Myotis septentrionalis

(Trovessart, 1897)

Northern Myotis

G2Imperiled (G2G3) Found in 290 roadless areas NatureServe Explorer →
G2ImperiledGlobal Rank
Near threatenedIUCN
Very high - highThreat Impact
Northern Long-Eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis). Photo by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Public Domain (U.S. Government Work), via ECOS.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, https://www.usa.gov/government-works
Identity
Unique IDELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.102615
Element CodeAMACC01150
Record TypeSPECIES
ClassificationSpecies
Classification StatusStandard
Name CategoryVertebrate Animal
IUCNNear threatened
Endemicoccurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
KingdomAnimalia
PhylumCraniata
ClassMammalia
OrderChiroptera
FamilyVespertilionidae
GenusMyotis
Synonyms
Myotis keenii septentrionalis(Trouessart, 1897)
Other Common Names
Chauve-souris nordique (FR) Northern Bat (EN) northern long-eared bat (EN) Northern Long-eared Bat (EN) Northern Long-eared Myotis (EN) Vespertilion nordique (FR)
Concept Reference
Jones, J. K., Jr., R. S. Hoffman, D. W. Rice, C. Jones, R. J. Baker, and M. D. Engstrom. 1992a. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1991. Occasional Papers, The Museum, Texas Tech University, 146:1-23.
Taxonomic Comments
Myotis septentrionalis formerly was regarded as conspecific with Myotis keenii; van Zyll de Jong (1979, 1985) and Jones et al. (1992) regarded Myotis keenii and M. septentrionalis as separate species; Koopman (in Wilson and Reeder 1993) included septentrionalis in Myotis keenii, noting that they may be separate species. Baker et al. (2003) and Simmons (in Wilson and Reeder 2005) recognized M. septentrionalis and M. keenii as distinct species. Most older literature using the name Myotis keenii actually pertains to Myotis septentrionalis. No subspecies are recognized. No genetically distinctive subpopulations have been identified (Johnson et al. 2014).
Conservation Status
Rank Method Rank calculation - Biotics v2
Review Date2021-12-02
Change Date2021-12-02
Edition Date2015-07-15
Edition AuthorsHammerson, G., L. A. Wilsmann, and J. Soule (2015)
Threat ImpactVery high - high
Range Extent>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Rank Reasons
Large range in the eastern and north-central United States and much of southern Canada; many hibernacula and maternity roost sites; does not form large colonies; severe recent declines in abundance associated with rapidly spreading white-nose syndrome have occurred in eastern North America, and the disease is expected to spread across the species' range; threats from wind-energy development, winter and summer habitat modification, destruction and disturbance of habitat (e.g., vandalism to hibernacula, roost tree removal), climate change, and contaminants may be significant for WNS-reduced populations.
Range Extent Comments
This bat is widely but patchily distributed in the eastern and north-central United States and adjacent southern Canada, from eastern British Columbia and southern Yukon eastward across southern Canada to eastern Quebec, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland, and southward to southern Texas (one old record), Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, and Florida (one old record from panhandle), and westward in the United States generally to the eastern margin of the Great Plains region (Barbour and Davis 1969, Harvey 1992, van Zyll de Jong 1985, Hall 1981, Crnkovic 2003, Wilson and Reeder 2005, Amelon and Burhans 2006, Marks and Marks 2006, Henderson et al. 2009, Ammerman et al. 2012, Park and Broders 2012). The overall summer and winter ranges are essentially the same (Barbour and Davis 1969).
Occurrences Comments
The number of distinct occurrences has not been determined using standardized criteria. More than 780 hibernacula have been identified throughout the species' range in the United States, although many hibernacula contain only a few (1 to 3) individuals (Barbour and Davis 1969, Whitaker and Hamilton 1998, USFWS 2013). Missouri, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia each have greater than 100 known hibernacula (USFWS 2013). The species is now absent from or very scarce in some of the historical hibernacula (see trend and threats comments). This species also is represented by a large number of maternity roost sites.
Threat Impact Comments
The most serious threat is white-nose syndrome (WNS), an often (but not always) lethal condition caused by a fungal pathogen (Pseudogymnoascus destructans). WNS was first noticed in 2006 in New York. Since its initial discovery, WNS has spread rapidly (confirmed in more than 100 bat hibernacula) and now has been documented throughout northeastern North America and as far west as Missouri and Arkansas, and south to northern Alabama and northern Georgia (as of May 2014; www.whitenosesyndrome.org). WNS affects Myotis septentrionalis and several other bat species (Gargas et al. 2009) and has resulted in several million bat deaths in the northeastern United States in recent years. Though M. septentrionalis was not common in surveys in the northeastern United States before the recognition of WNS, counts of this species subsequently have declined to zero in many caves since the advent of the disease (Hicks et al. 2008). As of 2013, WNS was still spreading and was documented in 22 of the 39 states in which the species occurs). As of early 2015, WNS was still spreading but was confined primarily to areas east of the Mississippi River (plus several locations in Arkansas and Missouri, with suspected instances in Iowa and Minnesota).The vast majority of known hibernacula are in regions where WNS has been confirmed. USFWS (2013) found no information to indicate that there are areas within the species' range that will not be impacted by the disease or that similar rates of decline (to what has been observed in the East, where the disease had been present for at most 8 years) will not occur throughout the species' range.

USFWS (2013) determined that although several activities, such as construction of physical barriers at cave accesses, mining, flooding, vandalism, development, and timber harvest may modify or destroy M. septentrionalis habitat, however, these activities alone are not thought to have significant, population-level effects on the species. Climate change, contaminants, wind energy development, and prescribed burning also are not believed to be significant threats alone. However, these factors may have a cumulative effect on the northern long-eared bat when added to white-nose syndrome, because the disease has led to dramatic population declines in the species (USFWS 2013).

Loss, degradation, and fragmentation of mature forest habitat (associated with various kinds of human activities, such as logging; oil, gas, and mineral development; and wind energy development) also may be a significant threat (Center for Biological Diversity 2010, USFWS 2011). However, the general lack of genetic structure at both watershed and regional scales indicates that forest disturbances such as prescribed fire or timber harvest at watershed scales do not appear to disrupt northern myotis gene flow across the landscape (Johnson et al. 2014).

Mortality caused directly by wind turbines may pose a significant threat in some areas (USFWS 2011).

Closures of mines used for hibernation are a potential threat, but there is no evidence that mine closures are currently affecting Myotis septentrionalis populations (USFWS 2011).

This species is sensitive to disturbance during hibernation (Garner, pers. comm., Thomas 1995); frequently aroused bats may deplete their energy reserves. Nursery colonies are very sensitive to disturbance by humans; bats may move to an alternate roost after a single disturbance, even if no attempt is made to capture the bats (Layne 1978).
Ecology & Habitat

Description

Methods of aging individuals by morphological features are limited. Juveniles can be distinguished from adults by the incomplete ossification of the phalangeal epiphyses until late August of the year of their birth (Kunz 1971, Caire et al. 1979). After that time, all are typically classified as adults. Degree of wear of the teeth has been used to determine relative age of adults (Guthrie 1933), though Hall et al. (1957) found this to be unreliable. Examination of canine and molars of individuals known to be at least 18-19 years of age revealed very little wear.

In Missouri, prehibernation fat deposition period occurs from August to October and results in an increase in average weight of 41-45% (Caire et al. 1979). By spring, the same study found that both sexes weighed approximately what they had before the prehibernation fat deposition period.

