Pinus flexilis

James

Limber Pine

G4Apparently Secure Found in 236 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G4Apparently SecureGlobal Rank
Least concernIUCN
HighThreat Impact
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.140758
Element CodePGPIN040F0
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVascular Plant
IUCNLeast concern
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomPlantae
PhylumConiferophyta
ClassPinopsida
OrderPinales
FamilyPinaceae
GenusPinus
Other Common Names
limber pine (EN) Pin flexible (FR) Rocky Mountain white pine (EN)
Concept Reference
Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Taxonomic Comments
Limber pine is a member of the pine family, Pinaceae within the section Strobus, subsection Strobi; similar to stone pines (subsection Cembrae) with large wingless or nearly wingless seeds that depend on corvid species (such as the Clark's nutcracker, Nucifraga columbiana) for seed dispersal across the landscape, however in contrast to stone pines, limber pine cones open when dry.
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2024-07-23
Change Date2009-04-13
Edition Date2024-07-23
Edition AuthorsM. Anions (2009), rev. Johnson, J. (2024)
Threat ImpactHigh
Range Extent200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Number of Occurrences> 300
Rank Reasons
Pinus flexilis is a coniferous tree that occurs in the northern, central, and southern Rocky Mountains, and the Great Basin regions from British Columbia and Alberta in Canada, south through Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Nevada, Utah, Colorado to New Mexico in the United States. Isolated populations occur in the Dakotas, Nebraska, Arizona, eastern Oregon, and California. A multifactor combination of climate stress, Dwarf Mistletoe, White Pine Blister Rust, and bark beetles have created complex stress situations in Limber Pine forests which has caused high mortality in populations in many areas. The tree can be drought sensitive due to the physiological cost of defending against pathogens which can divert resources from other plant functions or make it more sensitive to environmental stresses. Changing fire regimes combined with the poor competitiveness with other species and poor regeneration due to blister rust also cause concern for altering distribution and survival, however Limber Pine is a generalist and pioneer species, as well is cold and drought tolerant, making it capable of growing in a wide variety of environmental and physiological circumstances. Understanding the future of this wide ranging species is complicated due to multiple threats, variable levels of disease resistance, regeneration potential, and the possible positive impacts of selection pressure as a result of the beetle targeting the oldest and most mature trees.
Range Extent Comments
Limber pine is a species whose distribution has changed from continuous to patchy since the last glacial period. Approximately 14,000 years ago, Limber Pine was widespread along the eastern slope of the Colorado Front Range in the central Rocky Mountains (Schoettle 2004). Now it has a widespread but patchy distribution spanning a broad latitudinal and elevational range (1500-3600m) in the western United States and Canada. It occurs in the northern, central, and southern Rocky Mountains, and the Great Basin regions from British Columbia and Alberta in Canada, south through Oregon, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Nevada, Utah, Colorado to New Mexico. Isolated populations occur in the Dakotas, Nebraska, Arizona, eastern Oregon, and California (Burns and Honkala 1990, Johnson 2001). Cultivated populations can be found in New England, northern Europe, and New Zealand.
Occurrences Comments
By applying a 1 km separation distance to herbarium specimens and photo-based observations documented between 2003 and 2024, there are over 1,000 occurrences rangewide (GBIF 2024, iNaturalist 2024, NatureServe 2024, SEINet 2024).
Threat Impact Comments
White Pine Blister Rust (Cronartium ribicola), a non-native pathogen, causes high mortality but also results in low recruitment, extirpation and isolation, and exerts strong selective pressure at the seedling-sapling stage with high rates of seedling mortality. The physiological cost of plant defenses to blister rust can divert resources from other plant functions or make the tree more sensitive to environmental stresses, herbivory, pests, such as the Mountain Pine Beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) or other pathogens. As populations become more isolated, gene flow is interrupted affected genetic diversity (Schoettle 2004). Limber Pine appears to have less resistance to blister rust than other North American white pines with greenhouse infection levels as high as 98 to 100% and seedling mortality of 75% (Johnson 2001). The majority (73%) of stands in the Central Rocky Mountains have White Pine Blister Rust and it is moving southward (Cleaver et al. 2015). Major gene resistance has been detected in the Southern Rockies and Alberta (Schoettle et al. 2014).

