Ailanthus altissima

(P. Mill.) Swingle

Tree-of-Heaven

GNRUnranked Found in 111 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
GNRUnrankedGlobal Rank
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.148863
Element CodePDSIM01010
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
KingdomPlantae
PhylumAnthophyta
ClassDicotyledoneae
OrderSapindales
FamilySimaroubaceae
GenusAilanthus
Other Common Names
Ailante glanduleux (FR) tree of heaven (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
Called Ailanthus glandulosa in older literature.
Conservation Status
Review Date1994-03-22
Change Date1994-03-22
Edition Date1988-11-30
Edition AuthorsMARC C. HOSHOVSKY, CAFO (1988)
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Rank Reasons
Native to central China and widely planted, it now occurs in practically every state of the United States, and from Canada to Argentina, and is also escaped in Europe. Distribution and abundance in native range not known.
Range Extent Comments
Native to central China and widely planted, it now occurs in practically every state of the U.S. and from Canada to Argentina, and is also escaped in Europe. Distribution and abundance in native range not known.

The frequency of Ailanthus occurrences increases as one nears the cities. In neglected urban areas, Ailanthus grows "as trees close to buildings, as hedges, or as bushy aggregates along railroad tracks, highway embankments".
Threat Impact Comments
Although only occasionally found in nondisturbed areas (Kowarik 1983), ailanthus is a prolific seed producer, grows rapidly and can successfully compete with the native vegetation. It produces toxins which prevent the establishment of other species (Mergen 1959). The root system is aggressive enough to cause damage to sewers and foundations (Hu 1979).

Ailanthus was not nominated by any specific preserve manager, but is recognized by TNC staff as an important exotic weed. A recent survey (2 March 1985) of CNPS members showed a wide distribution of this tree throughout California. Members of both the Mt. Lassen and Sequoia chapters consider it a major pest at low elevations. There are also reports of it growing in Santa Cruz, Riverside, San Bernardino, Los Angeles and San Diego counties.
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Deciduous trees in the family Simaroubaceae, native to China.

Habitat

Ailanthus is native to central China, where its history is as old as the written language of the country (Hu 1979). Little information is available on its ecology in China, although Hu (1979) reviews its cultural importance and value for wood products and medicine.

The species was apparently introduced into America by two different routes. The first route began with Pierre d'Incarville mistaking it for the lacquer tree in China and sending seeds to England around 1751 (Feret and Bryant 1974, Hu 1979). It was then introduced to America by a Philadelphia gardener in 1784 (Hu 1979). Because of its rapid growth and ability to grow in unfavorable conditions with little care, it became a common stock in eastern nurseries by 1840. The second route was through Chinese miners. During the days of the California gold rush, many Chinese miners brought ailanthus seeds with them as they settled in California, probably because of its medicinal and cultural importance to them.

Escaping from cultivation and quickly becoming established on both coasts, ailanthus has expanded its range considerably since its initial introductions. Specimens from the Harvard University Herbarium indicate that it "runs wild from Massachusetts...to Oregon ... and from Toronto, Canada ... to Argentina ..." (Hu 1979). In some localities ailanthus is so well established that it appears to be a part of the native flora (Little 1974).

In the eastern United States, the frequency of ailanthus occurrences increases as one nears the cities. In neglected urban areas, ailanthus grows "as trees close to buildings, as hedges, or as bushy aggregates along railroad tracks, highway embankments, walls at the ends of bridges and overpasses, or in cracks of sidewalks and along fences" (Hu 1979). Although it is usually found in disturbed areas, it occasionally spreads to undisturbed areas. Kowarik (1983) views human settlements as centers of its distribution and roads as migration routes.

In California ailanthus is widely naturalized in cismontane areas, especially around old dwellings and mining settlements (Munz and Keck 1973). It has become established in Pleasants Valley, Solano and Marin counties, Berkeley, Vacaville, Petaluma, San Andreas, Angel's Camp, Columbia, and in various places in the Sacramento Valley (Robbins et al. 1951).

Ecology

Although ailanthus is sensitive to frost damage during its early years (Adamik and Brauns 1957), 6-year-old trees have survived winters of -33 centigrades accompanied by high winds (Zelenin 1976). Although Koffer (1895) suggested that ailanthus was unable to withstand the prolonged dry seasons of the Midwest, Dubroca and Bory (1981) commented on the "drought resistance" of the species. Dry soils are probably more suitable for its growth than wet soils (Adamik and Brauns 1957).

