Podilymbus podiceps

(Linnaeus, 1758)

Pied-billed Grebe

G5Secure Found in 108 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.100209
Element CodeABNCA02010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderPodicipediformes
FamilyPodicipedidae
GenusPodilymbus
Other Common Names
Grèbe à bec bigarré (FR) Mergulhão-Caçador (PT) Zambullidor Pico Grueso, Macá de Pico Grueso (ES)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
Taxonomic Comments
May constitute a superspecies with P. gigas (AOU 1998).
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-04-09
Change Date1996-11-20
Edition Date1987-04-22
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Range Extent Comments
BREEDING: southeastern Alaska through southern Canada to Nova Scotia, south locally through North America, Middle America, West Indies, and South America to central Chile and southern Argentina (AOU 1983). Breeding populations in the northeastern U.S. are more localized and less abundant than in other regions of the U.S. or Canada (Gibbs and Melvin 1992). NON-BREEDING: southern British Columbia, western and southern U.S. south through South America. Rare visitor in Hawaii (AOU 1983). Areas of highest winter concentration include southern and central Texas, Great Salt Lake (Utah), Lake Mead (Nevada-Arizona), and the San Joaquin Valley (California) (Root 1988).
Threat Impact Comments
Has declined locally due to degradation, disturbance, and loss of wetlands. The greatest threat to populations in the northeast is alteration and loss of wetland habitat through draining, dredging, filling, pollution, acid rain, agricultural practices, and siltation (Gibbs and Melvin 1992). Palustrine emergent wetlands, including inland freshwater and brackish marshlands frequented by grebes, are among the most threatened wildlife habitats in the U.S. Over 4.75 million acres (1.92 million ha) of such wetlands were destroyed in the U.S. between the mid-1950s and mid-1970s, and losses continue at > 160,000 ac/year (64,777 ha) (Tiner 1984). Pollution and environmental contaminants may degrade wetland ecosystems and impair reproductive capacity in industrialized portions of the range. Carbamate pesticides have had lethal effects in New York (Stone 1979). Although acidification of wetland nesting habitats could potentially reduce food supplies, grebes usually occupy wetlands of circumneutral pH with dense growths of emergent vegetation (Gibbs et al., in press; Gibbs and Melvin 1990) that may provide effective chemical buffering against acidification. In agricultural areas, siltation resulting from erosion of farmlands and run-off containing insecticides may degrade nesting habitats and reduce availability of invertebrate foods. Highly susceptible to oil toxicosis, although this does not pose a major threat to overwintering grebes because they occur in small groups and favor sites at inland, fresh waters generally well-protected from large, ocean-borne oil spills (Clapp et al. 1982). One died after choking on a fish (Behrstock 1981). These birds sometimes mistake wet roads for water bodies from which they are unable to take off. Human exploitation historically has had an important impact on numbers. Warren (1890) reported that large numbers were shot and sold to milliners and furriers who fashioned ear-muffs and hat ornaments from the silver-white breast and abdomen feathers. The grebe has long been persecuted because of the challenge it poses as a target for hunters (Bent 1919, Forbush 1925, Palmer 1949). Its predilection for using managed impoundments during migration may predispose it to accidental or malicious shootings by duck hunters. Human disturbance can greatly disrupt patterns of nest attendance and incubation (Forbes and Ankney 1988, Davis et al. 1985).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

A small, stocky, and poorly buoyant waterbird, 31-38 cm in length (Cramp 1977), with small, narrow wings, feet placed far back, and a blunt-ended posterior. During the non-breeding period, the bill is unmarked, the throat is white, and the white rear becomes more conspicuous. As adults, sexes are alike, whereas juveniles are distinguished by the lack of a white orbital ring, an unmarked bill, darker brown sides of the head and neck, and a whiter underbelly (Palmer 1962). Downy chicks have a striking, zebra-like pattern of black and white stripes, interspersed with reddish-brown spots, and a bare loral area (Palmer 1962, Storer 1967).

VOCALIZATIONS: During territorial defense, males emit a distinctive prolonged call, a loud "cow-cow-cow-cow-cow- cowp...cowp...cowp..." This call is reminiscent of cuckoos (Palmer 1962), and enables communication over several hundred meters in nesting habitats dominated by dense, visually restricting vegetation. A variety of other calls are also produced during the breeding season (see Palmer 1962), but during the non-breeding season generally silent.

