Phalaropus tricolor

(Vieillot, 1819)

Wilson's Phalarope

G4Apparently Secure Found in 45 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
High - mediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.105425
Element CodeABNNF20010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderCharadriiformes
FamilyScolopacidae
GenusPhalaropus
Synonyms
Steganopus tricolor
Other Common Names
Falaropo Pico Largo, Pollito de Mar Tricolor (ES) Phalarope de Wilson (FR) Pisa-n'Água (PT)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
Taxonomic Comments
Often placed in monotypic genus Steganopus (AOU 1983). Based on allozyme data, clearly genetically distinct from other phalaropes; may not be part of monophyletic phalarope group (Dittman et al. 1989). However, combined allozyme, morphologic, and mtDNA data suggest that Wilson's phalarope evolved shortly after the phalarope lineage itself arose and that the phalaropes are monophyletic (Dittman and Zink 1991).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-01-02
Change Date2025-01-02
Edition Date2025-01-02
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G., and F. J. Dirrigl, Jr. (2016); rev. R. L. Gundy (2025)
Threat ImpactHigh - medium
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
This migratory species has a wide range in both the breeding season (North America) and non-breeding season (South America). The species has suffered historical declines of over 50% and the population may be continuing to slowly decline. This species is threatened by loss of habitat and associated loss of food resources in lakes due to unsustainable water consumption rates at migratory staging sites in western North America and non-breeding sites in western South America.
Range Extent Comments
This species spends the breeding season in western North America with limited numbers of breeding sites in eastern North America (McAlpine et al. 1988, AOU 1998, Castellino et al. 2024). The non-breeding season is spent mainly in western and southern South America (Colwell and Jehl 1994, AOU 1998, Castellino et al. 2024).

Breeding range: In Canada, this species breeds in coastal British Columbia, southern Yukon, northern Alberta, central Saskatchewan, central Manitoba, southern Ontario, southern Quebec, and New Brunswick. In the United States, this species breeds in east-central California, central Nevada, central Utah, eastern Arizona, northern New Mexico, northern Texas, central Kansas, western Nebraska, eastern South Dakota, northern Iowa, northern Illinois, northern Indiana, northern Ohio, and northeastern New York (McAlpine et al. 1988, AOU 1998, Castellino et al. 2024).

Non-breeding range: During the non-breeding season, a large proportion of the population can be found in saline lakes in highlands of western and southern South America from Peru, Bolivia, Paraguay, and Uruguay south through Chile and Argentina. Some individuals can occasionally be found in northern and central California, Utah, central New Mexico, southern Texas, and southwestern Louisiana during the non-breeding season (Colwell and Jehl 1994, AOU 1998, Castellino et al. 2024).
Occurrences Comments
There are many breeding and non-breeding occurrences (Castellino et al. 2024). However, there are relatively few migratory staging sites at which large proportions of the population gather simultaneously (Carle et al. 2024, Castellino et al. 2024).
Threat Impact Comments
Loss of wetland habitats and the resultant loss of food due to climate change and anthropogenic water use are the primary threats to this species (Castellino et al. 2024). These have an especially large impact at migratory staging areas where large portions of the population gather at saline lakes in western North America to eat large quantities of food in order to gather enough calories to support a complete feather molt before continuing the southward migration (Carle et al. 2024, Castellino et al. 2024). Unsustainable water consumption from the agricultural, residential, and commercial sectors of the Great Basin of the United States is drastically lowering lake levels and increasing salinity to levels beyond what their preferred prey species can tolerate (Frank and Conover 2021, Hall et al. 2023, Carle et al. 2024, Castellino et al. 2024). Threats concerning water availability are also present in the nonbreeding range in South America (Castellino et al. 2024). Climate change is also responsible for lowering lake levels as increasing air and land surface temperatures decrease the amount of snow cover that would naturally drain into lakes, and by increasing lake evaporation rates (Hall et al. 2023, Castellino et al. 2024). The conversion to agriculture has continued to reduce the amount of available habitat in both the breeding range and non-breeding range (Castellino et al. 2024). In Argentina, Bolivia, and Ecuador, birds are threatened by disturbance from human activities and construction of infrastructure related to tourism and recreation (Castellino et al. 2024). Mining, particularly lithium mining, is a threat in Argentina, Chile, and Bolivia (Castellino et al. 2024). Pollution from agricultural runoff is considered a threat in México (Castellino et al. 2024).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

