Protonotaria citrea

(Boddaert, 1783)

Prothonotary Warbler

G5Secure Found in 138 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Prothonotary Warbler (Protonotaria citrea). © Tim Healy; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Tim Healy; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Prothonotary Warbler (Protonotaria citrea). © Matt Felperin; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Matt Felperin; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Prothonotary Warbler (Protonotaria citrea). © Matt Misewicz; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Matt Misewicz; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Prothonotary Warbler (Protonotaria citrea). © Brad Imhoff; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Brad Imhoff; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Prothonotary Warbler (Protonotaria citrea). © Jonathan Irons; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Jonathan Irons; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Prothonotary Warbler (Protonotaria citrea). © Ryan Justice; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Ryan Justice; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Prothonotary Warbler (Protonotaria citrea). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.100372
Element CodeABPBX07010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderPasseriformes
FamilyParulidae
GenusProtonotaria
Other Common Names
Chipe Dorado (ES) Paruline orangée (FR) prothonotary warbler (EN)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-04-09
Change Date1996-12-03
Edition Date2014-11-18
Edition AuthorsDirrigl, F. J., Jr., G. Hammerson, and R. Sallabanks; Modified by Jue, Dean K.
Range Extent20,000-2,500,000 square km (about 8000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
Large breeding range in much of eastern U.S. and adjacent southern Ontario; numerous occurrences; fairly stable population but with some indications of a small decline.
Range Extent Comments
BREEDING: eastern Minnesota and Wisconsin across southern Great Lakes region to northern New Jersey, south to Texas, Gulf Coast, and central Florida, west to Oklahoma and Kansas (AOU 1983). BBS data (1966-1991) indicate relatively high abundance in Louisiana, North Carolina, and Mississippi. Breeding range has expanded northward, especially in the Mississippi Valley and vicinity, and nesting recently (1992) was recorded in Rhode Island (Wadman et al., unpubl.). NON-BREEDING: Yucatan peninsula (rarely) south on Caribbean slope of Central America to Nicaragua; both slopes of Costa Rica and Panama; from Colombia east to northern Venezuela; and from the Netherlands Antilles east to Trinidad and Tobago (AOU 1983). Most common in Panama and western Colombia and northern Venezuela; barely reaches Suriname and northern Ecuador. Migrates through and apparently occasionally overwinters in West Indies. Uncommon in Puerto Rico, apparently rare in Virgin Islands (Raffaele 1983, 1989). Recorded also on the Galapagos Islands nearly 1000 km west of mainland South America (Petit and Tarvin 1990). Birdlife International (2014) estimates a range size of 1.4 million square kilometers
Occurrences Comments
This species has an extremely large range and populatioin size so it should have at least 81 EOs.
Threat Impact Comments
The primary threat in most areas is loss of suitable habitat (Leberman 1992; Busby and Mabey, pers. comms.). Loss of old growth forest associated with riparian habitats is detrimental because older trees are more likely to develop nesting cavities. Widespread drainage of required wetland habitat is a significant threat. Significant mortality factors appear to be competition with, and nest destruction, by house wrens (TROGLODYTES AEDON) (Walkinshaw 1941, 1953, Petit 1989, Brush 1991) in northern parts of the range, brood parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds (MOLOTHRUS ATER) (Walkinshaw 1941, Bent 1953, Petit 1989, 1991), predatory mammals, flooding and predatory birds (Walkinshaw 1941), and snakes (Bent 1953, Petit 1989). Nesting success was seriously impacted by competing house wrens in eastern Iowa (Brush 1991). Where nest-boxes were available, house wrens used 90-94% of them, making them unavailable to warblers. In areas that lacked nest-boxes but had higher water levels, wrens took over fewer warbler nests, and predation on warbler nests was rare. Guillory (1987) provided evidence of competition for cavities and predation on prothonotary warblers by PEROMYSCUS spp. (white-footed and cotton mice) in Louisiana; mice destroyed nests, killed adults and nestlings, and cached food in cavities and nest boxes. Predator-free habitat with high, stable water levels and low wren populations, appears to be more beneficial than are nest-boxes placed in low-quality habitat. By placing the nest over water, may be better protected from mammalian predators (Petit 1989). As a cavity nester, is probably less vulnerable than open-nesting species to increased predation or brood parasitism caused by forest fragmentation. However, cowbird parasitism has been documented to reduce nest success by approximately 25%, primarily through egg removal by female cowbirds and lowered hatching success of warbler eggs (Petit 1991). Petit (1991) found 21% of 172 nests (in nest-boxes) parasitized by cowbirds (natural cavities were parasitized at the same rate)--a relatively high frequency of parasitism for a hole-nesting species. The impact of parasitism appeared relatively low, however, compared with other host species. Females accepted parasitism in 81% of cases and were often able to raise most of their young along with the cowbird. Petit (1991) suggested that acceptance of parasitism may be more likely to occur when females have limited opportunities to renest in a different site. Prothonotary warblers therefore may be more strongly impacted by forest management practices that alter habitat or remove valuable cavity trees; with fewer nest-sites, cowbird parasitism will have greater effects. Two females were found dead on their nests by and were believed to have died as a result of prior illness and the energetic demands of reproduction (Petit and Petit 1987).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Length 14 cm. Relatively large, plump, short-tailed, and long-billed compared to other Parulidae. Eyes are large, dark, and prominent. Male's head and underparts are golden yellow, fading to white undertail coverts; wings are blue-gray, without wing bars; blue-gray tail has large white patches. Female is duller, head less golden. See Kowalski (1986) for information on weights, measurements, and methods of aging.

