Anaxyrus woodhousii

(Girard, 1854)

Woodhouse's Toad

G5Secure Found in 62 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G5SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
MediumThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.103855
Element CodeAAABB01180
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAmphibia
OrderAnura
FamilyBufonidae
GenusAnaxyrus
Synonyms
Bufo woodhouseiBufo woodhousiiGirard, 1854
Other Common Names
Crapaud de Woodhouse (FR) Woodhouse's toad (EN)
Concept Reference
Frost, D. R. 1985. Amphibian species of the world. A taxonomic and geographical reference. Allen Press, Inc., and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas. v + 732 pp.
Taxonomic Comments
The genus Anaxyrus was split from Bufo by Frost et al. (2006). However, taxonomy within the genus Bufo remains controversial and many references still use the long-established Bufo. The misspelling of the specific epithet to woodhousei has been used widely. Three nominal subspecies frequently recognized although these warrant detailed study regarding their evolutionary status (Frost 2017).

Bufo fowleri formerly was included in this species. Sullivan et al. (1996) examined advertisement call variation and concluded that B. fowleri should be recognized as a distinct species and that subspecies australis and woodhousii should continue to be regarded as western forms of the B. woodhousii complex.

Masta et al. (2002) noted that within Anaxyrus woodhousii two distinct mtDNA clades exist which are largely concordant with the subspecies A. woodhousii woodhousii and A. woodhousii australis. Fontenot et al. (2011) discussed hybridization with eastern members of the A. americanus group and; without discussion, recognized A. velatus as a distinct species. Lannoo (2005) and Dodd (2013) discussed the substantial hybridization with A. fowleri along the eastern edge of its range. Sullivan et al. (2015) reported on hybridization of this species and A. microscaphus along the Agua Fria River of central Arizona, USA, on the basis of morphology and mtDNA (Frost 2017).

Bufo woodhousii (sensu lato) hybridizes with B. americanus in several areas (Green 1984). Bufo woodhousii and B. punctatus sometimes hybridize in Colorado (Hammerson 1999) and northern Arizona (Malmos et al. 1995). See Sullivan and Lamb (1988) and Malmos et al. (2001) for information on hybridization with B. microscaphus in central Arizona.

In a taxonomic revision that has been rejected or ignored by other herpetologists, Sanders (1987) divided B. woodhousii into multiple species as follows: B. woodhousii (Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas), B. antecessor (southeastern Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Utah, western Colorado, part of New Mexico), B. planiorum (northern and central Great Plains), B. hobarti (range of B. w. fowleri of most authors, excluding northeastern U.S.), and B. fowleri (mostly restricted to southern New England). Sanders (1986) also elevated Bufo woodhousii velatus to full species status. Dundee and Rossman (1989) regarded velatus as a racial variant of woodhousii produced from various gene introgressions from other species of toads. Conant and Collins (1991) did not recognize velatus as valid at any taxonomic rank.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2025-06-25
Change Date2001-10-11
Edition Date2025-06-25
Edition AuthorsGundy, R. L. (2025)
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
This species is widespread and abundant through the central U.S. and northern México. The population has suffered historical localized declines but appears to be relatively stable currently. It is threatened by habitat loss, road mortality, and pesticide use.
Range Extent Comments
This species is found throughout most of the central and southwestern United States and portions of adjacent northern México. There are disjunct populations in southern Washington, northern and eastern Oregon, and western Idaho (Dodd Jr. 2023). It is absent from high mountains and the West Coast. Range extent is estimated to be 4.182 million km² (GBIF 2025, RARECAT 2025).
Occurrences Comments
Represented by many and/or large occurrences throughout most of the range.
Threat Impact Comments
This species is threatened by habitat loss, road mortality, and pesticides. Development and agriculture have caused local declines across the range (Dodd Jr. 2023). Road mortality is common and can cause large localized losses (Dodd Jr. 2023). At concentrations of 100 micrograms per liter, the antimicrobial triclosan is fatal to tadpoles (Brown et al. 2013). However, at concentrations of 10 micrograms per liter, triclosan suppresses the growth of chytrid fungus (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) and increased tadpole survival (Brown et al. 2013).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Dorsum yellowish brown, grayish, or olive, with unsymmetrical pattern of small dark spots that usually contain 1-2 warts; usually a light stripe along middle of back; cranial crests (supraorbital ridges) more or less parallel between eyes; parotoid glands about twice as long as wide; maximum snout-vent length about 12.7 cm), females grow much larger than males. Mature male: during breeding season, throat dark and dark patches present on inner surfaces of first and second digits of front feet; expanded vocal sac spherical or slightly elongated; breeding call: a loud waaaaaah lasting about 1-4 seconds and emitted up to several times per minute. Juvenile: middorsal stripe absent or inconspicuous, usually some warts reddish, often misidentified as red-spotted toad. Larvae: dorsum brown or dark gray, often with light mottling/dense gold flecking; head narrow when viewed from above (snout end more pointed and overall body shape more triangular than in red-spotted toad); belly gold with black mottling; eyes dorsal; fins mainly clear with sparse pigment flecks, more in upper fin than in lower; tail musculature dark with light mottling/gold flecking, pale along lower margin; labial tooth rows 2/3; oral papillae restricted to sides of mouth; anus on midline at front end of ventral tail fin; maximum total length at least 35 mm in Colorado. Eggs: black above, tan below, 1.0-1.5 mm in diameter, deposited in long strings in a single jelly envelope; single or double row of eggs in each jelly string. Source: Hammerson (1999).

