>Macroclemys</i>, <i>M. temminckii</i>. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles 562.1-562.4.
  50. Mays, J., T. Thomas, and K. Enge. 2015. Alligator snapping turtle survey. Project Number 9157-295-6263. Reptile and Amphibian Subsection Wildlife Research Section, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Submitted December 22, 2015. 22 pp.
  51. Minton, S. A., Jr. 1972. Amphibians and reptiles of Indiana. Indiana Academy Science Monographs 3. v + 346 pp.
  52. Minton, S. A., Jr. 2001. Amphibians & reptiles of Indiana. Revised second edition. Indiana Academy of Science, Indianapolis. xiv + 404 pp.
  53. Moler, P. E. 1996. Alligator snapping turtle distribution and relative abundance. Final report, Study Number 7544. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, FL.
  54. Mount, R. H. 1975. The reptiles and amphibians of Alabama. Auburn University Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn, Alabama. vii + 347 pp.
  55. Munscher, E., J. Gray, A. Tuggle, D. B. Ligon, V. Gladkaya, C. Franklin, C. Drake, V. Ricardez, B.P. Butterfield, K. Norrid, and A. Walde. 2020. Discovery of an Alligator Snapping Turtle (<i>Macrochelys temminckii</i>) population in metropolitan Houston, Harris County, Texas. Urban Naturalist 32:1-13.
  56. Nicholson, K. E. (ed.). 2025. Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, with Comments Regarding Confidence in Our Understanding. Ninth Edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. 87pp. Online database available at: https://cnah.org/SSARnames.aspx
  57. Phelps, J. P. 2004. Aquatic turtles of diversely managed watersheds in the Ouachita Mountains, Arkansas. Pages 183-186 in J. M. Guldin (editor). Ouachita and Ozark Mountains Symposium: Ecosystem Management Research. General Technical Report SRS-74. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Asheville, NC.
  58. Powell, S.C. and J.A. Knesel. 1992. Blood collection from <i>Macroclemys temmincki</i> (Troost). Herpetological Review 23(1):19.
  59. Pritchard, P. C. H. 1978. Alligator Snapping Turtle. pp 69-71 in R. McDiarmid, (ed.). Rare and endangered biota of Florida, vol. 3: Amphibians and Reptiles. Univ. Presses of Florida, Gainesville.
  60. Pritchard, P. C. H. 1982. The biology and status of the alligator snapping turtle (Macroclemys temminckii) with research and management recommendations. Florida Audubon Soc. Publ.
  61. Pritchard, P. C. H. 1989. The alligator snapping turtle, biology and conservation. Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 104 pp.
  62. Pritchard, P. C. H. 1990. The alligator snapping turtle: biology and conservation. Milwaukee Public Museum. xii + 104 pp.
  63. Pritchard, P. C. H. 1992. Alligator snapping turtle <i>Macroclemys temminckii</i> (Harlan). Pages 171-177 in P. E. Moler, editor. Rare and endangered biota of Florida. Vol. III. Amphibians and reptiles. Univ. Press of Florida.
  64. Reed, R. N., J. Congdon, and J. W. Gibbons. 2002. The alligator snapping turtle [<i>Macrochelys </i>(<i>Macroclemys</i>) <i>temminckii</i>]: a review of ecology, life history, and conservation, with demographic analyses of the sustainability of take from wild populations. Report to United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Arlington, Virginia. 17 pp.
  65. Riedle, J. D., P. A. Shipman, S. F. Fox, and D. M. Leslie, Jr. 2005. Status and distribution of the alligator snapping turtle <i>Macrochelys temminckii</i> in Oklahoma. Southwestern Naturalist 50:79-84.
  66. Riedle, J. D., P. A. Shipman, S. F. Fox, D. M. Leslie, Jr. 2006. Microhabitat use, home range, and movements of the alligator snapping turtle <i>Macrochelys temminckii</i> in Oklahoma. Southwestern Naturalist 51:35-40.