Habitat

This bat generally is associated with old-growth forests composed of trees 100 years old or older. It relies on intact interior forest habitat, with low edge-to-interior ratios. Relevant late-successional forest features include a high percentage of old trees, uneven forest structure (resulting in multilayered vertical structure), single and multiple tree-fall gaps, standing snags, and woody debris. These late successional forest characteristics may be favored for several reasons, including the large number of partially dead or decaying trees that the species uses for breeding, summer day roosting, and foraging. [Source: USFWS 2011, which see for citations of further literature]

Small, highly fragmented, or young forests that provide limited areas of subcanopy foraging habitat may not be suitable. Young forests may also lack appropriate nursery sites. However, recent studies indicate that these bats can exploit relatively isolated and small forest fragments (Caceres and Barclay 2000, Henderson et al. 2008, Johnson et al. 2008).

Foraging occurs within forests, along forest edges, over forest clearings, and occasionally over ponds (Ammerman et al. 2012). Eleven individuals (10 males, 1 female) tagged with chemical lights observed during the summer in Missouri (LaVal et al. 1977), foraged almost exclusively among the trees of hillside and ridge forests, rather than utilizing floodplain and riparian forests; frequently foraging occurred within 1 to 3 m of the ground. Foraging bats doubled back frequently and only slowly moved out of the observation area. In Iowa, Kunz (1973, 1971) found primarily females foraging in mature deciduous uplands with adjacent deep ravines and in a disturbed riparian area with an adjacent floodplain and agricultural lands.

Hibernation occurs primarily in caves, mines, and tunnels, typically those with large passages and entrances, relatively constant and cool temperatures, high humidity, and no air currents (Griffin 1940, Jackson 1961, Mumford and Cope 1964, Kurta 1982, Raesly and Gates 1987, Caceres and Pybus 1997, USFWS 2013). Hibernators frequently roost in crevices, drill holes, and similar sites (Griffin 1940, Layne 1958, Pearson 1962, Caire et al. 1979, Whitaker and Mumford 2009) where they may be overlooked during surveys, but roosting in the open is not uncommon (Barbour and Davis 1969, Whitaker and Mumford 2009). A lack of suitable hibernacula may prevent occupancy of areas that otherwise have adequate habitat (Kurta 1982).

Use of different types of hibernacula can vary considerably among areas, depending upon quality and availability of sites. In a study of 71 potential hibernation sites, including large and small caves, overhangs, and mines, on the Shawnee National Forest in southern Illinois (Whitaker and Winter 1977), mines were the only occupied habitat. Mines also are the principal hibernation sites in northern Michigan where there are no caves (Stones 1981). In the northeastern U.S., hibernation sites include mines and caves (Griffin 1940, Hall et al. 1957) as well as large, cavelike water conduit tunnels (G. Hammerson, pers. obs.; T. French, cited by USFWS 2013).

The principal requirements of a suitable hibernation site are winter-long, low temperatures above freezing, high humidity, and lack of disturbances, both natural (floods) and anthropogenic (visitation) (Barbour and Davis 1969, Hitchcock 1949). At least two studies have provided contradictory information on thermal habitat preferences, suggesting that warmer temperatures sometimes are selected or at least tolerated. In Illinois, Pearson (1962) found that the mean temperature at hibernation sites averaged 9.7 C. Stones (1981) studied the occurrence of bats in northern Michigan mines that were vertically thermally stratified. The mean ambient temperature was 5.9 C, with 43% of the population occurring in the range 7-8 C and 6.5% occurring in the range 9-11 C.

There appears to be a high degree of philopatry in hibernaculum use. In Missouri, over 90% of recaptured banded individuals, representing 5% of the original banded population of 945 (753 males and 192 females), were recaptured at their cave of origin (Caire et al. 1979). Mills (1971) recaptured 4.8% of 358 individuals at their cave of origin the year after banding. Griffin (1945) found that of over 13,000 banded bats of various species, of which about 8,500 were banded in their winter hibernacula, the ratio was 100:1 for bats that were observed to return to their cave of origin over subsequent winters vs. those that were recaptured elsewhere.

Night roosts used in summer between foraging bouts are in different habitats than day roosts. Caves, mines, and quarry tunnels are used as night roosts, typically by males, but also by nonreproductive females (Clark et al. 1987, Jones et al. 1967). They are joined later in the summer by juveniles and post-lactating females (Kunz, 1973). During the day, these same sites usually house no M. septentrionalis. Daytime observations typically are of individuals in crevices or hollows or under loose bark on trees (Foster and Kurta 1999) and in a variety of small spaces associated with buildings and other structures (Hoffmeister 1989, Caire et al. 1979, Hamilton and Whitaker 1979, Barbour and Davis 1969). At times M. septentrionalis has been found in or around caves on summer nights, but not actually roosting in them (Mills 1971). Early in the summer, these groups mostly comprise males, with females and young-of-the-year joining later in the season (Caire et al. 1979).

Nothing has been published on the fidelity of individuals or colonies to particular swarming sites, nor the relationship of swarming site selection to hibernaculum and summer roost selection. Given the low numbers found in most hibernacula and summer night roosts relative to the higher numbers found at swarming sites, it appears that certain caves serve as congregation points for fall mating activity. However, short-term banding returns at swarming sites are very low, indicating movement among swarming sites (Kurta, pers. comm.).

Most nursery colonies are in cavities or beneath loose bark in trees or snags in upland forests, with roost entrances generally below or within the tree canopy (Mumford and Cope 1964, Sasse and Perkins 1996, Lacki and Schwierjohann 2001, Menzel et al. 2002, Owen et al. 2002, Carter and Feldhamer 2005, Perry and Thill 2007, Lacki et al. 2009, Timpone et al. 2010, Silvis et al. 2012). Reproductive females use a wide range of tree species. For example, in summer in north-central Kentucky, Silvis et al. (2012) tracked 58 females to 105 roost trees of 21 species; sassafras was used as a day roost more than expected based on forest stand-level availability and accounted for 48.6 percent of all observed day roosts. Individuals frequently switch roosts (Menzel et al. 2002, Owen et al. 2002, Carter and Feldhamer 2005, Timpone et al. 2010).

Some summer roosts are in buildings or bat houses or under bridges (Brandon 1961, Barbour and Davis 1969, Cope and Humphrey 1972, Amelon and Burhans 2006, Whitaker and Mumford 2009). A large colony in a barn in Indiana (Cope and Humphrey 1972) on 22 June had 24 adult females, 12 immature females, and 18 immature males; 10 other adults escaped. Of the 24 females, 23 were lactating and 1 was pregnant. Roosts of males and nonreproductive females include tree hollows as well as cooler locations, including caves and mines (Barbour and Davis 1969, Amelon and Burhans 2006). In Arkansas, pine snags were important summer roosts for males (Perry and Thill 2007).

In West Virginia, these bats formed social groups whose roost areas and roost tree networks overlapped to some extent (Johnson et al. 2012). Most networks had a single central node roost tree. In control treatments, central node roost trees were in early stages of decay and surrounded by greater basal area than other trees within the networks. In prescribed fire treatments, central node roost trees were small in diameter, low in the forest canopy, and surrounded by low basal area compared to other trees in networks. The results indicated that forest disturbances, including prescribed fire, can affect availability and distribution of roosts within roost tree networks.

Ecology

Syntopic species during hibernation include Myotis lucifugus, Pipistrellus subflavus, and Eptesicus fuscus. Myotis septentrionalis; generally comprises a small percentage (for example, <1% in Missouri, 6% in Quebec-Ontario, 8% in Michigan, 10% in New England, 15% in Illinois) of the bats found hibernating in any single site (Griffin 1940, Hitchcock 1949, Pearson 1962, Caire et al. 1979, Stones 1981). Summer surveys reveal similar figures. In a netting survey of Iowa bats utilizing stream corridors for foraging, Kunz (1973) captured 64 Myotis septentrionalis over three years, out of an eight-species sample totaling 540 individuals (12%); Myotis septentrionalis was the third most abundant species, ranking far behind Eptesicus fuscus (243) and Lasiurus borealis (124). At Renfrew mine, Fenton (1969) found 117 Myotis septentrionalis compared to 5,712 Myotis lucifugus.