NEST: Build sodden, floating nests of rotting and green plant material and mud. Often anchored to growing, emergent plants. In Iowa, 138 nests averaged 38 cm in diameter (Glover 1953).

EGGS: elliptical to subelliptical, approx. 44.3 x 30.1 mm, smooth and nonglossy (Harrison 1978, Arnold 1989). Although white or tinted bluish or buff when laid, eggs gather a heavy, brown stain from the wet, organic matter comprising the nest.

MOLT: Molt is poorly known. Palmer (1962) noted that a complete molt into basic plumage takes place in autumn, with considerable individual variation in its timing and duration (Cramp et al. 1977). Flight feathers are lost simultaneously, prior to loss of body feathers. Complete molt takes one to two months. Basic molt and late nesting may occur simultaneously (Otto and Strohmeyer 1985). A partial molt into alternate plumage occurs in spring (Palmer 1962).

Diagnostic Characteristics

A short, stout, chicken-like bill with a broad, black band in the middle, large head and elongated neck, white orbital ring, black throat patch and forehead, and drab, brownish plumage throughout except for white under the tail (Palmer 1962, Cramp 1977).

Habitat

BREEDING: In eastern U.S., occurs in ponds, sloughs, and marshes, in marshy inlets and along edges of rivers, lakes, and reservoirs, and occasionally in estuarine wetlands (Palmer 1962, Chabreck 1963, Cramp et al. 1977, Andrle and Carroll 1988). Nests are typically built in shallow water surrounded by dense vegetation, especially cattail (TYPHA spp.) and bulrush (SCIRPUS spp.), and are farther from shore than from open water (Glover 1953, Stewart 1975, Faaborg 1976, Sealy 1978, Forbes et al. 1989). Wind and waves are major threats to floating nests and surrounding emergent vegetation acts as a wave break, anchors the nest, and conceals the nest from predators (Forbes et al. 1989). Because the direction of wind and waves shifts frequently during the nesting season, sheltered nesting sites can be limiting (Faaborg 1976). In Nova Scotia, avoided nesting on edges of stands of emergent vegetation that were exposed to wave action, and nest-site selection was related to structure but not type of vegetation available (Forbes et al. 1989). In comparison to randomly chosen marsh locations, nests were characterized by greater distance from shore, increased proximity to open water, and deeper water (Forbes et al. 1989).

Microhabitats at Manitoba wetlands included the densest and tallest stands of emergent vegetation available, particularly those in deeper portions of ponds (Nudds 1982). In Iowa, always associated with dense stands of emergent, littoral vegetation, and avoided wetlands with 100% open water (Faaborg 1976). On moist-soil impoundments in Missouri, habitat use was associated with water > 25 cm deep and vegetative cover characterized as "open, sparse, or short" (Fredrickson and Reid 1986). Grebe use was not associated with shallower waters or "dense" or "rank" emergent vegetative cover (Fredrickson and Reid 1986).

NON-BREEDING: Habitats in winter and migration similar to breeding areas (Cramp 1977), but many shift to more exposed areas on brackish, estuarine waters or sheltered inlets on large lakes, rivers, and salt water (Palmer 1962). Root (1988) noted that the densest overwintering populations occur on wide rivers and large lakes.

Ecology

Residents in pairs or family groups; more gregarious in winter (Stiles and Skutch 1989), with groups commonly including 100 or more. Generally one nesting pair on ponds up to 4 ha, but sometimes many more. One study recorded defended area of 46 m radius around nest, though nests sometimes closer than this (Johnsgard 1987). Mean distance between successful nests 55 meters (n=96; Chabreck 1963). Average home range 1.3 hectares (n=44; Glover 1953), but some as large as 35 hectares (Muller 1995).

Little is known about sources of mortality. Avian botulism, avian cholera, and gizzard worms are known to occur in grebes (Friend 1987). Predators include cottonmouths (AGKISTRODON PISCIVORUS) (Leavitt 1957), peregrine falcons (FALCO PEREGRINUS) (Buckalew 1948), and American alligators (ALLIGATOR MISSISSIPPIENSIS) (Delany 1986). Coulter (1957) reported substantial predation by snapping turtles in Maine.