VOCALIZATIONS: Song is a series of loud, ringing "zweet" notes (NGS 1987).

NEST: cup-shaped hollow of mosses, rootlets, twigs, and leaves, smoothly lined with fine grasses, leaf stems, and feathers; inside diameter 5.1 cm, depth 3.8 cm.

EGGS: average 18.47 x 14.55 mm; oval to short-oval; shell is smooth, somewhat glossy, creamy, boldly and liberally spotted and blotched with brown.

Diagnostic Characteristics

Distinguished from yellow warbler (DENDROICA PETECHIA) by blue-gray wings and uppertail feathers; distinguished from blue-winged warbler (VERMIVORA PINUS) by lack of a black eye line.

Habitat

BREEDING: Mature deciduous floodplain, river, and swamp forests; wet lowland forest. Primary habitats are almost always near standing water; swamps that are somewhat open with scattered dead stumps are preferred. Bottomland forests and extensive willow thickets near lakes or ponds are also quite suitable. Requires dense underbrush along streambanks (Bushman and Therres 1988). Nests in cavity (natural, old woodpecker hole, bird box, etc.), in snag or living tree, often or always near or over water, at average height of 1.5-3 m (range 0.9-9.8 m); male selects territory, nest site, places some material before female's spring arrival. May be limited by the number of available nesting cavities. See Blem and Blem (1994) for information on composition and microclimate of nests in Virginia. This is the only eastern warbler that nests in tree cavities or other crannies (the only other cavity-nesting wood warbler (Parulidae) is Lucy's warbler [VERMIVORA LUCIAE]). Petit and Petit (1988) provided the first record of a prothonotary warbler using an open-cup nest built by another species (red-winged blackbird [AGELAIUS PHOENICEUS]).

Hamel et al. (1982) provided details on habitat use and suitability in Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida. The following five vegetation types used by this species in five physiographic provinces (Piedmont, Sandhills, Inner Coastal Plain, Outer Coastal Plain, and Coastline) are listed in order of decreasing suitability: oak-gum-cypress is suitable at the sapling-poletimber successional stage, but optimal at the late successional sawtimber stage; both bay swamp-pocosin and elm-ash-cottonwood are only marginal at the sapling-poletimber stage and suitable at the sawtimber stage; southern mixed mesic hardwoods are only marginal in both the sapling-poletimber and sawtimber stages; and pond-pine pocosin is marginal at the late successional sawtimber stage only. In all cases, shrubs, midstory canopy and dead trees or limbs are used for all activities (foraging, nesting, perching, roosting, and singing), and snags must have a dbh of at least 15 cm.

Kahl et al. (1985) described habitat around song perches in Missouri as typically level terrain, with a small number of woody stems (< 2.5 cm dbh; < 2800 per ha, never > 4200), short ground vegetation (< 0.20 m, never > 0.36), and a high canopy (16-40 m, never < 12). Other important features included few dead stems (2.5-9.9 cm dbh; < 200 per ha, never > 250) and an intermediate subcanopy closure (30-80%, never < 10 or > 90).

