Spizella pusilla

(Wilson, 1810)

Field Sparrow

G5Secure Found in 54 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla). © Ryan Sanderson; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Ryan Sanderson; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla). © Brad Imhoff; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Brad Imhoff; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla). © Daniel Irons; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Daniel Irons; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla). © Grace C; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Grace C; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla). © Matt Mason; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Matt Mason; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla). © Nico Sarbanes; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library.
© Nico Sarbanes; Cornell Lab of Ornithology | Macaulay Library
Field Sparrow (Spizella pusilla). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.102535
Element CodeABPBX94050
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAves
OrderPasseriformes
FamilyPasserellidae
GenusSpizella
Other Common Names
Bruant des champs (FR) Gorrión Pusila (ES)
Concept Reference
American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in The Auk]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
Taxonomic Comments
Constitutes a superspecies with S. wortheni and considered to be conspecific with it by some authors (AOU 1983, 1998). See Zink and Dittmann (1993) for a hypothesis for evolution in the genus Spizella. See Dodge et al. (1995) for a comparison of phylogenies derived from two molecular data sets for the genus Spizella; among other results, monophyly of Spizella including the American tree sparrow was supported.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-04-10
Change Date1996-12-04
Edition Date1999-10-29
Edition AuthorsKOENEN, M.; Revisions by D.W. MEHLMAN
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 to >300
Rank Reasons
Abundant despite decline.
Range Extent Comments
BREEDING: eastern Montana east across the northern U.S. and southern Canada to New England and southern New Brunswick, south to northeastern Colorado, Oklahoma, Texas, Gulf Coast, and southern Georgia; also southern Manitoba (Carey et al. 1994, AOU 1998). NON-BREEDING: Kansas east to Massachusetts, south to southeastern New Mexico, northern Coahuila, central Nuevo Leon, northern Tamaulipas, Gulf Coast, and southern Florida (Carey et al. 1994, AOU 1998).
Occurrences Comments
Species is widely distributed.
Threat Impact Comments
PREDATION: Predation is the major cause of nest mortality. In Illinois, 112 of 147 nests depredated (Best 1978, cited in Carey et al. 1994). In Illinois 24 of 66 nests depredated (Nolan 1963, cited in Carey et al. 1994). In Pennsylvania, 163 of 371 nests depredated (Carey et al. 1994). Nest predators include variety of snakes (e.g., blue racers [COLUBER CONSTRICTOR], milk snake [LAMPROPELTIS spp.], black rat snake [ELAPHE OBSOLETA], garter snake [THAMNOPHIS SIRTALIS], and prairie kingsnake [LAMPROPELTIS CALLIGASTER]), small mammals (e.g., chipmunk [TAMIAS STRIATUS], red fox [VULPES FULVA], gray fox [UROCYON CINEOARGENTEUS], weasels [MUSTELA spp.], skunks [MEPHITIS MEPHITIS], mink [MUSTELA VISON], raccoon [PROCYON LOTOR], and opposum [DIDELPHIS VIRGINIANA]), and birds (e.g., blue jay [CYANOCITTA CRISTATA], American crow (CORVUS BRACHYRHYNCHUS], and house wren [TROGLODYTES AEDON]). Best (1978, cited in Carey et al. 1994) attributed 48 percent of egg loss and 54 percent of nestling loss to snakes. Another study attributed 65 percent of nest predation to snakes (Carey et al. 1994). PARASITISM: Parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds (MOLOTHRUS ATER) is common (Crooks and Henderson 1953, Friedmann 1963, Walkinshaw 1968, Kupsky 1970, Friedmann et al. 1977, Best 1978, Evans 1978, Buech 1982, Laubach 1984, Carey et al. 1994). Parasitism rate varies geographically: in Iowa, 80 percent of nests parasitized; in Missouri, 13 percent; in Illinois, 11 percent; in Ohio, 32 percent; in Pennsylavania, less than 1 percent. Parasitized nests commonly deserted (Walkinshaw 1949; George 1952; Crooks and Hendrickson 1953; Ely 1957; Best 1978; Carey et al. 1994; D. E. Burhans, pers. comm.). Of 182 parasitized nests in Michigan, 100 were deserted and only 27 of 234 cowbird eggs hatched (Walkinshaw 1968). In another study in Michigan, only eight of 29 cowbird eggs hatched and, of these, only one cowbird fledgling survived the first week (Crooks 1948).