Habitat

Woodhouse's toads inhabit grasslands, desert and semi-desert shrublands, river valleys and floodplains, and agricultural areas, usually in areas with deep friable soils. When inactive, they burrow underground or hide under rocks, plants, or other cover. These toads live on land except during the brief breeding season. Breeding occurs in marshes, rain pools, ponds, lakes, reservoirs, flooded areas, stream pools or backwaters, and other bodies of water with a shallow margin lacking a strong current, including both permanent and temporary pools, generally in sites with few if any fishes.

Reproduction

Breeding occurs in spring or summer, generally after rains. Several dozen adults may aggregate for breeding. Breeding choruses may last a few weeks. Females deposit a clutch of up to 25,000 eggs in long strings. Larvae metamorphose into tiny toadlets within 1-2 months. Individuals become sexually mature usually in 2-3 years.

Terrestrial Habitats
Shrubland/chaparralSavannaGrassland/herbaceousOld fieldDesertCropland/hedgerowSuburban/orchard
Palustrine Habitats
TEMPORARY POOLHERBACEOUS WETLANDRiparian
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN5
ProvinceRankNative
WashingtonS3Yes
ArizonaS5Yes
NevadaS5Yes
MontanaS5Yes
NebraskaS5Yes
TexasS5Yes
CaliforniaSNRYes
North DakotaSNRYes
WyomingS4Yes
UtahS5Yes
New MexicoS5Yes
OklahomaSNRYes
LouisianaS5Yes
OregonS2Yes
ColoradoS5Yes
IdahoS2Yes
MissouriS5Yes
South DakotaS5Yes
KansasS5Yes
IowaS3Yes
Navajo NationS5Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
1.2 - Commercial & industrial areasRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsRestricted (11-30%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsSmall (1-10%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
4.1 - Roads & railroadsSmall (1-10%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useSmall (1-10%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingSmall (1-10%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionSmall (1-10%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
9.3 - Agricultural & forestry effluentsSmall (1-10%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
9.3.3 - Herbicides and pesticidesSmall (1-10%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (62)
Arizona (12)
AreaForestAcres
Ash CreekPrescott National Forest7,663
Black CanyonPrescott National Forest10,683
BoulderTonto National Forest40,359
GaliuroCoronado National Forest28,333
HackberryCoconino National Forest17,885
HellsgateTonto National Forest6,171
Lime CreekTonto National Forest42,568
MazatzalTonto National Forest16,942
PinalenoCoronado National Forest130,920
SalomeTonto National Forest2,932
Sierra Ancha Wilderness ContiguousTonto National Forest7,787
TumacacoriCoronado National Forest44,594
Colorado (1)
AreaForestAcres
HermosaSan Juan NF148,103
Montana (3)
AreaForestAcres
Mt. Gmt Area HCuster National Forest1,335
North AbsarokaCuster National Forest21,063
Tongue River BreaksCuster National Forest17,481
New Mexico (15)
AreaForestAcres
Alamo CanyonSanta Fe National Forest8,639
Arroyo de los FrijolesSanta Fe National Forest5,277
Bull CanyonCarson National Forest11,512
Candian RiverCibola National Forest7,149
Chama WS RiverSanta Fe National Forest4,168
Chama WildernessSanta Fe National Forest1,295
Contiguous To Gila Wilderness & Primitive AreaGila National Forest79,049
El InviernoSanta Fe National Forest29,927
GallinasSanta Fe National Forest13,208
Gila BoxGila National Forest23,759
LemitasSanta Fe National Forest8,129
Pueblo MesaSanta Fe National Forest3,540
Sierra Negra Rare II Study AreaCarson National Forest9,470
Virgin CanyonSanta Fe National Forest6,068
YoungsvilleSanta Fe National Forest6,122
North Dakota (10)
AreaForestAcres