Ailanthus does well on very poor soils. Adamik and Brauns (1957) cultivated the species on rather thin topsoil and it "thrives even on stony ground." The tree has been used in revegetating acid mine spoils, tolerating a pH of less than 4.1, soluble salt concentrations up to 0.25 mmhos/cm and phosphorus levels as low as 1.8 ppm (Plass 1975). The tolerance of ailanthus to soil salinity is a disputed point in the literature. Opinions range from "salty soils not suitable for growth" (Adamik and Brauns 1957) to ailanthus "growing well on very saline shell sands (Lavrinenko and Volkov 1973). Intermediate views are expressed by Brogowski et al. (1977), Semoradova and Materna (1982) and Zelenin (1976).

Ailanthus has been planted widely in urban areas because of its ability to tolerate atmospheric pollution. Its ability to adapt to "the dirt and smoke, the dust and drought of cities" was recognized nearly 100 years ago (Sargent 1888). More recently ailanthus has been observed to survive cement dust near cement and lime works (Klincsek 1976); it is moderately resistant to fumes produced by the coke and coal-tar industry (Kozyukina and Obraztsova 1971); its leaves absorb significant amounts of sulfur in areas of high traffic flow (Kim 1975); it can accumulate high levels of mercury in its tissues (Smith 1972); and it is somewhat resistant to ozone exposure (Davis et al. 1978).

Although ailanthus may suffer from root competition by other trees already established in an area (Cozzo 1972), usually it competes successfully with other plants (Cozzo 1972, Hu 1979) and is considered a "dangerous weed" in forest plantations (Magic 1974). A high degree of shade tolerance gives ailanthus a competitive edge over other plant species (Grime 1965). The production of toxic chemicals by ailanthus may also explain the success of this plant. An aqueous extract of ailanthus leaves has been shown to be toxic to 35 species of gymnosperms and 10 species of angiosperms (Mergen 1959). This may be important in limiting natural succession in ailanthus stands. The toxicity levels are highest in the leaves during the early part of the growing season and are maintained at high levels at least until October (Voigt and Mergen 1962).

Reproduction

Ailanthus reproduces both sexually and asexually. Asexual reproduction is by vegetative sprouting from stumps or root portions (Hu 1979). Flowering occurs rather late in the spring (June). Ailanthus has the longest winter dormancy of all the trees in its native Chinese habitat (Hu 1979). Precocious flowering is not a rare occurrence in this species and has been observed in seedlings only 6 weeks after germination (Feret 1973).

Seeds ripen in large crowded clusters from September to October of the same year and may persist on the tree through the following winter (Little 1974, Hu 1979). An individual tree can produce 325,000 seeds per year which are easily wind-dispersed (Bory and Clair-Maczulajtys 1980). These seeds average over 30,000 per kilogram. This amount yields up to 6-7000 "usable plants" (Little 1974). Limited testing of ailanthus seeds indicate that they have dormant embryos, and that germination is benefited by stratification on moist sand for 60 days at 41 F (Little 1974).

