Myotis sodalis

Miller and Allen, 1928

Indiana Myotis

G2Imperiled Found in 164 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
Near threatenedIUCN
Very highThreat Impact
Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Indiana Myotis (Myotis sodalis). Photo by Amiel Hopkins, CC BY-NC 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Amiel Hopkins, CC BY-NC 4.0
Indiana Myotis (Myotis sodalis). Photo by Amiel Hopkins, CC BY-NC 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Amiel Hopkins, CC BY-NC 4.0
Indiana Myotis (Myotis sodalis). Photo by Amiel Hopkins, CC BY-NC 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Amiel Hopkins, CC BY-NC 4.0
Indiana Myotis (Myotis sodalis). Photo by Smaturin, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, via iNaturalist.
Smaturin, CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.100428
Element CodeAMACC01100
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNNear threatened
Endemicendemic to a single nation
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassMammalia
OrderChiroptera
FamilyVespertilionidae
GenusMyotis
Other Common Names
Chauve-souris de l'Indiana (FR) Indiana bat (EN) Indiana Bat (EN)
Concept Reference
Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.
Conservation Status
Rank MethodLegacy Rank calculation - Excel v3.1x
Review Date2015-03-12
Change Date1996-11-04
Edition Date2015-03-23
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G.
Threat ImpactVery high
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Rank Reasons
Wide range in the eastern United States; total population exceeded 500,000 in 2013; most of the population hibernates in relatively few caves, which makes the species exceptionally vulnerable to disturbance by humans and to local habitat (cave) changes; suitable summer habitat (forest) remains plentiful, and recent surveys have found numerous maternity colonies; species is vulnerable to white-nose syndrome, and this rapidly spreading fungal disease is projected to cause massive declines in M. sodalis populations in the near future.
Range Extent Comments
The overall range extends west to the western Ozark region in eastern Oklahoma (Saugey et al. 1990) and Iowa (Clark et al. 1987), north and east to southern Wisconsin and Michigan (Evers 1992, Kurta and Teramino 1994, Kurta 1995), New York, New England, and northern New Jersey, and south to northern Alabama and Arkansas, with accidental or nonregular occurrences outside this range (e.g., Florida, Marks and Marks 2006). The species has disappeared from or greatly declined in most of its former range in the northeastern United States (e.g., Trombulak et al. 2001).

Most capture records of reproductively active females and juveniles have occurred in glaciated portions of the Midwest including southern Iowa, northern Missouri, much of Illinois, most of Indiana, southern Michigan, and western Ohio, and in Kentucky, with a growing number of maternity records documented in New York, New Jersey, and Vermont in recent years (USFWS 2009). Maternity colonies also exist to the south in Arkansas (Brandebura et al. 2011) and in heavily forested regions to at least eastern Tennessee and western North Carolina (Britzke et al. 2003). However, the geographic locations of the majority of Indiana bat maternity colonies remain unknown (USFWS 2009).

Northern populations migrate south to Alabama, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana, Missouri, and West Virginia for winter. In winter, the species is apparently absent from Michigan, Ohio, and northern Indiana where suitable caves and mines are unknown. About 42 percent of the total population hibernates in southern Indiana (USFWS 2013).
Occurrences Comments
The number of distinct occurrences has not been determined using standardized criteria. This species is represented by many maternity occurrences and hibernacula. As of 2007, USFWS had records of extant winter populations at approximately 281 hibernacula in 19 states and 269 maternity colonies in 16 states (USFWS 2009). However, based on hibernaculum counts and the fact that maternity colonies rarely include more than 100 adult females and their young (e.g., Gardner et al. 1996), the total number of maternity colonies must be very large (at least a few thousand) (USFWS 2009).

Individuals from particular hibernacula may split and form multiple maternity colonies and these colonies can be made up of bats from multiple hibernacula; individuals from a particular hibernaculum may use many roost trees in summer (Britzke et al. 2006; Britzke, pers. comm., 2015).
Threat Impact Comments
White-nose syndrome (WNS) has quickly and significantly raised the degree of threat against the species and has lowered the species overall recovery potential (USFWS 2009). A model developed by Thogmartin et al. (2013) projected that WNS will cause a severe range-wide decline (> 86 percent) in the M. sodalis population over the next decade, with few of the remaining wintering populations exceeding 250 females.

The original (pre-WNS) recovery plan (USFWS 1983) identified threats or "causes of decline" as: natural hazards (i.e., flooding, freezing, mine ceiling collapse); human disturbance and vandalism at hibernacula (identified as "the most serious cause of Indiana bat decline"); deforestation and stream channelization; pesticide poisoning; indiscriminate scientific collecting; handling and banding of hibernating bats by biologists; commercialization of hibernacula; exclusion of bats from caves by poorly designed gates; man-made changes in hibernacula microclimate (blocking or adding entrances and/or by poorly designed gates; and flooding of caves by dams/reservoir developments. See also Twente (1955), Hall (1962), Mohr (1972), Engel et al. (1976), Brady et al. (1982), Richter et al. (1993), and Johnson et al. (1998) for discussions of these threats. According to USFWS (2009), several of these threats have largely been addressed and are no longer adversely affecting the species to the degree or extent that they once had (e.g., human disturbance at hibernacula, indiscriminate scientific collecting, banding of hibernating bats, commercialization of hibernacula, and poorly designed cave gates).

The 2007 recovery plan (USFWS 2007) identified and expounded upon additional threats including: quarrying and mining operations (summer and winter habitat); loss/degradation of summer/migration/swarming habitat; loss of forest habitat connectivity; some silvicultural practices and firewood collection; disease and parasites; predation; competition with other bat species; environmental contaminants (not just "pesticides"); climate change; and collisions with man-made objects (e.g., wind turbines). USFWS (2009) stated that with few exceptions all of the identified threats were still affecting the species to varying degrees.