Rarely are there more than 100 individuals per hibernation colony (Barbour and Davis 1969, Caire et al. 1979). However, Stones (1981), found over 100 individuals (mean = 226) in 5 of 21 mines in which M. septentrionalis occurred in northern Michigan. In that study, 73% of the entire population was found in 5 mines and 86% in 8 mines of the 21 mines containing the species. Individuals usually roost solitarily.

In summer, these bats generally are colonial, but reproductive females and juveniles often roost alone. As many as 60 adults have been found in a single tree (Foster and Kurta 1999).

No single population of significant size has been studied intensively or long enough to determine population structure. Habitat utilization biases are reflected in sex ratios of animals captured during the summer, when females are more frequently taken near streams and males are more frequently taken at caves. Sex ratio data from hibernacula are more consistent. Griffin (1940) reported on sex ratios from New England hibernacula, where he found males comprised 77.8% of a sample population of 877 individuals over an 8 year period. In southern Illinois, Pearson (1962) found 72% males among the groups hibernating in silica mines and Hitchcock (1949) found that 76.0% of 242 individuals hibernating in eastern Canada were males and that the sexes did not segregate during hibernation. In northern Michigan, males comprised 60% of winter populations and were more abundant than females in all but 3 of 21 mines searched (Stones 1981).

The disparity in the sex ratio appears to be quite consistent among studies, seasons, and sites. Griffin (1940) suggested that females may have a higher mortality rate than males and consequently, a shorter life span and lower representation in the population. Hitchcock's (1949) original data recently were statistically analyzed and shown to support this hypothesis (Hitchcock et al. 1984).

Although age structure is not known for any population, potential longevity is at least two decades. Hall et al. (1957) reported one banded M. septentrionalis that was found recently dead in the cave in which it had been banded almost 19 years earlier.

In West Virginia, foraging home ranges of seven females averaged 61.1 hectares (Menzel et al. 1999).

In Michigan, radio-tagged bats in spring-summer changed roosts every 2 days; distance between roosts was 6-2000 m (Foster and Kurta 1999).

In an experiment to determine the homing ability of blinded and deafened bats, a blinded individual returned 32 miles to its home cave in 2.5 hr. after being held in captivity for 3 days (Stones and Branick 1969). The return rate of this animal was at an average, straight-line speed of 12.8 miles per hour. Overall, blinded bats returned to their home cave at the same frequency as did the control animals over the 6-week period following their release. However, none of the bats with impaired hearing returned during that time.

No significant predators are known (Baker 1983). Reported parasites include chiggers, mites, and trematodes (Whitaker and Winter 1977, Whitaker and Mumford 1971).

Reproduction

Copulation occurs in the late summer and early fall, during the swarming period when large numbers of bats congregate in and near certain caves (Baker 1983, Kurta 1980). Females store sperm during hibernation, though some may copulate again at spring emergence (Guthrie 1933, Racey 1982). Guthrie (1933) found a portion of the males of some species to be reproductively active in late winter and early spring. However, males emerging from hibernation in Missouri were found to be reproductively inactive (undescended testes) until late July, with the largest percentage of males becoming reproductively active in August and September (Caire et al. 1979). Females ovulate at the time of emergence and parturition occurs 50-60 days later (Baker 1983). Later parturition dates at higher latitudes are due to later emergence and therefore later ovulation (Racey 1982).

Females bear a single young, with parturition occurring in late May or early June in Missouri and Oklahoma (Caire et al 1979, Easterla 1965, Caire et al. 1989), in early to late June in Indiana (Cope and Humphrey 1972), and in late June to early July in Iowa, Illinois, Michigan, and New York (Kunz 1971, Hoffmeister 1989, Kurta 1980, Hamilton and Whitaker 1979). Post-lactating females were observed by mid-June in Missouri (Caire et al. 1979) and by mid- July to late July in Michigan and Iowa (Kurta 1980, Kunz 1971), with volant young observed at about that time in all studies. Young-of-the-year may reproduce in their first fall, but the proportion of the cohort doing so is unknown (Kurta, pers. comm.). Nursery colonies are relatively small, most often including 2-30 adults (10-90 individuals, including young, according to Layne (1978)).
Terrestrial Habitats
Forest - HardwoodForest - ConiferForest - MixedWoodland - HardwoodWoodland - ConiferWoodland - MixedUrban/edificarianAerial
Palustrine Habitats
Riparian
Other Nations (2)
CanadaN3B,NNRN,NNRM
ProvinceRankNative
Yukon TerritoryS3BYes
SaskatchewanS3Yes
LabradorS2Yes
New BrunswickS1Yes
Island of NewfoundlandS2Yes
Prince Edward IslandS1Yes
British ColumbiaS2Yes
OntarioS3Yes
ManitobaS3N,S4BYes
Northwest TerritoriesS2Yes
AlbertaS2Yes
QuebecS1Yes
Nova ScotiaS1Yes
United StatesNNR
ProvinceRankNative
New JerseyS1Yes
DelawareS1Yes
AlabamaS2Yes
ArkansasS1Yes
KentuckyS1Yes
IndianaS1Yes
TennesseeS1Yes
North CarolinaS2Yes
MichiganS1Yes
VirginiaS2Yes
MontanaS1Yes
WisconsinS1Yes
South CarolinaS1Yes
IowaS4Yes
North DakotaSUYes
OklahomaS2Yes
District of ColumbiaS4Yes
PennsylvaniaS1Yes
MissouriS1Yes
ConnecticutS1Yes
MassachusettsS1Yes
LouisianaS1Yes
NebraskaS1Yes
IllinoisS1Yes
MarylandS1Yes
MinnesotaS3Yes
FloridaSHYes
MaineS1Yes
KansasS3Yes
MississippiS1Yes
South DakotaS2Yes
GeorgiaS1Yes
West VirginiaS1Yes
WyomingS1B,S1NYes
New YorkS1Yes
VermontS1Yes
OhioS1Yes
Rhode IslandS2Yes
New HampshireS1Yes
Threat Assessments
ThreatScopeSeverityTiming
1 - Residential & commercial developmentNegligible (<1%)High (continuing)
2 - Agriculture & aquacultureNegligible (<1%)High (continuing)
3 - Energy production & miningSmall (1-10%)UnknownHigh (continuing)
3.2 - Mining & quarrying
3.3 - Renewable energyHigh (continuing)
4 - Transportation & service corridorsNegligible or <1% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
5 - Biological resource useSmall (1-10%)Moderate - slightHigh (continuing)
5.3 - Logging & wood harvestingHigh (continuing)
6 - Human intrusions & disturbanceSmall (1-10%)Negligible or <1% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
6.1 - Recreational activitiesHigh (continuing)
7 - Natural system modificationsNegligible (<1%)Slight or 1-10% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8 - Invasive & other problematic species, genes & diseasesPervasive - largeExtreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
8.1 - Invasive non-native/alien species/diseasesExtreme or 71-100% pop. declineHigh (continuing)
9 - PollutionUnknownUnknownHigh (continuing)
10 - Geological eventsNegligible (<1%)
11 - Climate change & severe weatherPervasive (71-100%)UnknownHigh (continuing)