Bullion ButteDakota Prairie Grasslands19,877
Collar / Bennett - CottonwoodDakota Prairie Grasslands19,697
Kinley PlateauDakota Prairie Grasslands16,900
Lone ButteDakota Prairie Grasslands11,465
Long X DivideDakota Prairie Grasslands10,099
MagpieDakota Prairie Grasslands21,281
Ponderosa PineDakota Prairie Grasslands7,471
Strom - HansonDakota Prairie Grasslands18,957
Tracy MountainDakota Prairie Grasslands9,756
WannaganDakota Prairie Grasslands6,026
South Dakota (3)
AreaForestAcres
Cheyenne RiverBuffalo Gap National Grassland7,572
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Red ShirtBuffalo Gap National Grassland17,007
Texas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Big CreekNational Forests in Texas1,447
Utah (16)
AreaForestAcres
0419020Ashley National Forest355,684
418025Uinta National Forest32,698
418027Uinta National Forest13,884
418029Uinta National Forest15,673
Box - Death HollowDixie National Forest3,175
Capital ReefDixie National Forest763
CottonwoodDixie National Forest6,754
FishhookDixie National Forest12,959
Happy ValleyDixie National Forest14,458
Joe LottFishlake National Forest19,826
Lone Peak ContiguousWasatch-Cache National Forest874
Long Neck Mesa / Steep Creek / Oak Creek - Steep Creek / OakDixie National Forest55,489
Oak CreekFishlake National Forest54,053
Pine Valley MountainsDixie National Forest57,673
PyramidsFishlake National Forest13,020
Signal PeakFishlake National Forest30,889
Wyoming (1)
AreaForestAcres
Sand CreekBlack Hills National Forest7,950
References (33)
  1. Blackburn, L., P. Nanjappa, and M. J. Lannoo. 2001. An Atlas of the Distribution of U.S. Amphibians. Copyright, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana, USA.
  2. Brown, J. R., T. Miller, and J. L. Kerby. 2013. Interactive effect of an emerging infectious disease and an emerging contaminant on Woodhouse's toad (<i>Anaxyrus woodhousii</i>). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 32(9): 2003–2008.
  3. Collins, J. T. 1982. Amphibians and reptiles in Kansas. Second edition. Univ. Kansas Mus. Nat. Hist., Pub. Ed. Ser. 8. xiii + 356 pp.
  4. Conant, R. and J. T. Collins. 1991. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 450 pp.
  5. Crother, B. I. (editor). 2017. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 8th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 43:1-104. [Updates in SSAR North American Species Names Database at: https://ssarherps.org/cndb]
  6. Dodd, C. K., Jr. 2013. Frogs of the United States and Canada. Volume 1. Frogs of the United States and Canada. Volume 1 :xxxi + 460.
  7. Dodd, C. K., Jr. 2023. Frogs of the United States and Canada, Second Edition. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
  8. Dundee, H. A., and D. A. Rossman. 1989. The amphibians and reptiles of Louisiana. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge.
  9. Fontenot, B. E., R. Makowsky, and P. T. Chippindale. 2011. Nuclear–mitochondrial discordance and gene flow in a recent radiation of toads. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 59: 66–80.
  10. Frost, D. R. 1985. Amphibian species of the world. A taxonomic and geographical reference. Allen Press, Inc., and The Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, Kansas. v + 732 pp.
  11. Frost, D. R. 2010. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 5.4 (8 April 2010). Electronic Database accessible at http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.php. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA.
  12. Frost, D. R. 2017. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. Electronic Database accessible at http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA.
  13. Frost, D.R. 2020. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Online: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html
