Echinacea angustifolia

DC.

Narrowleaf Purple Coneflower

G5Secure Found in 15 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
UnknownThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.128470
Element CodePDAST38010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderAsterales
FamilyAsteraceae
GenusEchinacea
Other Common Names
Échinacée à feuilles étroites (FR)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
Varieties of Echinacea angustifolia are not considered distinct in the Flora of North America treatment (2006c) following the work of Binns et al. (2002) that found the varieties indistinguishable. Weakley and Southeastern Flora Team (2023) retain these varieties, following the monograph by R.L. McGregor (1968).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2024-02-12
Change Date2024-01-23
Edition Date2024-02-12
Edition AuthorsK. McKeown (1999), rev. L. Morse (2000), rev. Eberly (2024), rev. SE Ranking Workshop (2024)
Threat ImpactUnknown
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
Echinacea angustifolia is a long-lived perennial herb that is widespread in the Great Plains region of North America. Although still abundant, this species has suffered from large scale habitat loss and degradation, and nearly a century of wild root harvesting. The conversion of its native prairie habitat to pastures, overgrazing, and the control of noxious weeds, highway maintenance practices, fire suppression, and development have contributed to a slow decline in the species. As a species of highly fragmented habitats, inbreeding depression and low reproductive success are issues to monitor moving forward, in addition to direct loss of occurrences.
Range Extent Comments
Echinacea angustifolia occurs in south-central Canada and central USA from Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Montana and Minnesota, south to New Mexico, Texas and Louisiana.
Occurrences Comments
This species was historically abundant, secure and widespread throughout the Great Plains.
Threat Impact Comments
This species is threatened by fire suppression resulting in habitat succession, mowing, herbicide use to control noxious weeds, conversion of prairie to pasture, intensive grazing, development, and wild harvest for the medicinal herb trade. In north central Kansas, this species has been harvested commercially for over 100 years (Price and Kindscher 2007) but interviews with wild harvesters revealed that "experienced diggers use practices that moderate harvest intensity by rotating harvest areas and selectively harvesting at low density" (Price and Kindscher 2007). Excessive commercial harvest for medicinal purposes is a potential future threat depending on the demand of the market, local economics, and the standing of cultivated sources. When roots are shallowly harvested with less root length removed, plants can resprout; one study found 50% of plants resprouted at harvest sites. This research suggests that the species is capable of recovering after severe harvest if the plants are given time to recover (Kindscher et al. 2008). Castle et al. (2014) assessed the risk of overharvest as moderate for this species based on life history, effects of harvest, populations size, habitat, and demand including the consideration availability of cultivated resources.
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

This species grows in full sun in dry mixed and tall grass prairies, rocky barrens, and limestone bluffs.

Ecology

The deep tap root and coarsely hairy leaves of this species provide resilience against drought and other disturbances (Kindscher 2006), similar to that of Echinacea pallida (Weaver and Fitzpatrick 1934, Weaver et al. 1934).