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Old fields, brushy hillsides, overgrown pastures, thorn scrub, deciduous forest edge, sparse second growth, fencerows (AOU 1983). Early nests on or near ground in weed clumps or grass tufts, later nests may be higher in small thick shrubs as leaves grow, to about 30 centimeters above ground (Harrison 1978). Suitable habitat includes oldfields, sage (ARTEMISIA) flats, weedy pastures, untilled and idle cropland, Conservation Reserve Program fields, grassed waterways, hedgerows, shelterbelts, orchards, woodland edges, brushy woodlands, wooded draws, pine (PINUS) plantations, attenuated gallery and gallery forest, and reclaimed strip mines (Gabrielson 1914; Ely 1957; Graber and Graber 1963; Walkinshaw 1968; Stewart 1975; Best 1977, 1978; Evans 1978; Johnsgard 1980; Stauffer and Best 1980; Whitmore 1980; Best et al. 1981, 1997; Faanes 1981, 1983; Buech 1982; Hopkins 1983; Sousa 1983; Dinsmore et al. 1984; Kahl et al. 1985; Basore et al. 1986; Sample 1989; Bryan and Best 1991; Herkert 1991a; Cable et al. 1992; Zimmerman 1993; Carey et al. 1994; Vickery et al. 1994; Faanes and Lingle 1995). Woody vegetation and dense grass appear to be critical components for habitat suitability (Johnston 1947, Kupsky 1970, Lanyon 1981, Sousa 1983, Laubach 1984, Herkert 1991a). Optimal habitat was described as areas greater than 2 hectares containing dense, moderately tall grass, low to moderate shrub density with 50-75 percent of shrubs less than 1.5 meters tall, and shrub cover between 15-35 percent . Areas where most shrubs were less than 1.5 meters in height were considered too sparse in providing adequate numbers of perch sites, whereas areas where most shrubs were taller than 1.5 meters were considered too sparse in providing adequate numbers of possible nest sites. Areas with more than 75 percent shrub cover were too dense to be suitable breeding habitat (Sousa 1983).

The key to determining suitability of an area for nesting in Illinois was the availability of shrubs, trees, or other substrates that could be used as song perches; sparrows stayed within or near the forest edge, not venturing deeper than a few meters into the forest, nor farther than 12-15 meters into surrounding fields (Johnston 1947). In Illinois, preferred shrub-grassland, where shrubs and trees were less than 8 meters tall, over adjacent grassland or woodland edge; shrub-grassland offered an assemblage of grasses, forbs, trees, and shrubs to accommodate temporal shifts in the nesting and foraging preferences (Best 1974a, 1977). All available shrub-grassland habitat was encompassed within territories, whereas not all grassland or woodland edge habitat was encompassed within territories. Within riparian habitats ranging from hayfields to closed canopy woodlands in Iowa, density was positively correlated to species richness of shrubs; 67 percent of nine nests were built in shrubs, 22 percent in evergreen trees, and 11 percent in forbs (Stauffer and Best 1980, Best et al. 1981). Also in Iowa, preferred grassy areas with shrubs or low trees (Laubach 1984). In Wisconsin, density was positively correlated with percent woody cover and total number of dead stems (Sample 1989). In North Dakota, were attracted to wooded draws with a high shrub density (Faanes 1983). In Missouri, occupied grasslands and idle areas were characterized by low to intermediate canopy height (2-8 meters, never more than 8 meters), few woody stems less than 2.5 centimeters diameter at breast height (dbh) (approximately 350-700 per hectare), and moderate numbers of woody stems more than 2.5 centimeters dbh (approximately 25-50 per hectare) (Kahl et al. 1985). Moderate amounts of dense grass also are important (Sousa 1983). Optimal grass density is 50-90 percent canopy cover, which provides adequate nesting cover, abundant food sources, and ease of movement through vegetation (Sousa 1983). Optimal height of herbaceous vegetation during May and June is 16-32 centimeters; vegetation with an average height more than 40 centimeters provides suboptimal habitat and vegetation with an average height less than 5 centimeters provides inadequate concealment (Sousa 1983). In Wisconsin, preferred habitats that were relatively undisturbed, that were uncultivated, and that contained an average of 75 percent herbaceous cover (Sample 1989). In an Ohio oldfield, foraged in grasses in higher frequencies than expected based on their availability (Kupsky 1970). In Michigan, preferred to nest in residual stands of Indiangrass (SORGHASTRUM NUTANS) over residual stands of big bluestem (ANDROPOGON GERARDII) because most of the big bluestem was prostrate whereas most of the Indiangrass was upright (Best 1974a).