Periods of climate stress combining high temperature and sustained low precipitation, which have caused past forest dieback events, will most likely reoccur in western North America. Forest stands at higher density combined with this climate stress most likely promoted bark beetle outbreaks (Millar et al. 2007). Bark beetles prefer large trees and may kill many of the largest and oldest trees in a stand while leaving the smaller, younger trees. This selection pressure may help the species adapt to a warmer climate by removing the oldest trees, which are adapted to a cooler and wetter climate, from the breeding population (Connie Millar, pers. comm., 2024). Predators and parasites may also limit the populations of bark beetles during the course of an outbreak.

The species can be especially drought sensitive due to the physiological cost of defending against pathogens which can divert resources from other plant functions or make it more sensitive to environmental stresses (Schoettle 2004).

Damage by porcupines has been noted in North Dakota and consumption of seeds by mammals, particularly red squirrels, is noted in Alberta as detrimental and an important constraint. Dwarf Mistletoe (Arceuthobium cyanocarpum), a parasitic vascular plant, has caused high mortality of Limber Pine in some states in the Rocky Mountains, and the Blue Stain Fungus (Ophiostoma sp.) carried by pine beetles is infecting many populations (Millar et al. 2007). Red Band Needle Blight (Dothistroma septospora) has caused significant mortality in Montana (Alberta Sustainable Resource Development and Alberta Conservation Association 2007).

Fire can easily kill young Limber Pines because of their thin bark, but fuel loads on most Limber Pine sites are too light to generate severe fire damage, and most of the large trees normally survive (Burns and Honkala 1990).
Ecology & Habitat

Habitat

Limber pine dominates on dry rocky sites at many elevations (1500-3600m) within its range. It can occur scattered throughout forested regions on more mesic sites, especially in low density, open areas. At higher elevations, Pinus flexilis can define the boundary of the treeline; occurring in high montane forests, often at the timberline (FNA 1993, Schoettle 2004). In these areas (i.e., Utah and the West) it is often very long-lived and slow growing, occurring on dry, harsh sites. In the northern half of its distribution, limber pine is generally found near lower tree line and on dry sites in the montane forests, but between the 45th and 40th parallels, it grows in both lower and upper elevation forests and anywhere in between on dry, windswept sites. Its position gradually shifts upward in more southerly latitudes, so that in southern portions of its distribution, limber pine is more common from upper montane to alpine tree line, with only minor occurrences in the lower forested zones (Burns and Honkala 1990). In some areas, limber pine grows in greater numbers on certain soils, but the relationships vary geographically; but in general, the substrates are Entisols (Burns and Honkala 1990). It grows on a variety of topographies, from gently rolling terrain to cliffs and is most often found on rocky ridges and steep rocky slopes and can survive in extremely windswept areas at both the lower and upper tree line (Burns and Honkala 1990).
Climatic data for actual limber pine habitat are quite scarce, but the general distribution of limber pine in Alberta, Montana, central Idaho, and east of the Continental Divide in Wyoming and Colorado, is in forested areas having a continental climate (Baker 1944). This climate is typified by a relatively small amount of precipitation, with the wettest months during the growing season, very low humidity, and wide annual and diurnal temperature ranges. Winter conditions may be very cold, but relatively dry, and often include rapid fluctuations in temperature associated with chinook winds. Notable exceptions to this distribution are the small populations in eastern Oregon and adjacent Idaho, which lie within the Pacific maritime influence (Baker 1944). In the remainder of its distribution, it grows in climates that tend to have either more evenly distributed yearly precipitation or a winter peak in precipitation along with summer convectional storms (strongly influenced by Pacific maritime weather patterns). Only at its southern limits in the mountains of eastern and southern California does the pine encounter a strong pattern of proportionately high winter precipitation (Baker 1944). The amount of precipitation, however, is relatively smaller than that of the Pacific Northwest.