Roadless Areas (290)
Alabama (5)
AreaForestAcres
Blue MountainTalladega National Forest4,986
Cheaha ATalladega National Forest236
Cheaha BTalladega National Forest741
Oakey MountainTalladega National Forest6,129
Reed BrakeTalladega National Forest621
Arkansas (14)
AreaForestAcres
Bear MountainOuachita National Forest1,910
Blue MountainOuachita National Forest9,755
Brush HeapOuachita National Forest4,205
Clifty CanyonOzark-St. Francis National Forest1,963
Devils CanyonOzark-St. Francis National Forest1,877
Dismal CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest9,160
East ForkOzark-St. Francis National Forest13,037
Gee CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest7,957
Hurricane CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest2,279
Indian CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest7,855
Little BlakelyOuachita National Forest3,342
Pedestal RocksOzark-St. Francis National Forest21,957
PenhookOzark-St. Francis National Forest6,566
Richland CreekOzark-St. Francis National Forest571
Georgia (22)
AreaForestAcres
Ben GapChattahoochee National Forest1,292
Big MountainChattahoochee National Forest1,974
Boggs CreekChattahoochee National Forest2,073
Cedar MountainChattahoochee National Forest1,083
Duck BranchChattahoochee National Forest194
Ellicott Rock AdditionChattahoochee National Forest690
Foster BranchChattahoochee National Forest171
Helton CreekChattahoochee National Forest2,348
Indian Grave GapChattahoochee National Forest1,020
Joe GapChattahoochee National Forest5,321
Kelly RidgeChattahoochee National Forest8,325
Ken MountainChattahoochee National Forest527
Lance CreekChattahoochee National Forest9,025
Miller CreekChattahoochee National Forest701
Patterson GapChattahoochee National Forest1,186
Pink KnobChattahoochee National Forest12,127
Rocky MountainChattahoochee National Forest4,269
Sarah's CreekChattahoochee National Forest6,888
Shoal BranchChattahoochee National Forest413
Tate BranchChattahoochee National Forest1,069
Tripp BranchChattahoochee National Forest615
Turner CreekChattahoochee National Forest1,495
Idaho (1)
AreaForestAcres
Bear CreekCaribou-Targhee National Forest118,582
Illinois (6)
AreaForestAcres
Bay CreekShawnee National Forest120
Burden FallsShawnee National Forest485
Burke BranchShawnee National Forest6,231
Clear SpringsShawnee National Forest11
Eagle CreekShawnee National Forest38
Ripple HollowShawnee National Forest3,788
Indiana (1)
AreaForestAcres
Mogan RidgeHoosier National Forest8,435
Kentucky (1)
AreaForestAcres
WolfpenDaniel Boone National Forest2,835
Louisiana (2)
AreaForestAcres
Cunningham Brake Research Natural AreaKisatchie National Forest1,797
Saline Bayou W & S River CorridorKisatchie National Forest5,355
Maine (1)
AreaForestAcres
Caribou - Speckled ExtWhite Mountain National Forest5,988
Michigan (4)
AreaForestAcres
Bear SwampHuron-Manistee National Forest3,915
DeliriumHiawatha National Forest190
FibreHiawatha National Forest7,432
Norwich Plains Revised Roadless AreaOttawa National Forest4,360
Minnesota (15)
AreaForestAcres
Baker - Homer - Brule LakesSuperior National Forest6,712
Baldpate LakeSuperior National Forest486
Big IslandChippewa National Forest25
Brule Lake - Eagle MountainSuperior National Forest12,380
Cabin CreekSuperior National Forest6,071
Elmwood IslandChippewa National Forest42
Hegman LakesSuperior National Forest675
Kawishiwi Lake To SawbillSuperior National Forest15,305
Little Indian SiouxSuperior National Forest996
Mississippi CreekSuperior National Forest5,717
Moose Portage IIISuperior National Forest82
Phantom LakeSuperior National Forest6,521
South Kawishiwi RiverSuperior National Forest136
Tait LakeSuperior National Forest6,327
Wood LakeSuperior National Forest596
Mississippi (1)
AreaForestAcres
Sandy Creek Rare Ii AreaHomochitto National Forest2,620
Missouri (5)
AreaForestAcres
Anderson Mountain Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest2,741
Big Creek Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest9,277
Irish Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest1,226
Spring Creek Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest4,899
Swan Creek Rare II Study AreaMark Twain National Forest7,310
Montana (1)
AreaForestAcres
Cook MountainCuster National Forest9,621
New Hampshire (15)
AreaForestAcres
Carr MountainWhite Mountain National Forest17,110
Cherry MountainWhite Mountain National Forest8,766
Dartmouth RangeWhite Mountain National Forest9,233
Great Gulf Ext.White Mountain National Forest15,110
JobildunkWhite Mountain National Forest3,660
KearsargeWhite Mountain National Forest4,554
KilkennyWhite Mountain National Forest28,766
Kinsman MountainWhite Mountain National Forest8,999
Mt. Wolf - Gordon PondWhite Mountain National Forest11,846
PemigewassetWhite Mountain National Forest32,255
Pemigewasset ExtWhite Mountain National Forest15,840
Presidential - Dry River ExtWhite Mountain National Forest10,555
Sandwich RangeWhite Mountain National Forest16,797
WatervilleWhite Mountain National Forest4,312
Wild RiverWhite Mountain National Forest46,878
North Carolina (37)
AreaForestAcres
Bald MountainPisgah National Forest11,085
Balsam ConePisgah National Forest10,591
Barkers Creek (addition)Nantahala National Forest975
BearwallowPisgah National Forest4,113
Big Indian (addition)Nantahala National Forest1,155
Boteler PeakNantahala National Forest4,205
Catfish Lake NorthCroatan National Forest11,299
Catfish Lake South - ACroatan National Forest217
Catfish Lake South - BCroatan National Forest172
Cheoah BaldNantahala National Forest7,795
Cherry Cove (addition)Nantahala National Forest836
Chunky Gal (addition)Nantahala National Forest3,336
Craggy MountainPisgah National Forest2,657
Dobson KnobPisgah National Forest6,111
Graveyard Ridge (addition)Pisgah National Forest1,958
Harper CreekPisgah National Forest7,325
Jarrett CreekPisgah National Forest7,485
Laurel MountainPisgah National Forest5,683
Linville Gorge AdditionPisgah National Forest2,809
Little Indian (addition)Nantahala National Forest640
Lost CovePisgah National Forest5,944
Mackey MountainPisgah National Forest5,934
Middle Prong AdditionPisgah National Forest1,852
Overflow CreekNantahala National Forest3,379
Pocosin AdditionCroatan National Forest286
Pond Pine BCroatan National Forest2,961
Sam Knob (addition)Pisgah National Forest2,576
Sharptop Ridge (addition)Nantahala National Forest600
Sheep Ridge AdditionCroatan National Forest5,808
Slide HollowPisgah National Forest193
SnowbirdNantahala National Forest8,489
South Mills RiverPisgah National Forest8,588
Tusquitee BaldNantahala National Forest13,670
Wesser BaldNantahala National Forest4,061
Wilson CreekPisgah National Forest4,863
Woods MountainPisgah National Forest9,602
Yellowhammer Branch (add.)Nantahala National Forest1,255
North Dakota (16)
AreaForestAcres
Bell LakeDakota Prairie Grasslands11,265
BlacktailDakota Prairie Grasslands8,620
Bullion ButteDakota Prairie Grasslands19,877
Collar / Bennett - CottonwoodDakota Prairie Grasslands19,697
Dawsons WaterholeDakota Prairie Grasslands6,087
Easy HillDakota Prairie Grasslands7,344
Kinley PlateauDakota Prairie Grasslands16,900
Lone ButteDakota Prairie Grasslands11,465
Long X DivideDakota Prairie Grasslands10,099
MagpieDakota Prairie Grasslands21,281
Ponderosa PineDakota Prairie Grasslands7,471
Scairt WomanDakota Prairie Grasslands6,099
Strom - HansonDakota Prairie Grasslands18,957
