Argynnis idalia occidentalis

(B. Williams, 2002)

Regal Fritillary

T3T3 (G3?T3Q) Found in 35 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
T3T3Global Rank
HighThreat Impact
Western regal fritillary (Argynnis idalia occidentalis). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.120945
Element CodeIILEPJ6042
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSubspecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryInvertebrate Animal
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumArthropoda
ClassInsecta
OrderLepidoptera
FamilyNymphalidae
GenusArgynnis
Synonyms
Speyeria idalia occidentalisB. Williams, 2002
Concept Reference
Williams, B.E. 2002. Recognition of western populations of Speyeria idalia (Nymphalidae) as a new subspecies. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 55(4):144-149.
Taxonomic Comments
Zhang et al. (2020), following Simonsen et al. (2006), place Speyeria as a subgenus within Argynnis.

Prairie populations of regal fritllaries are described as a subspecies separate from the typical now nearly extinct eastern version of this species based on a morphometric analysis of wing spot characters and examination of mitochondrial DNA. Since the wing characters are almost certainly genetically based, even by those alone this taxon would be better founded than some butterfly subspecies. Unfortunately material from only one of the two or three known extant S. I. IDALIA populations was used for the mtDNA study. However the five individuals from that Pennsylvania population differed from all of the western populations with five synapomorphies. Still strictly speaking all this demonstrates is that Pennsylvania individuals are more similar to each other than to those from hundreds of kilometers farther west. Notably Wisconsin, Nebraska, Missouri and Iowa individuals did not cluster together (Williams' Figure 4). Also note that specimens from a large area of potential contact between these taxa (Ohio, Indiana, Michigan) were not included in the wing character or DNA analyses. S. idalia occidentalis coincides with the "prairie ecotype" previously recognized by Schweitzer in this database which was reported to differ from eastern populations in habitat acceptability. Specifically eastern populations use of a variety of mostly wet anthropogenic habitats, while more western ones are virtually restricted to prairie remnants, including native pastures etc. The biology of S. idalia occidentalis has been well studied (for example all of the Swengel studies). Note however, that Williams' statements regarding habitat and foodplant preferences for S. i. idalia are largely inaccurate. See documentation for that subspecies and the EMG for the species for details. This is provisionally accepted as a valid subspecies but from the analyses presented in its description the possibility of a large scale cline cannot be ruled out, especially since wing spot variation within (as opposed to between) the two subspecies is not explored. This account by Dale Schweitzer with input from Jason Weintraub.
Conservation Status
Review Date2008-01-29
Change Date2002-06-14
Edition Date2008-03-18
Edition AuthorsSchweitzer, Dale F.
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank Reasons
The ranks for this subspecies is the same as that for the full species because all but three remaining populations (as of 2007) are this subspecies. However obviously this subspecies has declined less (about 98- 99%) than the eastern one (>99.9%). This is the Regal Fritillary of the prairies.
Range Extent Comments
The exact boundary (presumably including parts of Illinois or Indiana) between this and the nearly extinct eastern subspecies idalia is unknown, as is the extent of the presumed blend zone. However, populations west of Illinois and the prairie parts of Wisconsin are/were mostly or entirely this subspecies. At minimum the range was southern Manitoba and eastern Montana south to Oklahoma and Colorado east into Wisconsin. Populations in and east of Ohio, and probably Michigan, were subspecies idalia.
Occurrences Comments
See full species account, all but three known extant EOs are this subspecies.
Threat Impact Comments
See species account, all but two or three known extant EOs are this subspecies. Threats include small population sizes, natural and unnatural fluctuations, conversion of prairie remnants to agriculture, pesticides and herbicides, isolation and ill-conceived prescribed burning. See EMG for details but generally the species is likely to survive on preserves of about 100 acres or larger if burn rotations include three or more units and at least three non-burn years for recovery. However five year minimum intervals are strongly recommended. It is very unlikely to survive complete burns and these have permanently eradicated populations e.g the one at Resthaven WMA in Ohio. It appears to thrive best where fire is not part of the management process. Its fire sensitivity is not greatly different from other specilist prairie Lepidoptera.
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

This subspecies is virtually restricted to remnant native prairies, including disturbed or somewhat degraded examples and native pastures. These prairies range from xeric to wet, and ideal habitat may be places with abundant violets in both dry and wet microhabitats. See discussion for full species.