According to USFWS (2009), the most significant rangewide threats to the species at that time were habitat loss/degradation, forest fragmentation, winter disturbance, and environmental contaminants. The greatest single cause of loss of forest habitat within the range of the species is urbanization and development (USFWS 2007), but the forested habitat used by this species remains extensive and probably is not limiting the population. Disturbance of hibernating bats by cavers remains a threat in many hibernacula, but progress has been made in reducing the number of caves in which disturbance threatens hibernating bats (USFWS 2007, 2009). The effects of climate change on M. sodalis populations are uncertain (USFWS 2009), as are the population effects of environmental contaminants.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Pelage very fine and fluffy, dull grayish chestnut above (hair tips slightly glossy; basal two-thirds blackish, followed by a grayish band and cinnamon tip), pinkish white underparts; membranes and ears blackish-brown; total length 75-102 mm; tail length 27-44 mm; wingspread 240-267 mm; length of head and body 41-49 mm; ear 10-15 mm, does not extend past end of nose when laid forward; forearm 36-41 mm; calcar obviously keeled (not always evident in dried study skins); hind foot small, 7-11 mm, hairs do not extend beyond toes; mass 5-11 g; greatest length of skull 14.2-15.0 mm, usually greater than 14.5 mm; length of maxillary toothrow 5.2-5.6 mm; complete sagittal crest usually present in adults; dentition I 2/3, C 1/1, P 3/3, M 3/3 (Hall 1981, Barbour and Davis 1969, Sealander 1979).

Diagnostic Characteristics

Differs from M. grisescens, M. lucifugus, M. velifer, and M. austroriparius in having an obviously keeled calcar. Has shorter ears than does M. septentrionalis (in which the ears extend more than 2 mm beyond the nose when laid forward). Lacks the distinct black face mask of M. leibii, which has a shorter skull (greatest length 13.1-14.7 mm, usually less than 14.5 mm). Skull is smaller, narrower, and lower than that of M. lucifugus. Myotis lucifugus has long hairs on toes, foot length greater than 10 mm, fur with a glossy sheen. Myotis grisescens has fur the same color from base to tip, and web attached to ankle. Myotis austroriparius has long hairs on toes and foot is greater than 10 mm. Pipistrellus subflavus is smaller, with a lightly colored forearm, partially furred tail membrane, and paler fur. See Barbour and Davis (1969).

Habitat

Myotis sodalis hibernates primarily in caves (about 70 percent of population), also in mines and in one dam and one tunnel (USFWS 2009). Maternity sites generally are behind loose bark of dead or dying trees or in tree cavities (Menzel et al. 2001). Foraging habitats include riparian areas, upland forests, ponds, and fields (Menzel et al. 2001), but forested landscapes are the most important habitat in agricultural landscapes (Menzel et al. 2005).

In hibernation, limestone caves with pools are preferred. Hall (1962) noted that preferred caves are of medium size with large, shallow passageways. Roosts usually are in the coldest part of the cave. Preferred sites have a mean midwinter air temperature of 4-8 C (tolerates much broader range) (Hall 1962, Henshaw and Folk 1966), well below that of caves that are not chosen (Clawson et al. 1980). Roost sites within caves may shift such that bats remain in the coldest area (Clawson et al. 1980); individuals may move from a location deeper in the cave to a site nearer the entrance as the cold season progresses; they may move away from areas that go below freezing. Hibernation in the coldest parts of the cave ensures a sufficiently low metabolic rate so that the fat reserves last through the six-month hibernation period (Henshaw and Folk 1966, Humphrey 1978). Relative humidity in occupied caves ranges from 66 to 95% and averages 87% throughout the year (Barbour and Davis 1969, Clawson et al. 1980). Because of these requirements, M. sodalis is highly selective of hibernacula.

During the fall, when these bats swarm and mate at their hibernacula, males roost in trees nearby during the day and fly to the cave during the night. In Kentucky, Kiser and Elliott (1996) found males roosting primarily in dead trees on upper slopes and ridgetops within 2.4 km of their hibernaculum. During September in West Virginia, males roosted within 5.6 km in trees near ridgetops, and often switched roost trees from day to day (C. Stihler, West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, pers. obs., October 1996, cited in USFWS 1999). Fall roost trees tend to be in sunnier areas rather than being shaded (J. MacGregor, pers. obs., October 1996, cited in USFWS 1999).

In summer, habitat consists of wooded or semi-wooded areas, often but not always along streams. Solitary females or small maternity colonies bear their offspring in hollow trees or under loose bark of living or dead trees (Humphrey et al. 1977, Garner and Gardner 1992). Known roost tree species include elm, oak, beech, hickory, maple, ash, sassafras, birch, sycamore, locust, aspen, cottonwood, pine, and hemlock (Cope et al. 1974, Humphrey et al. 1977, Garner and Gardner 1992, Britzke et al. 2003, Britzke et al. 2006).