NON-BREEDING: In migration, habitat includes dry woodland, scrub, thickets, and mangroves (AOU 1983). Commonly mist-netted in citrus groves in Belize (Mills 1989). Individuals were mist-netted in second-growth marshes, mangrove scrub, and seasonally flooded low forest in the northeastern coastal region of the Yucatan Peninsula (Ornat and Greenberg 1990). Usually occurs near water and most typically in mangroves in Puerto Rico (Raffaele 1989), though Faaborg and Arendt (1992) reported mist-net captures in dry forest in southwestern Puerto Rico. Records from Colombia include mangroves, freshwater swamps, coastal shrubs, and along the Rio Frio River in the edge of the foothills. The birds usually occur near water, but were also historically noted "in yellow, acacia-like trees on the border of stump land and dry forest, far from water" (Bent 1953).

Ecology

POPULATION DENSITY: Published information on bird densities from breeding bird censuses in the southeastern U.S. between 1947 and 1979 were summarized by Hamel et al. (1982): mean (se) density was listed as 14.9 (3.9) pairs per 40 ha, with a density range of 6-28 pairs per 40 ha. Accurate measures of population densities from censusing techniques are rare for this species because few studies of this nature occur in swamp forests. Encouragingly, however, there are two studies of cypress-tupelo wetlands that provide similar results: Mitchell and Lancia (1990) found prothonotary warblers to be the most abundant bird species of their studies in South Carolina; the mean number of detections per 25 m radius 10-min point count ranged from 0.11 in a clearcut to 2.68 in the forest interior. Similar results were obtained by R. Sallabanks (unpubl. data) in a study of bottomland hardwood forests along the Roanoke River in North Carolina; the mean number of detections per unlimited radius 10-min point count ranged from 0.73 in levee forest to 2.21 in large patches of cypress-tupelo swamp forest. Again, the prothonotary warbler was the most common species censused. Whitcomb et al. (1981) found 40 males per sq km in their Maryland study area and Fowler and Fowler (1985) report 0.90 birds per 0.8 km segments of the Duck River in middle Tennessee.

TERRITORY SIZE: Territory size seems variable. Mean territory size was 1.48 ha in Michigan (Walkinshaw 1953), 0.50 ha in southern Illinois (Kleen 1973), and 0.48 ha in Tennessee (Petit 1989). Lefebvre et al. (1994) considered this species to be nonterritorial in winter in northeastern Venezuela mangroves. May roost communally during nonbreeding season (Warkentin and Morton 1995).

SITE FIDELITY: In Venezuela, exhibited some fidelity to wintering sites (Lefebvre et al. 1994).

Reproduction

In the mid-Atlantic region, nesting occurs from late April to late June, with a peak from mid-May to mid-June (see Bushman and Therres 1988). Petit (1989) found the mean initiation dates for late nests to be 7 June in 1985, and 13 June in 1987. Clutch size is 3-8 (usually 4-6) (Walkinshaw 1941, 1953; Petit 1989; Blem and Blem 1992). Incubation, by female, typically lasts 12-14 days. Young are tended by both parents, leave nest at 10-11 days. Typically, individual females produce two broods per year, sometimes one, especially in the north. Petit (1989) found most females to lay two clutches, but Blem and Blem (1992) never found the same female incubating two sets of eggs in any single year.