BREEDING: Shallow freshwater and saline ponds, marshes and wet meadows (AOU 1998). Nests on the ground in wet meadows, grassy marshes, and along edges of shallow inland waters. The nest is a well-concealed scrape, lined with grass. Uses both fresh and alkali wetlands with three characteristics: open water, emergent vegetation, and open shoreline (Saunders 1914, Hohn 1967, Stewart 1975, Prescott et al. 1995, Naugle 1997). Nesting habitat varies widely, including wetlands, wet meadows, upland grasslands, and road rights-of -way (Bent 1927, Roberts 1932, Hohn 1967, Stewart 1975, Murray 1983, Bomberger 1984, Colwell 1987, Colwell and Oring 1990, Einemann 1991, Faanes and Lingle 1995, Dinsmore and Schuster 1997). Occasionally occur in Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) fields and dense nesting cover (Johnson and Schwartz 1993, Prescott et al. 1993, D.H. Johnson, unpubl. data).

In North Dakota, densities were highest in undifferentiated tillage wetlands (wetlands with frequently tilled soils), followed by temporary, seasonal, semipermanent, fen, alkali, and permanent wetlands (Kantrud and Stewart 1984). Often occupied the peripheral low prairie and wet-meadow areas of most classes of wetlands in North Dakota. In South Dakota, occurrence was associated positively with the presence of seasonal and semipermanent wetlands, stock ponds, and intermittent streams; area of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) hayland; area of surface water; and the percentage of grazed shoreline (Weber 1978, Weber et al. 1982). In eastern South Dakota, the probability of occurrence in semipermanent wetlands was related positively to the proportion of untilled uplands and the number of emergent hydrophyte species (e.g., willow [Salix spp.]) composing > 10% of the vegetated wetland area; were associated negatively with wetlands dominated by thick-stemmed plants (e.g., cattail [TYPHA spp.] and river bulrush [Scirpus fluviatilis]) (Naugle 1997). Within seasonal wetlands, the probability of occurrence was related negatively to wetlands dominated by thick-stemmed plants (Naugle 1997).

Nest site selection varies seasonally. Nests in upland vegetation early in the breeding season and wet-meadow vegetation later in the season (Colwell and Oring 1990). Usually nests less than 100 meters from shoreline (Hohn 1967, Hatch 1971, Colwell and Oring 1990, Eldridge in prep.). Nest sites in Nebraska were in wet sedge (Carex) meadows (Faanes and Lingle 1995). In North Dakota and Iowa, nested in wetlands associated with river floodplains (Murray 1983, Koenig 1984). In Alberta, Saskatchewan, and North Dakota nested in grasses of various heights on islands or in wet-meadow zones around lakes and wetlands; in Saskatchewan, brood rearing occurred in patches of foxtail barley (Hordeum jubatum) (Bent 1927, Hohn 1967, Kagarise 1979, Colwell 1987). In Saskatchewan, Colwell and Oring (1990) found that nest sites had taller, denser, and more homogeneous vegetation and less bare ground than randomly selected sites. However, in the Nebraska sandhills, nest sites had shorter vegetation than random sites (Bomberger 1984).

NON-BREEDING: on lake shores, mudflats, salt marshes, freshwater marshes, alkaline ponds; rarely along seacoasts; stages on salt lakes (Colwell and Jehl 1994, AOU 1998). Also at sewage ponds; rarely reported at sea.

Ecology

Reproductive success varies greatly (17-56%); most clutch failures result from predation (Colwell 1992). Exhibits annual variation in nest site selection, moving to deeper, more permanent wetlands in dry years (Hohn 1967, Colwell 1991).