  67. Riedle, J. D., P. A. Shipman, S. F. Fox, J. C. Hackler, and D. M. Leslie, Jr. 2007. Population structure of the alligator snapping turtle, <i>Macrochelys temminckii</i>, on the western edge of its distribution. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 7(1):100-104.
  68. Roman, J., S. D. Santhuff, P. E. Moler, and B. W. Bowen. 1999. Population structure and cryptic evolutionary units in the alligator snapping turtle. Conservation Biology 13:135-142.
  69. Sanspree, C. R., C. M. Murray, and B. Folt. 2016. <i>Macrochelys temminckii</i> (Alligator Snapping Turtle). Predation. Herpetological Review 47(1):124-125.
  70. Santhuff, S. D. 1993. Alligator snapping turtle, <i>Macroclemys temminckii</i>, trap, mark, and release project 1993. Final Report to the Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, MO. 17 pp.
  71. Scott, A. F., and J. Koons. 1994. <i>Macroclemys temminckii</i> (alligator snapping turtle). Reproduction. Herpetological Review 25:64.
  72. Shipman, P. A., and J. D. Riedle. 2008. Status and distribution of the alligator snapping turtle (<i>Macrochelys temminckii</i>) in southeastern Missouri. Southeastern Naturalist 7:331-338.
  73. Shipman, P., D. Edds, and D. Blex. 1991. Report on the recapture of an alligator snapping turtle (Macroclemys temminckii) in Kansas. Kansas Herpetological Society Newsletter No. 85: 8-9.
  74. Sloan, K., and J. E. Lovich. 1995. Exploitation of the alligator snapping turtle, <i>Macroclemys temminckii</i>, in Louisiana: a case study. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 1(3):221-222.
  75. Sloan, K. N. and D. Taylor. 1987. Habitats and movements of adult alligator snapping turtles in northeast Louisiana. Proceedings of the Annual Conference, Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Associations 41:343-348.
  76. Sloan, K. N., K. A. Buhlman, and J. E. Lovich. 1996. Stomach contents of commercially harvested adult alligator snapping turtles, <i>Macroclemys temminckii</i>. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 2(1):96-99.
  77. Smith, P. W. 1961. The amphibians and reptiles of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey 28(1):1-298.
  78. Steen, D. A., and O. J. Robinson Jr. 2017. Estimating freshwater turtle mortality rates and population declines following hook ingestion. Conservation Biology 31(6):1333-1339.
  79. Taggart, T. W., and J. Carr. 2025. Testudines – Turtles. In K. E. Nicholson (ed.), Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, with Comments Regarding Confidence in Our Understanding. Ninth Edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. 87 pp.
  80. Thomas, T.M., M.C. Granatosky, J.R. Bourque, K.L. Krysko, P.E. Moler, T. Gamble, E. Suarez, E. Leone, K.M. Enge, and J. Roman. 2014. Taxonomic assessment of Alligator Snapping Turtles (Chelydridae: <i>Macrochelys</i>), with the description of two new species from the southeastern United States. Zootaxa 3786(2):141-165.
  81. Thompson, D. M., D. B. Ligon, J. C. Patton, and M. Papes. 2017. Effects of life-history requirements on the distribution of a threatened reptile. Conservation Biology 31(2):427-436.
  82. Trauth, S. E, D. S. Siegel, M. L. McCallum, D. H. Jamieson, A. Holt, J. B. Trauth, H. Hicks, J. W. Stanley, J. Elston, J. J. Kelly, and J. D. Konvalina. 2016. Long-term monitoring and recovery of a population of alligator snapping turtles, <i>Macrochelys temminckii</i> (Testudines: Chelydridae), from a northeastern Arkansas stream. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science 70(39):235-247.
  83. Trauth, S. E., H. W. Robison, and M. V. Plummer. 2004. The amphibians and reptiles of Arkansas. University of Arkansas Press.
  84. Trauth, S. E., J. D. Wilhide, and A. Holt. 1998. Population structure and movement patterns of alligator snapping turtles (<i>Macroclemys temminckii</i>) in northeastern Arkansas. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 3(1):64-70.