Humphrey et al. (1977) determined that dead trees are preferred roost sites and that trees standing in sunny openings are attractive because the air spaces and crevices under the bark are warmer. In Illinois, Garner and Gardner (1992) found that typical roosts were beneath the exfoliating bark of dead trees; other roost sites were beneath the bark of living trees and in cavities of dead trees. Kurta et al. (1993) found a large maternity colony in a dead, hollow, barkless, unshaded sycamore tree in a pasture in Illinois. In Michigan, a reproductively active colony occupied eight different roost trees (all green ash), all of which were exposed to direct sunlight throughout the day; bats roosted beneath loose bark of dead trees (Kurta et al. 1993). In western Virginia, a male used a mature, live, shagbark hickory tree as a diurnal roost; the bat foraged primarily among tree canopies of an 80-year-old oak-hickory forest (Hobson and Holland 1995). In Missouri, primary maternity roosts were in standing dead trees exposed to direct sunlight; there were 1-3 primary roosts per colony; alternate roosts were in living and dead trees that typically were within the shaded forest interior (Callahan et al. 1997). In eastern Tennessee and western North Carolina, several maternity colonies were in sun-exposed conifer snags (roost sites were above the surrounding canopy); some of these snags fell and were not used in subsequent years (Britzke et al. 2003). Rarely maternity colonies have been found in crevices in utility poles or in bat boxes (e.g., Ritzi et al. 2005). See Menzel et al. (2001) for a review of forest habitat relationships.

Though maternity sites have been reported as occurring mainly in riparian and floodplain forests (Humphrey et al. 1977, Garner and Gardner 1992), recent studies indicate that upland habitats are used by maternity colonies much more extensively than previously reported. Garner and Gardner (1992) reported that 38 of 51 roost trees in Illinois occurred in uplands and 13 trees were in floodplains. Of the 47 trees in forested habitat, 27 were in areas having a closed (80-100%) canopy, and 15 were in areas having an intermediate (30-80%) canopy. A single roost tree was found in the following types of habitat: a heavily grazed ridgetop pasture with a few scattered dead trees, a partially wooded swine feedlot, a palustrine wetland with emergent vegetation, a forested island in the Mississippi river, and a clearcut around a segment of an intermittent stream where dead trees were retained for wildlife. Roosts were not found in forests with open canopies (10-30%) or in old fields with less than or equal to 10% canopy cover.

In Illinois, Indiana bats used the same, evidently traditional, roost sites in successive summers. Recapture of the same individuals within traditional roost sites during subsequent summers suggests site fidelity (Garner and Gardner 1992, Gardner et al. 1996).

Relatively few individuals roost in caves at the mouths of which late summer swarming occurs (Cope and Humphrey 1977, Barbour and Davis 1969).

Ecology

Hibernating individuals characteristically form large, compact clusters of as many as 5,000 individuals (averaging 500 to 1,000 bats per cluster; Hall 1962); the clusters may average 300 individuals per square foot (LaVal and LaVal 1980). Clusters form in the same area in a cave each year, with more than one cluster possible in a particular cave (Hall 1962, Engel et al. 1976). Clustering may perform certain functions, such as protecting the central individuals from temperature changes (Twente 1955), reducing the sensitivity of most bats to external disturbance (Hall 1962), or rapid arousal and escape from predators (Humphrey 1978).

Female survivorship in an Indiana population was 76% for ages 1 to 6 years, and 66% for ages 6 to 10 years (Humphrey and Cope 1977). Male survivorship was 70% for ages 1 to 6 years and 36% for ages 6 to 10 years. Maximum ages of banded individuals were 15 years for females and 14 years for males.

Reproduction

Mating occurs from late August to early October prior to hibernation, or in spring. Bats assemble at cave entrances at dusk and dawn in late August and September. Such staging is believed to facilitate breeding and reduce the chances of inbreeding in small summer colonies (Humphrey and Cope 1977). Males arrive first at the staging areas. Females begin to appear as early as late July, and the number of bats and the proportion of females rise to a maximum in early September. Ovulation takes place after the bats arouse in spring. Delayed fertilization (from sperm stored during the autumn matings) occurs in most reproductively active females (Guthrie 1933). Young are born in June-July. Litter size is 1. Young first fly at 25-37 days. Maximum longevity is about 15 years. A maternity roost in Illinois included up to 95 individuals (including juveniles) (Kurta et al. 1993). Main tree roost in Michigan was inhabited by up to 45 individuals (Kurta et al. 1993).