Reproductive success in natural cavities (e.g., Walkinshaw 1941) appears to be significantly lower than in nest-boxes (e.g., Petit 1989). Walkinshaw (1941) reported a hatching success of 38% in Michigan and 61% in Tennessee; Petit (1989) reported a hatching success of 84% and a low nestling mortality of 11%, compared to Walkinshaw's (1941) 33% in Michigan. The difference in nest success appears to be most attributable to regional differences in competition from house wrens (TROGLODYTES AEDON). Life history accounts were provided by Brewster (1878), Loucks (1894), Meyer and Nevius (1943), Bent (1953), Walkinshaw (1953), and Petit (1989).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - HardwoodForest - ConiferForest - MixedWoodland - HardwoodWoodland - ConiferWoodland - MixedShrubland/chaparral
Palustrine Habitats
FORESTED WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN1B
ProvinceRankNative
OntarioS1BYes
United StatesN5B
ProvinceRankNative
KentuckyS5BYes
MarylandS4BYes
South CarolinaS3Yes
TexasS3BYes
ColoradoSNAYes
IndianaS4BYes
MississippiS5BYes
WisconsinS2BYes
Rhode IslandS1B,S1NYes
South DakotaSNAYes
FloridaS4BYes
New MexicoS4NYes
MichiganS3Yes
MissouriS4Yes
IowaS3B,S3NYes
GeorgiaS3Yes
District of ColumbiaS1BYes
New YorkS2BYes
North CarolinaS5BYes
KansasS3BYes
IllinoisS5Yes
TennesseeS4Yes
VirginiaS4Yes
MassachusettsS1B,S2NYes
AlabamaS5BYes
ArkansasS4BYes
DelawareS4BYes
OklahomaSNRBYes
ArizonaS1MYes
OhioS3Yes
NebraskaS2Yes
MinnesotaSNRBYes
PennsylvaniaS3B,S2MYes
ConnecticutSNAYes
New JerseyS4B,S4NYes
LouisianaS5BYes
West VirginiaS2BYes
Roadless Areas (138)
Alabama (4)
AreaForestAcres
Blue MountainTalladega National Forest4,986
Blue MountainTalladega National Forest4,986
Reed BrakeTalladega National Forest621
Reed BrakeTalladega National Forest621
Arkansas (4)
AreaForestAcres
Blue MountainOuachita National Forest9,755
Blue MountainOuachita National Forest9,755
Richland CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest571
Richland CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest571
Florida (16)
AreaForestAcres
Clear LakeApalachicola National Forest5,592
Clear LakeApalachicola National Forest5,592
Clear LakeApalachicola National Forest5,592
Gum BayApalachicola National Forest11,645
Gum BayApalachicola National Forest11,645
Impassable BayOsceola National Forest2,789
Impassable BayOsceola National Forest2,789
Long BayApalachicola National Forest5,726
Long BayApalachicola National Forest5,726
Long BayApalachicola National Forest5,726
Natural Area WsaOsceola National Forest2,543
Natural Area WsaOsceola National Forest2,543
PinhookOsceola National Forest15,405
PinhookOsceola National Forest15,405
SavannahApalachicola National Forest1,927
SavannahApalachicola National Forest1,927
Illinois (10)
AreaForestAcres
Bay CreekShawnee National Forest120
Bay CreekShawnee National Forest120
Burke BranchShawnee National Forest6,231
Burke BranchShawnee National Forest6,231
Clear SpringsShawnee National Forest11
Clear SpringsShawnee National Forest11
Eagle CreekShawnee National Forest38
Eagle CreekShawnee National Forest38
Ripple HollowShawnee National Forest3,788
Ripple HollowShawnee National Forest3,788
Indiana (2)
AreaForestAcres
Mogan RidgeHoosier National Forest8,435
Mogan RidgeHoosier National Forest8,435
Kentucky (2)
AreaForestAcres
WolfpenDaniel Boone National Forest2,835
WolfpenDaniel Boone National Forest2,835
Louisiana (4)
AreaForestAcres
Cunningham Brake Research Natural AreaKisatchie National Forest1,797
Cunningham Brake Research Natural AreaKisatchie National Forest1,797
Saline Bayou W & S River CorridorKisatchie National Forest5,355
Saline Bayou W & S River CorridorKisatchie National Forest5,355
Missouri (4)
AreaForestAcres
Irish Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest1,226
Irish Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest1,226
Swan Creek Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest7,310
Swan Creek Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest7,310
North Carolina (30)
AreaForestAcres
Bald MountainPisgah National Forest11,085
Bald MountainPisgah National Forest11,085
Catfish Lake NorthCroatan National Forest11,299
Catfish Lake NorthCroatan National Forest11,299
Catfish Lake NorthCroatan National Forest11,299
Catfish Lake South - ACroatan National Forest217
Catfish Lake South - ACroatan National Forest217
Catfish Lake South - BCroatan National Forest172
Catfish Lake South - BCroatan National Forest172