Reproduction

In the central and northern Great Plains (Minnesota, Nebraska, and North Dakota), arrives on the breeding grounds from mid-April to early May and departs from mid-August to early September (Roberts 1932, Howe 1972, Johnsgard 1980, Murray 1983). In Alberta, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan, arrives on breeding grounds from late April to early May and is observed until early September (Hohn 1967; Maher 1974; Reynolds et al. 1986; Colwell 1987; Colwell and Oring 1988a,b). Females arrive on the breeding grounds earlier than males (Reynolds et al. 1986, Colwell 1987), and commonly depart from breeding areas earlier than males, usually from early June to early July (Hohn 1967, Howe 1972, Colwell 1987, Colwell and Oring 1988a,b).

May re-nest after nest failure, and females are capable of laying multiple clutches (Colwell and Jehl 1994). Polyandry was first documented in Saskatchewan, where a color-banded female laid two clutches with two individual males (Colwell 1986a, Colwell 1987). Philopatry is uncommon, although males return to breeding areas in successive years more often than females (Colwell 1987, Colwell and Oring 1988b). Of 154 adult male phalaropes banded over four years in Saskatchewan, 16 percent returned to their previous breeding area in successive years, whereas only 2 percent of 69 banded adult females returned (Colwell 1987).
Terrestrial Habitats
Grassland/herbaceous
Palustrine Habitats
HERBACEOUS WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN5B
ProvinceRankNative
British ColumbiaS4BYes
AlbertaS5BYes
OntarioS2B,S4MYes
Prince Edward IslandSUMYes
New BrunswickS1BYes
ManitobaS4BYes
SaskatchewanS5BYes
QuebecS2BYes
Nova ScotiaSNAYes
Northwest TerritoriesSUYes
Yukon TerritoryS1BYes
United StatesN5B
ProvinceRankNative
North DakotaSNRBYes
WashingtonS3BYes
FloridaS2MYes
District of ColumbiaS1NYes
PennsylvaniaS2MYes
New JerseyS4NYes
New YorkSNAYes
KansasS2B,S4NYes
ArkansasSNAYes
WyomingS3B,S3NYes
Rhode IslandS3NYes
LouisianaSNAYes
NevadaS2B,S4MYes
MinnesotaS2BYes
Navajo NationS4MYes
KentuckySNAYes
New MexicoS2B,S4MYes
ArizonaS1B,S5NYes
WisconsinS1BYes
South DakotaS4BYes
North CarolinaSNAYes
TexasS3B,S5NYes
IowaS3NYes
MarylandSNAYes
MissouriSNAYes
NebraskaS4Yes
TennesseeS3NYes
IdahoS3BYes
DelawareS3MYes
MontanaS4BYes
OregonS3B,S2NYes
IndianaSHBYes
AlabamaSNRMYes
MaineSNAYes
MichiganS3Yes
South CarolinaSNAYes
GeorgiaSNRNYes
New HampshireSNAYes
MississippiSNAYes
IllinoisS2Yes
CaliforniaSNRB,SNRNYes
OklahomaSNRNYes
UtahS3Yes
ColoradoS4B,S4NYes
MassachusettsS1B,S2NYes
VirginiaSNAYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
3 - Energy production & miningRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh (continuing)
3.2 - Mining & quarryingRestricted (11-30%)Serious - slightHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesRestricted (11-30%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
7.2 - Dams & water management/useLarge (31-70%)Serious - moderateHigh (continuing)
7.2.1 - Abstraction of surface water (domestic use)Large (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
7.2.2 - Abstraction of surface water (commercial use)Large (31-70%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
7.2.3 - Abstraction of surface water (agricultural use)Large (31-70%)Serious - slightHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (45)
Arizona (1)
AreaForestAcres
PinalenoCoronado National Forest130,920
California (7)
AreaForestAcres
CuyamaLos Padres National Forest19,631
Excelsior (CA)Inyo National Forest45,607
Glass MountainInyo National Forest52,867
Log Cabin SaddlebagInyo National Forest15,165
Mt. JacksonHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest20,721
Mt. HoffmanModoc National Forest9,780
WildhorseCleveland National Forest1,483
Colorado (1)
AreaForestAcres
Dome PeakRoutt NF35,716
Idaho (4)
AreaForestAcres
Borah PeakSalmon-Challis National Forest130,463
HoodooNez Perce-Clearwater National Forest153,868
Italian PeakCaribou-Targhee National Forest141,158
PalisadesCaribou-Targhee National Forest122,002
Montana (7)
AreaForestAcres
Bear - Marshall - Scapegoat - SwanLolo National Forest118,485