Reproduction

Limber pine reproduces entirely from seed; it does not layer lower branches in the soil (Daly and Shankman 1985, Tomback 1991, Weisberg and Baker 1995). Seeds are not effectively dispersed by wind as small mammals and birds, especially Clark's nutcrackers and pinyon jays, disperse limber pine seeds (Woodmansee 1977, Lanner and Vander Wall 1980, Lanner 1985, 1996, Tomback 2001). The minimum seed-bearing age of limber pine ranges from 20 to 40 years. There are 2 to 4 years between large seed crops (Krochman and Krochman 1982, Burns and Honkala 1990). Seeds from krummholz trees have low germination potential (Lanner and Wall 1980). Clark's nutcrackers have evolved an important mutualism and are the primary harvester and disperser of its seeds.

Limber pine regeneration on burns is largely from germinants of Clark's nutcrackers seed caches (Woodmansee 1977, Lanner and Vander Wall 1980, Lanner 1985, 1996, Tomback 2001). The birds begin harvesting seeds in late August, while the cones are still green and slightly closed. They remove the cones by pecking them loose, fly them to perches, and peck between the scales to remove the seeds. As cones begin to open on the trees in September, Clark's nutcrackers remove exposed seeds. An individual bird can store as many as 125 seeds in its sublingual pouch, then flies to a cache area and deposits numerous caches from its pouchful of seeds. In a burned-over area in northern Utah, Clark's nutcrackers cached an estimated 12,140 seeds per acre (30,000/ha) in 1 year (Burns and Honkala 1990, Tomback and Linhart 1990).

Mating system: Limber pine seed dispersal by corvids leads to a genetic population structure different from that of wind-dispersed conifers with respect to patterns of gene flow and genetic relationships among neighboring trees. The seed caching by birds influences the distribution, population age structure, and spacing of limber pine. Clusters of seedlings germinating from a single cache may generate multi-stemmed growth forms that contain 2 or more distinct genotypes. A consequence of this growth form is a tendency toward clumped stand structure. Because seeds within an individual cache were often collected from a single parent tree, trees within clumps may be more closely related compared to trees from neighboring clumps (Lanner 1996, Tomback 2001), although multi-stemmed growth is most often a result of apical meristem damage that results in several leaders on an individual tree (Welsh et al. 1987). Tomback and Linhart (1990) found that on 361 limber pine sites in Colorado, 30% showed clumping. Several genetic studies have shown that from 0 to 82% of individuals within limber pine clumps are closely related (Welsh et al. 1987, Burns and Honkala 1990, van Wagtendonk et al. 1998). On the Pawnee National Grassland, clump members were related, on average, as nearly half-sibs. Genetic consequences of this kinship include possible inbreeding. On the plus side, closely related trees within clumps often form roots grafts, which may increase survivorship and fitness of the entire clump (Welsh et al. 1987).

Pollen phenology also influences gene flow. In Colorado, most sites that differ in elevation by more than 1,300 feet (400 m) in elevation do not have overlapping pollination periods, restricting pollination between populations that are widely separated by elevation; however, pollen transfer between intermediate populations and a high level of gene flow via bird-dispersed seeds appear to maintain interpopulation gene flow (Schuster et al. 1989).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest/WoodlandForest - ConiferCliff
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN2
ProvinceRankNative
AlbertaS2Yes
British ColumbiaS2Yes
United StatesN4
ProvinceRankNative
North DakotaS1Yes
MontanaS5Yes
ArizonaSNRYes
New MexicoSNRYes
CaliforniaSNRYes
NevadaS4Yes
WyomingS4Yes
South DakotaS1Yes
OregonS1Yes
UtahSNRYes
IdahoSNRYes
NebraskaS1Yes
ColoradoS4Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
7 - Natural system modificationsLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1 - Fire & fire suppressionLarge (31-70%)Moderate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1.1 - Increase in fire frequency/intensityRestricted (11-30%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
7.1.2 - Suppression in fire frequency/intensityRestricted (11-30%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive (71-100%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesPervasive (71-100%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1.2 - Named speciesPervasive (71-100%)Serious or 31-70% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherUnknownModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
11.1 - Habitat shifting & alterationUnknownModerate or 11-30% pop. declineHigh (continuing)