Harper CreekPisgah National Forest7,325
Harper CreekPisgah National Forest7,325
Laurel MountainPisgah National Forest5,683
Laurel MountainPisgah National Forest5,683
Linville Gorge AdditionPisgah National Forest2,809
Linville Gorge AdditionPisgah National Forest2,809
Lost CovePisgah National Forest5,944
Lost CovePisgah National Forest5,944
Pocosin AdditionCroatan National Forest286
Pocosin AdditionCroatan National Forest286
Pocosin AdditionCroatan National Forest286
Pond Pine BCroatan National Forest2,961
Pond Pine BCroatan National Forest2,961
Pond Pine BCroatan National Forest2,961
Sheep Ridge AdditionCroatan National Forest5,808
Sheep Ridge AdditionCroatan National Forest5,808
Sheep Ridge AdditionCroatan National Forest5,808
Wilson CreekPisgah National Forest4,863
Wilson CreekPisgah National Forest4,863
Woods MountainPisgah National Forest9,602
Woods MountainPisgah National Forest9,602
South Carolina (10)
AreaForestAcres
Bee CoveSumter National Forest3,025
Bee CoveSumter National Forest3,025
Ellicott Rock 1Sumter National Forest301
Ellicott Rock 1Sumter National Forest301
Ellicott Rock 2Sumter National Forest517
Ellicott Rock 2Sumter National Forest517
Hellhole ExtFrancis Marion National Forest891
Hellhole ExtFrancis Marion National Forest891
Wambaw ExtFrancis Marion National Forest527
Wambaw ExtFrancis Marion National Forest527
Tennessee (24)
AreaForestAcres
Bald MountainCherokee National Forest11,743
Bald MountainCherokee National Forest11,743
Beaver Dam CreekCherokee National Forest5,070
Beaver Dam CreekCherokee National Forest5,070
Big Frog AdditionCherokee National Forest369
Big Frog AdditionCherokee National Forest369
Devil's BackboneCherokee National Forest4,287
Devil's BackboneCherokee National Forest4,287
Flint Mill GapCherokee National Forest9,494
Flint Mill GapCherokee National Forest9,494
Joyce Kilmer Slickrock Add.Cherokee National Forest1,396
Joyce Kilmer Slickrock Add.Cherokee National Forest1,396
London Bridge BranchCherokee National Forest3,387
London Bridge BranchCherokee National Forest3,387
Sampson Mountain AdditionCherokee National Forest3,064
Sampson Mountain AdditionCherokee National Forest3,064
Slide HollowCherokee National Forest4,057
Slide HollowCherokee National Forest4,057
Stone MountainCherokee National Forest5,367
Stone MountainCherokee National Forest5,367
Sycamore CreekCherokee National Forest6,984
Sycamore CreekCherokee National Forest6,984
Upper Bald RiverCherokee National Forest9,202
Upper Bald RiverCherokee National Forest9,202
Texas (2)
AreaForestAcres
Big WoodsNational Forests in Texas1,320
Big WoodsNational Forests in Texas1,320
Virginia (24)
AreaForestAcres
Beaver Dam CreekJefferson National Forest1,135
Beaver Dam CreekJefferson National Forest1,135
Brush MountainJefferson National Forest6,002
Brush MountainJefferson National Forest6,002
Dolly AnnGeorge Washington National Forest7,855
Dolly AnnGeorge Washington National Forest7,855
Horse HeavenJefferson National Forest4,748
Horse HeavenJefferson National Forest4,748
James River AdditionJefferson National Forest1,140
James River AdditionJefferson National Forest1,140
Little Dry Run AdditionJefferson National Forest2,204
Little Dry Run AdditionJefferson National Forest2,204
New London Bridge BranchJefferson National Forest844
New London Bridge BranchJefferson National Forest844
Northern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest9,444
Northern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest9,444
Oak KnobGeorge Washington National Forest10,882
Oak KnobGeorge Washington National Forest10,882
Peters Mountain Addition A (VA)Jefferson National Forest1,268
Peters Mountain Addition A (VA)Jefferson National Forest1,268
Southern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest11,985
Southern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest11,985
Three SistersGeorge Washington National Forest8,149
Three SistersGeorge Washington National Forest8,149
West Virginia (2)
AreaForestAcres
Peters Mountain Addition A (WV)Jefferson National Forest343
Peters Mountain Addition A (WV)Jefferson National Forest343
References (82)
  1. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.
  2. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in <i>The Auk</i>]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
  3. Balda, R. P., and G. C. Bateman. 1971. Flocking and annual cycle of the piñon jay, <i>Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus</i>. Condor 73:287-302.