Nests on or near the ground in weed clumps, grass tufts, or litter usually at or near the base of woody vegetation early in the breeding season (May-June), but nest in small shrubs and saplings later in the breeding season as vegetative cover increases in height (Walkinshaw 1936, 1945; Crooks 1948; Crooks and Hendrickson 1953; Nolan 1963; Best 1974a, 1978; Evans 1978; Sousa 1983; Carey et al. 1994). Nest height ranges from 0 to 4.4 meters above ground (Walkinshaw 1936, 1945; Crooks 1948; George 1952; Ely 1957; Nolan 1963; Kupsky 1970; Best 1978; Evans 1978; Lanyon 1981; Buech 1982; Laubach 1984; Carey et al. 1994; D. E. Burhans, pers. comm.), but height is dependent upon time of season and substrate type. Based on the observations of one male that returned to the same Michigan site for 6 years, May nests were on the ground, and June and July nests averaged 26.0 centimeters and 40.5 centimeters above the ground, respectively (Walkinshaw 1945). In Iowa, six of 11 nests built in May were above ground with an average height of 16 centimeters; by June, six of 10 nests were above ground with an average height of 40 centimeters, and by July, all of the 11 nests found were above ground with an average of 51 centimeters (Crooks 1948). May nest in woody vegetation after foliage becomes dense enough to conceal nests (Crooks 1948, Nolan 1963). Best (1978), however, found preference for use of residual grasses as a nesting substrate over live grasses or woody vegetation that had leafed out. As long as isolated clumps of residual grass remained exposed from new growth, nested in residual grass; once residual grass was covered by live grasses, nested in woody vegetation.

Other important habitat features are vegetation patchiness, species richness of herbaceous and woody vegetation, and slope (Stauffer and Best 1980, Best et al.1981, Sample 1989, Vickery et al. 1994). In riparian habitats in Iowa, densities were positively correlated to horizontal patchiness of shrubs, vertical patchiness of trees, slope, and species richness of grass-like vegetation, shrubs, and evergreen trees; densities were negatively correlated to tree density and tree size, species richness of vines, and vertical stratification of vegetation (Stauffer and Best 1980, Best et al. 1981). In Maine grassland barrens, abundance was positively correlated to habitat patchiness, litter, shrub cover, and short grass, and negatively correlated to bare ground (Vickery 1993, Vickery et al. 1994). Density in Wisconsin was positively correlated to plant species richness (Sample 1989). In Iowa, all 15 breeding territories in an idle pasture were located on semi-wooded hillsides or lowlands (Crooks and Hendrickson 1953).

Ecology

Territory sizes range from 0.3 to 2.4 hectares (Walkinshaw 1945, 1968; Crooks 1948; Best 1977; Evans 1978; Laubach 1984). In Illinois, territories that included suboptimal habitats, such as grasslands devoid of woody vegetation and woodlands, were found to be larger in area than those habitats that included only optimal habitat, such as shrubby grassland (Best 1977).

Reproduction

Clutch size usually three to five. Two or sometimes three broods per year. Incubation 10-17 days (average 11.6), by female. Young tended by both parents, leave nest at 7-8 days, independent at 26-34 days.