Bear - Marshall - Scapegoat - SwanLewis and Clark National Forest344,022
East PioneerBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest145,082
Ellis CanyonHelena National Forest5,578
Freezeout MountainBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest97,305
Selway - Bitterroot (01067)Bitterroot National Forest114,953
West PioneerBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest248,631
Nevada (6)
AreaForestAcres
Antelope - West 1Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest8,642
Four MileHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest24,093
KingHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest5,083
Ruby - Lamoille CynHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest32,771
ShellbackHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest36,455
Table Mtn. - EastHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest87,789
Oregon (3)
AreaForestAcres
BuckhornWallowa-Whitman National Forest17,180
Crane MountainFremont National Forest23,096
Snake RiverWallowa-Whitman National Forest31,229
Utah (3)
AreaForestAcres
Fishlake MountainFishlake National Forest25,217
Little CreekFishlake National Forest11,479
WellsvilleWasatch-Cache National Forest1,717
Washington (2)
AreaForestAcres
EntiatWenatchee National Forest72,617
Rock CreekWenatchee National Forest32,239
Wyoming (11)
AreaForestAcres
Gros Ventre MountainsBridger-Teton National Forest106,418
Horse Creek MesaBighorn National Forest77,808
Middle ForkMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest13,238
Mosquito Lake - Seven LakesBridger-Teton National Forest51,950
Munger MountainBridger-Teton National Forest12,827
PalisadesTarghee National Forest1,121
Sheep MountainMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest17,626
Warm Spring CreekShoshone National Forest6,216
West Slope TetonsTarghee National Forest47,448
West Slope WindsBridger-Teton National Forest143,252
Wilderness Study AreaTarghee National Forest51,961
References (87)
  1. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.
  2. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in <i>The Auk</i>]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
  3. Bent, A.C. 1927. Life histories of North American shorebirds (Part I). U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 142, Washington, D.C.
  4. BirdLife International. 2004b. Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD ROM. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  5. BirdLife International. (2013-2014). IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on various dates in 2013 and 2014. http://www.birdlife.org/
  6. Bomberger, M.L. 1984. Quantitative assessment of the nesting habitat of Wilson's Phalarope. Wilson Bulletin 96:126-128.
  7. Burns, G., and N. D. Van Schmidt. 2023. Bridging the gap between disparate phalarope survey methodologies to evaluate population status. San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory. Report prepared for the South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project. 20 pp.
  8. Carle, R. D., K. Tarr, J. Neill, D. House, R. Larson, A. E. McKellar, J. Ng, M. Prather, J. Reuland, M. Rubega, H. Tobiason, and N. D. Van Schmidt. 2024. Coordinated phalarope surveys at western North American staging sites 2019–2023. Unpublished report of the International Phalarope Working Group. 46 pp.
  9. Castellino, M., R. Carle, A. J. Lesterhuis, and R. Clay. 2024. Conservation plan for Wilson’s phalarope (<i>Phalaropus tricolor</i>). Version 2.0. Manomet Inc. Manomet, Massachusetts. 66 pp.
  10. Castro, I. and A. Phillips. 1996. A guide to the birds of the Galapagos Islands. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
  11. Colwell, M.A. 1986. The first documented case of polyandry for Wilson's phalarope. Auk 103:611-612.
  12. Colwell, M.A. 1987. Breeding biology, intrasexual competition, and philopatry in Wilson's Phalarope. Ph.D. dissertation. University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND. 123 pp.