  4. Bent, A. C. 1953. Life histories of North American wood warblers. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 203. Washington, D.C.
  5. BirdLife International. 2004b. Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD ROM. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  6. BirdLife International. (2013-2014). IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on various dates in 2013 and 2014. http://www.birdlife.org/
  7. Blem, C. R., and L. B. Blem. 1991. Nest-box selection by Prothonotary Warblers. Journal of Field Ornithology 62:299-307.
  8. Blem, C. R., and L. B. Blem. 1992. Prothonotary Warblers nesting in nest boxes: clutch size and timing in Virginia. The Raven 63:15-20.
  9. Blem, C.R., and L.B. Blem. 1994. Composition and microclimate of Prothonotary Warbler nests. Auk 111(1):197-200.
  10. Braun, M. J., D. W. Finch, M. B. Robbins, and B. K. Schmidt. 2000. A field checklist of the birds of Guyana. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
  11. Brewster, W. 1878. The Protohonotary Warbler (PROTONOTARIA CITREA). Bulletin of the Nuttall Ornithological Club 3:153-62.
  12. Brush, T. 1991. Nesting ecology of Prothonotary Warblers in eastern Iowa: 1988-1991. Report submitted to the Iowa Department of Natural Resources. Unpublished.
  13. Bushman, E. S., and G. D. Therres. 1988. Habitat management guidelines for forest interior breeding birds of coastal Maryland. Maryland Dept. Natural Resources, Wildlife Tech. Publ. 88-1. 50 pp.
  14. Carter, M., C. Hunter, D. Pashley, and D. Petit. 1998. The Watch List. Bird Conservation, Summer 1998:10.
  15. Carter, M., G. Fenwick, C. Hunter, D. Pashley, D. Petit, J. Price, and J. Trapp. 1996. Watchlist 1996: For the future. Field Notes 50(3):238-240.
  16. Droege, S., and J.R. Sauer. 1990. North American Breeding Bird Survey, annual summary, 1989. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Report 90(8). 22 pp.
  17. Faaborg, J., and W. J. Arendt. 1992. Long-term declines of winter resident warblers in a Puerto Rican dry forest: which species are in trouble? Pages 57-63 in J. M. Hagan III and D. W. Johnston (editors). Ecology and Conservation of Neotropical Migrant Landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  18. Fleming, W. J. and D. R. Petit. 1986. Modified milk carton nest box for studies of Prothonotary Warblers. Journal of Field Ornithology 57:313-5.
  19. Fowler, L. J., and D. K. Fowler. 1985. Breeding birds and vegetation along the Duck river in middle Tennessee. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science 60:48-51.
  20. Griscom, L., and A. Sprunt, Jr. 1979. The warblers of America. Doubleday and Co., Garden City, New York. 302 pp.
  21. Guillory, H. D. 1987. Cavity competition and suspected predation on Prothonotary Warberls by <i>Peromyscus</i> spp. Journal of Field Ornithology 58:425-7.
  22. Hamel, P. B., H. E. LeGrand Jr., M. R. Lennartz, and S. A. Gauthreaux, Jr. 1982. Bird-habitat relationships on southeastern forest lands. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report SE-22.
  23. Harrison, C. 1978. A Field Guide to the Nests, Eggs and Nestlings of North American Birds. Collins, Cleveland, Ohio.
  24. Harrison, H. H. 1979. A field guide to western birds' nests. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 279 pp.
  25. Harrison, H.H. 1984. Wood warblers' world. Simon and Schuster, New York. 335 pp.
  26. Hilty, S. 1999. Three new bird species new to Venezuela and notes on the behaviour and distribution of other poorly known species. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club 119:220-235
  27. Horn, H. S. 1968. The adaptive significance of colonial nesting in the Brewer's Blackbird. Ecology 49:682-694.
  28. Howell, S. N. G., and S. Webb. 1995. A guide to the birds of Mexico and northern Central America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  29. James, F. C., D. A. Wiedenfeld, and C. E. McCulloch. 1992. Trends in breeding populations of warblers: declines in the southern highlands and increases in the lowlands. Pages 43-56 in J. M. Hagan III and D. W. Johnston (editors). Ecology and Conservation of Neotropical Migrant Landbirds. Smiethsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
  30. Kahl, R. B., T. S. Baskett, J. A. Ellis, and J. N. Burroughs. 1985. Charactersitics of summer habitats of selected nongame birds in Missouri. Univeristy of Missouri-Columbia College of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Station, Research Bulletin 1056:58-60.