Terrestrial Habitats
Woodland - HardwoodShrubland/chaparralOld field
Other Nations (2)
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
MontanaS4BYes
VirginiaS5Yes
KentuckyS5B,S5NYes
TennesseeS4Yes
North DakotaSNRBYes
District of ColumbiaS2B,S4NYes
WisconsinS3BYes
South DakotaS4BYes
MissouriSNRB,SNRNYes
MassachusettsS3Yes
OhioS5Yes
ColoradoS1BYes
MarylandS5Yes
North CarolinaS4B,S5NYes
ConnecticutS4BYes
PennsylvaniaS3B,S3N,S4MYes
MississippiS4B,S5NYes
TexasS5BYes
MichiganS5Yes
New HampshireS3Yes
South CarolinaS4Yes
NebraskaS5Yes
KansasS5BYes
New JerseyS3B,S4NYes
DelawareS4Yes
Rhode IslandS4BYes
LouisianaS3Yes
IowaS5B,S5NYes
New YorkS5BYes
GeorgiaS5Yes
VermontS4BYes
OklahomaSNRYes
New MexicoS3NYes
WyomingS5B,S5NYes
MaineS3BYes
IllinoisS5Yes
FloridaSNRB,SNRNYes
MinnesotaSNRBYes
West VirginiaS3B,S3NYes
ArkansasS4B,S5NYes
AlabamaS5Yes
IndianaS4Yes
CanadaN4B
ProvinceRankNative
QuebecS3BYes
OntarioS4B,S3NYes
SaskatchewanSUBYes
Roadless Areas (54)
Arkansas (13)
AreaForestAcres
Dismal CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest9,160
Dismal CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest9,160
East ForkOzark-St. Francis National Forest13,037
East ForkOzark-St. Francis National Forest13,037
Gee CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest7,957
Gee CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest7,957
Little BlakelyOuachita National Forest3,342
Pedestal RocksOzark-St. Francis National Forest21,957
Pedestal RocksOzark-St. Francis National Forest21,957
PenhookOzark-St. Francis National Forest6,566
PenhookOzark-St. Francis National Forest6,566
Richland CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest571
Richland CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest571
California (2)
AreaForestAcres
North LakeInyo National Forest2,406
Table Mtn.Inyo National Forest4,215
Illinois (12)
AreaForestAcres
Bay CreekShawnee National Forest120
Bay CreekShawnee National Forest120
Burden FallsShawnee National Forest485
Burden FallsShawnee National Forest485
Burke BranchShawnee National Forest6,231
Burke BranchShawnee National Forest6,231
Clear SpringsShawnee National Forest11
Clear SpringsShawnee National Forest11
Eagle CreekShawnee National Forest38
Eagle CreekShawnee National Forest38
Ripple HollowShawnee National Forest3,788
Ripple HollowShawnee National Forest3,788
Indiana (2)
AreaForestAcres
Mogan RidgeHoosier National Forest8,435
Mogan RidgeHoosier National Forest8,435
Missouri (4)
AreaForestAcres
Anderson Mountain Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest2,741
Anderson Mountain Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest2,741
Big Creek Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest9,277
Big Creek Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest9,277
New Hampshire (1)
AreaForestAcres
Cherry MountainWhite Mountain National Forest8,766
North Carolina (1)
AreaForestAcres
Tusquitee BaldNantahala National Forest13,670
North Dakota (3)
AreaForestAcres
Long X DivideDakota Prairie Grasslands10,099
MagpieDakota Prairie Grasslands21,281
SheyenneDakota Prairie Grasslands14,537
Tennessee (3)
AreaForestAcres
Bald MountainCherokee National Forest11,743
Flint Mill GapCherokee National Forest9,494
Stone MountainCherokee National Forest5,367
Virginia (9)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekJefferson National Forest18,274
Beartown Addition BJefferson National Forest2,985
Brush MountainJefferson National Forest6,002
Mt. PleasantGeorge Washington National Forest8,933
Northern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest9,444
Raccoon BranchJefferson National Forest4,388
Saint Marys AdditionGeorge Washington National Forest1,454
Seng MountainJefferson National Forest6,428
Shawvers Run AdditionJefferson National Forest1,927
West Virginia (4)
AreaForestAcres
Canaan LoopMonongahela National Forest7,867
Dolly Sods Roaring PlainMonongahela National Forest13,392
Little MountainMonongahela National Forest8,172
Mcgowan MountainMonongahela National Forest10,504
References (83)
  1. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1983. Check-list of North American Birds, 6th edition. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas. 877 pp.
  2. American Ornithologists' Union (AOU). 1998. Check-list of North American birds. Seventh edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. [as modified by subsequent supplements and corrections published in <i>The Auk</i>]. Also available online: http://www.aou.org/.
  3. Balda, R. P., and G. C. Bateman. 1971. Flocking and annual cycle of the piñon jay, <i>Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus</i>. Condor 73:287-302.
  4. Bart, J. 1979. Effects of acephate and Sevin on forest birds. Journal of Wildlife Management 43:544-549.
  5. Basore, N.S., L.B. Best, and J.D. Wooley, Jr. 1986. Bird nesting in Iowa no-tillage and tilled cropland. Journal of Wildlife Management 50:10-28.
  6. Bent, A.C., et al. 1968. Life histories of North American cardinals, grosbeaks, buntings, towhees, finches, sparrows, and allies. Part Two. U.S. National Museum Bulletin 237. (reprinted by Dover Publications, Inc., New York, NY).