In Indiana, Humphrey et al. (1977) studied a maternity colony that contained between 25 and 28 reproductively active females. Females arrived at the roost sites starting on May 4, with the majority arriving in late May. Each female bore a single young between June 25 and July 4. The young required about 25 to 37 days before learning to fly; this time interval was dependent on weather, particularly the temperature. Mortality between birth and weaning was about 8%. The authors observed mothers moving non-volant young to warmer roost spots. Apparently, the first flights of the young were tandem flights with the mother.
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandForest - HardwoodForest - MixedWoodland - HardwoodAerial
Palustrine Habitats
FORESTED WETLANDRiparianAerial
Other Nations (1)
United StatesN2
ProvinceRankNative
MassachusettsSHYes
GeorgiaS1Yes
ConnecticutSHNYes
West VirginiaS1Yes
MichiganS1Yes
ArkansasS1Yes
PennsylvaniaS1Yes
IowaS1Yes
MarylandS1Yes
KentuckyS1Yes
North CarolinaS1Yes
VirginiaS1Yes
New YorkS1Yes
AlabamaS2Yes
VermontS1Yes
South CarolinaSUYes
OhioS1Yes
MissouriS1Yes
OklahomaS1Yes
IndianaS1Yes
New JerseyS1Yes
TennesseeS1Yes
IllinoisS1Yes
MississippiS1BYes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentNegligible (<1%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
1.1 - Housing & urban areasSmall (1-10%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureNegligible (<1%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
2.1 - Annual & perennial non-timber cropsSmall (1-10%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningNegligible (<1%)High (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsNegligible or <1% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useSmall (1-10%)Negligible or <1% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingSmall (1-10%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceSmall (1-10%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesUnknownExtreme - seriousHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsNegligible (<1%)High (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive (71-100%)Extreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
10 - Geological eventsNegligible (<1%)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)UnknownHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (164)
Alabama (5)
AreaForestAcres
Blue MountainTalladega National Forest4,986
Cheaha ATalladega National Forest236
Cheaha BTalladega National Forest741
Oakey MountainTalladega National Forest6,129
Reed BrakeTalladega National Forest621
Arkansas (14)
AreaForestAcres
Bear MountainOuachita National Forest1,910
Blue MountainOuachita National Forest9,755
Brush HeapOuachita National Forest4,205
Clifty CanyonOzark-St. Francis National Forest1,963
Devils CanyonOzark-St. Francis National Forest1,877
Dismal CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest9,160
East ForkOzark-St. Francis National Forest13,037
Gee CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest7,957
Hurricane CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest2,279
Indian CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest7,855
Little BlakelyOuachita National Forest3,342
Pedestal RocksOzark-St. Francis National Forest21,957
PenhookOzark-St. Francis National Forest6,566
Richland CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest571
Georgia (7)
AreaForestAcres
Foster BranchChattahoochee National Forest171
Indian Grave GapChattahoochee National Forest1,020
Ken MountainChattahoochee National Forest527
Lance CreekChattahoochee National Forest9,025
Patterson GapChattahoochee National Forest1,186
Pink KnobChattahoochee National Forest12,127
Rocky MountainChattahoochee National Forest4,269
Idaho (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekCaribou-Targhee National Forest118,582
Illinois (6)
AreaForestAcres
Bay CreekShawnee National Forest120
Burden FallsShawnee National Forest485
Burke BranchShawnee National Forest6,231
Clear SpringsShawnee National Forest11
Eagle CreekShawnee National Forest38
Ripple HollowShawnee National Forest3,788
Indiana (1)
AreaForestAcres
Mogan RidgeHoosier National Forest8,435
Kentucky (1)
AreaForestAcres
WolfpenDaniel Boone National Forest2,835
Michigan (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bear SwampHuron-Manistee National Forest3,915
Missouri (5)
AreaForestAcres
Anderson Mountain Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest2,741
Big Creek Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest9,277
Irish Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest1,226
Spring Creek Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest4,899
Swan Creek Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest7,310
North Carolina (21)
AreaForestAcres
Bald MountainPisgah National Forest11,085
Barkers Creek (addition)Nantahala National Forest975
Big Indian (addition)Nantahala National Forest1,155
Boteler PeakNantahala National Forest4,205
Cheoah BaldNantahala National Forest7,795
Cherry Cove (addition)Nantahala National Forest836
Chunky Gal (addition)Nantahala National Forest3,336
Graveyard Ridge (addition)Pisgah National Forest1,958
Harper CreekPisgah National Forest7,325
Little Indian (addition)Nantahala National Forest640
Lost CovePisgah National Forest5,944
Middle Prong AdditionPisgah National Forest1,852
Overflow CreekNantahala National Forest3,379
Sam Knob (addition)Pisgah National Forest2,576
Sharptop Ridge (addition)Nantahala National Forest600
Slide HollowPisgah National Forest193
SnowbirdNantahala National Forest8,489
Tusquitee BaldNantahala National Forest13,670
Wesser BaldNantahala National Forest4,061
Wilson CreekPisgah National Forest4,863
Yellowhammer Branch (add.)Nantahala National Forest1,255
Oklahoma (1)
AreaForestAcres
Beech CreekOuachita National Forest8,303
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Tennessee (15)
AreaForestAcres
Bald MountainCherokee National Forest11,743
Bald River Gorge AdditionCherokee National Forest1,728