Plant Characteristics
DurationPERENNIAL, Long-lived, EVERGREEN
Economic Value (Genus)Yes
Roadless Areas (236)
California (29)
AreaForestAcres
AntimonyLos Padres National Forest40,911
Bear Camp FlatModoc National Forest2,471
Birch CreekInyo National Forest28,816
Black CanyonInyo National Forest32,421
Boundary Peak (CA)Inyo National Forest210,884
Cactus Springs BSan Bernardino National Forest3,106
ChannellSequoia National Forest45,429
Coyote NorthInyo National Forest11,932
Coyote SoutheastInyo National Forest53,159
Cucamonga CSan Bernardino National Forest4,106
Domeland Add.Sequoia National Forest3,046
Glass MountainInyo National Forest52,867
Heartbreak RidgeSan Bernardino National Forest4,455
HortonInyo National Forest5,717
North LakeInyo National Forest2,406
Pleasant ViewAngeles National Forest26,395
Raywood Flat BSan Bernardino National Forest11,373
Rock Creek WestInyo National Forest3,626
San SevaineSan Bernardino National Forest6,866
Sawmill - BadlandsLos Padres National Forest51,362
Sespe - FrazierLos Padres National Forest106,910
Sheep MountainAngeles National Forest21,098
SherwinInyo National Forest3,140
Soldier CanyonInyo National Forest40,589
South SierraInyo National Forest41,853
SugarloafSan Bernardino National Forest8,206
Table Mtn.Inyo National Forest4,215
Wonoga Pk.Inyo National Forest11,272
WoodpeckerSequoia National Forest11,936
Colorado (6)
AreaForestAcres
Comanche Peak Adjacent AreaArapaho & Roosevelt NFs44,158
Dome PeakRoutt NF35,716
HermosaSan Juan NF148,103
Long ParkRoutt NF42,100
San MiguelSan Juan NF64,263
Storm PeakSan Juan NF57,617
Idaho (7)
AreaForestAcres
Borah PeakSalmon-Challis National Forest130,463
HoodooNez Perce-Clearwater National Forest153,868
Italian PeakCaribou-Targhee National Forest141,158
Lemhi RangeSalmon-Challis National Forest308,533
PalisadesCaribou-Targhee National Forest122,002
Pioneer MountainsSalmon-Challis National Forest172,460
Pioneer MountainsSawtooth National Forest119,563
Montana (26)
AreaForestAcres
Anaconda HillHelena National Forest18,546
Bear - Marshall - Scapegoat - SwanHelena National Forest51,360
Bear - Marshall - Scapegoat - SwanLewis and Clark National Forest344,022
BeartoothGallatin National Forest5,285
Big BaldyLewis and Clark National Forest43,135
Big Snowy Mountains WsaLewis and Clark National Forest88,003
Bluff MountainLewis and Clark National Forest38,060
BridgerGallatin National Forest45,059
East PioneerBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest145,082
Freezeout MountainBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest97,305
Gallatin FringeGallatin National Forest51,571
Hellgate GulchHelena National Forest16,821
Hyalite - Porcupine - Buffalo Horn Wilderness Study AreaGallatin National Forest143,991
Italian PeakBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest90,401
Lazyman GulchHelena National Forest11,614
Line Creek PlateauCuster National Forest24,825
LionheadGallatin National Forest33,549
MadisonGallatin National Forest127,859
Middle Fork Judith WsaLewis and Clark National Forest81,131
Mt. Gmt Area HCuster National Forest1,335
North AbsarokaGallatin National Forest159,075
North AbsarokaCuster National Forest21,063
Red Lodge Creek HellroaringCuster National Forest17,210
Republic MountainGallatin National Forest836
Tenderfoot - Deep CreekLewis and Clark National Forest85,614
West PioneerBeaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest248,631
Nevada (50)
AreaForestAcres
Alta T - East BHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest21,732
Alta T - NorthHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest9,325
Angel Peak NorthHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest12,577
Arc Dome - MahoganyHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest4,208
Arc Dome - OphirHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest5,652
Arc Dome - Secret BsnHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest74,782