Sometimes associate with other birds to enhance foraging opportunities. Have been observed in mutualistic foraging associations with snowy egrets (EGRETTA THULA) in Virginia (Leck 1971), snowy egrets and tricolored herons (HYDRANASSA TRICOLOR) in North Carolina (Mueller et al. 1972), and boat-tailed grackles (QUISCALUS MAJOR) in Mississippi (Jackson 1985).

Reproduction

Single- or double-brooded and lay two to ten eggs, usually six to eight eggs per clutch (Sealy 1978, Forbes et al. 1989). Eggs are laid daily. Incubation is initiated after the fourth egg is laid, and occurs during about 90% of a given day (Forbes and Ankney 1988). Incubation is shared equally between sexes during laying and post-laying periods, although females spend more time incubating around hatching (Forbes and Ankney 1988), which occurs at about 23 days (Palmer 1962). Begin incubation before completing the clutch (Cramp et al. 1977) leading to considerable hatching asynchrony among the brood. Two to four eggs generally hatch on the first day of hatching, and the remaining eggs hatch daily over a period of three to seven days (Forbes and Ankney 1987, 1988). A detailed description of the hatching muscle and its development is given by Fisher (1961). The first eggs laid are about 8% lighter than subsequent eggs within clutches (Forbes and Ankney 1988), but variation in egg weight probably has little effect on the vigor of individual hatchlings (Arnold 1989).

Adults usually divide brood. Age at first flight has been estimated at 35 days (Kirby 1976, Forbes and Ankney 1987). Age at first breeding may be as early as 13 months (MacVean 1990). Solitary nesters and defend relatively small territories of as little as less than two ha (Glover 1953) that provide food, cover, and nest sites. Territorial birds also sometimes forage outside their defended areas. Highly territorial and usually only one pair nests at a wetland (Faaborg 1976, Sealy 1978). Wetlands more than five ha, however, may support more than one pair (Palmer 1962, Faaborg 1976), and large marshes with suitable habitat support multiple pairs (Chabreck 1963).

NESTING PERIOD: Initiation of nesting activity varies throughout the range, occurring as early as April and as late as June, and peaking in May in most areas. Examples of nesting periods are 3 May to 10 September for 107 nests in Louisiana (Chabreck 1963), 2 May to 8 August for 138 nests in Iowa (Glover 1953), and 3 May to 22 August in Ontario (Johnsgard 1987). Although some pairing may occur on wintering areas (Palmer 1962), courtship begins soon after ice-out following arrival at nesting areas. Courtship behavior is mutual and less formalized than other species of grebes (Palmer 1962).

NESTS AND EGGS: Both sexes build nests and may add plant material and mud as the season progresses and as nests slowly sink (Fjeldsa 1975). Air-pockets in green plants and trapped gases generated by the fermenting and rotting vegetation give the nest buoyancy. The floating, rotting nest generates substantial quantities of heat, and many aspects of reproduction may be related to their use of a warm, humid nest (Davis et al. 1985). Nests have a hollow to hold the eggs, and may extend 90 cm below the surface but only eight cm above (Glover 1953). The eggs have a threefold increase in pore density, compared to other birds' eggs, which enables the eggs to lose sufficient water within the humid confines of the nest prior to hatching (Davis et al. 1985). When leaving the nest, adults cover their eggs with plant material, and the rotting nest, where temperatures may remain 11-13 degrees Celsius higher than the surrounding water, can provide enough heat to incubate the eggs in the adults' absence (Davis et al. 1985). Time constraints imposed by incubation may thereby be lessened, providing adults with more time for foraging and territory defense.

NESTING SUCCESS: High nest success has been reported in many areas: 70% of 138 nests in Iowa (Glover 1953), 77% of 150 nests in Wisconsin (Otto 1983), 90% of 107 nests in Louisiana (Chabreck 1963), and 90% of 115 nests in Nova Scotia (Forbes et al. 1989) hatched one egg or less. Wind and high waves, fluctuating water levels, and predation can be significant sources of nest loss. Of 42 nests in Manitoba, 69% failed, mostly due to flooding from high waves (Sealy 1978). Half of total nest loss in Iowa was due to wave action or water level fluctuation and 25% to raccoon (PROCYON LOTOR) predation (Glover 1953). In Nova Scotia, nest loss resulted from predation, including crows (CORVUS BRACHYRHYNCHOS) and poor weather (Forbes et al. 1989). In comparison to clutch sizes, observations of relatively small broods, e.g., averaging 4.4 (Chabreck 1963) and 2.9 (Yocum et al. 1958), suggest that substantial chick mortality occurs. Snapping turtles (CHELYDRA SERPENTINA) may represent important predators of young (Coulter 1957). Females are indeterminate layers (Fugle and Rothstein 1977), and frequently replace lost clutches, usually renesting within 50 m of destroyed nests (Glover 1953, Forbes et al. 1989).