  13. Colwell, M.A. 1991. Effects of fluctuating wetland conditions on prairie shorebirds. Pages 173-180 in G.L. Holroyd, G. Burns, and H.C. Smith, editors. Proceedings of the second endangered species and prairie conservation workshop, Natural History Occasional Paper 15. Provincial Museum of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
  14. Colwell, M.A. 1992. Wilson's Phalarope nest success is not influenced by vegetation concealment. Condor 94:767-772.
  15. Colwell, M.A. and J.R. Jehl, Jr. 1994. Wilson's Phalarope (<i>Phalaropus tricolor</i>). The Birds of North America Online (A. Poole, ed.). Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca. Retrieved from the Birds of North America Online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu.bnaproxy.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/083/doi:10.2173/bna.83.
  16. Colwell, M.A., and L.W. Oring. 1988a. Habitat use by breeding and migrating shorebirds in southcentral Saskatchewan. Wilson Bulletin 100(4):554-566.
  17. Colwell, M.A., and L.W. Oring. 1988b. Return rates of prairie shorebirds: sex and species differences. Wader Study Group Bulletin 55:21-24.
  18. Colwell, M.A., and L.W. Oring. 1988c. Breeding biology of Wilson's Phalarope in southcentral Saskatchewan. Wilson Bulletin 100:567-582.
  19. Colwell, M.A., and L.W. Oring. 1990. Nest site characteristics of prairie shorebirds. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68:297-302.
  20. Dechant, J.A., D.H. Johnson, L.D. Igl, C.M. Goldade, A.L. Zimmerman, and B.R. Euliss. 1999. Effects of management practices on grassland birds: Wilson's Phalarope. Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Jamestown, ND. 13 pp.
  21. Dinsmore, J.J., and W. Schuster. 1997. Wilson's Phalarope nest in Boone County. Iowa Bird Life 67:67.
  22. Dittman, D. L., R. M. Zink, and J. A. Gerwin. 1989. Evolutionary genetics of phalaropes. Auk 106:326-331.
  23. Dittmann, D. L., and R. M. Zink. 1991. Mitochondrial DNA variation among phalaropes and allies. Auk 108:771-779.
  24. Einemann, L. 1991. A nesting report of a Wilson's Phalarope in Lancaster County. Nebraska Bird Review 59:59-61.
  25. Eldridge, J. In prep. Management for breeding and migrating shorebirds in the Midwest.
  26. Faanes, C.A., and G.R. Lingle. 1995. Breeding birds of the Platte River Valley of Nebraska. Online. Available: http://www.npwrc.org/resource/distr/birds/platte/platte.htm.
  27. Frank, M. G., and M. R. Conover. 2021. Foraging behavior of red-necked (<i>Phalaropus lobatus</i>) and Wilson's (<i>P. tricolor</i>) phalaropes on Great Salt Lake, Utah. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 133(4): 538–551.
  28. Friedmann, H. 1963. Host relations of the parasitic Cowbird. Museum of Natural History. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C.
  29. Hagan, J. M., III, and D. W. Johnston, editors. 1992. Ecology and conservation of neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. xiii + 609 pp.
  30. Harrison, C. 1978. A Field Guide to the Nests, Eggs and Nestlings of North American Birds. Collins, Cleveland, Ohio.
  31. Hatch, D.R.M. 1971. Brown-headed Cowbird parasitism on Spotted Sandpiper and Wilson's Phalarope. Blue Jay 29:17-18.
  32. Hayman, P., J. Marchant, and T. Prater. 1986. Shorebirds: an identification guide to the waders of the world. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston.
  33. Herkert, J. R., editor. 1992. Endangered and threatened species of Illinois: status and distribution. Vol. 2: Animals. Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board. iv + 142 pp.
  34. Higgins, K.F. 1975. Shorebird and game bird nests in North Dakota croplands. Wild. Soc. Bull. 3:176-179.
  35. Hohn, E.O. 1967. Observations on the breeding biology of Wilson's Phalaropes in central Alberta. Auk 84:220-244.
  36. Howell, S. N. G., and S. Webb. 1995. A guide to the birds of Mexico and northern Central America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  37. Howe, M.A. 1972. Pair bond formation and maintenance in Wilson's Phalarope, PHALAROPUS TRICOLOR. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. 169 pp.
  38. Jehl, J. R. 1988. Biology of the Eared Grebe and Wilson's Phalarope in the nonbreeding seson: a study of adaptations to saline lakes. Cooper Ornithol. Soc., Studies in Avian Biology No. 12. iv + 74 pp.