Bald Mtn.Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest41,598
Boundary Peak (NV)Inyo National Forest21,851
Bunker HillHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest27,569
Charleston - CarpenterHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest17,828
Charleston - Macks CynHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest11,378
Currant - East SlopeHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest10,101
Duck Creek Mtns.Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest12,165
EightmileHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest5,332
FaulknerHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest12,310
Grant - Little Deer SpHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest177
Humboldt - Angel LkHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest1,008
Humboldt - LizziesHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest70
Humboldt - WinchellHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest1,272
La Madre - ProspectHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest278
Long ValleyHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest50,472
Moriah - Silver CreekHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest1,582
Moriah - West SlopeHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest14,737
Mt. HicksHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest15,698
North SchellHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest30,773
NorthumberlandHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest22,464
Pearl PeakHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest71,405
Pogonip RidgeHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest6,629
QuinnHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest62,459
Red MountainHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest30,242
ReynoldsHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest7,064
Ruby - Lamoille CynHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest32,771
Ruby - MarshHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest10,164
Ruby - SegundaHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest12,532
Ruby - SouthHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest13,195
Santa RosaHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest54,555
Snake - Big WashHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest4,146
Snake - ChokecherryHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest30,845
Snake - HatcheryHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest4,627
Snake - Lincoln CynHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest314
Snake - MurphyHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest27,064
Snake - Pole CynHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest766
South SchellHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest125,614
South Shoshone PeakHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest24,528
Spanish PeakHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest31,520
SugarloafInyo National Forest11,534
Toiyabe RangeHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest99,225
Ward MountainHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest15,927
West SchellHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest21,656
WildcatHumboldt-Toiyabe National Forest28,565
New Mexico (14)
AreaForestAcres
Alamo CanyonSanta Fe National Forest8,639
Black CanyonSanta Fe National Forest1,922
Chama WS RiverSanta Fe National Forest4,168
Columbine - Hondo Wilderness Study AreaCarson National Forest43,739
Comales CanyonCarson National Forest4,389
Juan de Gabaldon GrantSanta Fe National Forest8,023
Latir PeakCarson National Forest3,573
Little TesuqueSanta Fe National Forest815
Nichols ReservoirSanta Fe National Forest1,518
PecosCarson National Forest13,436
Ryan HillCibola National Forest34,201
San Pedro ParksSanta Fe National Forest5,824