Seedlings establish themselves rapidly by producing a well formed tap root in less than three months (Adamik and Brauns 1957). In more compacted soils these seedlings put forth long rope-like lateral roots to exploit a greater soil volume (Rabe and Bassuk 1984). Ailanthus grows quickly in full sunlight and averages a meter of growth in height per year for at least the first 4 years (Adamik and Brauns 1957). The trees may grow to 15-20 meters tall but have a rather short lifespan of less than 50 years (Adamik 1955).
Terrestrial Habitats
Urban/edificarian
Other Nations (2)
United StatesNNA
ProvinceRankNative
UtahSNANo
South CarolinaSNANo
WisconsinSNANo
WashingtonSNANo
OklahomaSNANo
KentuckySNANo
PennsylvaniaSNANo
TennesseeSNANo
ColoradoSNANo
KansasSNANo
MarylandSNANo
AlabamaSNANo
FloridaSNANo
MassachusettsSNANo
NebraskaSNANo
New YorkSNANo
West VirginiaSNANo
IowaSNANo
Rhode IslandSNANo
North CarolinaSNANo
VirginiaSNANo
LouisianaSNANo
ArizonaSNANo
MissouriSNANo
VermontSNANo
MaineSNANo
IdahoSNANo
IndianaSNANo
CaliforniaSNANo
TexasSNANo
District of ColumbiaSNANo
IllinoisSNANo
New JerseySNANo
OhioSNANo
MichiganSNANo
DelawareSNANo
GeorgiaSNANo
ConnecticutSNANo
ArkansasSNANo
MississippiSNANo
New MexicoSNANo
MinnesotaSNANo
CanadaNNA
ProvinceRankNative
British ColumbiaSNANo
OntarioSNANo
QuebecSNANo
Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, DECIDUOUS
Economic Value (Genus)No
Roadless Areas (111)
Arizona (3)
AreaForestAcres
Lower San FranciscoApache-Sitgreaves National Forests59,310
MazatzalTonto National Forest16,942
Sierra Ancha Wilderness ContiguousTonto National Forest7,787
Arkansas (3)
AreaForestAcres
Dismal CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest9,160
Gee CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest7,957
Richland CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest571
California (51)
AreaForestAcres
AntimonyLos Padres National Forest40,911
Arroyo SecoAngeles National Forest4,703
Barker ValleyCleveland National Forest11,940
Bell QuinbyShasta-Trinity National Forest11,556
Birch CreekInyo National Forest28,816
Black ButteLos Padres National Forest5,116
Black CanyonInyo National Forest32,421
CajonSan Bernardino National Forest7,548
CalienteCleveland National Forest5,953
ChannellSequoia National Forest45,429
ChicoSequoia National Forest39,836
Circle MountainSan Bernardino National Forest6,375
ColdwaterCleveland National Forest8,402
Cow CreekShasta-Trinity National Forest22,627
Crystal CreekSan Bernardino National Forest6,783
Cucamonga BSan Bernardino National Forest11,933
Cucamonga CSan Bernardino National Forest4,106
Deep CreekSan Bernardino National Forest23,869
Devil GulchSierra National Forest30,490
Dog CreekShasta-Trinity National Forest5,001
EagleShasta-Trinity National Forest6,553
East GirardShasta-Trinity National Forest27,894
Ferguson RidgeSierra National Forest6,104
Fish CanyonAngeles National Forest29,886
Fox MountainLos Padres National Forest52,072
Garcia MountainLos Padres National Forest7,850
Greenhorn CreekSequoia National Forest28,226
Kettle Mtn.Shasta-Trinity National Forest4,589
LaddCleveland National Forest5,300
Little French CShasta-Trinity National Forest11,529
Magic MountainAngeles National Forest15,542
MatilijaLos Padres National Forest5,218
Mill CreekSequoia National Forest27,643
Mill PeakSan Bernardino National Forest7,884
No NameCleveland National Forest4,897
NordhoffLos Padres National Forest12,031
Orleans Mtn.Klamath National Forest49,090
Orleans Mtn. BSix Rivers National Forest17,183
Orleans Mtn. CSix Rivers National Forest15,589
PaiuteInyo National Forest58,712
Raywood Flat BSan Bernardino National Forest11,373
RinconSequoia National Forest54,610
San SevaineSan Bernardino National Forest6,866
Sheep MountainAngeles National Forest21,098
Sill HillCleveland National Forest5,294
Soldier CanyonInyo National Forest40,589
TuleAngeles National Forest9,861
West GirardShasta-Trinity National Forest37,516
WildhorseCleveland National Forest1,483
Wonoga Pk.Inyo National Forest11,272
WoolstaffSequoia National Forest41,445
Georgia (1)
AreaForestAcres
Ben GapChattahoochee National Forest1,292
Idaho (2)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekCaribou-Targhee National Forest118,582
HoodooNez Perce-Clearwater National Forest153,868
Nevada (9)
AreaForestAcres
Four MileHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest24,093
Mystic (NV)Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest5,644
Pine Grove SouthHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest88,945