  7. Best, L.B. 1974. Breeding ecology of the Field Sparrow (<i>Spizella pusilla</i>). Ph.D. dissertation. University of Illinois, Urbana, IL. 163 pp.
  8. Best, L.B. 1977. Territory quality and mating success in the Field Sparrow (SPIZELLA PUSILLA). Condor 79:192-204.
  9. Best, L.B. 1978. Field Sparrow reproductive success and nesting ecology. Auk 95:9-22.
  10. Best, L.B. 1979. Effects of fire on a Field Sparrow population. American Midland Naturalist 101:434-443.
  11. Best, L.B., D.F. Stauffer, A.R. Geier, K.L. Varland, J.P. Vogler, R.B. Dahlgren, and R.Q. Landers. 1981. Effects of habitat alterations on riparian plant and animal communities in Iowa. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-81/26. 55 pp.
  12. Best, L.B., H. Campa, III, K.E. Kemp, R.J. Robel, M.R. Ryan, J.A. Savidge, H.P. Weeks, Jr., and S.R. Winterstein. 1997. Bird abundance and nesting in CRP fields and cropland in the Midwest: a regional approach. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25:864-877.
  13. BirdLife International. 2004b. Threatened birds of the world 2004. CD ROM. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  14. Bryan, G.G., and L.B. Best. 1991. Bird abundance and species richness in grassed waterways in Iowa rowcrop fields. American Midland Naturalist 126:90-102.
  15. Bryan, G.G., and L.B. Best. 1994. Avian nest density and success in grassed waterways in Iowa rowcrop fields. Wildlife Society Bulletin 22:583-592.
  16. Buech, R. R. 1982. Nesting ecology and cowbird parasitism of Clay-colored, Chipping and Field Sparrows in a Christmas tree plantation. Journal of Field Ornithology 53:363-369.
  17. Cable, T.T., R.L. Schroeder, V. Brack, Jr., and P.S. Cook. 1992. Summer bird use of Kansas windbreaks. Prairie Naturalist 24:175-184.
  18. Carey, M., D.E. Burhans, and D.A. Nelson. 1994. Field Sparrow (SPIZELLA PUSILLA). In A. Poole and F. Gill, editors, The Birds of North America, No. 103. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, DC. 20 pp.
  19. Carter, M., G. Fenwick, C. Hunter, D. Pashley, D. Petit, J. Price, and J. Trapp. 1996. Watchlist 1996: For the future. Field Notes 50(3):238-240.
  20. Crooks, M.P. 1948. Life history of the Field Sparrow, SPIZELLA PUSILLA PUSILLA (Wilson). M.S. thesis. Iowa State College, Ames, IA. 109 pp.
  21. Crooks, M.P., and G.O. Hendrickson. 1953. Field Sparrow life history in central Iowa. Iowa Bird Life 23:10-13.
  22. Dechant, J.A., M.L. Sondreal, D.H. Johnson, L.D. Igl, C.M. Goldade, B.D. Parkin, and B.R. Euliss. 1999. Effects of management practices on grassland birds: Field Sparrow. Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Jamestown, ND. 19 pp.
  23. Dinsmore, J.J., T.H. Kent, D. Koenig, P.C. Peterson, and D.M. Roosa. 1984. Iowa birds. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA. 356 pp.
  24. Dodge, A. G., A. J. Fry, R. C. Blackwell, and R. M. Zink. 1995. Comparison of phylogenies derived from two molecular data sets in the avian genera PIPILO and SPIZELLA. Wilson Bulletin 107:641-654.
  25. Droege, S., and J.R. Sauer. 1990. North American Breeding Bird Survey, annual summary, 1989. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Report 90(8). 22 pp.
  26. Ely, C.A. 1957. Comparative nesting success of certain south-central Oklahoma birds. M.S. thesis. University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK. 74 pp.
  27. Evans, E.W. 1978. Nesting responses of Field Sparrows (SPIZELLA PUSILLA) to plant succession on a Michigan old field. Condor 80:34-40.
  28. Faanes, C. 1983. Breeding birds of wooded draws in western North Dakota. Prairie Naturalist 15:173-187.
  29. Faanes, C.A. 1981. Birds of the St. Croix River Valley: Minnesota and Wisconsin. North American Fauna 73. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. 196 pp.