Tesuque CreekSanta Fe National Forest810
Thompson PeakSanta Fe National Forest33,001
Utah (65)
AreaForestAcres
0401001Ashley National Forest11,705
0401010Ashley National Forest21,886
0401011Ashley National Forest30,062
0401012Ashley National Forest46,400
0401013Ashley National Forest11,909
0401030Ashley National Forest531
0401031Ashley National Forest7,110
418024Uinta National Forest51,699
418026Uinta National Forest14,038
418027Uinta National Forest13,884
418028Uinta National Forest34,002
418029Uinta National Forest15,673
418040Uinta National Forest1,702
Big Bear CreekManti-Lasal National Forest28,440
Boulger - Black CanyonManti-Lasal National Forest23,286
Box - Death HollowDixie National Forest3,175
Bullion - DelanoFishlake National Forest14,917
Bunker CreekDixie National Forest7,474
Burch CreekWasatch-Cache National Forest6,938
Casto BluffDixie National Forest87,466
Cedar KnollManti-Lasal National Forest22,502
Circleville MountainFishlake National Forest24,142
City CreekFishlake National Forest13,939
Clear CreekSawtooth National Forest7,188
Dairy ForkManti-Lasal National Forest30,222
Deer CreekDixie National Forest39,818
East MountainManti-Lasal National Forest30,705
FishhookDixie National Forest12,959
Fishlake MountainFishlake National Forest25,217
GibsonWasatch-Cache National Forest5,350
HancockDixie National Forest9,809
High Uintas (UT)Wasatch-Cache National Forest102,398
HogsbackWasatch-Cache National Forest7,936
Jake HollowDixie National Forest15,146
LakesWasatch-Cache National Forest121,967
Lava BedsDixie National Forest14,944
Lewis PeakWasatch-Cache National Forest11,616
Lone Peak ContiguousWasatch-Cache National Forest874
Mahogany RangeWasatch-Cache National Forest11,409
Mcgath Lake - Auger HoleDixie National Forest8,334
Middle FrancisWasatch-Cache National Forest3,296
Mt. AireWasatch-Cache National Forest9,681
Mt. Logan NorthWasatch-Cache National Forest18,930
Mt. Logan SouthWasatch-Cache National Forest17,014
Mt. NaomiWasatch-Cache National Forest41,922
Mt. OlympusWasatch-Cache National Forest9,982
Muddy Creek - Nelson Mt.Manti-Lasal National Forest59,034
North FrancisWasatch-Cache National Forest8,148
Pine Valley MountainsDixie National Forest57,673
Red Canyon NorthDixie National Forest9,973
Red Canyon SouthDixie National Forest3,736
Right Hand Fork LoganWasatch-Cache National Forest15,023
SanpitchManti-Lasal National Forest29,129
South FrancisWasatch-Cache National Forest3,374
Stansbury MountainsWasatch-Cache National Forest39,696
Sugar PineWasatch-Cache National Forest5,600
Swan Creek MountainWasatch-Cache National Forest9,390
Table Cliffs - Henderson CanyonDixie National Forest19,581
Temple PeakWasatch-Cache National Forest24,081
Tushar MountainFishlake National Forest39,992
Twin PeaksWasatch-Cache National Forest6,157
Wayne WonderlandFishlake National Forest12,395
WellsvilleWasatch-Cache National Forest1,717
White MountainFishlake National Forest23,939
White PineWasatch-Cache National Forest1,942
Wyoming (39)
AreaForestAcres
Bear RocksBighorn National Forest25,023
Beartooth Proposed WildernessShoshone National Forest16,837
Cloud Peak ContiguousBighorn National Forest113,757
Deep CreekMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest6,411
Devils CanyonBighorn National Forest37,416
Franc's PeakShoshone National Forest68,561
Grayback RidgeBridger-Teton National Forest295,113
Gros Ventre MountainsBridger-Teton National Forest106,418
Horse Creek MesaBighorn National Forest77,808
Lake Alice - Commissary RidgeBridger-Teton National Forest166,707
Laramie PeakMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest28,608
Leigh CreekBighorn National Forest19,180
Libby FlatsMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest11,107
Little BighornBighorn National Forest133,949
Little GooseBighorn National Forest25,558
Middle ForkMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest13,238
Middle ForkShoshone National Forest51,772