  31. Kleen, V. M. 1973. The density and territory size of breeding Prothonotary Warblers (PROTONTARIA CITREA) in southern Illinois. Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois. M.S. thesis.
  32. Kowalski, M. P. 1986. Weights and measurements of Prothonotary Warblers from southern Indiana, with a method of aging males. North American Bird Bander 11:129-31.
  33. Leberman, R. C. 1992. Prothonotary Warbler. Pages 334-5 in D. W. Brauning (editor). Atlas of breeding birds in Pennsylvania. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  34. Lefebvre, G., B. Poulin, and R. McNeil. 1992. Abundance, feeding behavior, and body condition of Nearctic warblers wintering in Venezuelan mangroves. Wilson Bull. 104:400-412.
  35. Lefebvre, G., B. Poulin, and R. McNeil. 1994. Spatial and social behavior of Nearctic warblers wintering in Venezuelan mangroves. Can. J. Zool. 72:757-764.
  36. Ligon, J. D. 1971. Late summer-autumnal breeding of the piñon jay in New Mexico. Condor 73:147-153.
  37. Loucks, W. E. 1894. The life history and distribution of the Prothonotary Warbler in Illinois. Bulletin of the Illinois State Laboratory of Natural History 4:10-35.
  38. McCracken, J.D. 1984. Status report on the Prothonotary Warbler PROTONOTARIA CITREA. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). 27 pp.
  39. Meyer, H., and R. R. Nevius. 1943. Some observations on the nesting and development of the Prothonotary Warbler, PROTONOTARIA CITREA. The Migrant 14:31-36.
  40. Milk carton nest box use by Prothonotary Warblers. Nongame Quarterly Spring 1988:5
  41. Mills, E. D. 1989. Nearctic bird migration and wintering ecology in Belize, Central America. Univeristy of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Ph.D. dissertation. Unpublished.
  42. Mitchell, L. J., and R. A. Lancia. 1990. Breeding bird community changes in a Bald Cypress-Tupelo wetland following timber harvesting. Pages 189-201 in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southeasten Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Vol. 44.
  43. Mitchell, W. A. 1988. Songbird nest boxes. Section 5.1.8, US Army Corps of Engineers Wildlife Resources Management Manual. Tech. Rep. EL-88-19. Waterways Expt. Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. 48 pp.
  44. Moore, W. S., and R. A. Dolbeer. 1989. The use of banding recovery data to estimate dispersal rates and gene flow in avian species: case studies in the Red-winged Blackbird and Common Grackle. Condor 91:242-253.
  45. National Audubon Society. 2014. View all Species. Website accessible at http://birds.audubon.org/species. Accessed on various dates in 2014.
  46. National Geographic Society (NGS). 1987. Field guide to the birds of North America. Second edition. National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C.
  47. Ornat, A. L., and R. Greenberg. 1990. Sexual segregation by habitat in migratory warblers in Quintana Roo, Mexico. The Auk 107:539-43.
  48. Parker III, T. A., D. F. Stotz, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases for neotropical birds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  49. Petit, K. E., and K. A. Tarbin. 1990. First record of Prothonotary Warbler from Galapagos Islands, Ecuador. American Birds 44:1094.
  50. Petit, L. J. 1989. Breeding biology of Prothonotary Warblers in riverine habitat in Tennessee. The Wilson Bulletin 101:51-61.
  51. Petit, L. J. 1991. Adaptive tolerance of cowbird parasitism by Prothonotary Warblers: a consequence of nest-site limitation? Animal Behavior 41:425-32.
  52. Petit, L.J. 1999. Prothonotary Warbler (<i>Protonotaria citrea</i>). The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, ed.). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca. Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu.bnaproxy.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/408
  53. Petit, L. J., and D. R. Petit. 1987. Non-violent deaths of female Prothonotary Warblers on their nests. Journal of Field Ornithology 58:52-54.
  54. Petit, L. J., and D. R. Petit. 1988. Use of Red-Winged Blackbird nest by a Prothonotary Warbler. Wilson Bulletin 100:305-6.
  55. Petit, L. J., et al. 1990. Intersexual and temporal variation in foraging ecology of prothonotary warblers during the breeding season. Auk 107:133-145. See also Auk 107:146-152.