Tracy MountainDakota Prairie Grasslands9,756
Twin ButtesDakota Prairie Grasslands13,492
WannaganDakota Prairie Grasslands6,026
Oklahoma (1)
AreaForestAcres
Beech CreekOuachita National Forest8,303
Pennsylvania (7)
AreaForestAcres
Allegheny FrontAllegheny National Forest7,430
Clarion RiverAllegheny National Forest3,821
CornplanterAllegheny National Forest2,929
Hearts ContentAllegheny National Forest221
Minister ValleyAllegheny National Forest1,417
Tracy RidgeAllegheny National Forest9,034
Verbeck IslandAllegheny National Forest14
South Carolina (6)
AreaForestAcres
Bee CoveSumter National Forest3,025
Big MountainSumter National Forest2,337
Ellicott Rock 1Sumter National Forest301
Ellicott Rock 2Sumter National Forest517
Hellhole ExtFrancis Marion National Forest891
Wambaw ExtFrancis Marion National Forest527
South Dakota (2)
AreaForestAcres
Beaver ParkBlack Hills National Forest5,010
Indian CreekBuffalo Gap National Grassland24,666
Tennessee (18)
AreaForestAcres
Bald MountainCherokee National Forest11,743
Bald River Gorge AdditionCherokee National Forest1,728
Beaver Dam CreekCherokee National Forest5,070
Big Frog AdditionCherokee National Forest369
Big Laurel Branch AdditionCherokee National Forest5,577
Brushy RidgeCherokee National Forest7,469
Devil's BackboneCherokee National Forest4,287
Flint Mill GapCherokee National Forest9,494
Joyce Kilmer Slickrock Add.Cherokee National Forest1,396
Little Frog Addition NECherokee National Forest321
Little Frog Addition NWCherokee National Forest628
London Bridge BranchCherokee National Forest3,387
Rogers RidgeCherokee National Forest4,738
Sampson Mountain AdditionCherokee National Forest3,064
Slide HollowCherokee National Forest4,057
Stone MountainCherokee National Forest5,367
Sycamore CreekCherokee National Forest6,984
Upper Bald RiverCherokee National Forest9,202
Vermont (6)
AreaForestAcres
Bread LoafGreen Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests1,768
Devil's Den 09083Green Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests9,169
Griffith Lake 09084Green Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests1,833
Lye Brook Addition 09085Green Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests1,111
Wilder Mountain 09082Green Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests8,759
Woodford 09086Green Mountain and Finger Lakes National Forests2,456
Virginia (63)
AreaForestAcres
Adams PeakGeorge Washington National Forest7,135
Barbours Creek AdditionJefferson National Forest733
Bear CreekJefferson National Forest18,274
Beards MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,505
Beartown Addition AJefferson National Forest1,370
Beartown Addition BJefferson National Forest2,985
Beaver Dam CreekJefferson National Forest1,135
Broad RunJefferson National Forest10,971
Brush MountainJefferson National Forest6,002
Brush Mountain EastJefferson National Forest4,916
Brushy MountainJefferson National Forest4,168
Crawford MountainGeorge Washington National Forest9,892
Dolly AnnGeorge Washington National Forest7,855
Dry River (VA)George Washington National Forest1
Elliott KnobGeorge Washington National Forest9,380
Garden MountainJefferson National Forest3,960
Gum RunGeorge Washington National Forest12,620
Hoop HoleJefferson National Forest4,652
Horse HeavenJefferson National Forest4,748
Hunting Camp Little Wolf CreekJefferson National Forest8,953
James River AdditionJefferson National Forest1,140
JerkemtightGeorge Washington National Forest16,687
Kelley MountainGeorge Washington National Forest7,590
Kimberling Creek Addition AJefferson National Forest89
Kimberling Creek Addition BJefferson National Forest196
Laurel ForkGeorge Washington National Forest9,967
Lewis Fork AdditionJefferson National Forest749
Little AlleghanyGeorge Washington National Forest10,215
Little Dry Run AdditionJefferson National Forest2,204
Little RiverGeorge Washington National Forest27,292
Little Walker MountainJefferson National Forest9,818
Little Wilson Creek Addition AJefferson National Forest78
Little Wilson Creek Addition BJefferson National Forest1,725
Long SpurJefferson National Forest6,417
Mill MountainGeorge Washington National Forest10,840
Mottesheard (VA)Jefferson National Forest2,596
Mountain Lake Addition AJefferson National Forest1,469
Mountain Lake Addition B (VA)Jefferson National Forest3,405
Mountain Lake Addition CJefferson National Forest494
Mt. PleasantGeorge Washington National Forest8,933
New London Bridge BranchJefferson National Forest844
North Fork PoundJefferson National Forest4,757
North MountainJefferson National Forest8,377
Northern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest9,444
Oak KnobGeorge Washington National Forest10,882
Oliver MountainGeorge Washington National Forest13,090
Patterson MountainJefferson National Forest4,865
Peters Mountain Addition A (VA)Jefferson National Forest1,268
Peters Mountain Addition BJefferson National Forest2,909
Price MountainJefferson National Forest9,119
Raccoon BranchJefferson National Forest4,388
Ramseys Draft AdditionGeorge Washington National Forest12,781
Rogers RunJefferson National Forest181
Rough Mountian AdditionGeorge Washington National Forest1,142
Saint Marys AdditionGeorge Washington National Forest1,454
Seng MountainJefferson National Forest6,428
Shawvers Run AdditionJefferson National Forest1,927
SkidmoreGeorge Washington National Forest5,641
Southern MassanuttenGeorge Washington National Forest11,985
The FriarsGeorge Washington National Forest2,035
The PriestGeorge Washington National Forest5,737
Three RidgesGeorge Washington National Forest4,745
Three SistersGeorge Washington National Forest8,149
West Virginia (25)
AreaForestAcres
Canaan LoopMonongahela National Forest7,867
Cheat MountainMonongahela National Forest8,191
Cranberry AdditionMonongahela National Forest11,123
Cranberry Glades Botanical AreaMonongahela National Forest785
Dolly Sods Roaring PlainMonongahela National Forest13,392
Dry ForkMonongahela National Forest657
Dry River (WV)George Washington National Forest7,331
East Fork Of GreenbrierMonongahela National Forest7,167
Falls Of Hills CreekMonongahela National Forest6,925
Gauley MountainMonongahela National Forest13,285
Glady ForkMonongahela National Forest3,239
Laurel ForkMonongahela National Forest1,172
Little Allegheny MountainMonongahela National Forest10,514
Little MountainMonongahela National Forest8,172
Marlin MountainMonongahela National Forest9,344
Mcgowan MountainMonongahela National Forest10,504
Middle MountainMonongahela National Forest19,020
Mottesheard (WV)Jefferson National Forest3,964
Mountain Lake Addition B (WV)Jefferson National Forest557
North Mountain HopevilleMonongahela National Forest6,525
Peters Mountain Addition A (WV)Jefferson National Forest343
Seneca CreekMonongahela National Forest22,287
Spice RunMonongahela National Forest6,251
Tea Creek MountainMonongahela National Forest8,295
Turkey MountainMonongahela National Forest6,421
Wisconsin (13)
AreaForestAcres
09011 - Flynn Lake Study AreaChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest5,951
09154 - St. Peters DomeChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest4,002
09157 - Chase CreekChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest6,140
09159 - ThornappleChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest9,744
09162 - MooseChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest6,161