CHICK REARING: Adults usually divide broods and provision chicks with a variety of small-sized prey, including dragonfly naiads, dytiscid beetle larvae, leeches, and salamanders (Forbes and Ankney 1987). Chicks usually remain near parents, and frequently ride on the backs of adults, even during foraging dives (Forbush 1925). Initial size disparities of chicks, due to asynchronous hatching, influence food allocation within broods. Aggression among chicks is high when rates of food-delivery by adults are low, and larger chicks win more disputes over food than smaller chicks (Forbes and Ankney 1987). The bare loral area of chicks changes from dull-colored to bright crimson in hungry chicks, however, and adults may use this indicator of nutritional status to allocate food among members of a brood (Forbes and Ankney 1987). Two unusual forms of chick provisioning occur: for unknown reasons, chicks are occasionally fed by adults other than pair members (Forbes 1987), and young grebes from first broods may feed young from second broods (Cramp et al. 1977).
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLAND
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN5B,N5N
ProvinceRankNative
IndianaS3BYes
MassachusettsS1B,S4NYes
North DakotaSNRBYes
New HampshireS2BYes
ArkansasS2B,S4NYes
MontanaS5BYes
South DakotaS4BYes
MichiganS4Yes
North CarolinaS3B,S5NYes
MinnesotaSNRBYes
AlabamaS3B,S5NYes
MaineS4BYes
South CarolinaS4Yes
ColoradoS5BYes
TennesseeS4Yes
New YorkS3B,S1NYes
Navajo NationS4B,S3NYes
OhioS2Yes
ConnecticutS1BYes
OklahomaSNRYes
District of ColumbiaS4NYes
VirginiaS1B,S4NYes
NevadaS4Yes
NebraskaS4Yes
KansasS2BYes
TexasS5BYes
New JerseyS1B,S3NYes
IowaS4B,S4NYes
WashingtonS4B,S5NYes
WyomingS5Yes
FloridaSNRB,SNRNYes
New MexicoS5Yes
Rhode IslandS1BYes
ArizonaS5Yes
GeorgiaS4Yes
MissouriS3Yes
PennsylvaniaS2B,S4N,S4MYes
IllinoisS3Yes
DelawareS1B,S3NYes
MississippiS5NYes
KentuckyS1B,S4NYes
LouisianaS4B,S5NYes
UtahS4B,S3NYes
West VirginiaS2B,S4NYes
VermontS2BYes
WisconsinS4BYes
MarylandS2BYes
OregonS5Yes
IdahoS3Yes
AlaskaS2BYes
CaliforniaSNRYes
CanadaN5B,N4N
ProvinceRankNative
SaskatchewanS5BYes
Prince Edward IslandS4BYes
QuebecS4BYes
Northwest TerritoriesSUYes
NunavutSUBYes
ManitobaS5BYes
Nova ScotiaS4BYes
Yukon TerritoryS1BYes
AlbertaS5BYes
British ColumbiaS4Yes
Island of NewfoundlandS1B,SUMYes
OntarioS4B,S2NYes
New BrunswickS4BYes
Roadless Areas (108)
Alaska (6)
AreaForestAcres
GravinaTongass National Forest37,381
North BaranofTongass National Forest314,089
Port AlexanderTongass National Forest120,681
RedoubtTongass National Forest68,347
RevillaTongass National Forest29,298
Sitka UrbanTongass National Forest112,003
Arizona (7)
AreaForestAcres
Black CrossTonto National Forest5,966
Butterfly Roadless AreaCoronado National Forest42,296
GoldfieldTonto National Forest15,257
Horse MesaTonto National Forest9,146
Lower San FranciscoApache-Sitgreaves National Forests59,310
PinalenoCoronado National Forest130,920
TumacacoriCoronado National Forest44,594
Arkansas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Little BlakelyOuachita National Forest3,342
California (29)
AreaForestAcres
AgnewSequoia National Forest9,561
CajonSan Bernardino National Forest7,548
Castle PeakTahoe National Forest14,974
ChannellSequoia National Forest45,429
ChicoSequoia National Forest39,836
City CreekSan Bernardino National Forest9,997
Deep CreekSan Bernardino National Forest23,869
Glass MountainInyo National Forest52,867
Granite ChiefTahoe National Forest6,546
Greenhorn CreekSequoia National Forest28,226
Hoover - NorthHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest1,574
Horse Mdw.Inyo National Forest5,687
Iceberg - Mill CreekHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest26,988
Kings RiverSierra National Forest52,999
Malduce BuckhornLos Padres National Forest14,177
Mill PeakSan Bernardino National Forest7,884
Mt. JacksonHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest20,721
North MountainStanislaus National Forest7,856
ParsnipModoc National Forest8,485
PyramidEldorado National Forest24,347