Reproduction

Seeds are dispersed by wind and gravity and likely birds. This species has a large taproot that can grow up to 8 feet deep. It takes several years for this species to reach sexual maturity (Weaver and Fitzpatrick 1934).
Terrestrial Habitats
Grassland/herbaceousBarrens
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
WyomingS3Yes
LouisianaS1Yes
ColoradoS2Yes
MissouriS1Yes
MontanaS4Yes
South DakotaSNRYes
District of ColumbiaSNANo
TexasSNRYes
KansasS5Yes
OklahomaSNRYes
North DakotaSNRYes
MinnesotaSNRYes
NebraskaSNRYes
IowaS3Yes
New MexicoSNRYes
CanadaN3
ProvinceRankNative
SaskatchewanS3Yes
AlbertaSNANo
ManitobaS3Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentSmall (1-10%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureSmall (1-10%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useRestricted - smallModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.2 - Gathering terrestrial plantsRestricted - smallModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.2.1 - Intentional use (species being assessed is the target)Restricted - smallModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9.3.3 - Herbicides and pesticidesSmall (1-10%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, Long-lived
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (15)
North Dakota (12)
AreaForestAcres
Bullion ButteDakota Prairie Grasslands19,877
Collar / Bennett - CottonwoodDakota Prairie Grasslands19,697
Dawsons WaterholeDakota Prairie Grasslands6,087
Kinley PlateauDakota Prairie Grasslands16,900
Long X DivideDakota Prairie Grasslands10,099
MagpieDakota Prairie Grasslands21,281
Ponderosa PineDakota Prairie Grasslands7,471
SheyenneDakota Prairie Grasslands14,537
Tracy MountainDakota Prairie Grasslands9,756
Twin ButtesDakota Prairie Grasslands13,492
VenloDakota Prairie Grasslands5,317
WannaganDakota Prairie Grasslands6,026
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Red ShirtBuffalo Gap National Grassland17,007
Wyoming (2)
AreaForestAcres
Sand CreekBlack Hills National Forest7,950
Walker PrairieBighorn National Forest62,434
References (18)
  1. Beck, J., A. Waananen, and S. Wagenius. 2023. Habitat fragmentation decouples fire-stimulated flowering from plant reproductive fitness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120(39):e2306967120.
  2. Binns, S.E., B.R. Baum, and J.T. Arnason. 2002. A Taxonomic Revision of <i>Echinacea</i> (Asteraceae: Heliantheae). Systematic Botany 27(3):610–632.
  3. Castle, L.M., S. Leopold, R. Craft, and K. Kindscher. 2014. Ranking Tool Created for Medicinal plants at Risk of Being Overharvested in the Wild. Ethnobiology Letters 5:77–88.
  4. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 2006c. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 21. Magnoliophyta: Asteridae, part 8: Asteraceae, part 3. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xxii + 616 pp.
  5. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  6. Kindscher, K., D.M. Price, and L. Castle. 2008. Resprouting of <i>Echinacea angustifolia </i>Augments Sustainability of Wild Medicinal Plant Populations. Econonomic Botany 62:139–147.
  7. Kittelson, P.M., S. Wagenius, R. Nielsen, S. Qazi, M. Howe, G. Kiefer, and R.G. Shaw. 2015. How functional traits, herbivory, and genetic diversity interact in <i>Echinacea</i>: implications for fragmented populations. Ecology 96(7):1877-86.
  8. McGregor, R.L. 1968. The taxonomy of the genus Echinacea (Compositae). University of Kansas Science Bulletin 48(4): 113-142.
  9. McKeown, K.A. 1999. A review of the taxonomy of the genus <i>Echinacea</i>. Pages 482-489 in: J. Janick (ed.). Perspectives on new crops and new uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA.
  10. McKeown, Kathleen A. North Carolina State University.
  11. Nordstrom, S.W., A.B. Dykstra, and S. Wagenius. 2021. Fires slow population declines of a long-lived prairie plant through multiple vital rates. Oecologia 196:679–691.
  12. Price, D.M., and K. Kindscher. 2007. One Hundred Years of <i>Echinacea angustifolia</i> Harvest in the Smoky Hills of Kansas, USA. Economic Botany 61(1):86-95.
  13. Richardson, L.K, M.K. Gallagher, T. E. Hayes, A.S. Gallinat, G. Kiefer, K. Manion, M. Jenkins, G. Diersen, and S. Wagenius. 2020. Competition for pollination and isolation from mates differentially impact four stages of pollination in a model grassland perennial. Journal of Ecology 109:1356–1369.
  14. Samson, F.B., and F.L. Knopf. 1994. Prairie conservation in North America. Bioscience 44:418–421.
  15. Wagenius, S. 2004. Style persistence, pollen limitation, and seed set in the common prairie plant <i>Echinacea angustifolia </i>(Asteraceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 165: 595-603.
  16. Weakley, A.S., and Southeastern Flora Team. 2023. Flora of the southeastern United States. Edition of April 14, 2023. University of North Carolina Herbarium (NCU), North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 2105 pp.
  17. Weaver, J.E., and T.J. Fitzpatrick. 1934. The prairie. Ecological Monographs 4:109-225.
  18. Weaver, J.E., L.A. Stoddart, and W. Noll. 1935. Response of the Prairie to the Great Drought of 1934. Ecology 16(4):612–629.