09164 - Tea LakeChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest5,510
09166 - East TorchChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest4,647
09177 - Le Roy CreekChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest8,138
09180 - Perch LakeChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest2,390
09181 - FoursectionChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest2,037
09182 - Pentoga RoadChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest5,008
09183 - Shoe Lake IslandsChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest7
09186 - Shelp LakeChequamegon-Nicolet National Forest285
Wyoming (2)
AreaForestAcres
Inyan KaraBlack Hills National Forest1,310
Sand CreekBlack Hills National Forest7,950
References (117)
  1. Amelon, S., and D. Burhans. 2006b. Conservation assessment: <i>Myotis septentrionalis</i> (northern long-eared bat) in the eastern United States. Pages 69-82 in Thompson, F. R., III, editor. Conservation assessments for five forest bat species in the eastern United States. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, General Technical Report NC-260. St. Paul, Minnesota. 82 pp.
  2. American Society of Mammalogists (ASM). 2025. Mammal Diversity Database (Version 1.13) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10595931. Online. Available: https://www.mammaldiversity.org/
  3. Ammerman, L. K., C. L. Hice, and D. J. Schmidly. 2012. Bats of Texas. Texas A &amp; M University Press, College Station, Texas. xvi + 305 pp.
  4. Bailey, M. Alabama Natural Heritage Program, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Division of Lands, Folsom Administration Building, Montgomery, Alabama
  5. Baker, R. H. 1983. Michigan mammals. Michigan State University Press. 642 pp.
  6. Baker, R. J., L. C. Bradley, R. D. Bradley, J. W. Dragoo, M. D. Engstrom, R. S. Hoffman, C. A. Jones, F. Reid, D. W. Rice, and C. Jones. 2003a. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 2003. Museum of Texas Tech University Occasional Papers 229:1-23.
  7. Barbour, R. W., and W. H. Davis. 1969. Bats of America. The University of Kentucky Press, Lexington, Kentucky. 286 pp.
  8. Best, T. Auburn University, Montgomery, AL. Pers. comm.
  9. Bradley, R.D., L.K. Ammerman, R.J. Baker, L.C. Bradley, J.A. Cook. R.C. Dowler, C. Jones, D.J. Schmidly, F.B. Stangl Jr., R.A. Van den Bussche and B. Würsig. 2014. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 2014. Museum of Texas Tech University Occasional Papers 327:1-28. Available at: http://www.nsrl.ttu.edu/publications/opapers/ops/OP327.pdf
  10. Brandon, R. A. 1961. Observations of young keen bats. Journal of Mammalogy 42(3):400-1.
  11. Caceres, M. C., and M. J. Pybus. 1997. Status of the northern long-eared bat (<i>Myotis </i><i>septentrionalis</i>) in Alberta. Alberta Environmental Protection, Wildlife Management Division, Wildlife Status Report No. 3, Edmonton, AB.
  12. Caceres, M. C., and R.M.R. Barclay. 2000. <i>Myotis septentrionalis</i>. Mammalian Species 634:1-4.
  13. Caire, W., J. D. Tyler, B. P. Glass, and M. A. Mares. 1989. Mammals of Oklahoma. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. Oklahoma. 567 pp.
  14. Caire, W., R. K. LaVal, M. L. LaVal, and R. Clawson. 1979. Notes on the ecology of MYOTIS KEENIII (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) in Eastern Missouri. Amer. Midl. Nat. 102(2):404-7.
  15. Carter, T. C., and G. A. Feldhamer. 2005. Roost tree use by maternity colonies of Indiana bats and northern long-eared bats in southern Illinois. Forest Ecology and Management 219:259-268.
  16. Center for Biological Diversity. 2010. Petition to list the eastern small-footed bat Myotis leibii and northern long-eared bat Myotis septentrionalis as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act. Center for Biological Diversity, P.O. Box 188, Richmond, VT.
  17. Clark, B. K., J. B. Bowles, and B. S. Clark. 1987. Summer status of the endangered Indiana bat in Iowa. Amer. Midl. Nat. 118(1):32-9.
  18. Clawson, R. L., R. K. LaVal, M. L. LaVal, and W. Claire. 1980. Clustering behavior of hibernating <i>Myotis sodalis</i> in Missouri, USA. Journal of Mammalogy 61:245-53.
  19. Cockrum, E. L. 1956. Homing, movements, and longevity of bats. Journal of Mammalogy 37(1):48-57.
  20. Cope, J. B., and S. R. Humphrey. 1972. Reproduction of the bats MYOTIS KEENII and PIPISTRELLUS SUBFLAVUS in Indiana. Bat Res. News 13:9-10.
  21. Crnkovic, A. C. 2003. Discovery of northern long-eared myotis, Myotis septentrionalis (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae), in Louisiana. Southwestern Naturalist 48:715-717.
  22. Easterla, D. A. 1965. Parturition of Keen's myotis in southwestern Missouri. Journal of Mammalogy 49(4):770.
  23. Elliott, W. R. 2003. A guide to Missouri's cave life: 70 species brought to life. Missouri Department of Conservation. 37 pp.
  24. Fellers, G. M., and E. D. Pierson. 2002. Habitat use and foraging behavior of Townsend's Big-eared Bat (<i>Corynorhinus townsendii</i>) in coastal California. Journal of Mammalogy 83:167-177.
  25. Fenton, M. B. 1969. Summer activity of MYOTIS LUCIFUGUS (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) at hibernacula in Ontario and Quebec. Can. J. Zool. 47:597-602.
  26. Fenton, M. B. 1982. Echolocation, insect hearing, and feeding ecology of insectivorous bats. Pages 261-85 in T. H. Kunz (editor). Ecology of Bats. Plenum Press, New York, New York.
  27. Fleming, T.H., and P. Eby. 2003. Ecology of bat migration. Pages 156-208 in T. H. Kunz and M. B. Fenton, editors. Bat ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
  28. Foster, R. W., and A. Kurta. 1999. Roosting ecology of the northern bat (MYOTIS SEPTENTRIONALIS) and comparisons with the endangered Indiana bat (MYOTIS SODALIS). Journal of Mammalogy 80:659-672.
  29. Gargas, A., M. T. Trest, M. Christensen, T. J. Volk, and D. Blehert. 2009. <i>Geomyces destructans</i> sp. nov. associated with bat white-nose syndrome. Mycotaxon 108: 147-154.
  30. Garner, J. D., and J. E. Gardner. 1992. Determination of summer distribution and habitat utilization of the Indiana bat (<i>Myotis sodalis</i>) in Illinois. Illinois Department of Conservation. Final Report, Project E-3. Springfield, IL, 23 pp.
  31. Garner, J. Illinois Natural Heritage Division, Department of Conservation, Springfield, Illinois. Personal communication.
  32. Garroway, C. J., and H. G. Broders. 2008. Day roost characteristics of northern long-eared bats (<i>Myotis septentrionalis</i>) in relation to female reproductive status. Ecoscience 15:89-93.
  33. Griffin, D. R. 1940a. Notes on the life histories of New England cave bats. Journal of Mammalogy 21:181-7.
  34. Griffin, D. R. 1940b. Migrations of New England bats. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 86:217-246.
  35. Griffin, D.R. 1945. TRAVELS OF BANDED CAVE BATS. J. MAMMAL. 26:15-23.
  36. Griffith, L. A., and J. E. Gates. 1985. Food habits of cave-dwelling bats in the central Appalachians, Journal of Mammalogy 66(3):451-60.
  37. Guthrie, M. J. 1933. The reproductive cycles of some cave bats. Journal of Mammalogy 14:199-216.
  38. Hall, E. R. 1981a. The Mammals of North America, second edition. Vols. I &amp; II. John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, New York. 1181 pp.