Raymond PeakStanislaus National Forest3,646
Raywood Flat BSan Bernardino National Forest11,373
Red MountainAngeles National Forest8,034
Rouse HillSan Bernardino National Forest13,745
Salt CreekAngeles National Forest11,022
Sespe - FrazierLos Padres National Forest106,910
TequepisLos Padres National Forest9,080
Timbered CraterLassen National Forest4,096
TuleAngeles National Forest9,861
Colorado (2)
AreaForestAcres
Dome PeakRoutt NF35,716
San MiguelSan Juan NF64,263
Florida (1)
AreaForestAcres
Alexander Springs CreekOcala National Forest2,954
Idaho (4)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekCaribou-Targhee National Forest118,582
HoodooNez Perce-Clearwater National Forest153,868
NeedlesPayette National Forest131,279
PalisadesCaribou-Targhee National Forest122,002
Minnesota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Wood LakeSuperior National Forest596
Missouri (1)
AreaForestAcres
Irish Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest1,226
Montana (5)
AreaForestAcres
Bear - Marshall - Scapegoat - SwanLolo National Forest118,485
Buckhorn Ridge (MT)Kootenai National Forest34,716
Cube Iron - SilcoxLolo National Forest36,998
Freezeout MountainBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest97,305
Selway - Bitterroot (01067)Bitterroot National Forest114,953
Nevada (6)
AreaForestAcres
Bald Mtn.Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest41,598
East Fork QuinnHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest30,977
GroundhogHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest7,232
Pearl PeakHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest71,405
South Fork QuinnHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest40,535
Staunton RidgeHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest10,328
New Mexico (4)
AreaForestAcres
Contiguous To Black & Aldo Leopold WildernessGila National Forest111,883
Contiguous To Gila Wilderness & Primitive AreaGila National Forest79,049
Gila BoxGila National Forest23,759
Meadow CreekGila National Forest34,167
North Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
SheyenneDakota Prairie Grasslands14,537
Oregon (9)
AreaForestAcres
MarshWinema National Forest1,226
Mt. JeffersonDeschutes National Forest2,282
Mt. BaileyUmpqua National Forest18,401
Sky Lakes AWinema National Forest3,940
TahkenitchSiuslaw National Forest5,799
TenmileSiuslaw National Forest10,818
Umpqua SpitSiuslaw National Forest2,090
West - South BachelorDeschutes National Forest25,994
WoahinkSiuslaw National Forest5,309
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Texas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Big CreekNational Forests in Texas1,447
Utah (8)
AreaForestAcres
418025Uinta National Forest32,698
418027Uinta National Forest13,884
Burch CreekWasatch-Cache National Forest6,938
CottonwoodDixie National Forest6,754
FishhookDixie National Forest12,959
HogsbackWasatch-Cache National Forest7,936
South FrancisWasatch-Cache National Forest3,374
WellsvilleWasatch-Cache National Forest1,717
Virginia (6)
AreaForestAcres
Adams PeakGeorge Washington National Forest7,135
Bear CreekJefferson National Forest18,274
Brush MountainJefferson National Forest6,002
Mountain Lake Addition B (VA)Jefferson National Forest3,405
North MountainJefferson National Forest8,377
Seng MountainJefferson National Forest6,428
Washington (7)
AreaForestAcres
Abercrombie - HooknoseColville National Forest33,862
Black CanyonOkanogan National Forest9,681
Granite MountainOkanogan National Forest27,428
LightningOlympic National Forest7,179
Madison CreekOlympic National Forest1,223
Mt. BaldyOlympic National Forest3,557
TaneumWenatchee National Forest26,140
West Virginia (5)
AreaForestAcres
Canaan LoopMonongahela National Forest7,867
Falls Of Hills CreekMonongahela National Forest6,925
Mcgowan MountainMonongahela National Forest10,504
Middle MountainMonongahela National Forest19,020
Mountain Lake Addition B (WV)Jefferson National Forest557
Wyoming (3)
AreaForestAcres
PalisadesTarghee National Forest1,121
Teton Corridor TrailheadsBridger-Teton National Forest286