Beaver Dam CreekCherokee National Forest5,070
Big Laurel Branch AdditionCherokee National Forest5,577
Brushy RidgeCherokee National Forest7,469
Devil's BackboneCherokee National Forest4,287
Flint Mill GapCherokee National Forest9,494
Joyce Kilmer Slickrock Add.Cherokee National Forest1,396
London Bridge BranchCherokee National Forest3,387
Rogers RidgeCherokee National Forest4,738
Sampson Mountain AdditionCherokee National Forest3,064
Slide HollowCherokee National Forest4,057
Stone MountainCherokee National Forest5,367
Sycamore CreekCherokee National Forest6,984
Upper Bald RiverCherokee National Forest9,202
Vermont (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bread LoafGreen Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests1,768
Virginia (59)
AreaForestAcres
Adams PeakGeorge Washington National Forest7,135
Barbours Creek AdditionJefferson National Forest733
Bear CreekJefferson National Forest18,274
Beards MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,505
Beartown Addition AJefferson National Forest1,370
Beartown Addition BJefferson National Forest2,985
Beaver Dam CreekJefferson National Forest1,135
Broad RunJefferson National Forest10,971
Brush MountainJefferson National Forest6,002
Brush Mountain EastJefferson National Forest4,916
Brushy MountainJefferson National Forest4,168
Crawford MountainGeorge Washington National Forest9,892
Dolly AnnGeorge Washington National Forest7,855
Dry River (VA)George Washington National Forest1
Elliott KnobGeorge Washington National Forest9,380
Garden MountainJefferson National Forest3,960
Gum RunGeorge Washington National Forest12,620
Hoop HoleJefferson National Forest4,652
Horse HeavenJefferson National Forest4,748
Hunting Camp Little Wolf CreekJefferson National Forest8,953
JerkemtightGeorge Washington National Forest16,687
Kelley MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,590
Kimberling Creek Addition AJefferson National Forest89
Kimberling Creek Addition BJefferson National Forest196
Laurel ForkGeorge Washington National Forest9,967
Lewis Fork AdditionJefferson National Forest749
Little AlleghanyGeorge Washington National Forest10,215
Little Dry Run AdditionJefferson National Forest2,204
Little RiverGeorge Washington National Forest27,292
Little Walker MountainJefferson National Forest9,818
Little Wilson Creek Addition AJefferson National Forest78
Little Wilson Creek Addition BJefferson National Forest1,725
Long SpurJefferson National Forest6,417
Mill MountainGeorge Washington National Forest10,840
Mottesheard (VA)Jefferson National Forest2,596
Mountain Lake Addition AJefferson National Forest1,469
Mountain Lake Addition B (VA)Jefferson National Forest3,405
Mountain Lake Addition CJefferson National Forest494
New London Bridge BranchJefferson National Forest844
North Fork PoundJefferson National Forest4,757
North MountainJefferson National Forest8,377
Northern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest9,444
Oak KnobGeorge Washington National Forest10,882
Oliver MountainGeorge Washington National Forest13,090
Patterson MountainJefferson National Forest4,865
Peters Mountain Addition A (VA)Jefferson National Forest1,268
Peters Mountain Addition BJefferson National Forest2,909
Price MountainJefferson National Forest9,119
Raccoon BranchJefferson National Forest4,388
Ramseys Draft AdditionGeorge Washington National Forest12,781
Rogers RunJefferson National Forest181
Rough Mountian AdditionGeorge Washington National Forest1,142
Saint Marys AdditionGeorge Washington National Forest1,454
Seng MountainJefferson National Forest6,428
Shawvers Run AdditionJefferson National Forest1,927
SkidmoreGeorge Washington National Forest5,641
Southern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest11,985
Three RidgesGeorge Washington National Forest4,745
Three SistersGeorge Washington National Forest8,149
West Virginia (25)
AreaForestAcres
Canaan LoopMonongahela National Forest7,867
Cheat MountainMonongahela National Forest8,191
Cranberry AdditionMonongahela National Forest11,123
Cranberry Glades Botanical AreaMonongahela National Forest785
Dolly Sods Roaring PlainMonongahela National Forest13,392
Dry ForkMonongahela National Forest657
Dry River (WV)George Washington National Forest7,331
East Fork Of GreenbrierMonongahela National Forest7,167
Falls Of Hills CreekMonongahela National Forest6,925
Gauley MountainMonongahela National Forest13,285
Glady ForkMonongahela National Forest3,239
Laurel ForkMonongahela National Forest1,172
Little Allegheny MountainMonongahela National Forest10,514
Little MountainMonongahela National Forest8,172
Marlin MountainMonongahela National Forest9,344
Mcgowan MountainMonongahela National Forest10,504
Middle MountainMonongahela National Forest19,020
Mottesheard (WV)Jefferson National Forest3,964
Mountain Lake Addition B (WV)Jefferson National Forest557
North Mountain HopevilleMonongahela National Forest6,525
Peters Mountain Addition A (WV)Jefferson National Forest343
Seneca CreekMonongahela National Forest22,287
Spice RunMonongahela National Forest6,251
Tea Creek MountainMonongahela National Forest8,295
Turkey MountainMonongahela National Forest6,421
References (102)
  1. American Society of Mammalogists (ASM). 2025. Mammal Diversity Database (Version 1.13) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10595931. Online. Available: https://www.mammaldiversity.org/
  2. Baker, R. H. 1983. Michigan mammals. Michigan State University Press. 642 pp.
  3. Barbour, R. W., and W. H. Davis. 1969. Bats of America. The University of Kentucky Press, Lexington, Kentucky. 286 pp.
  4. Brack, V., Jr., and K. Tyrell. 1990. A model of the habitat used by the Indiana bat (MYOTIS SODALIS) during the summer in Indiana: 1990 field studies. Indiana Dept. Natural Resources, Div. Fish Wildlife, Endangered Species Program, Project E-1-4, Study No. 8. 45 pp.
  5. Brack, V., Jr., and R. K. LaVal. 1985. Food habits of the Indiana bat in Missouri. J. Mammalogy 66:308-315.