  39. Jehl, J. R., Jr. 1973. Breeding biology and systematic relationships of the stilt sandpiper. Wilson Bulletin 85:115-147.
  40. Johnsgard, P.A. 1980. A preliminary list of the birds of Nebraska and adjacent plains states. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE. 156 pp.
  41. Johnson, D.H. 1996. Management of northern prairies and wetlands for the conservation of Neotropical migratory birds. Pages 53-67 in F.R. Thompson, III, editor. Management of midwestern landscapes for the conservation of Neotropical migratory birds. U.S. Forest Service, General Technical Report NC-187.
  42. Johnson, D.H., and M.D. Schwartz. 1993b. The conservation reserve program and grassland birds. Conservation Biology 7:934-937.
  43. Kagarise, C.M. 1979. Breeding biology of the Wilson's Phalarope in North Dakota. Bird Banding 50:12-22.
  44. Kantrud, H. A. 1981. Grazing intensity effects on the breeding avifauna of North Dakota native grasslands. Canadian Field-Naturalist 95:404-417.
  45. Kantrud, H.A., and K.F. Higgins. 1992. Nest and nest site characteristics of some ground-nesting, non-passerine birds of northern grasslands. Prairie Naturalist 24:67-84.
  46. Kantrud, H.A., and R.E. Stewart. 1984. Ecological distribution and crude density of breeding birds on prairie wetlands. Journal of Wildlife Management 48:426-437.
  47. Knopf, F.L. 1996. Mountain Plover (<i>Charadrius montanus</i>). In A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The Birds of North America, No. 211. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC. 16 pp.
  48. Knopf, F.L., and J.R. Rupert. 1996. Productivity and movements of mountain plovers breeding in Colorado. Wilson Bulletin 108:28-35.
  49. Koenig, D. 1984. A Wilson's Phalarope nest in Allamakee County. Iowa Bird Life 54:123.
  50. Maher, W.J. 1974. Matador Project: Birds II. Avifauna of the Matador area. Canadian Committee for the International Biological Pragramme, Matador Project, Technical Report 58. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. 31 pp.
  51. McAlpine, D.F., M. Phinney, and S. Makepeace. 1988a. New Brunswick breeding of Wilson's phalarope, PHALAROPUS TRICOLOR, confirmed. Canadian Field-Naturalist 102:77-78.
  52. Morrison, R.I.G. 1993/1994. Shorebird population status and trends in Canada. Bird Trends (3):3-5. Canadian Wildlife Service.
  53. Morrison, R. I. G., and R. K. Ross. 1989. Atlas of Nearctic shorebirds on the coast of South America. Vols. 1 and 2. Canadian Wildl. Serv. Spec. Publ. 325 pp.
  54. Morrison, R.I.G., McCaffery, B.J., Gill, R.E., Skagen, S.K., Jones, S.K., Page, G.W., Gratto-Trevor, C.L., and Andres, B.A. 2006. Population estimates of North American shorebirds, 2006. Waders Study Group Bulletin 111: 67-85.
  55. Morrison, R. I. G., R. E. Gill, Jr., B. A. Harrington, S. Skagen, G. W. Page, C. L. Gratto-Trevor, and S. M. Haig. 2001. Estimates of shorebird populations in North America. Occasional Paper Number 104, Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Ottawa, ON. 64 pages.
  56. Murray, B.G., Jr. 1983. Notes on the breeding biology of Wilson's Phalarope. Wilson Bulletin 95:472-475.
  57. National Audubon Society. 2014. View all Species. Website accessible at http://birds.audubon.org/species. Accessed on various dates in 2014.
  58. National Geographic Society (NGS). 1987. Field guide to the birds of North America. Second edition. National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C.
  59. Naugle, D.E. 1997. Habitat area requirements of prairie wetland birds in eastern South Dakota. Ph.D. dissertation. South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD. 85 pp.
  60. Nol, E., and M. S. Blanken. 1999. Semipalmated Plover (<i>Charadrius semipalmatus</i>). No. 444 IN A. Poole and F. Gill, eds. The birds of North America. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 24pp.
  61. Oberholser, H.C. 1974. The bird life of Texas. 2 vols. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin.
  62. Owens, R. A., and M. T. Myres. 1973. Effects of agriculture upon populations of native passerine birds of an Alberta fescue grassland. Canadian Journal of Zoology 51:697-713.
