Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.104648
Element CodeAAABA01020
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassAmphibia
OrderAnura
FamilyAscaphidae
GenusAscaphus
Other Common NamesGrenouille à queue des Rocheuses (FR) Grenouille-à-queue des Rocheuses (FR) Inland Tailed Frog (EN)
Concept ReferenceNielson, M., K. Lohman, and J. Sullivan. 2001. Phylogeography of the tailed frog (Ascaphus truei): implications for the biogeography of the Pacific Northwest. Evolution 55:147-160.
Taxonomic CommentsNielson et al. (2001) examined phylogeography of A. truei using mtDNA data. Based on the results of this study and on previous allozyme and morphological data, they recommended that the coastal and inland segments of A. truei be recognized as distinct species, A. truei (coastal) and A. montanus (inland). See also Ritland et al. (2000) for information on tailed frog phylogeography based on genetic variation.
Tailed frogs sometimes are placed in the family Leiopelmatidae. Stebbins (1985) placed them in the family Ascaphidae.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodExpertise without calculation
Review Date2016-08-01
Change Date2001-05-15
Edition Date2011-05-02
Edition AuthorsGaines, E., and G. Hammerson
Threat ImpactMedium
Range Extent20,000-2,500,000 square km (about 8000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences81 - 300
Rank ReasonsModerately widespread and locally common in the northern Rocky Mountain region; trend is uncertain; may be threatened in some areas by habitat loss/degradation resulting from timber harvest; better information on current status and response to current timber harvest practices is needed.
Range Extent CommentsExtreme southeastern British Columbia south through western Montana to extreme southeastern Washington, northeastern Oregon, and south-central Idaho (Leonard et al. 1993, Nielson et al. 2001, Stebbins 2003). Elevational range in Oregon mainly 1,100-2,100 m (occurrence data); ranges to at least 2,134 m in the Wallowa Mountains in northeastern Oregon (Leonard et al. 1993). Occurs at elevations as low as 550 m or less in British Columbia.
Occurrences CommentsMany occurrences in Montana and Idaho.
In British Columbia (Linda Dupuis, pers. comm., 2001), there are two small population groups, isolated from one another by the Rocky Mountain Trench (dry habitat). The populations to the east of the trench includes 7 occurrences. There is only one other suitable creek within a 25-km radius of this cluster of occurrences. They are all found in unstable channels and their populations are low. Probably this population would not survive another logging rotation. The populations to the west of the Trench are faring better. There are 12 occurrences, but these are all clustered, have low densities, are in less than ideal creeks, and are also vulnerable to the next logging rotation.
Threat Impact CommentsTailed frogs are sensitive to logging and road building (Leonard et al. 1993). Logging practices that increase water temperatures and siltation may have an adverse effect on tailed frog populations (Nussbaum et al. 1983). See also Bury and Corn (1988) and Corn and Bury (1989) for information on negative effects of timber harvest. Despite negative effects of logging, tailed frogs frequently occur in many young forests that have been harvested one or more times in the past. Sensitivity to timber harvest may depend on surface geology and harvest practices (Adams and Bury 2002, Welsh and Lind 2002). Diller and Wallace (1999) emphasized that current timber harvest practices are not as detrimental as those used in the past. Information on the responses of tailed frogs to timber harvest are based primarily on the coastal tailed frog, A. truei. Further information is needed on the responses of A. montanus.
Apparently low dispersal abilities may limit rate of recovery of depleted populations