  6. Bradley, R.D., L.K. Ammerman, R.J. Baker, L.C. Bradley, J.A. Cook. R.C. Dowler, C. Jones, D.J. Schmidly, F.B. Stangl Jr., R.A. Van den Bussche and B. Würsig. 2014. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 2014. Museum of Texas Tech University Occasional Papers 327:1-28. Available at: http://www.nsrl.ttu.edu/publications/opapers/ops/OP327.pdf
  7. Brady, J., R. L. Clawson, R. K. LaVal, T. Kunz, M. D. Tuttle, and D. Wilson. 1983. Recovery plan for the Indiana bat. U. S. Fish Wildlife Service, Rockville, Maryland. 94 pp.
  8. Brady, J., T. Kunz, M. D. Tuttle, and D. Wilson. 1982. Gray Bat Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish Wildlife Service 140 pp.
  9. Brandebura, S. C., E. L. Pannkuk, and T. S. Risch. 2011. Indiana bat <i>(Myotis sodalis</i>) maternity colonies in Arkansas. Southeastern Naturalist 10:529-532.
  10. Britzke, E. R., A. C. Hicks, S. L. von Oettingen, and S. R. Darling. 2006. Description of spring roost trees used by female Indiana bats (<i>Myotis sodalis</i>) in the Lake Champlain Valley of Vermont and New York. American Midland Naturalist 155:181-187.
  11. Britzke, E. R., M. J. Harvey, and S. C. Loeb. 2003. Indiana bat, <i>Myotis sodalis</i>, maternity roosts in the southern United States. Southeastern Naturalist 2:235-242.
  12. Caire, W., J. D. Tyler, B. P. Glass, and M. A. Mares. 1989. Mammals of Oklahoma. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. Oklahoma. 567 pp.
  13. Callahan, E. V., R. D. Drobney, ad R. L. Clawson. 1997. Selection of summer roosting sites by Indiana bats (MYOTIS SODALIS) in Missouri. Journal of Mammalogy 78:818-825.
  14. Choate, J. R., J. K. Jones, Jr., and C. Jones. 1994. Handbook of mammals of the south-central states. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge. 304 pp.
  15. Clark, B. K., J. B. Bowles, and B. S. Clark. 1987. Summer status of the endangered Indiana bat in Iowa. Amer. Midl. Nat. 118(1):32-9.
  16. Clawson, R. L. 2002. Trends in population size and current status. Pages 2-8 in A. Kurta and J. Kennedy, editors. The Indiana bat: biology and management of an endangered species. Bat Conservation International, Austin, Texas. 253 pp.
  17. Clawson, R. L. 2004. National status of the Indiana bat. Pages 1-6 in K. C. Vories and A. Harrington, editors. Indiana bat and coal mining: a technical interactive forum. U.S. Department of Interior, Office of Surface Mining, Alton, Illinois, and Coal Research Center, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois.
  18. Clawson, R. L., R. K. LaVal, M. L. LaVal, and W. Claire. 1980. Clustering behavior of hibernating <i>Myotis sodalis</i> in Missouri, USA. Journal of Mammalogy 61:245-53.
  19. Cope, J. B., and S. R. Humphrey. 1977. Spring and autumn swarming behavior in the Indiana bat, MYOTIS SODALIS. Journal of Mammalogy 58:93-5.
  20. Cope, J. B., A. R. Richter, and R. A. Mills. 1974. A summer concentration of the Indiana bat, MYOTIS SODALIS, in Wayne Co., Indiana. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 83:482-4.
  21. Dalton, V.M. 1987. Distribution, abundance, and status of bats hibernating in caves in Virginia. Virginia Journal of Science 38(4): 369-379.
  22. Drobney, R. D., and R. L. Clawson. 1995. Indiana bats, Pages 97-98 in LaRoe E. T., G. S. Farris, C. E. Puckett, P. D. Doran, and M. J. Mac (editors). Our Living Resources: a Report to the nation on the distribution, abundance, and health of U.S. plants, animals and ecosystems. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Service, Washington, D.C. 530 pp.
  23. Elliott, W. R. 2003. A guide to Missouri's cave life: 70 species brought to life. Missouri Department of Conservation. 37 pp.
  24. Engel, J. M. 1976. THE INDIANA BAT, MYOTIS SODALIS: A BIBLIOGRAPHY. U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERV., SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC REPORT-WILDLIFE NO. 196. 11 PP.
  25. Engel, J. M. et al. 1975. RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE INDIANA BAT. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. 36 PP.
  26. Engel, J. M., F. R. Cowresal, R. L. Marin, J. R. Messerli, T. H. Hooper, R. E. Mumford, and L. E. Terry. 1976. Indiana bat recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 106 pp.
  27. Evers, D. C. 1992. A guide to Michigan's endangered wildlife. Univ. Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. viii + 103 pp.
  28. Fellers, G. M., and E. D. Pierson. 2002. Habitat use and foraging behavior of Townsend's Big-eared Bat (<i>Corynorhinus townsendii</i>) in coastal California. Journal of Mammalogy 83:167-177.
  29. Figg, D. E. 1991. Missouri Department of Conservation Annual Nongame and Endangered Species Report July 1990 - June 1991. ii + 35 pp.
  30. Figg, D. E. 1993. Missouri Department of Conservation wildlife diversity report, July 1992-June 1993. 75 pp.
  31. Figg, D. E., and C. M. Bessken. 1995[?]. Missouri Department of Conservation wildlife diversity report: July 1994 - June 1995. v + 104 pp. [perhaps date is 1996]
  32. Gardner, J. E., J. E. Hofmann, and J. D. Garner. 1996. Summer distribution of the federally endangered Indiana bat (<i>Myotis sodalis</i>) in Illinois. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science 89:187-196.
  33. Garner, J. D. 1991. Determination of summer distribution and habitat utilization of the Indiana bat (MYOTIS SODALIS) in Illinois. Final report submitted to the Illinois Natural History Survey. 23 pp.
  34. Garner, J. D., and J. E. Gardner. 1992. Determination of summer distribution and habitat utilization of the Indiana bat (<i>Myotis sodalis</i>) in Illinois. Illinois Department of Conservation. Final Report, Project E-3. Springfield, IL, 23 pp.
  35. Gene Gardner. Biologist. Illinois Natural History Survey. Champaign, IL.
  36. Griffin, D. R. 1940b. Migrations of New England bats. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 86:217-246.
  37. Guthrie, M. J. 1933. The reproductive cycles of some cave bats. Journal of Mammalogy 14:199-216.