Rose - Big MeadowsHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest311
Rose - Davis Mdw.Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest2,361
Rose - Dutch LouieHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest363
Rose - EvansHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest4,782
Rose - Hunter Lk NoHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest149
Table Mtn. - EastHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest87,789
New Mexico (11)
AreaForestAcres
Black CanyonSanta Fe National Forest1,922
Candian RiverCibola National Forest7,149
Contiguous To Gila Wilderness & Primitive AreaGila National Forest79,049
Juan de Gabaldon GrantSanta Fe National Forest8,023
Little TesuqueSanta Fe National Forest815
Lower San FranciscoGila National Forest26,460
Meadow CreekGila National Forest34,167
Ortega PeakLincoln National Forest11,545
Peloncillo (NM)Coronado National Forest43,339
Thompson PeakSanta Fe National Forest33,001
Virgin CanyonSanta Fe National Forest6,068
North Carolina (3)
AreaForestAcres
Harper CreekPisgah National Forest7,325
Linville Gorge AdditionPisgah National Forest2,809
Lost CovePisgah National Forest5,944
Oregon (3)
AreaForestAcres
HellholeUmatilla National Forest65,679
HomesteadWallowa-Whitman National Forest5,817
Snake RiverWallowa-Whitman National Forest31,229
South Dakota (1)
AreaForestAcres
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Tennessee (1)
AreaForestAcres
Sampson Mountain AdditionCherokee National Forest3,064
Texas (1)
AreaForestAcres
Big CreekNational Forests in Texas1,447
Utah (7)
AreaForestAcres
418024Uinta National Forest51,699
418025Uinta National Forest32,698
CottonwoodDixie National Forest6,754
Lone Peak ContiguousWasatch-Cache National Forest874
Mt. Logan NorthWasatch-Cache National Forest18,930
Pine Valley MountainsDixie National Forest57,673
South FrancisWasatch-Cache National Forest3,374
Virginia (10)
AreaForestAcres
Adams PeakGeorge Washington National Forest7,135
Bear CreekJefferson National Forest18,274
Brush MountainJefferson National Forest6,002
JerkemtightGeorge Washington National Forest16,687
Kelley MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,590
North MountainJefferson National Forest8,377
Northern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest9,444
Shawvers Run AdditionJefferson National Forest1,927
Southern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest11,985
Three SistersGeorge Washington National Forest8,149
Washington (3)
AreaForestAcres
ManastashWenatchee National Forest11,155
QuartzWenatchee National Forest8,550
Slide RidgeWenatchee National Forest11,430
West Virginia (2)
AreaForestAcres
Dry River (WV)George Washington National Forest7,331
North Mountain HopevilleMonongahela National Forest6,525
References (44)
  1. Abrams, L. 1951. Illustrated flora of the Pacific states: Washington, Oregon, and California. Vol. 3. Geraniaceae to Scrophulariaceae. Stanford Univ. Press, Stanford, California. 866 pp.
  2. Adamik, K. J. 1955. The use of Ailanthus glandulosa as pulpwood. Tappi 38(9): 150A-153A.
  3. Adamik, K. J. and F. E. Brauns. 1957. Ailanthus glanulosa (tree of heaven) as a pulpwood. Part II. Tappi 40(7):522-527.
  4. Amechem Products, Inc. 1967. Tre-Hold: A tree paint for controlling regrowth of the sprout after trimming. Info Sheet Amechem Products #34. 2 pp.
  5. Bory, G. And D. Clair-Maczulajtys. 1980. [Production, dissemination and ploymorphism of seeds in Ailanthus altissima]. Reuve Generale de Botanique 88(1049/1051):297-311 (in French)
  6. Brogowski, A., A.Czerwinski, and J. Pracz. 1977. [Ionic balance and the resistance of ornamental trees and shrubs to NaCl]. Roczniki. Nauk Roniczych A 102(2):51-64 (in Polish with English summary).
  7. Cozzo, D. 1972. [Initial behavior of Ailanthus altissima in experimental plantation]. Revista Forestal Argentina 16(2):47-52 (in Spanish).
  8. Davis, D. D., C. A. Miller, and J. B. Coppolino. 1978. Foliar response of eleven woody species to ozone with emphasis on black cherry. Proc. Am. Phytopath. Soc. [Abstract NE-22] 4:185.
  9. Dubroca, E. and G. Bory. 1981. [Carbohydrate and nitrogen compounds and resistance to drought in Ailanthus altissima]. Biochem Syst. Ecol 9(4):283-288 (in French)
  10. Feret, P. P. 1973. Early flowering in Ailanthus. Forest Sci. 19(3):237-9.
  11. Feret, P. P. and R. L. Bryant. 1974. Genetic differences between American and Chinese Ailanthus seedlings. Silvae Genetica 23(5):144-148.
  12. French, W. J. 1972. Cristulariella pyramidalis in Florida: an extension of range and new hosts. Plant Disease Report 56(2): 135-138.