  56. Petit, L. J., W. J. Fleming, K. E. Petit, and D. R. Petit. 1987. Nest-box use by Prothonotary Warblers (PROTONOTARIA CITREA) in riverine habitat. The Wilson Bulletin 99:485-8.
  57. Poole, A. F. and F. B. Gill. 1992. The birds of North America. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. and The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.
  58. Price, J., S. Droege, and A. Price. 1995. The summer atlas of North American birds. Academic Press, New York. x + 364 pp.
  59. Raffaele, H. A. 1983a. A guide to the birds of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Fondo Educativo Interamericano, San Juan, Puerto Rico. 255 pp.
  60. Raffaele, H. A. 1989a. A guide to the birds of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Revised edition. Princeton Univ. Press. 220 pp.
  61. Raffaele, H., J. Wiley, O. Garrido, A. Keith, and J. Raffaele. 1998. A guide to the birds of the West Indies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 511 pp.
  62. Ridgely, R. S. 2002. Distribution maps of South American birds. Unpublished.
  63. Ridgely, R. S. and G. Tudor. 1989. The birds of South America. Volume 1. University of Texas Press, Austin, USA. 516 pp.
  64. Ridgely, R. S. and J. A. Gwynne, Jr. 1989. A Guide to the Birds of Panama. 2nd edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
  65. Robbins, C.S. 1979. Effect of forest fragmentation on bird populations. Pages 198-212 in R.M. DeGraff and K.E. Evans, editors. Management of north central and northeastern forests for nongame birds. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, General Technical Report NC-51.
  66. Robbins, C.S. 1980. Effect of forest fragmentation on breeding bird populations in the Piedmont of the mid-Atlantic region. Atlantic Naturalist: pp. 31-36.
  67. Robbins, C. S., D. Bystrak, and P. H. Geissler. 1986. The Breeding Bird Survey: its first fifteen years. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv. Resource Publ. 157. iii + 196 pp.
  68. Sauer, J.R., and S. Droege. 1992. Geographical patterns in population trends of Neotropical migrants in North America. Pages 26-42 in J.M. Hagan, III, and D.W. Johnston, editors. Ecology and conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  69. Sauer, J. R., J. E. Hines, J. E. Fallon, K. L. Pardieck, D. J. Ziolkowski, Jr., and W. A. Link. 2014. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966 - 2012. Version 02.19.2014. USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD. http://www.pwrc.usgs.gov/.
  70. Sibley, D. A. 2000a. The Sibley guide to birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  71. Stiles, F. G. and A. F. Skutch. 1989. A guide to the birds of Costa Rica. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA. 511 pp.
  72. Tarvin, K. A., and G. E. Woolfenden. 1999. Blue Jay (<i>Cyanocitta cristata</i>). No. 469 IN A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The birds of North America. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 32pp.
  73. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  74. Thompson, F. R., III. 1994. Temporal and spatial patterns of breeding brown-headed cowbirds in the midwestern United States. Auk 111:979-990.
  75. Wadman, R. R., C. J. Raithel, and R. W. Enser. No date. First nesting of the Prothonotary Warbler in Rhode Island and the continuing range expansion of this species. Submitted to the Wilson Bulletin. Unpublished.
  76. Walkinshaw, L. H. 1941. The Prothonotary Warbler, a comparison of nesting conditions in Tennessee and Michigan. The Wilson Bulletin 65:152-68.
  77. Walkinshaw, L. H. 1953. Life-history of the Prothonotary Warbler. The Wilson Bulletin 65:152-168.
  78. Warkentin, I.G., and E.S. Morton. 1995. Roosting behavior of Prothonotary Warblers in the non-breeding season. Wilson Bulletin 107(2):374-376.
  79. Whitcomb, R. F., C. S. Robbins, J. F. Lynch, B. L. Whitcomb, M. K. Klimciewicz, and D. Bystrak. 1981. Effects of forest fragmentation on avifauna of the eastern deciduous forest. Pages 125-206 in R. L. Burgess, and B. L. Sharpe (editors). Forest island dynamics in man-dominated landscapes.
  80. Williams, L. 1952b. Breeding behavior of the Brewer blackbird. Condor 54:3-47.
  81. Willson, M. F. 1966. Breeding ecology of the Yellow-headed Blackbird. Ecological Monographs 36:51-77.
  82. Zook, J. L. 2002. Distribution maps of the birds of Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama. Unpublished.