  38. Hall, E. R. 1981a. The Mammals of North America, second edition. Vols. I &amp; II. John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, New York. 1181 pp.
  39. Hall, J. S. 1962. A life history and taxonomic study of the Indiana bat, <i>Myotis sodalis</i>. Reading Publication Museum Art Gallery, Science Publication 12. 68 pp.
  40. Hamilton, W. J., Jr., and J. O. Whitaker, Jr. 1979. Mammals of the eastern United States. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York. 346 pp.
  41. Handley, C. O., Jr. 1991. Mammals. Pages 539-616 in K. Terwilliger, coordinator. Virginia's endangered species: proceedings of a symposium. McDonald and Woodward Publishing Company, Blacksburg, Virginia.
  42. Harvey, M. J. 1987. Recent population declines and recovery efforts for the endangered Indiana bat MYOTIS SODALIS, in Arkansas and Tennesse. (Abstract). Bat Research News 28(3-4):35.
  43. Hassell, M.D. 1963. A study of homing in the Indiana bat, <i>Myotis sodalis</i>. Transactions of the Kentucky Academy of Science 24(1-2):1-4.
  44. Hassell, M. D. 1967. Intra-cave activity of four species of bats, hibernating in Kentucky. University of Kentucky. Ph. D. dissertation.
  45. Hassell, M. D., and M. J. Harvey. 1965. Differential homing in MYOTIS SODALIS. Am. Mid. Nat. 74:501-3
  46. Henshaw, R. E., and G. E. Folk. 1966. Relation of thermo-regulation to seasonally changing microclimate in 2 species of bats, MYOTIS LUCIFUGUS and M. SODALIS. Physiol. Zool.39:223-36.
  47. Herkert, J. R., editor. 1992. Endangered and threatened species of Illinois: status and distribution. Vol. 2: Animals. Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board. iv + 142 pp.
  48. Hobson, C. S., and J. N. Holland. 1995. Post-hibernation movement and foraging habitat of a male Indiana bat, MYOTIS SODALIS (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae), in western Virginia. Brimleyana 23:95-101.
  49. Humphrey, S.R. 1978. Status, winter habitat, and management of the endangered Indiana bat, <i>Myotis sodalis</i>. Florida Scientist 41(2):65-76.
  50. Humphrey, S. R., and J. B. Cope. 1977. Survival rates of the endangered Indiana bat, MYOTIS SODALIS. Journal of Mammalogy 58:32-6.
  51. Humphrey, S. R., A. R. Richter, and J. B. Cope. 1977. Summer habitat and ecology of the endangered Indiana bat, MYOTIS SODALIS. J. Mammalogy 58:334-346.
  52. Humphrey, S.R. (editor). 1992. Rare and endangered biota of Florida. Vol. I. Mammals. Univ. Press of Florida, Gainesville. xviii + 392 pp.
  53. Johnson, S. A., V. Brack, Jr., and R. E. Rolley. 1998. Overwinter weight loss of Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis) from hibernacula subject to human visitation. American Midland Naturalist 139:255-261.
  54. Jones, J. K., Jr., R. S. Hoffman, D. W. Rice, C. Jones, R. J. Baker, and M. D. Engstrom. 1992a. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1991. Occasional Papers, The Museum, Texas Tech University, 146:1-23.
  55. Kiser, J. D. and C. L. Elliott. 1996. Foraging habitat, food habits, and roost tree characteristics of the Indiana bat (<i>Myotis sodalis</i>) during autumn in Johnson County, Kentucky. Final report, Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, Frankfort, Kentucky. 65pp.
  56. Kurta, A. 1995. Mammals of the Great Lakes region. Univ. Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. xii + 376 pp.
  57. Kurta, A., and J. A. Teramino. 1994. A novel hibernaculum and noteworthy records of the Indiana bat and eastern pipistrelle (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). American Midland Naturalist 132:410-413.
  58. Kurta, A., and J. Kennedy (editors). 2002. The Indiana bat: biology and management of an endangered species. Bat Conservation International, Austin, Texas. 253 pp.
  59. Kurta, A., and S. W. Murray. 2002. Philopatry and migration of banded Indiana bats (<i>Myotis sodalis</i>) and effects of radio transmitters. Journal of Mammalogy 83:585-589.
  60. Kurta, A., et al. 1993a. A maternity roost of the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) in an unshaded, hollow, sycamore tree (Platanus occidentalis). American Midland Naturalist 130:405-407.
  61. Kurta, A., et al. 1993b. Summer roosts of the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) on the northern edge of its range. American Midland Naturalist 129:132-138.
  62. LaVal, R. K., and M. L. LaVal. 1980. Ecological studies and management of Missouri bats, with emphasis on cave dwelling species. Terrestrial Series 8, Missouri Department of Conservation.
  63. Layne, J. N., editor. 1978. Rare and endangered biota of Florida. Vol. 1. Mammals. State of Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission. xx + 52 pp.
  64. Linzey, D. W. 1998. The mammals of Virginia. McDonald and Woodward, Blacksburg, VA. 459 pp.
  65. Linzey, D.W. 2016. Mammals of Great Smoky Mountains National Park: 2016 revision. Southeastern Naturalist 15(Monograph 8):1–93.
  66. Lowe, D. W. 1990b. Indiana Bat, MYOTIS SODALIS. Pages 506-8 in J. R. Matthews, and C. J. Moseley (editors). The official World Wildlife Fund guide to endangered species of North America.
  67. Luensmann, P. S. 2005. <i>Myotis sodalis</i>. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [accessed 10 April 2006].
  68. Marks, C. S., and G. E. Marks. 2006. Bats of Florida. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. xii + 176 pp.
  69. Matthews, J.R. and C.J. Moseley (eds.). 1990. The Official World Wildlife Fund Guide to Endangered Species of North America. Volume 1. Plants, Mammals. xxiii + pp 1-560 + 33 pp. appendix + 6 pp. glossary + 16 pp. index. Volume 2. Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Fishes, Mussels, Crustaceans, Snails, Insects, and Arachnids. xiii + pp. 561-1180. Beacham Publications, Inc., Washington, D.C.
  70. Menzel, J. M., M. A. Menzel, W. M. Ford, J. W. Edwards, S. R. Sheffield, J. C. Kilgo, and M. S. Bunch. 2003. The distribution of the bats of South Carolina. Southeastern Naturalist 2:121-152.