  30. Faanes, C.A., and G.R. Lingle. 1995. Breeding birds of the Platte River Valley of Nebraska. Online. Available: http://www.npwrc.org/resource/distr/birds/platte/platte.htm.
  31. Fretwell, S. 1970. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta. Biotheor. 19: 45-52.
  32. Friedmann, H., L.F. Kiff, and S.I. Rothstein. 1977. A further contribution to knowledge of the host relations of the parasitic cowbirds. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology No. 235. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
  33. Gabrielson, I. N. 1914. Ten day's bird study in a Nebraska swamp. Wilson Bulletin. 87:51-68.
  34. George, J.L. 1952. The birds on a southern Michigan farm. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 413 pp.
  35. Good, E.E., and C.A. Dambach. 1943. Effect of land use practices on breeding bird populations in Ohio. Journal of Wildlife Management 7:291-297.
  36. Graber, R.R., and J.W. Graber. 1963. A comparative study of bird populations in Illinois, 1906-1909 and 1956-1958. Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 28:383-528.
  37. Griebel, R.L., S.L. Winter, and A.A. Steuter. 1998. Grassland birds and habitat structure in sandhills prairie management using cattle or bison plus fire. Great Plains Research 8:255-268.
  38. Gruver, B.J., and F.S. Guthery. 1986. Effects of brush control and game-bird management on nongame birds. Journal of Range Management 39:251-253.
  39. Harrison, C. 1978. A Field Guide to the Nests, Eggs and Nestlings of North American Birds. Collins, Cleveland, Ohio.
  40. Harrison, H. H. 1979. A field guide to western birds' nests. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 279 pp.
  41. Herkert, J.R. 1991b. Study suggests increases in restored prairie fragments to conserve breeding bird communities. Restoration and Management Notes 9:107.
  42. Herkert, J.R. 1991d. An ecological study of the breeding birds of grassland habitats within Illinois. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Illinois, Urbana, IL. 112 pp.
  43. Herkert, J.R. 1994a. Breeding bird communities of Midwest prairie fragments: the effects of prescribed burning and habitat-area. Natural Areas Journal 14:128-135.
  44. Herkert, J.R. 1994b. The effects of habitat fragmentation on midwestern grassland bird communities. Ecological Applications 4(3):461-471.
  45. Hopkins, R. 1983. Vegetation structure and avian communities in some rangeland types of western North Dakota. Proceedings of the North Dakota Academy of Science 37:82.
  46. Horn, H. S. 1968. The adaptive significance of colonial nesting in the Brewer's Blackbird. Ecology 49:682-694.
  47. Howell, S. N. G., and S. Webb. 1995. A guide to the birds of Mexico and northern Central America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  48. Johnsgard, P. A. 1980. A revised list of the birds of Nebraska and adjacent plains states. Occ. Papers of the NE Ornithologist's Union, No. 6.
  49. Johnston, V.R. 1947. Breeding birds of the forest edge in Illinois. Condor 49:45-53.
  50. Kahl, R. B., T. S. Baskett, J. A. Ellis, and J. N. Burroughs. 1985. Charactersitics of summer habitats of selected nongame birds in Missouri. Univeristy of Missouri-Columbia College of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Station, Research Bulletin 1056:58-60.
  51. Koford, R.R., and L.B. Best. 1996. Management of agricultural landscapes for the conservation of Neotropical migratory birds. Pages 68-88 in F. Thompson, III, editor. Management of agricultural landscapes for the conservation of Neotropical migratory birds. U.S. Forest Service, General Technical Report NC-187. North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN.
  52. Kupsky, E. 1970. Habitat utilization and invertebrate exploitation in the Field Sparrow, SPIZELLA PUSILLA. M.S. thesis. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. 65 pp.
  53. Lanyon, W.E. 1981. Breeding birds and old field succession on fallow Long Island farmland. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. Volume 168. 60 pp.
  54. Laubach, R. 1984. Breeding birds of Sheeder Prairie Preserve, west-central Iowa. Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science 91:153-163.
  55. Ligon, J. D. 1971. Late summer-autumnal breeding of the piñon jay in New Mexico. Condor 73:147-153.
  56. Moore, W. S., and R. A. Dolbeer. 1989. The use of banding recovery data to estimate dispersal rates and gene flow in avian species: case studies in the Red-winged Blackbird and Common Grackle. Condor 91:242-253.