Mosquito Lake - Seven LakesBridger-Teton National Forest51,950
PalisadesTarghee National Forest1,121
Platte River AdditionMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest7,962
Rock CreekMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest18,874
Salt River RangeBridger-Teton National Forest235,661
Sheep MountainMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest17,626
Sibley LakeBighorn National Forest10,367
Snowy RangeMedicine Bow-Routt National Forest29,660
South Beartooth HighwayShoshone National Forest105,570
South ForkShoshone National Forest64,903
South Wyoming RangeBridger-Teton National Forest85,776
Spread Creek - Gros Ventre RiverBridger-Teton National Forest166,097
Sulphur CreekShoshone National Forest30,221
Teton Corridor TrailheadsBridger-Teton National Forest286
Trout CreekShoshone National Forest44,034
Walker PrairieBighorn National Forest62,434
Wapiti Valley NorthShoshone National Forest18,345
Wapiti Valley SouthShoshone National Forest43,517
West Slope TetonsTarghee National Forest47,448
West Slope WindsBridger-Teton National Forest143,252
Wilderness Study AreaTarghee National Forest51,961
Windy MountainShoshone National Forest31,283
References (33)
  1. Alberta Environment and Parks. 2022. Alberta Whitebark Pine and Limber Pine Recovery Plan. Alberta Species at Risk Recovery Plan No. 44. Edmonton, Alberta. 88 pp.
  2. Alberta Sustainable Resource Development and Alberta Conservation Association. 2007. Status of the limber pine (<i>Pinus flexilis</i>) in Alberta. Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, Wildlife Status Report No. 62. Edmonton, Alberta. 17 pp.
  3. Baker, F.S. 1944. Mountain climates of the western United States. Ecological Monographs 14:223-254.
  4. Breshears, D.D., N.S. Cobb, P.M. Rich, K.P. Price, C.D. Allen, R.G. Balice, W.H. Romme, J.H. Kastens, M.L. Floyd, J. Belnap, J.J. Anderson, O.B. Myers, and C.W. Meyer 2005. Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102:15144-15148.
  5. Burns, R. M., and B. H. Honkala, eds. 1990. Silvics of North America, vol. 1: Conifers. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 654, Washington, DC. 675 pp.
  6. Cleaver, C.M., W.R. Jacobi, K.S. Burns, and R.E. Means. 2015. Limber pine in the central and southern Rocky Mountains: Stand conditions and interactions with blister rust, mistletoe, and bark beetles. Forest Ecology Management 358(15):139-153.
  7. Coop, J.D. and A.W. Schoettle. 2009. Regeneration of Rocky Mountain bristlecone pine (<i>Pinus aristata</i>) and limber pine (<i>Pinus flexilis</i>) three decades after stand-replacing fires. Forest Ecology and Management. 257: 893-903
  8. COSEWIC. 2014. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the limber pine<i> Pinus flexilis </i>in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, Ottawa, ON. 49 pp.
  9. Daly, C. and D. Shankman. 1985. Seedling establishment by conifers above tree limit on Niwot Ridge, Front Range, Colorado, U.S.A. Arctic and Alpine Research 17(4):389-400.
  10. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (FNA). 1993a. Flora of North America north of Mexico. Vol. 2. Pteridophytes and gymnosperms. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. xvi + 475 pp.
  11. Johnson, K.A. 2001. <i>Pinus flexilis</i>. In: Fire Effects Information System. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available online: <u></u> (accessed 4 February 2009).
  12. Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
  13. Krist, F.J., and S.A. Romero. 2014. 2013–2027 National insect and disease forest risk assessment: Summary and data access. In: Forest health monitoring: National status, trends, and analysis 2014. K. M. Potter, and B. L. Conkling, eds. Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
  14. Krochmal, A. and C. Krochmal. 1982. Uncultivated nuts of the United States. Agriculture Information Bulletin 450, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: Washington, D.C.. 89 pp.