  71. Menzel, J. M., W. M. Ford, M. A. Menzel, T. Carter, J. E. Gardner, J. D. Garner, and J. E. Hofmann. 2005a. Summer habitat use and home-range analysis of the endangered Indiana bat. Journal of Wildlife Management 69:430-436.
  72. Menzel, M. A., J. M. Menzel, T. C. Carter, W. M. Ford, and J. W. Edwards. 2001a. Review of the forest habitat relationships of the Indiana bat (<i>Myotis sodalis</i>). Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-284. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station. 21 pp.
  73. Menzel, M. A., R. Odom, S. Owen, W. M. Ford, B. R. Chapman, K. V. Miller, J. Edwards, and P. Wood. 1999b. Investigation of foraging habitat use by bats with a focus on Northern Long-eared Myotis (<i>Myotis septentrionalis</i>): a comparison of methods. IN M. K. Clark, editor. Abstracts from the 1999 Colloquium on the conservation of mammals in the Southeastern United States. Available at: http://www.batworkinggroups.org/sbdnnews.htm. Accessed 2001-06-12.
  74. Mohr, C. E. 1972. The status of threatened species of cave-dwelling bats. Bull. Nat. Speleol. Soc. 34(2):33-47.
  75. Morgan, C. N., L. K. Ammerman, K. D. Demere, J. B. Doty, Y. J. Nakazawa, and M. R. Mauldin. 2019. Field identification key and guide for bats of the United States of America. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University, Number 360. Texas Tech University Natural Science Research Laboratory. 29 pp.
  76. Nowak, R. M. 1991. Walker's mammals of the world. Fifth edition. Vols. I and II. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore. 1629 pp.
  77. Ransome, R. 1990. The natural history of hibernating bats. Christopher Helm, London. xxi + 235 pp.
  78. Richter, A. R., et al. 1993. Modified cave entrances: thermal effect on body mass and resulting decline of endangered Indiana bats (<i>Myotis sodalis</i>). Conservation Biology 7:407-415.
  79. Ritzi, C. M., B. L. Everson,and J. O. Whitaker, Jr. 2005. Use of bat boxes by a maternity colony of Indiana myotis (<i>Myotis sodalis</i>). Northeastern Naturalist 12:217-220.
  80. Saugey, D. A., et al. 1990. Hibernating Indiana bats (<i>Myotis sodalis</i>) from the Ouachita Mountains of southwestern Oklahoma. Southwestern Naturalist 35:341-342.
  81. Schwartz, C. W., and E. R. Schwartz. 1981. The wild mammals of Missouri. University of Missouri Press, Columbia. 356 pp.
  82. Sealander, J. A. 1979. A guide to Arkansas mammals. River Road Press, Conway. 313 pp.
  83. Simmons, N. B. and A. L. Cirranello. 2025. Bat Species of the World: A taxonomic and geographic database. Version 1.7. Online. Available: https://batnames.org/
  84. Sparks, D. W., C. M. Ritzi, J. E. Duchamp, and J. O. Whitaker, Jr. 2005. foraging habitat of the Indiana bat (<i>Myotis sodalis</i>) at an urban-rural interface. Journal of Mammalogy 86:713-718.
  85. Thogmartin, W. E., C. A. Sanders-Reed, J. A. Szymanski, P. C. McKann, L. Pruitt, R. A. King, M. C. Runge, and R. E. Russell. 2013. White-nose syndrome is likely to extirpate the endangered Indiana bat over large parts of its range. Biological Conservation 160:162-172.
  86. Thogmartin, W. E., P. C. McKann, R. A. King, J. A. Szymanski, and L. Pruitt. 2012. Population-level impact of white-nose syndrome on the endangered Indiana bat. Journal of Mammalogy 93:1086-1098.
  87. Thompson, C. E. 1982. <i>Myotis sodalis</i>. Mammalian Species No. 163:1-5.
  88. Thom, R. H. 1981. Endangered and threatened mammals. Pages 59-69 in M. Bowles, editor. Endangered and threatened vertebrate animals and vascular plants of Illinois. Natural Land Institute, Rockford, Illinois.
  89. Trombulak, S. C., P. E. Higuera, and M. DesMeules. 2001. Population trends of wintering bats in Vermont. Northeastern Naturalist 8:51-62.
  90. Tuttle, M. D. 1976a. Population ecology of the gray bat (<i>Myotis grisescens</i>): philopatry, timing, and patterns of movement, weight loss during migration, and seasonal adaptive strategies. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History Occasional Papers (54):1-38.
  91. Tuttle, M. D. 1977. Gating as a means of protecting cave dwelling bats. Pages 77-82 in T. Aley and D. Rhodes, editors. National cave management symposium proceedings.
  92. Tuttle, M. D., and D. E. Stevenson. 1978. Variation in the cave environment and its biological implications. Pages 108-21 in R. Zuber (editor). National Cave Management Symposium Proceedings.
  93. Twente, J. W. 1955. Some aspects of habitat selection and other behavior of cavern-dwelling bats. Ecology 36:706-32.
  94. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1983. Recovery plan for the Indiana bat.
  95. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1990. Endangered and threatened species recovery program: report to Congress. 406 pp.
  96. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1999. Agency draft Indiana Bat (<i>Myotis sodalis</i>) revised recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, Minnesota. 53 pp.
  97. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2002. Threatened and endangered species: Indiana bat (<i>Myotis sodalis</i>). U.S. Fish and Wilife Service, Fort Snelling, Minnesota. 2 pp.
  98. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2007. Indiana bat (<i>Myotis sodalis</i>) draft recovery plan: first revision. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, MN. 258 pp.
  99. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2009. Indiana bat (<i>Myotis sodalis</i>) 5-year review: summary and evaluation. USFWS, Bloomington Ecological Services Field Office, Bloomington, Indiana.
  100. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2013. 2013 rangewide population estimate for the Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) by USFWS region. <http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/inba/pdf/2013inbaPopEstimate26Aug2013.pdf>
  101. Whitaker, J. O., and W. J. Hamilton. 1998. Mammals of the eastern United States. Comstock Publishing, Ithaca, New York.
  102. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.