Wilderness Study AreaTarghee National Forest51,961
References (81)
  1. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.
  2. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in <i>The Auk</i>]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
  3. Andrle, R. F., and J. R. Carrol, editors. 1988. The atlas of breeding birds in New York State. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, New York. 551 pp.
  4. Arnold, T. W. 1989. Variation in size and composition of horned and pied-billed grebe eggs. Condor 91:987-9.
  5. Behrstock, R. A. 1981. Prey-induced mortality of a pied-billed grebe. Western Birds 12:183-4.
  6. Bent, A.C. 1919. Life histories of North American diving birds. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 107. Washington, D.C.
  7. BirdLife International. 2004b. Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD ROM. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  8. Braun, M. J., D. W. Finch, M. B. Robbins, and B. K. Schmidt. 2000. A field checklist of the birds of Guyana. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
  9. Brown, M., and J. J. Dinsmore. 1986. Implications of marsh size and isolation for marsh bird management. J. Wildl. Manage. 50:392-397.
  10. Buckalew, J. H. 1948. Pied-billed grebe escapes duck hawk. Wood Thrush 4:59.
  11. Bull, J. 1974. Birds of New York state. Doubleday/Natural History Press, Garden City, New York. Reprint, 1985 (with Supplement, Federation of New York Bird Clubs, 1976), Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York.
  12. Castro, I. and A. Phillips. 1996. A guide to the birds of the Galapagos Islands. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
  13. Chabreck, R. H. 1963. Breeding habits of the pied-billed grebe in an impounded coastal marsh in Louisiana. Auk 80:447-52.
  14. Clapp, R. B., et al. 1982. Marine birds of the southeastern United States and Gulf of Mexico. Part 1, Gaviiformes through Pelecaniformes. U.S. Fish & Wildl. Serv., FWS/OBS 82/01. 637 pp.
  15. Coulter, M. W. 1957. Predation by snapping turtles upon aquatic birds in Maine marshes. Journal of Wildlife Management 21:17-21.
  16. Cramp, S. (editor). 1977. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East, and North Africa; the Birds of the Western Paleartic. Vol. 1: Ostrich to Ducks. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. 722 pp.
  17. Davis, T. A., M. F. Platter-Reiger, and R. A. Ackerman. 1985. Incubation water loss by pied-billed grebe eggs: adaptations to a hot, wet nest. Physiological Zoology 57:384-91.
  18. Delany, M. F. 1986. Bird bands recovered from American alligator stomachs in Florida. N. Amer. Bird Bander 11:92-4.
  19. Faaborg, J. 1976. Habitat selection and territorial behavior of the small grebes of North Dakota. Wilson Bulletin 88:390-399.
  20. Fisher, H. I. 1961. The hatching muscle in North American grebes. Condor 63:227-33.
  21. Fjeldsa, J. 1975. Grebes. Villadsen and Christensen, Hvidovre, Denmark. 64 pp.
  22. Forbes, M. R. L. 1987. Extrapair feeding in pied-billed grebes. Wilson Bulletin 99:109-111.
  23. Forbes, M. R. L., and C. D. Ankney. 1987. Hatching asynchrony and food allocation within broods of pied-billed grebes, PODILYMBUS PODICEPS. Canadian Journal of Zoology 65:2872-7.
  24. Forbes, M. R. L., and C. D. Ankney. 1988a. Nest attendance by adult pied-billed grebes, PODILYMBUS PODICEPS (L.). Canadian Journal of Zoology 66:2019-23.
  25. Forbes, M. R. L., and C. D. Ankney. 1988b. Intraclutch variation in egg weights of pied-billed grebes. Condor 90:709-11.
  26. Forbes, M. R. L., H. P. Barkhouse, and P. C. Smith. 1989. Nest-site selection by pied-billed grebes PODILYMBUS PODICEPS. Ornis Scandinavia 20:211-8.
  27. Forbush, E. H. 1925. Birds of Massachusetts and other New England states. Part 1: Water birds, marsh birds and shore birds. Massachusetts Department of Agriculture, Boston, Massachusetts. 486 pp.
  28. Fredrickson, L. H., and T. S. Taylor. 1982. Managment of seasonally flooded impoundments for wildlife. Fish and Wildlife Service Resource Publication 148. 29 pp.