  63. Parker III, T. A., D. F. Stotz, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases for neotropical birds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  64. Paton, P. W., C. Kneedy, and E. Sorensen. 1992. Chronology of shorebird and ibis use of selected marshes at Great Salt Lake. Utah Birds 8(1):1-19.
  65. Poole, A. F. and F. B. Gill. 1992. The birds of North America. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. and The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.
  66. Pratt, H. D., P. L. Bruner, and D. G. Berrett. 1987. A Field Guide to the Birds of Hawaii and the Tropical Pacific. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. 409 pp. + 45 plates.
  67. Prescott, D.R.C., A.J. Murphy, and E. Ewaschuk. 1995. An avian community approach to determining biodiversity values of NAWMP habitats in the aspen parkland of Alberta. Alberta NAWMP Centre. NAWMP-012. Edmonton, Alberta. 58 pp.
  68. Prescott, D.R.C., R. Arbuckle, B. Goddard, and A. Murphy. 1993. Methods for the monitoring and assessment of avian communities on NAWMP landscapes in Alberta, and 1993 results. Alberta NAWMP Centre. NAWMP-007. Edmonton, Alberta. 48 pp.
  69. Price, J., S. Droege, and A. Price. 1995. The summer atlas of North American birds. Academic Press, New York. x + 364 pp.
  70. Raffaele, H., J. Wiley, O. Garrido, A. Keith, and J. Raffaele. 1998. A guide to the birds of the West Indies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 511 pp.
  71. Renken, R. B. 1983. Breeding bird communities and bird-habitat associations on North Dakota waterfowl production areas of three habitat types. M.S. Thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, IA. 90 pp.
  72. Renken, R. B., and J. J. Dinsmore. 1987. Nongame bird communities on managed grasslands in North Dakota. Canadian Field-Naturalist 101:551-557.
  73. Reynolds, J.D., M.A. Colwell, and F. Cooke. 1986. Sexual selection and spring arrival times of Red-necked and Wilson's phalaropes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 18:303-310.
  74. Ridgely, R. S. 2002. Distribution maps of South American birds. Unpublished.
  75. Ridgely, R. S. and J. A. Gwynne, Jr. 1989. A Guide to the Birds of Panama. 2nd edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA.
  76. Roberts, T. S. 1932. The Birds of Minnestoa. Vol. 2. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 821 pp.
  77. Rubega, M. A., D. Schamel, and D. M. Tracy. 2000. Red-necked Phalarope (<i>Phalaropus lobatus</i>). No. 538 IN A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The birds of North America. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 28pp.
  78. Sauer, J.R., and S. Droege. 1992. Geographical patterns in population trends of Neotropical migrants in North America. Pages 26-42 in J.M. Hagan, III, and D.W. Johnston, editors. Ecology and conservation of Neotropical migrant landbirds. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  79. Saunders, A.A. 1914. The birds of Teton and northern Lewis and Clark counties, Montana. Condor 16:124-144.
  80. Sibley, D. A. 2000a. The Sibley guide to birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  81. Stewart, R. E. 1975. Breeding Birds of North Dakota. Tri-College Center for Environmental Studies, Fargo ND.
  82. Stiles, F. G. and A. F. Skutch. 1989. A guide to the birds of Costa Rica. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, USA. 511 pp.
  83. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  84. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2026. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Findings for 10 Species. Federal Register 91(16):3096-3101.
  85. Weber, M.J. 1978. Non-game birds in relation to habitat variation on South Dakota wetlands. M.S. thesis. South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD. 54 pp.
  86. Weber, M.J., P.A. Vohs, Jr., and L.D. Flake. 1982. Use of prairie wetlands by selected bird species in South Dakota. Wilson Bulletin 94:550-554.
  87. Zook, J. L. 2002. Distribution maps of the birds of Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama. Unpublished.