  13. Fuller, T. C. and G. D. Barbe. 1985. The Bradley method of eliminating exotic plants from natural reserves. Fremontia 13:(2): 24-26.
  14. Grime, J. P. 1965. Shade tolerance in flowering plants. Nature 208:161-163.
  15. Hu, S. Y. 1979. Ailanthus. Arnoldia 39(2):29-50.
  16. Jones and Stokes Associates. 1984. Transmission right-of-way vegetation management program: analysis and recommendations. Prepared for Seattle City Light, Seattle, Washington. Copy on file at The Nature Conservancy, California Field Office, 785 Market Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103.
  17. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  18. Kim, M. H. 1975. [Studies on the effect of sulfer dixide gas on tree leaves]. Res. Rep. For. Res. Inst. Korea 22:31-36. (in Korean).
  19. Klincsek, P. 1976. [Investigations into the effect of cement dust in some frquent tree and shrub species]. Kertgaz dasag 8(3):71-76 (in Hungrian).
  20. Koffer, C. A. 1895. Trees of minor importance for western planning. Gorden and Forest. 8:122-123.
  21. Kowarik, I. 1983. The acclimatizaiton and phytogeographical behavior of the tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima) in the French Mediterranean area (Bas-Langvedoc). Phytocoenologia 11(3): 389-406.
  22. Kozyukina, Ah.T. and V. I. Bolkov. 1973. [Salt resistance of species on the coast of the Sea of Azov]. Lesnoe Khozyaistro 9:33-36 (in Russian).
  23. Lavrinenko, D. D. and F. I. Volkov. 1973. [Salt resistance of species on the coast of the Sea of Azov]. Lesnoe Khozyaistro 9:33-36 (in Russian).
  24. Little, E.L., Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized). Agriculture Handbook No. 541. U.S. Forest Service, Washington, D.C. 375 pp.
  25. Little, S. 1974. Ailanthus altissima. In C. S. Schopmeyer (ed.), Seeds of Woody plants in the United States. USDA Forest Service Agriculture Handbook No. 450.
  26. Magic, D. 1974. [Cultivated trees and forest weeds]. Acta Inst. Bot. Acad. Sci. Slov. (Czechoslovakia) 1A:33-38 (in Slovakian).
  27. Marshall, P. E. and G. R. Furnier. 1981. Growth responses of Ailanthus altissima seedlings to SO2. Environ. Poll. Ser. A:149-153.
  28. Matthews, L. J. 1960. Weed identification and control: Broom. New Zealand J. Agriculture 100(3):229.
  29. McHenry, J. 1985. University of California, Davis, CA. Personal communication to Don Pitcher.
  30. Mergen, F. 1959. A toxic principle in the leaves of Ailanthus. Bot. Gazette 121:32-36.
  31. Misra, R. M. 1978. A mermithid parasite of Attera fabricella. Indian Forester 104(2):133-134.
  32. Munz, P.A., and D.D. Keck. 1973. A California Flora and Supplement. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. 1905 pp.
  33. Plass, W. T. 1975. An evaluation of trees and shrubs for planting surface mine spoils. USDA For. Serv. N. E. For. Exper. Stat. Res. Paper N. E. 317. 8 pp.
  34. Rabe, E. P. and N. Bassuk. 1984. Adaptation of Ailanthus altissima to the urban environment through analysis of habitat usage and growth repsonse to soil compaction. Hortscience (Programs and Abstracts) 19(3):572.
  35. Robbins, W. W., M. K. Bellue, and W. S. Ball. 1951. Weeds of California. California Dept. Agric., Sacramento.
  36. Sargent, C. S. 1888. The Ailanthus. Garden and Forest 1888: 1385-1386.
  37. Selenin, A. V. 1976. [Afforestation of saline soils in the Sal'skaya steppes]. Lesnoe Khozyaistro 9:79-81 (in Russian).
  38. Semoradova, E. and J. Materna. 1982. [Salt treatment of roads in winter: the response of trees and the content of chlorine in their assimilaton organs]. Scientia Agric. Bohemoslovaca 14(4):241-260.
  39. Smith, W. H. 1972. Lead and mercury burden of urban woody plants. Science 176(4040):1237-1239.
  40. Sterrett, J. P., J. A. Baden, III, and J. T. Davis. 1971. Defoliation of oak, maple and other woody plants with 2-chloro-ethyl phosphoric acid (68-240) and potassium iodide (KI). Abstracts Proc. NE Weed Sci. Soc., NY 25:376.
  41. Thomas, T. Park Ranger, Santa Monica Mountains National Recreational Area. Personal communication. March 1985.
  42. United States Department of Agriculture. 1984. Pesticide background statements. Vol. I: Herbicides. Agric. Handbook No. 633, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
  43. Watson, H. K. 1977. Present weed control projections for the year 2001. Unpublished manuscript. Copy on file at The Nature Conservancy, California Field Office, 785 Market Street, 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103.
  44. Weed Science Society of America. 1983. Herbicide handbook.