  39. Hall, J. S., R. J. Cloutier, and D. R. Griffin. 1957. Longevity records and notes on tooth wear of bats. Journal of Mamalogy 38:407-409.
  40. Hamilton, W. J., Jr., and J. O. Whitaker, Jr. 1979. Mammals of the eastern United States. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York. 346 pp.
  41. Harvey, M. J. 1992b. Bats of the eastern United States. Arkansas Game and Fish Commission in cooperation with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Tennessee Technological University. Little Rock, AR.
  42. Harvey, M. J., J. R. MacGregor, and R. R. Currie. 1991. Distribution and status of Chiroptera in Kentucky and Tennessee. J. of Tenn. Acad. of Sci. 66(4):191-193.
  43. Hebda, A.J. 2011. List of mammals of Nova Scotia (including synonyms used in the literature relating to Nova Scotia) (revision 2) 24 July 2011. Nova Scotia Museum Collections Unit, Halifax, Nova Scotia. 24 pp. Online. Available: https://naturalhistory.novascotia.ca/sites/default/files/inline/images/names_and_synonyms_ver3.pdf
  44. Henderson, L. E., L. J. Farrow, and H. G. Broders. 2008. Intra-specific effects of forest loss on the distribution of the forest-dependent northern long-eared bat (<i>Myotis septentrionalis</i>). Biological Conservation 141:1819-1828.
  45. Henderson, L. E., L. J. Farrow, and H. G. Broders. 2009. Summer distribution and status of the bats of Prince Edward Island, Canada. Northeastern Naturalist 16:131-140.
  46. Hitchcock, H. B. 1949. Hibernation of bats in southeastern Ontario and adjacent Quebec. The Canadian Field Naturalist 63(2):47-59.
  47. Hitchcock, H. B., R. Keen, and A. Kurta. 1984. Survival rates of <i>Myotis leibii</i> and <i>Eptesicus fuscus</i> in southeastern Ontario. Journal of Mammalogy 65:126-30.
  48. Hoffmeister, D. F. 1989. Mammals of Illinois. University of Illinois Press. 349 pp.
  49. Jackson, H. H. 1961. Mammals of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. 504 pp.
  50. Johnson, J. B., J. E. Gates, and W. M. Ford. 2008. Distribution and activity of bats at local and landscape scales within a rural-urban gradient. Urban Ecosystems 11:227-242.
  51. Johnson, J. B., J. H. Roberts, T. L. King, J. W. Edwards, W. M. Ford, and D. A. Ray. 2014. Genetic structuring of northern myotis (<i>Myotis septentrionalis</i>) at multiple spatial scales. Acta Theriol 59:223-231.
  52. Johnson, J. B., J. W. Edwards, W. M. Ford, and J. E. Gates. 2009. Roost tree selection by northern myotis (<i>Myotis septentrionalis</i>) maternity colonies following prescribed fire in a Central Appalachian Mountains hardwood forest. Forest Ecology and Management 258:233-242.
  53. Johnson, J. B., W. M. Ford, and J. W. Edwards. 2012c. Roost networks of northern myotis (<i>Myotis septentrionalis</i>) in a managed landscape. Forest Ecology and Management 266:223-231.
  54. Jones, J. K. Jr., E. D. Fleharty, and P. B. Dunnigan. 1967. The distributional status of bats in Kansas. Univ. Kans, Mus. Nat. Hist. Misc. Pub. 46:1-33.
  55. Jones, J. K., Jr., R. S. Hoffman, D. W. Rice, C. Jones, R. J. Baker, and M. D. Engstrom. 1992a. Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico, 1991. Occasional Papers, The Museum, Texas Tech University, 146:1-23.
  56. Keen, R., and H. B. Hitchcock. 1980. Survival and longevity of the little brown bat in southeastern Ontario. Journal of Mammalogy 61:1-7.
  57. Kiser, J. D. and C. L. Elliott. 1996. Foraging habitat, food habits, and roost tree characteristics of the Indiana bat (<i>Myotis sodalis</i>) during autumn in Johnson County, Kentucky. Final report, Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, Frankfort, Kentucky. 65pp.
  58. Kunz, T. H. 1971. Reproduction of some vespertilionid bats of central Iowa. Amer. Midl. Nat. 86(2):477-86.
  59. Kunz, T. H. 1973. Resource utilization: Temporal and spatial components of bat activity in cental Iowa. Journal of Mammalogy 54(1):14-32.
  60. Kurta, A. 1979. Bat rabies in Michigan. Mich. Acad. 12(2):221-30.
  61. Kurta, A. 1980. Notes on summer bat activity at Michigan caves. Natl. Speleolog. Soc. Bull. 42:68-9.
  62. Kurta, A. 1982. A review of Michigan Bats: Seasonal and geographic distribution. Mich. Acad. 14(3):295-312.
  63. Kurta, A. 1989. Bat species diversity in central Michigan. Jack-Pine Warbler 67(3):80-7.
  64. Kurta, A. Biology Department. Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, Michigan. Personal communication.
  65. Lacki, M. J., and J. H. Schwierjohann. 2001. Day-roost characteristics of northern bats in mixed mesophytic forest. Journal of Wildlife Management 65:482-488.
  66. Lacki, M. J., D. R. Cox, L. E. Dodd, and M. B. Dickinson. 2009. Response of northern bats (<i>Myotis septentrionalis</i>) to prescribed fires in eastern Kentucky forests. Journal of Mammalogy 90:1165-1175.
  67. Langwig, K., A. Hicks, R. von Linden, C. Herzog, S. Darling, T. French,and J. Armstrong. 2009. White nose syndrome related declines of hibernating bat species in the Northeast. Presentation at 2009 North American Society for Bat Research Symposium, Portland, Oregon.
  68. LaVal, R. K., and M. L. LaVal. 1980. Ecological studies and management of Missouri bats, with emphasis on cave dwelling species. Terrestrial Series 8, Missouri Department of Conservation.
  69. LaVal, R. K., R. L. Clawson, M. L. LaVal and W. Caire. 1977. Foraging behavior and nocturnal activity patterns of Missouri bats, with emphasis on the endangered species <i>Myotis grisescens</i> and <i>Myotis sodalis</i>. Journal of Mammalogy 58:592-599.
  70. Layne, J. N. 1958. Notes on animals of southern Illinois. Amer. Midl. Nat. 60(1):219-54.
  71. Layne, J. N., editor. 1978. Rare and endangered biota of Florida. Vol. 1. Mammals. State of Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission. xx + 52 pp.
  72. Linzey, D. W. 1998. The mammals of Virginia. McDonald and Woodward, Blacksburg, VA. 459 pp.
  73. Linzey, D.W. 2016. Mammals of Great Smoky Mountains National Park: 2016 revision. Southeastern Naturalist 15(Monograph 8):1–93.
  74. Marks, C. S., and G. E. Marks. 2006. Bats of Florida. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. xii + 176 pp.
  75. McNab, B. K. 1982. Evolutionary alternatives in the physiological ecology of bats. Pages 151-200 in T. H. Kunz (editor). Ecology of Bats. Plenum Press, New York, New York.
  76. Menzel, M. A., R. Odom, S. Owen, W. M. Ford, B. R. Chapman, K. V. Miller, J. Edwards, and P. Wood. 1999b. Investigation of foraging habitat use by bats with a focus on Northern Long-eared Myotis (<i>Myotis septentrionalis</i>): a comparison of methods. IN M. K. Clark, editor. Abstracts from the 1999 Colloquium on the conservation of mammals in the Southeastern United States. Available at: http://www.batworkinggroups.org/sbdnnews.htm. Accessed 2001-06-12.
  77. Menzel, M. A., S. F. Owen, W. M. Ford, J. W. Edwards, P. B. Wood, B. R. Chapman, and K. V. Miller. 2002. Roost tree selection by northern long-eared bat (<i>Myotis septentrionalis</i>) maternity colonies in an industrial forest of the central Appalachian mountains. Forest Ecology and Management 155:107-114.
  78. Mills, R. S. 1971. A concentration of MYOTIS KEENII at caves in Ohio. Journal of Mammalogy 52:625.
  79. Morgan, C. N., L. K. Ammerman, K. D. Demere, J. B. Doty, Y. J. Nakazawa, and M. R. Mauldin. 2019. Field identification key and guide for bats of the United States of America. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University, Number 360. Texas Tech University Natural Science Research Laboratory. 29 pp.