  14. Frost, D.R., T. Grant, J. Faivovich, R. Bain, A. Haas, C.F.B. Haddad, R.O. de Sa´, S.C. Donnellan, C.J. Raxworthy, M. Wilkinson, A. Channing, J.A. Campbell, B.L. Blotto, P. Moler, R.C. Drewes, R.A. Nussbaum, J.D. Lynch, D. Green, and W.C. Wheeler. 2006. The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 297: 1-370.
  15. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). 2025. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) data portal. Online. Available: https://www.gbif.org/ (accessed 2025).
  16. Green, D. M. 1984. Sympatric hybridization and allozyme variation in the toads <i>Bufo americanus</i> and <i>B. fowleri</i> in southern Ontario. Copeia 1984:18-26.
  17. Hammerson, G. A. 1982b. Amphibians and reptiles in Colorado. Colorado Division of Wildlife, Denver. vii + 131 pp.
  18. Hammerson, G. A. 1999. Amphibians and reptiles in Colorado. Second edition. University Press of Colorado, Boulder. xxvi + 484 pp.
  19. Johnson, T.R. 1977. The Amphibians of Missouri. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History, Public Education Series 6: ix + 134 pp.
  20. Lannoo, M. (editor). 2005. Amphibian declines: the conservation status of United States species. University of California Press, Berkeley. xxi + 1094 pp.
  21. Malmos, K. B., B. K. Sullivan, and T. Lamb. 2001. Calling behavior and directional hybridization between two toads (<i>Bufo microscaphus</i> X <i>B. woodhousei</i>) in Arizona. Evolution. 55:626-630.
  22. Malmos, K., R. Reed, and B. Starrett. 1995. Hybridization between <i>Bufo woodhousii</i> and <i>Bufo punctatus</i> from the Grand Canyon region of Arizona."The Great Basin Naturalist 55(4):368-371.
  23. Masta, S. E., B. K. Sullivan, T. Lamb, and E. J. Routman. 2002. Molecular systematics, hybridization, and phylogeography of the <i>Bufo americanus</i> complex in eastern North America. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 24:302–314.
  24. Mulcahy, D. G., M. R. Cummer, J. R. Mendelson, III, B. L. Williams, and P. C. Ustach. 2002. Status and distribution of two species of <i>Bufo </i>in the northeastern Bonneville basin of Idaho and Utah. Herpetological Review 33:287-289.
  25. <p>NatureServe's Rapid Analysis of Rarity and Endangerment Conservation Assessment Tool (RARECAT). 2025. Version: 2.1.1 (released April 04, 2025).</p>
  26. Sanders, O. 1986. The heritage of <i>Bufo woodhousei</i> Girard in Texas. Baylor Univ., Occas. Pap. Strecker Mus. No. 1. 28 pp.
  27. Sanders, O. 1987. Evolutionary hybridization and speciation in North American indigenous bufonids. Strecker Museum, Baylor Univ., Waco, Texas. 110 pp.
  28. Stebbins, R. C. 1985a. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. xiv + 336 pp.
  29. Stebbins, R. C. 2003. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
  30. Sullivan, B. K. and T. Lamb. 1988. Hybridization between the toads <i>Bufo microscaphus</i> and <i>Bufo woodhousii</i> in Arizona: variation in release calls and allozymes. Herpetologica 44:325-333.
  31. Sullivan, B. K., J. A. Wooten, T. D. Schwaner, K. O. Sullivan, and M. Takahashi. 2015. Thirty years of hybridization between toads along the Agua Fria River in Arizona: I. Evidence from morphology and mtDNA. Journal of Herpetology 49:150–156.
  32. Sullivan, B. K., K. B. Malmos, and M. F. Given. 1996. Systematics of the <i>Bufo woodhousii</i> complex (Anura: Bufonidae): advertisement call variation. Copeia 1996:274-280.
  33. Washington Herp Atlas. 2009 (map products updated March 2017). A cooperative effort of Washington Natural Heritage Program, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S.D.I. Bureau of Land Management, and U.S. Forest Service. 250 pp.