  29. Fredrickson, L.H., F.A. Reid. 1986. Wetlands and riparian habitats: a nongame management overview. Pages 59-96 in J.B. Hale, L.B. Best, and R. L. Clawson, (eds.) Management of nongame wildlife in the Midwest: a developing art. Proc. Symp. 47th Midwest Fish and Wildl. Conf.
  30. Friend, M. 1987. Field Guide to Wildlife Diseases. Vol. 1: General Field Procedures and Diseases of Migratory Birds. Fish and Wildlife Service Resource Publication 167. 225 pp.
  31. Fugle, G. N., and S. I. Rothstein. 1977. Clutch size determination, egg size and egg-shell thickness in the pied-billed grebe. Auk 94:371-3.
  32. Garrido, O. H. and A. Kirkconnell. 2000. Field guide to the birds of Cuba. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
  33. Gibbs, J.P., and S.M. Melvin. 1990. An assessment of wading birds and other wetlands avifauna and their habitats in Maine. Maine Department of Inland Fish. and Wildlife, Bangor, Maine. 61 pp. Unpublished report.
  34. Gibbs, J. P., and S. M. Melvin. 1992. Pied-billed grebe, PODILYMBUS PODICEPS. Pages 31-49 in K. J. Schneider and D. M. Pence, editors. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the Northeast. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, Massachusetts. 400 pp.
  35. Gibbs, J. P., J. R. Longcore, D. G. McAuley, and J. K. Ringelman. 1991. Use of wetland habitats by selected nongame waterbirds in Maine. Fish and Wildlife Reservation 9, Fish and Wildlife Service.
  36. Glover, F. A. 1953. Nesting ecology of the pied-billed grebe in northwestern Iowa. Wilson Bulletin 65:32-9.
  37. Harrison, C. 1978. A Field Guide to the Nests, Eggs and Nestlings of North American Birds. Collins, Cleveland, Ohio.
  38. Harrison, H. H. 1979. A field guide to western birds' nests. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 279 pp.
  39. Herkert, J. R., editor. 1992. Endangered and threatened species of Illinois: status and distribution. Vol. 2: Animals. Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board. iv + 142 pp.
  40. Howell, S. N. G., and S. Webb. 1995. A guide to the birds of Mexico and northern Central America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  41. Jackson, J.A. 1985. A mutualistic feeding association between boat-tailed grackles and pied-billed grebes. Condor 87:147-148.
  42. Johnsgard, P. A. 1987. Diving birds of North America. Univ. Nebraska Press, Lincoln. xii + 292 pp.
  43. Kibbe, D. 1989. Survey of Vermont's rare marshland bird species. Unpubl. report, Hoboken, New Jersey. 8 pp.
  44. Kilham, L. 1954. Repeated territorial attacks of pied-billed grebe on ring-necked duck. Wilson Bulletin 66:265-7.
  45. Kirby, R. E. 1976. Mapping wetlands on beaver flowages with 35-mm photography. Canadian Field-Naturalist 90:423-431.
  46. Leavitt, B.B. 1957. Water moccasin preys on pied-billed grebe. Wilson Bulletin 69:112-113.
  47. Leck, C.F. 1971. Cooperative feeding in LEUCOPHOYX THULA and PODILYMBUS PODICEPS (Aves). American Midland Naturalist 86:241-242.
  48. Manci, K. M., and D. H. Rusch. 1988. Indices to distribution and abundance of some inconspicuous waterbirds at Horicon Marsh. Journal of Field Ornithology 59:67-75.
  49. Mueller, H. C., M. G. Biben, and H. F. Sears. 1972. Feeding interactions between pied-billed grebes and herons. Auk 89:190.
  50. Muller, M. J. 1995. Pied-billed Grebes nesting on Green Lake, Seattle, Washington. Washington Birds 4:35-59.
  51. Nudds, T. D. 1982. Ecological separation of grebes and coots: interference competition or microhabitat selection? Wilson Bulletin 94:505-514.
  52. Orians, G. H. 1980. Some adaptations of marsh-nesting blackbirds. Princeton Univ. Press. 295 pp.
  53. Otto, J. E. 1983. Breeding ecology of the pied-billed grebe (PODILYMBUS PODICEPS [Linneaus]) on Rush Lake, Winnebago County, Wisconsin. M.S. thesis, University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh, Wisconsin.
  54. Otto, J. E., and D. L. Strohmeyer. 1985. Wing molt by a nesting pied-billed grebe. Wilson Bulletin 97:239-40.