  15. Lanner, R.M. 1985. Effectiveness of the seed wing of Pinus flexilis in wind dispersal. The Great Basin Naturalist 45(2):318-320
  16. Lanner, R.M. 1996. Made for Each Other: A Symbiosis of Birds and Pines. Oxford University Press: New York. 160 pp.
  17. Lanner, R.M. and S.B. Vander Wall. 1980. Dispersal of limber pine seed by Clark's nutcracker. Journal of Forestry 78(10):637-639.
  18. Little, E.L., Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native and naturalized). Agriculture Handbook No. 541. U.S. Forest Service, Washington, D.C. 375 pp.
  19. Millar, C.I., D.A. Charlet, R.D. Westfall, J.C. King, D.L. Delany, A.L. Flint, and L.E. Flint. 2018. Do low-elevation ravines provide climate refugia for subalpine limber pine (<i>Pinus flexilis</i>) in the Great Basin, USA?. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 48(6):663-671.
  20. Millar, C.I., R.D. Westfall, and D. L. Delany. 2007. Response of high-elevation limber pine (<i>Pinus flexilis</i>) to multi-year droughts and 20th century warming; Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Can. J. For. Res. 37:2508-2520.
  21. Schoettle, A.W. 2004. Ecological roles of five-needle pines in Colorado: potential consequences of their loss. Pages 124-135 in: R.A. Sniezko, S. Samman, S.E. Schlarbaum, and B.E. Howard (eds.). Breeding and Genetic Resources of Five-needle Pines: Growth, Adaptability and Pest Resistance. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-32. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experimental Station, Fort Collins, CO.
  22. Schoettle, A.W., R.A. Sniezko, A. Kegley, and K.S. Burns. 2014. White pine blister rust resistance in limber pine: Evidence for a major gene. Phytopathology 104:163-173.
  23. Schuster, W.S., D.L. Alles, and J.B. Mitton. 1989. Gene flow in limber pine: Evidence from pollination phenology and genetic differentiation along an elevational transect. American Journal of Botany 76(9):1395-1403.
  24. Sniezko, R.A., R. Danchok, D.P. Savin, J.J. Liu,and A. Kegley. 2016. Genetic resistance to white pine blister rust in limber pine (<i>Pinus flexilis</i>): Major gene resistance in a northern population. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 46:1173-1178.
  25. Tomback, D.F. 2001a. Blister rust in white pine ecosystems: The imminent decline of western montane biodiversity. Phytopathology 91:S155
  26. Tomback, D.F. 2001b. Clark's nutcracker: agent of regeneration. Pages 88-104 in D.F. Tomback, S.F. Arno, and R.E. Keane (eds.) Whitebark Pine Communities: Ecology and Restoration. Island Press: Washington, DC.
  27. Tomback, D.F. and Y.B. Linhart. 1990. The evolution of bird-dispersed pines. Evolutionary Ecology 4:185-219.
  28. Tomback, D.F., A.W. Schoettle, K.E. Chevalier and C.A. Jones. 2005. Life on the edge for limber pine: seed dispersal within a peripheral population. EcoScience 12(4):519-529
  29. van Mantgem, P.J., N.L. Stephenson, J.C. Byrne, L.D. Daniels, J.F. Franklin, P.Z. Fule, M.E. Harmon, A.J. Larson, J.M. Smith, A.H. Taylor and T.T. Veblen. 2009. Widespread increase in tree mortality rates in the western United States. Science 323:521-524.
  30. van Wagtendonk, J.W., J.M. Benedict, and W.M. Sydoriak. 1998. Fuel bed characteristics of Sierra Nevada conifers. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 13(3):73-84.
  31. Weisberg, P.J. and W.L. Baker. 1995. Spatial variation in tree regeneration in the forest-tundra ecotone, Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 25(8):1326-1339.
  32. Welsh, S.L., N.D. Atwood, L.C. Higgins, and S. Goodrich, eds. 1987. A Utah Flora. Great Basin Naturalist Memoir 9: 1- 894. Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah. 894 pp.
  33. Woodmansee, R.G. 1977. Clusters of limber pine trees: a hypothesis of plant-animal coaction. Southwest Naturalist 21(4):511-517.