Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.637723
Element CodeARAAD01010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassChelonia
OrderTestudines
FamilyEmydidae
GenusChrysemys
COSEWICPS:T,SC,NAR
Other Common Namesnorthern painted turtle (EN) Tortue peinte (FR)
Concept ReferenceStarkey, D. E., H. B. Shaffer, R. L. Burke, M.R.J. Forstner, J. B. Iverson, F. J. Janzen, A.G.J. Rhodin, and G. R. Ultsch. 2003. Molecular systematics, phylogeography, and the effects of Pleistocene glaciation in the painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) complex. Evolution 57:119-128.
Taxonomic CommentsIncludes three subspecies: C. p. bellii, C. p. marginata, and C. p. picta. Based on molecular data, Starkey et al. (2003) recognized C. dorsalis as a distinct species. This was adopted by Crother et al. (2008, 2017) and the Turtle Taxonomy Working Group (2012, 2021). Some herpetologists, citing apparent intergrades in western Kentucky, southern Illinois, and southeastern Missouri, still regard it as conspecific with C. picta. Additional genetic work by Jensen et al. (2014) and Jensen et al. (2015) supported Starkey et al. (2003). However, according to Crother (2017), these studies also questioned the recognition of the remaining subspecies on genetic grounds, but did not take a position on their abandonment. In contrast, Ernst et al. (2006) reexamined color patterns and dorsal scute alignment in Chrysemys and identified intermediate specimens between C. dorsalis and C. p. marginata and C. p. bellii. Although the evidence for species recognition of dorsalis is primarily mitochondrial, Crother (2017) continue to recognize it as a full species pending further genetic sampling.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2024-02-04
Change Date1996-10-21
Edition Date2024-02-04
Edition AuthorsGundy, R. L.
Threat ImpactLow
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank ReasonsThis species is widely distributed across North America and abundant throughout most of its range. It is highly adaptable to altered and man-made aquatic habitats. There are no major range-wide declines reported. However, some western populations are rare and declining. There are no major range-wide threats, although there are localized threats including habitat, loss, predation, severe flooding, pollution, and drought.
Range Extent CommentsThis species is the only turtle species that spans the width of North America from coast to coast (Ernst and Lovich 2009). It ranges from New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, Canada across southern Canada to Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada (Ernst and Lovich 2009, Barela and Olson 2014, COSEWIC 2016). It is found in most states in the eastern and central United States. The range extends farthest south in the east where it reaches the Gulf Coast in Louisiana, United States (Ernst and Lovich 2009). There are three subspecies. Chrysemys picta picta occurs along the Coastal Plain and Appalachians east of the Great Lakes, C. p. marginata occurs in the Great Lakes Region east of the Mississippi River, and C. p. bellii occurs west of the Mississippi River (Starkey et al. 2003, Ernst and Lovich 2009, Ernst et al. 2014). Using a combination of records from Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF 2024) and iNaturalist (2024), GeoCat (2024) estimated range extent to be about 7,250,000 km².
Occurrences CommentsThis species has many hundreds of occurrences throughout its range (Ernst and Lovich 2009, Barela and Olson 2014, COSEWIC 2016).
Threat Impact CommentsThere are no major range-wide threats affecting this species. There are a number of threats operating at local scales including habitat, loss, predation, severe flooding, pollution, and drought (Ernst and Lovich 2009). Development of uplands surrounding occupied ponds may cause long-term declines that are not detectable for many years (Eskew et al. 2010, Capkun-Huot et al. 2021). Roads are generally suspected of causing a high degree of mortality due to vehicle strikes and a lack of connectivity between ponds, but there is a growing body of evidence documenting a remarkable adaptability and resilience to roads and some development (Ernst and Lovich 2009, Laporte et al. 2012, Dorland et al. 2014, Capkun-Huot et al. 2021). Western populations are threatened by habitat loss due to development and agriculture (Barela and Olson 2014, COSEWIC 2016).