  55. Palmer, R. S. 1949. Maine Birds. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, Vol. 102. 656 pp.
  56. Palmer, R. S. (editor). 1962. Handbook of North American birds. Vol. 1. Loons through flamingos. Yale University Press, New Haven. 567 pp.
  57. Parker III, T. A., D. F. Stotz, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases for neotropical birds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  58. Perkins, G. A., and J. S. Lawrence. 1985. Bird use of wetlands created by surface mining. Trans. Ill. State Acad. Sci. 78:87-96.
  59. Peterson, R.T. 1980b. A field guide to the birds of eastern and central North America. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
  60. Peterson, R.T. 1990b. A field guide to western birds. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
  61. Raffaele, H., J. Wiley, O. Garrido, A. Keith, and J. Raffaele. 1998. A guide to the birds of the West Indies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 511 pp.
  62. Rappole, J.H., Morton, E.S., Lovejoy, T.E. and Ruos, J.L. 1983. Nearctic avian migrants in the Neotropics. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service and World Wildlife Fund, Washington D.C.
  63. Rickard, W. H., R. E. Fitzner, and C. E. Cushing. 1981. Biological colonization of an industrial pond, status after two decades. Environmental Conservation 8:241-7.
  64. Ridgely, R. S. 2002. Distribution maps of South American birds. Unpublished.
  65. Ridgely, R. S. and J. A. Gwynne, Jr. 1989. A Guide to the Birds of Panama. 2nd edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
  66. Root, T. 1988. Atlas of wintering North American birds: An analysis of Christmas Bird Count data. University of Chicago Press. 336 pp.
  67. Schneider, K.J., and D.M. Pence, editors. 1992. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the Northeast. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, MA. 400 pp.
  68. Sealy, S. G. 1978. Clutch size and nest placement of the pied-billed grebe in Manitoba. Wilson Bulletin 90:301-2.
  69. Stiles, F. G. and A. F. Skutch. 1989. A guide to the birds of Costa Rica. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA. 511 pp.
  70. Stone, W. B. 1979. Poisoning of wild birds by organophosphates and carbamate pesticides. New York Fish and Game Journal 26:37-47.
  71. Storer, R. W. 1967. The patterns of downy grebes. Condor 69:469-78.
  72. Swift, B. L. 1987. An analysis of avian breeding habitats in Hudson river tidal marshes. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Division of Fish and Wildlife, Delmar, New York. Unpublished report. 62 pp.
  73. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  74. Tiner, R. W., Jr. 1984. Wetlands of the United States: current status and recent trends. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory, Washington, D.C. 59 pp.
  75. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1987. Migratory Nongame Birds of Management Concern in the United States: The 1987 List. Office of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. 63 pp.
  76. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1995. Migratory nongame birds of management concern in the United States: The 1995 list. Office of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. 22 pp.
  77. Warren, B. H. 1890. Report on the birds of Pennsylvania. 2nd Edition. Pennsylvania State Boad Agric., Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. 434 pp.
  78. Weller, M. W., and C. S. Spatcher. 1965. Role of habitat in the distribution and abundance of marsh birds. Iowa State University Agricultural and Home Economics Experiment Station Special Report No. 43. Ames, Iowa. 31 pp.
  79. Wetmore, A. 1924. Food and economic relations of North American grebes. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Biol. Surv, Rep. Bull. No. 1196.
  80. Yocum, L. F., S. W. Harris, and H. A. Hanson. 1958. Status of grebes in eastern Washington. Auk 75:36-47.
  81. Zook, J. L. 2002. Distribution maps of the birds of Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama. Unpublished.