  80. Mumford, R.E. and J.B. Cope. 1964. Distribution and status of the Chiroptera of Indiana. American Midland Naturalist 72(2):473-489.
  81. Nagorsen, D. W., and R. M. Brigham. 1993. Bats of British Columbia. Vol. I. The Mammals of British Columbia. UBC Press, Vancouver, 164 pp.
  82. Owen, S. F., M. A. Menzel, J. W. Edwards, et al. 2004. Bat activity in harvested and intact forest stands in the Allegheny Mountains. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 21:154-159.
  83. Owen, S. F., M. A. Menzel, W. M. Ford, J. W. Edwards, B. R. Chapman, K. V. Miller, and P. B. Wood. 2002. Roost tree selection by maternal colonies of northern long-eared myotis in an intensively managed forest. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report NE-292, Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA.
  84. Park, A. C., and H. G. Broders. 2012. Distribution and roost selection of bats on Newfoundland. Northeastern Naturalist 19:165-176.
  85. Pearson, E. W. 1962. Bats hibernating in silica mines in southern Illinois. Journal of Mammalogy 43(1):27-33.
  86. Perry, R. W., and R. E. Thill. 2007b. Roost selection by male and female northern long-eared bats in a pine-dominated landscape. Forest Ecology and Management 247:220-226.
  87. Racey, P. A. 1982. Ecology of bat reproduction. Pages 57-104 in T. H. Kunz (editor). Ecology of Bats. Plenum Press, New York, New York.
  88. Raesly, R.L., and J. E. Gates 1987. Winter habitat selection by north temperate cave bats. American Midland Naturalist 118:15-31.
  89. Sasse, D. B., and P. J. Perkins. 1996. Summer roosting ecology of northern long-earedbats (<i>Myotis septentrionalis</i>) in the White Mountain National Forest. Pages 91-101 in Barclay, R.M.R., and R. M. Brigham, editors. Bats and forest symposium, Working Paper 23/1996. Victoria, BC: British Columbia Ministry of Forests.
  90. Silvis, A., W. M. Ford, E. R. Britzke, N. R. Beane, and J. B. Johnson. 2012. Forest succession and maternity day roost selection by <i>Myotis septentrionalis </i>in a mesophytic hardwood forest. International Journal of Forest Research, Volume 2012, Article ID 148106, 8 pages. doi:10.1155/2012/148106
  91. Simmons, N. B. and A. L. Cirranello. 2025. Bat Species of the World: A taxonomic and geographic database. Version 1.7. Online. Available: https://batnames.org/
  92. Stones, R. C. 1981. Survey of winter bat populations in search of the Indiana bat in the western Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Report submitted to Michigan Department of Natural Resources. 20 pp.
  93. Stones, R. C., and L. P. Branick. 1969. Use of hearing in homing by two species of MYOTIS bats. Journal of Mammalogy 50(1):157-60.
  94. Strayer, M. Personal communication. Nongame and Heritage Trust, South Carolina Wildlife Department, Clemson, SC
  95. Swanson, G., and C. Evans. 1936. The hibernation of certain bats in southern Minnesota. Journal of Mammalogy 17:39-43.
  96. Thomas, D. W. 1995. Hibernating bats are sensitive to nontactile human disturbance. Journal of Mammalogy 76:940-946.
  97. Timpone, J. C., J. G. Boyles, K. L. Murray, D. P. Aubrey, and L. W. Robbins. 2010. Overlap in roosting habits of Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis) and northern bats (Myotis septentrionalis). American Midland Naturalist 163:115-123.
  98. Tuttle, M. D. 1976a. Population ecology of the gray bat (<i>Myotis grisescens</i>): philopatry, timing, and patterns of movement, weight loss during migration, and seasonal adaptive strategies. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History Occasional Papers (54):1-38.
  99. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1991. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; animal candidate review for listing as endangered or threatened species. Proposed Rule. Federal Register. 56(225):58804-36.
  100. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1999. Agency draft Indiana Bat (<i>Myotis sodalis</i>) revised recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, Minnesota. 53 pp.
  101. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2015. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Threatened Species Status for the Northern Long-Eared Bat With 4(d) Rule. Federal Register 80(63):17974-18033.
  102. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for Northern Long-Eared Bat. Final rule. Federal Register 87(229):73488-73504.
  103. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for Northern Long-Eared Bat. Proposed rule. Federal Register 87(56):16442-16452.
  104. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for Northern Long-Eared Bat; Delay of Effective Date. Federal Register 88(17):4908-4910.
  105. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2025. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notification of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions. Candidate notice of review (CNOR). Federal Register 90(209):48912-48937.
  106. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 29 June 2011. 90-day finding on a petition to list the eastern small-footed bat and the northern long-eared bat as threatened or endangered. Federal Register 76(125):38095-38106.
  107. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2 October 2013. 12-month finding on a petition to list the eastern small-footed bat and the northern long-eared bat as endangered or threatened species; listing the northern long-eared bat as an endangered species. Federal Register 78(191):61046-61080.
  108. van Zyll de Jong, C. G. 1979. Distribution and systematic relationships of long-eared <i>Myotis </i>in western Canada. Canadian J. Zool. 57:987-994.
  109. van Zyll de Jong, C.G. 1985. Handbook of Canadian Mammals. Vol. II, Bats. National Museum of Natural Sciences, National Museums of Canada, Ottawa, Canada. 212 pp.
  110. Whitaker, J. O., and W. J. Hamilton. 1998. Mammals of the eastern United States. Comstock Publishing, Ithaca, New York.
  111. Whitaker, J. O. Jr. 1972. Food habits of bats from Indiana. Can. J. Zoology. 50:877-83.
  112. Whitaker, J. O. Jr, and F. A. Winter. 1977. Bats of the caves and mines of the Shawnee National Forest, southern Illinois. Ill. State Acad. Sci. 70(3/4):301-13.
  113. Whitaker, J. O., Jr., and L. J. Rissler. 1992. Winter activity of bats at a mine entrance in Vermillion County, Indiana. Am. Midl. Nat. 127:52-59.
  114. Whitaker, J. O. Jr., and R. E. Mumford. 1971. Notes on a collection of bats taken by mist-netting at an Indiana cave. Amer. Midl. Nat. 85(1):277-9.
  115. Whitaker, J. O., Jr., and R. E. Mumford. 2009. Mammals of Indiana. Indiana University Press, Bloomington. 661 pp.
  116. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 1993. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Second edition. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. xviii + 1206 pp. Available online at: http://www.nmnh.si.edu/msw/.
  117. Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder (editors). 2005. Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Third edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Two volumes. 2,142 pp. [As modified by ASM the Mammal Diversity Database (MDD) at https://www.mammaldiversity.org/index.html]