  85. Tucker, A. D., and K. N. Sloan. 1997. Growth and reproductive estimates from alligator snapping turtles, <i>Macroclemys temminckii</i>, taken by commercial harvest in Louisiana. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 2(4):587-592.
  86. Tucker, A.D. and N.N. Fitzsimmons. 1992. A device for separating fecal samples of a mollusc-feeding turtle, <i>Malaclemys terrapin</i>. Herpetological Review 23(4):113-115.
  87. Turtle Taxonomy Working Group (TTWG) [Rhodin, A.G.J., Iverson, J.B., Bour, R. Fritz, U., Georges, A., Shaffer, H.B., and van Dijk, P.P.]. 2017. Turtles of the World: Annotated Checklist and Atlas of Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution, and Conservation Status (8th Ed.). In: Rhodin, A.G.J., Iverson, J.B., van Dijk, P.P., Saumure, R.A., Buhlmann, K.A., Pritchard, P.C.H., and Mittermeier, R.A. (Eds.). Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group. Chelonian Research Monographs 7:1–292. doi: 10.3854/crm.7.checklist.atlas.v8.2017.
  88. Turtle Taxonomy Working Group [TTWG: Rhodin, A.G.J., Iverson, J.B., Fritz, U., Gallego-García, N., Georges, A., Shaffer, H.B., and van Dijk, P.P.]. 2025. Turtles of the World: Annotated Checklist and Atlas of Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution, and Conservation Status (10th Ed.). In: Rhodin, A.G.J., Iverson, J.B., van Dijk, P.P., Stanford, C.B., Goode, E.V., Buhlmann, K.A., and Mittermeier, R.A. (Eds.). Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project of the IUCN SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group. Chelonian Research Monographs 10:1–575. doi:10.3854/crm.10.checklist.atlas.v10.2025.
  89. Turtle Taxonomy Working Group (TTWG) [Rhodin, A. G. J., J. B. Iverson, R. Bour, U. Fritz, A. Georges, H. B. Shaffer, and P. P. van Dijk]. 2021. Turtles of the World: Annotated Checklist and Atlas of Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution, and Conservation Status (9th Ed.). In: Rhodin, A. G. J., J. B. Iverson , P. P. van Dijk, C. B. Stanford, E. V. Goode, K. A. Buhlmann, and R. A. Mittermeier (Eds.). Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group. Chelonian Research Monographs 8:1–472. doi: 10.3854/crm.8.checklist.atlas.v9.2021.
  90. Turtle Taxonomy Working Group [van Dijk, P.P., Iverson, J.B., Shaffer, H.B., Bour, R., and Rhodin, A.G.J.]. 2012. Turtles of the world, 2012 update: annotated checklist of taxonomy, synonymy, distribution, and conservation status. In: Rhodin, A.G.J., Pritchard, P.C.H., van Dijk, P.P., Saumure, R.A., Buhlmann, K.A., Iverson, J.B., and Mittermeier, R.A. (Eds.). Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project of the IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group. Chelonian Research Monographs No. 5:000.243-000.328. Online. Available: www.iucn-tftsg.org/cbftt/.
  91. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Threatened Species Status With Section 4(d) Rule for Alligator Snapping Turtle. Federal Register 86(214):62434-62463.
  92. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2025. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notification of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions. Candidate notice of review (CNOR). Federal Register 90(209):48912-48937.
  93. Walker, D., and J. C. Avise. 1998. Principles of phylogeography as illustrated by freshwater and terrestrial turtles in the southeastern United States. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:23-58.
  94. Webb, R. G. 1970. Reptiles of Oklahoma. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. 370 pp.
  95. Webb, R.G. 1995. The date of publication of Gray’s Catalogue of Shield Reptiles. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 1(4): 322-323.
  96. Wickham, M. M. 1922. Notes on the migration of <i>Macrochelys lacertina</i>. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science 2:20-22.