  57. Nolan, V., Jr. 1963. Reproductive success of birds in a deciduous scrub habitat. Ecology 44:305-313.
  58. Parker III, T. A., D. F. Stotz, and J. W. Fitzpatrick. 1996. Ecological and distributional databases for neotropical birds. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  59. Petter, S.C., D.B. Miles, and M.M. White. 1990. Genetic evidence of mixed reproductive strategy in a monogamous bird. Condor 92:702-708.
  60. Poole, A. F. and F. B. Gill. 1992. The birds of North America. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. and The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA.
  61. Sample, D.W. 1989. Grassland birds in southern Wisconsin: habitat preference, population trends, and response to land use changes. M.S. thesis. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. 588 pp.
  62. Sauer, J.R., J.E. Hines, G. Gough, I. Thomas, and B.G. Peterjohn. 1997b. July 29-last update. The North American Breeding Bird Survey Results and Analysis. Version 96.4. Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD. Online. Available: http://www.mbr.nbs.gov/bbs/bbs.html.
  63. Sousa, P.J. 1983. Habitat suitability index models: Field Sparrow. FWS/OBS-82/10.62. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 14 pp.
  64. Stauffer, D.F., and L.B. Best. 1980. Habitat selection by birds of riparian communities: evaluating effects of habitat alterations. Journal of Wildlife Management 44:1-15.
  65. Stewart, R. E. 1975. Breeding Birds of North Dakota. Tri-College Center for Environmental Studies, Fargo ND.
  66. Stewart, R. E., and C. S. Robbins. 1958. Birds of Maryland and the District of Columbia. North American Fauna No. 62. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
  67. Tarvin, K. A., and G. E. Woolfenden. 1999. Blue Jay (<i>Cyanocitta cristata</i>). No. 469 IN A. Poole and F. Gill, editors. The birds of North America. The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA. 32pp.
  68. Terres, J. K. 1980. The Audubon Society encyclopedia of North American birds. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  69. Thompson, F. R., III. 1994. Temporal and spatial patterns of breeding brown-headed cowbirds in the midwestern United States. Auk 111:979-990.
  70. Vickery, P.D. 1993. Habitat selection of grassland birds in Maine. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Maine, Orono, ME. 124 pp.
  71. Vickery, P.D., M.L. Hunter, and S.M. Melvin. 1994. Effects of habitat area on the distribution of grassland birds in Maine. Conservation Biology 8:1087-1097.
  72. Walkinshaw, L.H. 1936. Notes on the Field Sparrow in Michigan. Wilson Bulletin 48:94-101.
  73. Walkinshaw, L.H. 1945. Field Sparrow, 39-54015. Bird-Banding 16:1-14.
  74. Walkinshaw, L.H. 1949. Twenty-five eggs apparently laid by a cowbird. Wilson Bulletin 61:82-85.
  75. Walkinshaw, L.H. 1968. Eastern Field Sparrow. Pages 1217-1235 in O.L. Austin, editor. Life histories of North American cardinals, grosbeaks, buntings, towhees, finches, sparrows, and allies. Dover Publications, Inc., New York, NY.
  76. Warburton, D.B., and W.D. Klimstra. 1984. Wildlife use of no-tilled and conventional tilled corn fields. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 39:327-330.
  77. Westemeier, R.L., and J.E. Buhnerkempe. 1983. Responses of nesting wildlife to prairie grass management in prairie chicken sanctuaries in Illinois. Pages 36-46 in R. Brewer, editor. Proceedings of the Eighth North American Prairie Conference. Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI.
  78. Whitmore, R.C. 1980. Reclaimed surface mines as avian habitat islands in the eastern forest. American Birds 34(1):13-14.
  79. Williams, L. 1952b. Breeding behavior of the Brewer blackbird. Condor 54:3-47.
  80. Willson, M. F. 1966. Breeding ecology of the Yellow-headed Blackbird. Ecological Monographs 36:51-77.
  81. Zimmerman, J.L. 1993b. Birds of Konza: the avian ecology of the tallgrass prairie. University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, KS. 186 pp.
  82. Zimmerman, J.L. 1997. Avian community responses to fire, grazing, and drought in the tallgrass prairie. Pages 167-180 in F.L. Knopf and F.B. Samson, editors. Ecology and conservation of Great Plains vertebrates. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
  83. Zink, R. M., and D. L. Dittmann. 1993b. Population structure and gene flow in the chipping sparrow and a hypothesis for evolution in the genus SPIZELLA. Wilson Bull. 105:399-413.