Ecology

See full species. Adults are not migratory, but are sometimes dispersive and can travel several miles at least. The ability of this subspecies to colonize new sites and the extent of gene flow are not well documented. I pre-settlement times, populations probably shifted due to wildfires and bison.
Terrestrial Habitats
Grassland/herbaceous
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLAND
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN3
ProvinceRankNative
ColoradoS1Yes
WyomingS3Yes
Roadless Areas (35)
Idaho (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekCaribou-Targhee National Forest118,582
Montana (3)
AreaForestAcres
Cook MountainCuster National Forest9,621
King MountainCuster National Forest12,134
Tongue River BreaksCuster National Forest17,481
North Dakota (21)
AreaForestAcres
Bell LakeDakota Prairie Grasslands11,265
BlacktailDakota Prairie Grasslands8,620
Bullion ButteDakota Prairie Grasslands19,877
Collar / Bennett - CottonwoodDakota Prairie Grasslands19,697
Dawsons WaterholeDakota Prairie Grasslands6,087
DelamereDakota Prairie Grasslands5,087
DurlerDakota Prairie Grasslands12,464
Easy HillDakota Prairie Grasslands7,344
Kinley PlateauDakota Prairie Grasslands16,900
Lone ButteDakota Prairie Grasslands11,465
Long X DivideDakota Prairie Grasslands10,099
MagpieDakota Prairie Grasslands21,281
McleodDakota Prairie Grasslands9,117
Ponderosa PineDakota Prairie Grasslands7,471
Scairt WomanDakota Prairie Grasslands6,099
SheyenneDakota Prairie Grasslands14,537
Strom - HansonDakota Prairie Grasslands18,957
Tracy MountainDakota Prairie Grasslands9,756
Twin ButtesDakota Prairie Grasslands13,492
VenloDakota Prairie Grasslands5,317
WannaganDakota Prairie Grasslands6,026
South Dakota (4)
AreaForestAcres
Beaver ParkBlack Hills National Forest5,010
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
South ForkDakota Prairie Grasslands7,653
Twin Butte CreekDakota Prairie Grasslands6,700
Wyoming (6)
AreaForestAcres
Buffalo PeakMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest17,560
Cow Creek MountainMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest8,276
Duck CreekThunder Basin National Grassland12,343
Inyan KaraBlack Hills National Forest1,310
Labonte CanyonMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest16,281
Laramie PeakMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest28,608
References (7)
  1. Pelham, J. P. 2008. A catalogue of the butterflies of the United States and Canada with a complete bibliography of the descriptive and systematic literature. The Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera. Volume 40. 658 pp. Revised 14 February, 2012.
  2. Pelham, J.P. 2023. A catalogue of the butterflies of the United States and Canada. Revised 15 February 2023. http://butterfliesofamerica.com/US-Can-Cat.htm
  3. Simonsen, T. J., N. Wahlberg, A. V. Z. Brower, and R. de Jong. 2006. Morphology, molecules and fritillaries: approaching a stable phylogeny for Argynnini (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Insect Systematics & Evolution 37:405-418.
  4. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2025. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notification of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions. Candidate notice of review (CNOR). Federal Register 90(209):48912-48937.
  5. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Status for the Eastern Regal Fritillary, and Threatened Status With Section 4(d) Rule for the Western Regal Fritillary. Proposed rule. Federal Register 89(151):63888-63909.
  6. Williams, B.E. 2002. Recognition of western populations of <i>Speyeria idalia</i> (Nymphalidae) as a new subspecies. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 55(4):144-149.
  7. Zhang, J., Q. Cong, J. Shen, P. A. Opler, and N. V. Grishin. 2020. Genomic evidence suggests further changes of butterfly names. The Taxonomic Report of The International Lepidoptera Survey 8(7): 1-41.